Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2003, p. 2351-2353, Vol. 47, No. 7
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.7.2351-2353.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Wolfgang Sadee,1,
and B. Joseph Guglielmo1*
Schools of Pharmacy,1 Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California2
Received 22 November 2002/ Returned for modification 17 March 2003/ Accepted 24 April 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The intra- and interindividual variabilities of the oral bioavailability of valacyclovir have not been well studied. We evaluated the variability of valacyclovir absorption, as measured by the acyclovir AUC, and the impact of cephalexin on the acyclovir AUC.
This study was conducted at the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) General Clinical Research Center (GCRC). All study subjects gave informed consent. The protocol was approved by the Committee on Human Research.
Volunteers were excluded if they had (i) diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or renal or hepatic disease; (ii) a recent history of drug abuse, alcoholism, or nicotine dependence; (iii) a history of intolerance to acyclovir or its analogues, cephalosporins, or penicillins; (iv) participated in other studies during the preceding month; or (v) taken any medication or dietary supplement other than oral contraceptives, vitamins, or minerals within the preceding 2 weeks; and (vi) female volunteers were excluded if they were pregnant, lactating, or sexually active without using adequate contraceptive measures. All female volunteers were required to provide urine for a urine dipstick pregnancy test.
With a random-number generator, subjects were randomly assigned to a single oral dose of (i) 500 mg of valacyclovir at both visits 1 and 2 (control group; n = 6) (ii), 500 mg of valacyclovir at visit 1 and 500 mg of valacyclovir plus 500 mg of cephalexin at visit 2 (treatment group A; n = 5), or (iii) 500 mg of valacyclovir plus 500 mg of cephalexin at visit 1 and 500 mg of valacyclovir at visit 2 (treatment group B; n = 5).
Subjects were admitted to the GCRC for two admissions, separated by at least 7 days. During each admission, subjects were allowed to continue their existing medication regimen. Subjects were required to abstain from alcohol-, caffeine-, or xanthine-containing products within 24 h prior to and during each admission, fast the night before each admission, and abstain from fluid intake within 2 h prior to and after the administration of each valacyclovir dose.
Blood samples were collected in 5-ml sodium heparinized tubes before dosing and then at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h following the administration of each valacyclovir dose. Plasma was separated via centrifugation at 1,300 x g for 5 min and then frozen in 2 aliquots at -20°C. After overnight storage at -20°C, plasma samples were stored at -80°C until assayed.
Concentrations of acyclovir in plasma were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method developed at the UCSF Drug Study Unit (E. T. Lin, unpublished data). The standard curve was linear over a concentration range of 50 to 6,000 ng/ml (r2, ≥0.996). The lower limit of quantitation was 50 ng/ml, and the coefficients of variation were less than 15%. The assay was reproducible and accurate (coefficient of variation, ≤10%) and without interference from the matrix and anticoagulant. Although the samples were analyzed within 1 month of collection, acyclovir was stable in frozen human plasma at -80°C for at least 3 months. Acyclovir was stable in plasma for up to five freeze-and-thaw cycles.
The above-mentioned liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was modified to monitor the conversion of valacyclovir to acyclovir.
WinNonLin 3.1 was used to perform noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. Acyclovir concentration-versus-time curves were integrated and extrapolated by the linear/log trapezoidal rule and the 1/concentration weighted method to yield the AUC from zero to infinity (AUC0
).
z was calculated by selecting the terminal portion of the curve and subsequently used to extrapolate the AUC from the last measurable concentration to infinity (AUClast
).
Eleven previously identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in and surrounding the hPEPT1-encoding gene were selected for sequencing on the basis of their allelic variation frequency (>1%) or phenotype (P. Anderle and W. Sadee, unpublished data).
Genotyping of hPEPT1 was performed as previously described (9). Briefly, primers for exons and adjoining intronic regions (ca. 50 bp) for hPPEP1 (National Center for Biotechnology Information reference sequence, NM_005073) were designed by using the Virtual Genome center website at http://alces.med.umn.edu/VGC.html and ordered from Operon (Alameda, Calif.). A collection of 247 ethnically identified genomic DNA samples was obtained from the Coriell Institute of Medicine and used to screen for hPEPT1 variants. PCR was performed with TaqGold on the GeneAmp 9700 thermocycler from PE. Samples were pooled 3 deep so that 96 samples were ready for high-performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC). dHPLC was performed on Varian HPLC machines with Varian Helix columns. The sequence for each amplicon was submitted to the dHPLC melt program at Stanford University (http://insertion.stanford.edu/melt.html). This information was used as the basis for analysis. Typically, the highest recommended temperature was run along with at least one other temperature, depending on the complexity of the melt profile. The results were scored manually. If a well was scored positive, the three PCRs corresponding to that well were cleaned with 2 U of SAP and ExoI (from USB), sequenced with ABI BigDye v2, cleaned with 96-well gel filtration blocks from Edge BioSystems, and run on an ABI 3700 DNA analyzer.
