AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Herrewege, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Herrewege, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2004, p. 337-339, Vol. 48, No. 1
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.1.337-339.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Evaluation of Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors UC-781 and TMC120-R147681 as Human Immunodeficiency Virus Microbicides{dagger}

Yven Van Herrewege,1* Jo Michiels,1 Jens Van Roey,2 Katrien Fransen,3 Luc Kestens,1 Jan Balzarini,4 Paul Lewi,5 Guido Vanham,1 and Paul Janssen5

Laboratory of Immunology,1 AIDS Reference Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp,3 Tibotec-Virco NV, Mechlin,2 Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Leuven,4 Center for Molecular Design, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Vosselaar, Belgium5

Received 11 June 2003/ Returned for modification 26 August 2003/ Accepted 23 September 2003


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 References
 
The nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors UC-781 and TMC120-R147681 (Dapivirine) effectively prevented human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in cocultures of monocyte-derived dendritic cells and T cells, representing primary targets in sexual transmission. Both drugs had a favorable therapeutic index. A 24-h treatment with 1,000 nM UC-781 or 100 nM TMC120-R147681 prevented cell-free HIV infection, whereas 10-fold-higher concentrations blocked cell-associated HIV.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 References
 
Condom use is effective in preventing sexual human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission but is male controlled and often not negotiable (9, 10, 12, 15, 18). To offer women more control, vaginal microbicides need to be developed.

We evaluated the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors UC-781 (Crompton Corp., Middleburg, Conn.) and TMC120-R147681 (Tibotec-Virco, Mechlin, Belgium), both in preclinical development as microbicides. UC-781 was reported as a reverse transcriptase tight-binding thiocarboxanilide (4, 6), while TMC120-R147681 is a diarylpyrimidine with high activity against wild-type and mutant HIV (13; B. Gruzdev, A. Horban, A. Boron-Kaczmarska, D. Gille, G. Van't Klooster, and R. Pauwels, 8th Conf. Retrovir. Opportunistic Infect., abstr. 13, 2001).

Since early microbicide trials raised concerns about testing incompletely characterized compounds in humans (17), we propose an in vitro model using monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MO-DC) and autologous CD4+ T cells (20), representing early targets during sexual transmission (14, 16).

Reference data on antiviral activities and cellular toxicities of the two drugs were obtained using CEM T cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va.), infected with the lymphotropic HIV strain HTLV-IIIB under previously standardized conditions (1). Both drugs prevented HIV-induced syncytium formation in the nanomolar range and showed a low cytostatic activity (Table 1), evaluated by cell counting (Coulter Counter, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom) of mock-infected, drug-exposed cell cultures. Inhibition of HIV type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase activity was determined in a cell-free assay according to a previously published description (3), resulting in similar 50% inhibitory concentrations for the two drugs (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Antiviral activities, cytotoxicities, and HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitory capacities of UC-781 and TMC120-R147681 in CEM T cellsa

 
Using a T-cell line and a lymphotropic strain is physiologically less relevant; therefore, we focused on MO-DC plus CD4+ T-cell cocultures, infected with monotropic HIV-1 Ba-L.

We evaluated cell-free and cell-associated virus because both are present in semen (21, 22) and cervical mucus from HIV-1-infected persons (11). MO-DC and CD4+ T cells were generated from buffy coat peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) as previously described (20).

To mimic a sustained drug release (e.g., a microbicide formulated in an intravaginal device), virus was drug treated for 1 h before infection, during the 2-h incubation of the virus with the MO-DC, and after infection (during primary culture of MO-DC and autologous CD4+ T cells). Culture medium was refreshed twice weekly with drug. After 2 weeks of primary culture, cells were washed and cultured for 2 weeks with activated PBMCs to assess viral rescue (secondary cultures), as described previously (20). Secondary culture supernatants were tested in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), while cells were processed for HIV DNA measurement with a PCR-based HIV proviral DNA quantitation kit developed from the Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor test, version 1.5 (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, N.J.), the modifications of which have been described elsewhere (7).

