Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2003, p. 2397-2403, Vol. 47, No. 8
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.8.2397-2403.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Instituto de Parasitología y Biomedicina "López-Neyra," Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Granada, Spain
Received 10 February 2003/ Returned for modification 15 April 2003/ Accepted 2 May 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is well established and appears to be a common feature in eukaryotic cells that aminophospholipids such as fluorescent analogs of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylserine (PS) are internalized through inward translocation across the plasma membrane, a process which is energy dependent, protein mediated, and stereospecific for natural L isomers (16, 31). Inward translocation, inward transbilayer movement, and flip are synonyms meaning the transfer of an amphiphilic molecule, i.e., a phospholipid, from the outer leaflet to the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane. On the other hand, a similar translocation activity for short-chain PC has been described in only a few cell lines (9, 21, 34). Little is known about the specific uptake systems for alkyl-lysophospholipids, molecules structurally similar to lysophosphatidylcholine. A similar pathway for the uptake of edelfosine and lysophosphatidylcholine has been proposed in macrophages (35), but whether the same route applies to HePC, a phosphocholine derivative with no glycerol backbone, remains to be investigated.
In the present paper, we describe the accumulation of HePC in wild-type and HePC-resistant Leishmania donovani parasites and provide evidence of a defect in the inward translocation of the drug as one of the main mechanisms of resistance to HePC.
|
|
|---|
Strains and parasite culture. Promastigote forms of wild-type L. donovani (MHOM/ET/67/HU3) and the HePC-resistant line (HePC-R; M-40 R), described previously (26), were maintained at 28°C in the following culture medium: medium 199 (Gibco) supplemented with 40 mM HEPES (Sigma), 100 µM adenosine (Sigma), hemin (0.2% of a 250-µg/ml stock solution; Sigma), and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Gibco). The HePC-R line presents a phenotype of cross-resistance to edelfosine (1-O-octadecyl-2-O-methyl-rac-glycero-3-phosphocholine), a related ether lipid drug 12-fold more toxic in the parental wild-type line.
Determination of HePC accumulation. Unless otherwise specified, logarithmic-phase parasites were incubated at a density of 2 x 107 per ml in culture medium with 0.09 µCi of [14C]HePC per ml (2.5 µM) at 28°C. At the indicated time points (5, 15, 60, 180, and 360 min), 1-ml aliquots were removed and placed on ice. The parasites were spun down in a microcentrifuge and washed two times in 0.2 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 8.1 mM Na2HPO4, 130 mM NaCl, and 2.6 mM KCl adjusted to pH 7.4) containing 10 mg of BSA per ml for 5 min on ice, followed by a wash in PBS. This washing step with buffer containing albumin (back-exchange) is reported to remove short-chain phospholipid analogs from the external surface of the plasma membrane (16, 17, 27). Finally, the cell pellet was resuspended in 0.1 ml of 1% Triton X-100. Ten microliters of the sample was used for protein determination by use of the Bradford kit (Bio-Rad), and the remaining volume was used to determine cell-associated radioactivity by liquid scintillation counting.
HePC efflux studies. Parasites (2 x 107 per ml) were loaded at 28°C with different [14C]HePC concentrations in order to allow similar labeling. Wild-type parasites were loaded for 35 min with 0.225 µCi/ml (6.75 µM), whereas HePC-R parasites were loaded for 1 h with 2.7 µCi/ml (75 µM) in culture medium. After the parasites were washed with fresh medium, efflux was initiated at 28°C, and the radioactivity retained was measured at different time points (0, 15, 40, and 60 min), as described above.
Metabolism of HePC. The parasites were incubated at a density of 4 x 107 per ml in culture medium with 0.18 µCi of [14C]HePC per ml (5 µM). After 6 h at 28°C, two 0.5-ml aliquots were prepared. In one aliquot, both cells and medium were recovered together. In the other aliquot, the medium was removed and the cell pellet was washed with BSA-containing PBS buffer before extraction of total lipids from the samples, as described previously (35). Samples were separated on silica gel 60 thin-layer chromatography plates (Merck) with chloroform-methanol-acetic acid-H2O (75:75:16:8 [vol/vol]). Finally, the plates were exposed to X-ray film at -70°C.