Parametric, paired, two-tailed t tests were used to determine the statistical significance (P = 0.05) of intra- and interindividual variability, the period effect, and the effect of concomitant treatment with cephalexin on acyclovir AUC0
.
Sixteen healthy volunteers (nine females, seven males) with a mean age of 27 years (range, 22 to 39 years) enrolled in the study. Their mean height and weight were 167 cm (range, 152 to 182 cm) and 62 kg (range, 45 to 77 kg), respectively. All subjects were calculated to be within their ideal body weight range.
The acyclovir AUC0
values for the control and treatment groups are shown in Fig. 1 and 2. While considerable interindividual variability was observed, no significant intraindividual variability in the AUC was demonstrated (P = 0.82) between study periods. Coadministration of cephalexin reduced the acyclovir AUC0
by 7.1% or from 9.8 ± 1.7 to 9.1 ± 1.8 h · µg/ml (P = 0.034). However, this AUC reduction was only observable after exclusion of an outlier who had an increased acyclovir AUC with concomitant cephalexin. In 2 of 10 subjects, oral bioavailability was reduced by 20% with concomitant administration of cephalexin. Figures 3 and 4 display acyclovir concentrations in plasma over time in patients receiving valacyclovir with or without cephalexin. While a reduction in the peak concentration of acyclovir in plasma and the AUC was observed with concomitant administration of cephalexin, no change in the time to the peak concentration of acyclovir in plasma or the terminal half-life took place.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Acyclovir AUC0![]() in the absence of cephalexin. VCV (1) is valacyclovir during PK visit 1, and VCV (2) is valacyclovir during PK visit 2. The interindividual standard deviations for VCV (1) and VCV (2) were 2.5 and 2.2, respectively. The intraindividual standard deviation was 0.56 or about four times less than the interindividual variability. There was no difference in the acyclovir AUC0![]() between the periods (P = 0.82).
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Acyclovir AUC0![]() in the presence and absence of cephalexin. VCV + LEX is concomitant administration of valacyclovir and cephalexin, and VCV alone is single treatment with only valacyclovir. The 7.1% reduction in oral bioavailability was determined without the outlier (). Concomitant cephalexin reduced the acyclovir AUC0![]() from 9.8 ± 1.7 to 9.1 ± 1.8 h · µg/ml (P = 0.034). The AUC0![]() was reduced by 20% in subjects represented by the symbol .
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Mean plasma concentration-versus-time profiles of acyclovir in treatment group A (n = 5; 500 mg of valacyclovir [VCV] plus 500 mg of cephalexin [CPX] at PK 1 and 500 mg of VCV at PK 2). Standard deviations are shown as error bars.
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Mean plasma concentration-versus-time profiles of acyclovir in treatment group B (n = 5; 500 mg of valacyclovir [VCV] at PK 1 and 500 mg of VCV plus 500 mg of cephalexin [CPX] at PK 2). Standard deviations are shown as error bars.
|
The experimental procedures and medications were generally well tolerated. Most subjects reported nonpainful erythema at the site of venous access.
While considerable interindividual variability was observed, the intraindividual oral bioavailability of valacyclovir was remarkably constant. As hPEPT1 is assumed to play a major role in valacyclovir absorption, the stability of hPEPT1 activity, as indicated by minimal intraindividual variability at two observation periods, is consistent with results from animal studies (9, 10). Interindividual variability, while significantly greater than intraindividual variability, did not exceed a twofold range, thereby, supporting the utility of hPEPT1 as a drug target. While a more substantial reduction in valacyclovir absorption (measured by the acyclovir AUC) was associated with concom-itant administration of cephalexin in some patients, the reduction was less than the 50% decrease suggested by isolated hPEPT1 models (5-7). Furthermore, one patient actually experienced an increased acyclovir AUC with simultaneous administration of cephalexin. One explanation for the discrepancy between studies is that the isolated hPEPT1 models used much higher concentrations and differing ratios of the respective agents. The reduction in bioavailability may be more significant with increased valacyclovir doses, longer duration of therapy, and concomitant administration with a more potent hPEPT1 competitive substrate, such as cefadroxil (11). It is possible that additional subjects with increased genetic polymorphism would produce more substantial differences in bioavailability. The results also suggest that isolated models of hPEPT1 do not account for all of the factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of valacyclovir. It is also possible that cephalexin and valacyclovir are absorbed via other transporters and less dependent on hPEPT1-mediated transport than previously suggested.
We thank R. Shih and the Drug Study Unit team for bioanalytical support. We also thank the GCRC for clinical and statistical support.
Present address: ISREC, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland. ![]()
Present address: Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»