Infection of MO-DC plus CD4+ T-cell cocultures with cell-associated virus was apparently blocked with 100 nM UC-781 (Table 2). However, secondary culture revealed latent infection in four of six cultures. Treatment with 1,000 nM UC-781 in the primary culture rescued virus in one of six wells. No rescue was found after treatment with a 10,000 nM concentration.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Inhibition of infection of MO-DC plus CD4+ T-cell cocultures with cell-associated HIV Ba-L

 
TMC120-R147681 apparently blocked infection in the primary cultures at a 10 nM concentration, but secondary cultures revealed that a 100 nM concentration was needed to completely prevent proviral integration.

When cell-free virus was used, proviral integration could not be blocked by continuous treatment (during primary culture) with up to 1,000 nM UC-781 (one of six wells positive in an ELISA of secondary culture; data not shown). In contrast, continuous treatment with 10 nM TMC120-R147681 sufficed to completely block HIV infection (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Minimal drug concentrations for prevention of replicative HIV infection in MO-DC plus CD4+ T-cell cocultures

 
We next investigated whether viral infection and integration (measured by ELISA and PCR, respectively) were prevented by a short drug treatment (24 h) of virus and cells, mimicking a microbicide formulated in a gel. After 24 h, cells were washed and incubated without drug (primary and secondary cultures). Compared to continuous treatment, similar concentrations of UC-781 were needed to completely block cell-free or cell-associated virus, whereas TMC120-R147681 blocked infection at concentrations 10 times higher than those used for the continuous treatment (Table 3).

If treatment was further limited to pretreatment of the virus (1 h) and treatment of the MO-DC during infection (2 h), but not during the MO-DC plus CD4+ T-cell cocultures, up to 10,000 nM (either) UC-781 or TMC120-R147681 failed to completely block infection (data not shown). Nevertheless, previous studies by Borkow et al. showed that UC-781 acts as a "virucidal agent" (4). Possible explanations for this discrepancy include the use of a different viral strain (the lymphotropic HIV-1 IIIB instead of HIV-1 Ba-L) and different target cells (cord blood mononuclear cells instead of MO-DC). Borkow et al. themselves reported that UC-781 was unable to establish a "chemical barrier" to protect epithelial cells from HIV infection (5). Moreover, other labs also were unable to reproduce the memory and virucidal effects of UC-781 (19).

Besides antiviral activity, we evaluated whether both drugs inhibited cell proliferation in mixed leukocyte cultures with MO-DC as stimulators and allogeneic CD4+ T cells as responders. This model was chosen to mimic the induction of an immune response, as happens during HIV infection. In the case that an anti-HIV drug fails, it should at least not inhibit the generation of a potentially beneficial immune response. If drug was present during the whole 5-day culture period, the 50% immune suppressive concentration (ISC50) was over 45,000 nM for UC-781 and about 1,500 nM for TMC120-R147681. If the drugs were present during the first 24 h only, the ISC50 of UC-781 was similar, but it increased to almost 25,000 nM for TMC120-R147681 (Table 4). Thus, the immune suppressive activity of UC-781 was low, irrespective of the duration of exposure, whereas TMC120-R147681 was clearly less suppressive in the 24-h treatment. We don't know which mechanism causes this effect.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Overview of the antiviral and immune suppressive activities of UC-781 and TMC120- R147681 in cocultures of MO-DC plus CD4+ T cells

 
To evaluate the relation of antiviral and immune suppressive activities, the 50% effective concentrations (EC50) were calculated and the therapeutic indices (TI; ISC50/EC50) were determined (Table 4). Both drugs, but especially TMC120-R147681, showed favorable TIs which were higher during a continuous treatment than during a 24-h treatment. This is mainly due to the lower EC50 (higher antiviral activity) of drugs during a continuous treatment, while the ISC50 were less affected.