Energy depletion and protein modification experiments. The parasites were washed two times in HEPES-buffered saline (HBS; 21 mM HEPES, 137 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 0.7 mM NaH2PO4, and 20 mM glucose adjusted to pH 7.4) and resuspended in the same buffer at 4 x 107 per ml. For the energy depletion studies, the parasites were preincubated with 20 mM NaN3 for 30 min at 28°C in HBS buffer without glucose. For protein modification, the parasites were treated with either 0.2 or 1 mM NEM for 15 min on ice, centrifuged, and resuspended in fresh HBS. Finally, 1 volume of 0.18 µCi of [14C]HePC per ml (5 µM) in HBS (HBS without glucose for the experiments with NaN3) plus 1% BSA was added, resulting in a final cell density of 2 x 107 per ml. After 1 h of incubation at 28°C or on ice, the amount of drug incorporated into the cells was determined after the back-exchange procedure, as described above. Parasites incubated in HBS at 28°C were used as controls.
Fluorescent phospholipid analog accumulation. C6-NBD phospholipid accumulation was measured by flow cytometry analysis. Parasites (4 x 106/ml) were preincubated in culture medium with 0.5 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride for 30 min at 28°C. The parasites were then incubated with the fluorescent phospholipid analogs (3 µM C6-NBD-PC, 3 µM C6-NBD-PE, or 6 µM C6-NBD-PS) for 30 min at 28°C in culture medium. The fluorescent analogs were added directly from an ethanol stock solution. After the samples were washed with cold culture medium to extract the fraction bound to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane and then with cold PBS, the samples were maintained on ice and the cellular fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry in a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, Calif.) equipped with an argon laser operating at 488 nm. The cells were gated to eliminate dead cells and debris, and the cellular fluorescence was quantified by scanning the emission between 515 and 545 nm (FL-1) by using Cell Quest software. Accumulation ratios were determined as the fluorescence intensity ratio among wild-type and resistant parasites.
Measurements of endocytosis. The uptake of the endocytosis marker FM 4-64 was measured by flow cytometry. A total of 4 x 106 parasites/ml were incubated with 5 µM FM 4-64 in HBS plus 0.5% BSA at 28°C or on ice for 30 min. Afterward, the parasites either were washed one time with cold PBS to remove the label bound to the plasma membrane and flagellar pocket and then resuspended in PBS or were directly analyzed by measuring their cellular fluorescence as described above, but by scanning the emission between 615 and 680 nm (FL-3).
Statistical analysis. Results are expressed as means ± standard errors of the means or as proportions. Statistical significance was calculated by using Student's t test.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Time-dependent uptake of [14C]HePC. Labeling of wild-type (solid circles) and HePC-R (open circles) promastigotes was performed as described in Materials and Methods. All values represent the means ± standard errors of the means of three independent experiments, each of which was performed in duplicate.
|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Binding and uptake of [14C]HePC. Wild-type (solid bars) and HePC-R (open bars) parasites were incubated with [14C]HePC for 5 min (A) and 60 min (B), as described in Materials and Methods. The uptake (internalized HePC) data were measured after two washes with BSA-containing buffer to remove the drug bound to the plasma membrane, whereas the binding (BSA exchangeable fraction) data were determined as the total amount of HePC incorporated after two washings in PBS without BSA minus the corresponding uptake amount. The data shown are the mean values of three independent experiments, each of which was performed in duplicate. Standard errors were below 10%. Results are expressed as the percentage of the total radioactivity incorporated normalized to the protein concentration.
|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. [14C]HePC efflux. Wild-type (solid circles) and HePC-R (open circles) parasites were preincubated with [14C]HePC at 28°C as described in Materials and Methods, and the decay in radioactivity was monitored at different times (15, 40, and 60 min). The data are expressed as the percentage of the initial amount of [14C]HePC incorporated (in counts per minute per microgram of protein) and represent the means ± standard errors of three independent experiments, each of which was performed in duplicate.
|
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Lack of metabolism of [14C]HePC. Cells were incubated for 6 h at 28°C in the presence of [14C]HePC. Both cells and medium (lanes 2 and 3) or just the cell pellets (lanes 4 and 5) were recovered, and lipids were extracted for analysis by thin-layer chromatography as described in Materials and Methods. Lane 1, 0.9 µCi of [14C]HePC from an ethanol stock solution, lanes 2 and 4, wild-type parasites; lanes 3 and 5, HePC-R parasites.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Effects of temperature, energy depletion, and protein inactivation on [14C]HePC uptake in the wild-type L. donovani line. Wild-type parasites were incubated with 20 mM NaN3 in HBS buffer without glucose or 0.2 and 1 mM NEM in HBS buffer, as described in Materials and Methods. After 1 h of incubation in the presence of [14C]HePC and 0.5% BSA at 28°C or on ice, the amount of drug incorporated in the cells was determined. The data shown are the means of three independent experiments, each of which was performed in duplicate, and are expressed as the percentage of HePC accumulation compared to that for the controls incubated in HBS buffer only at 28°C. Standard errors were below 15%.
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Cellular accumulation of C6-NBD-labeled phospholipids. Fluorescence intensity histograms were obtained by flow cytometry analysis after incubation of wild-type (open profiles) and HePC-R (solid profiles) parasites with 3 µM C6-NBD-PC (A), 3 µM C6-NBD-PE (B), or 6 µM C6-NBD-PS (C) for 30 min at 28°C in culture medium, as described in Materials and Methods. Parasite autofluorescence (broken profiles) is also shown. A total of 10,000 cells were counted for each histogram. Experiments were repeated three times and gave essentially the same profiles as the ones shown here. All values were significantly different (P < 0.01) between wild-type and resistant parasites.
|
|
|
|---|
The development and initial characterization of this HePC-R L. donovani line have been described elsewhere (26). The stability of the resistant phenotype, the absence of DNA amplification as a drug response, and the lack of involvement of P-glycoprotein-like transporters in the mechanism of resistance suggested that the presence of stable mutations accounts for the resistance phenotype. Considering that one of the main determinants of cell sensitivity to alkylphosphocholines and alkyl-lysophospholipids is drug uptake (3, 6, 7, 28, 32, 35), we studied the accumulation of [14C]HePC by wild-type and HePC-R Leishmania promastigotes. Interestingly, the resistant parasites show a significantly reduced level of uptake of the drug, as seen in Fig. 1. It is well established that short-chain phospholipids such as HePC or C6-NBD-PC bind to the albumin of the culture medium, which acts as a reservoir from which the phospholipids are partitioned to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane. It is considered that no receptor mediates binding of HePC to the plasma membrane (28). This idea is also supported by our data, as observed in Fig. 2, in which the rates of binding of HePC to both wild-type and resistant parasites were similar and constant over time. In fact, the defective HePC accumulation in the resistant parasites is caused not by differences in drug binding but by a reduction in its level of uptake. Since drug efflux is similar for both wild-type and resistant parasites (Fig. 3) and no metabolism is observed for HePC (Fig. 4), the differential uptake must be due to an internalization defect in HePC-R parasites.
Interestingly, our resistant line is not the first organism in which the inability to take up alkyl-lysophospholipids induces resistance. Remarkably, the generation of RAW macrophage-like cells resistant to edelfosine by mutagenesis followed by selection against the drug (35) produced a phenotype very similar to that found in our resistant Leishmania parasites. The investigators proved by hybridization studies that reversion of the resistance phenotype was possible in heterozygous lines, suggesting that a defect in just one gene is probably responsible for this phenotype.
The protein, energy, and temperature dependence of the uptake in wild-type parasites (Fig. 5) also suggests a loss of function in the resistant parasites. This dependence is in agreement with previous results describing the uptake of C6-NBD-PC and C6-NBD-PE from the plasma membranes of yeasts (13), the flippase activity dependent on the Ros3 protein in yeasts (12), and the inward translocation activity of short-chain PC in MDCK epithelial cells (21), all of which strongly depend on ATP.
As shown in the C6-NBD-phospholipid accumulation studies by flow cytometry (Fig. 6), resistant parasites also present with an impairment in the uptake of short-chain phospholipids, independently of the polar head group. Furthermore, their uptake also depends on temperature, energy, and membrane proteins, just as HePC uptake does (data not shown). These results suggest that all these phospholipids are taken up in L. donovani promastigotes by one similar route or through pathways that require at least one common factor that is defective in resistant parasites. It is of interest to draw attention to the chemical differences between HePC and glycerophospholipids such as C6-NBD-PC, C6-NBD-PE, and edelfosine. Even though HePC is more hydrophilic and such a simple molecule, it must be recognized by the same protein(s) responsible for the uptake of short-chain glycerophospholipids. Whether a similar activity for the uptake of long-chain physiological phospholipids is also present in Leishmania remains to be investigated. In order to be internalized inside the cells, HePC as well as other water-soluble phospholipids needs to either flip from the outer to the inner side of the plasma membrane or be endocytosed together with a fraction of the membrane. In any case, the action of one or more proteins is likely to be needed, since short-chain phospholipids flip in synthetic bilayers with half-lives of hours (22). We propose that transbilayer movement across the plasma membrane, the nonendocytic pathway, or inward translocation must be the main determinant of HePC uptake in wild-type Leishmania promastigotes and that such activity is absent in the resistant line. In fact, endocytosis of the bulk-phase marker FM 4-64 is similar in both wild-type and resistant parasites. If endocytosis were the main factor affecting HePC uptake and accumulation, resistant parasites would not behave normally in the uptake of FM 4-64, or the defect in HePC and C6-NBD derivative uptake would not be so severe. Moreover, studies of the accumulation of [14C]HePC at 0°C, conditions under which endocytosis is prevented, still showed a significant translocation of the drug in wild-type parasites but none in resistant ones. Studies with mammalian cell lines suggested that choline phospholipids enter cells through endocytosis after membrane binding (19), whereas aminophospholipids enter mainly through transbilayer movement (16), and this general opinion had been extrapolated to ether lipid uptake (3, 28). However, Hofmann and coauthors (23) showed in a panel of tumor cell lines that endocytosis does not correlate with HePC accumulation. Moreover, recent studies with yeast mutants defective in either vesicular trafficking or endocytosis (9) have proven that C6-NBD-PC and C6-NBD-PE are internalized mainly through transbilayer movement across the plasma membrane and not by endocytosis. Thus, it is likely that those cell types able to internalize C6-NBD-PC through inward translocation are also likely to transport edelfosine and HePC by the same mechanism. The molecular identities of the proteins involved in the inward-directed translocation of PC were unknown until recently, with the identification of Ros3p as a membrane protein essential for the internalization of C6-NBD-PE and C6-NBD-PC in yeasts (12), although no flippase protein has been identified so far. It will be interesting to study whether possible Ros3 protein analogs are present in Leishmania and whether their functionality is related to HePC sensitivity.
The active uptake of short-chain phospholipids has been explained physiologically for different mammalian cell types. For instance, the protein-mediated transport of water-soluble phospholipids across the brush border cells of the rabbit intestine (34) may be relevant for the absorption of phospholipid digestion products. Similarly, the uptake of lysophospholipids and edelfosine by macrophages (35) could be important for the clearance of compounds able to induce biological responses, such as platelet-activating factor or lysophosphatidylcholine. L. donovani promastigotes are able to take up ether lysophospholipids rapidly (1), and these are extensively metabolized within 1 h, mainly through incorporation into physiological plasmalogens. Such an active uptake of lysophospholipids may constitute an advantage for the parasites that could synthesize plasmalogens and normal phospholipids through this pathway instead of from de novo synthesis. Ether lipids such as edelfosine and perifosine are metabolically stable and nondegraded in mammalian cells (2, 4) due to their stable ether linkages. Similarly, HePC is not degraded in Leishmania parasites (Fig. 4). It is tempting to suggest that Leishmania parasites have an active uptake of short-chain phospholipids in order to feed more effectively. Consequently, they incorporate HePC and other ether lipid analogs, which can then exert their toxic actions. Since resistant parasites have the same duplicating time and morphology as their parental line, it is clear that this uptake activity is not essential for promastigotes grown in vitro, but we cannot rule out its importance in intracellular amastigotes in vivo. It will be interesting to test the infectivity of the HePC-R line for macrophages and animal models and their response to HePC under those conditions, as well as to study whether the generation of amastigote lines resistant to HePC by continuous drug pressure is possible.
In summary, we have shown that an impairment in HePC uptake is likely to be the main mechanism of resistance in our HePC-R line. We have also described a new activity in Leishmania characterized by the rapid transbilayer movement of short-chain phospholipids across the plasma membrane, an energy-dependent and protein-mediated activity defective in the resistant line. Whether this loss of function is due to a defect in some of the proteins directly involved in flippase activity, a defect in vesicular trafficking, or any other defect remains to be investigated. We are approaching these questions through proteomic and functional genomic experiments, since Leishmania is an organism amenable to genetic manipulation.
We thank Simon L. Croft for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Pilar Navarro for expert technical assistance. We are grateful to Zentaris (Frankfurt, Germany) for providing the HePC used in this study.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»