With regard to in vivo vaginal toxicity, Balzarini et al. reported on the toxicity of UC-781 in a rabbit model, in which a gel containing 148 mM UC-781 (5%) did not cause local inflammation or damage of the vaginal mucosa and epithelia (2). Similarly, a 10-day daily application of a gel containing up to 10 mM TMC120-R147681 (0.3%) showed no irritation, evaluated either macroscopically at necropsy or microscopically after histopathologic examination (J. Van Roey, personal communication).

Di Fabio et al. recently showed that vaginal infection of SCID mice with cell-associated HIV-1 is blocked with a nontoxic, 0.00225 mM TMC120-R147681-containing gel (8). We provide in vitro evidence that a short treatment (24 h) with UC-781 or TMC120-R147681 can block cell-free or cell-associated HIV infection of MO-DC plus CD4+ T-cell cocultures, representing the early targets during transmission. From this viewpoint, our results encourage the further development of these drugs as microbicides.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank G. Mertens (Antwerp Red Cross Blood Transfusion Center) for providing buffy coats, Roche for its generous gift of Amplicor DNA kits, and Sergio Garcia Ribas and Marianne Mangelschots for performing the test. UC-781 and TMC120-R147681 were kindly provided by Crompton Corp. (Uniroyal Chemical) and Tibotec, respectively.

This work was supported by a grant from Janssen Pharmaceutica and by a grant from the European Microbicides Project (EMPRO; contract no. 503558).


    FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of Immunology, Institute of Tropical Medicine; 155 Nationalestraat, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium. Phone: 32-3-247.62.26. Fax: 32-3-247.62.31. E-mail: yvherrewege{at}itg.be. Back

{dagger} This work is dedicated to the memory of Paul A. J. Janssen, founder of Janssen Pharmaceutica and the Center for Molecular Design. Back


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 References
 

  1. Balzarini, J., E. De Clercq, A. Carbonez, V. Burt, and J. P. Kleim. 2000. Long-term exposure of HIV type 1-infected cell cultures to combinations of the novel quinoxaline GW420867X with lamivudine, abacavir, and a variety of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 16:517-528.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Balzarini, J., L. Naesens, E. Verbeken, M. Laga, L. Van Damme, M. Parniak, L. Van Mellaert, J. Anne, and E. De Clercq. 1998. Preclinical studies on thiocarboxanilide UC-781 as a virucidal agent. AIDS 12:1129-1138.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Balzarini, J., M. J. Pérez-Pérez, A. San Felix, M. J. Camarasa, I. C. Bathurst, P. J. Barr, and E. De Clercq. 1992. Kinetics of inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase by the novel HIV-1-specific nucleoside analogue [2',5'-bis-O-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-ß-D-ribofuranosyl]-3'-spiro-5"-(4"-amino-1",2"-oxathiole-2",2"-dioxide)thymine (TSAO-T). J. Biol. Chem. 267:11831-11838.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Borkow, G., J. Barnard, T. M. Nguyen, A. Belmonte, M. A. Wainberg, and M. A. Parniak. 1997. Chemical barriers to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection: retrovirucidal activity of UC781, a thiocarboxanilide nonnucleoside inhibitor of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. J. Virol. 71:3023-3030.[Abstract]
  5. Borkow, G., H. Salomon, M. A. Wainberg, and M. A. Parniak. 2002. Attenuated infectivity of HIV type 1 from epithelial cells pretreated with a tight-binding nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 18:711-714.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Buckheit, R. W., Jr., M. Hollingshead, S. Stinson, V. Fliakas-Boltz, L. A. Pallansch, J. Roberson, W. Decker, C. Elder, S. Borgel, C. Bonomi, R. Shores, T. Siford, L. Malspeis, and J. P. Bader. 1997. Efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and in vivo antiviral activity of UC781, a highly potent, orally bioavailable nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor of HIV type 1. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 13:789-796.[Medline]
  7. Christopherson, C., Y. Kidane, B. Conway, J. Krowka, H. Sheppard, and S. Kwok. 2000. PCR-based assay to quantify human immunodeficiency virus type 1 DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:630-634.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Di Fabio, S., J. Van Roey, G. Giannini, G. van den Mooter, M. Spada, A. Binelli, M. F. Pirillo, E. Germinario, F. Belardelli, M. P. de Bethune, and S. Vella. 2003. Inhibition of vaginal transmission of HIV-1 in hu-SCID mice by the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor TMC120 in a gel formulation. AIDS 17:1597-1604.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Elias, C. J., and L. L. Heise. 1994. Challenges for the development of female-controlled vaginal microbicides. AIDS 8:1-9.[Medline]
  10. Feldblum, P. J., C. S. Morrison, R. E. Roddy, and W. Cates, Jr. 1995. The effectiveness of barrier methods of contraception in preventing the spread of HIV. AIDS 9(Suppl. A):S85-S93.
  11. Hart, C. E., J. L. Lennox, M. Pratt-Palmore, T. C. Wright, R. F. Schinazi, T. Evans-Strickfaden, T. J. Bush, C. Schnell, L. J. Conley, K. A. Clancy, and T. V. Ellerbrock. 1999. Correlation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA levels in blood and the female genital tract. J. Infect. Dis. 179:871-882.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Irwin, K., M. Scarlett, and R. Moseley. 1998. Observations from the CDC. The urgent need for new HIV/STD prevention options for women. J. Women's Health 7:1081-1086.[Medline]
  13. Ludovici, D. W., B. L. De Corte, M. J. Kukla, H. Ye, C. Y. Ho, M. A. Lichtenstein, R. W. Kavash, K. Andries, M. P. de Bethune, H. Azijn, R. Pauwels, P. J. Lewi, J. Heeres, L. M. Koymans, M. R. de Jonge, K. J. Van Aken, F. F. Daeyaert, K. Das, E. Arnold, and P. A. Janssen. 2001. Evolution of anti-HIV drug candidates. Part 3: diarylpyrimidine (DAPY) analogues. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11:2235-2239.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Milman, G., and O. Sharma. 1994. Mechanisms of HIV/SIV mucosal transmission. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 10:1305-1312.[Medline]
  15. Short, R. V. 1994. Contraceptives of the future in the light of HIV infection. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 34:330-332.[Medline]
  16. Spira, A. I., P. A. Marx, B. K. Patterson, J. Mahoney, R. A. Koup, S. M. Wolinsky, and D. D. Ho. 1996. Cellular targets of infection and route of viral dissemination after an intravaginal inoculation of simian immunodeficiency virus into rhesus macaques. J. Exp. Med. 183:215-225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Stafford, M. K., H. Ward, A. Flanagan, I. J. Rosenstein, D. Taylor-Robinson, J. R. Smith, J. Weber, and V. S. Kitchen. 1998. Safety study of nonoxynol-9 as a vaginal microbicide: evidence of adverse effects. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. Hum. Retrovirol. 17:327-331.[Medline]
  18. Stein, Z. A. 1990. HIV prevention: the need for methods women can use. Am. J. Public Health 80:460-462.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Turpin, J. A. 2002. Considerations and development of topical microbicides to inhibit the sexual transmission of HIV. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 11:1077-1097.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Van Herrewege, Y., L. Penne, C. Vereecken, K. Fransen, G. van der Groen, L. Kestens, J. Balzarini, and G. Vanham. 2002. Activity of reverse transcriptase inhibitors in monocyte-derived dendritic cells: a possible in vitro model for postexposure prophylaxis of sexual HIV transmission. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 18:1091-1102.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Vernazza, P. L., J. J. Eron, S. A. Fiscus, and M. S. Cohen. 1999. Sexual transmission of HIV: infectiousness and prevention. AIDS 13:155-166.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Zhang, H., G. Dornadula, M. Beumont, L. Livornese, Jr., B. Van Uitert, K. Henning, and R. J. Pomerantz. 1998. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in the semen of men receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 339:1803-1809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2004, p. 337-339, Vol. 48, No. 1
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.1.337-339.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Herrewege, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Herrewege, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, P.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS