Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2004, p. 3720-3728, Vol. 48, No. 10
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.10.3720-3728.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Cheol-In Kang,2,
Jeong-Hum Byeon,1 Ki-Deok Lee,2 Wan Beom Park,2 Hong-Bin Kim,2 Eui-Chong Kim,3,4 Myoung-don Oh,2,4* and Kang-Won Choe2,4
Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine,1 Departments of Internal Medicine,2 Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine,3 Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea4
Received 1 November 2003/ Returned for modification 16 January 2004/ Accepted 19 May 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Organisms with plasmid-mediated AmpC enzymes are generally resistant to broad-spectrum penicillins, extended-spectrum cephalosporins, monobactam, and cephamycins but are susceptible to cefepime, cefpirome, and carbapenems (21). However, it is difficult to distinguish ESBL-producing organisms from plasmid-mediated AmpC ß-lactamase-producing organisms by phenotypic susceptibility testing. Standard guidelines for the detection of AmpC-producing isolates are also lacking.
Although there have been several reports of nosocomial outbreaks caused by organisms which produce plasmid-mediated AmpC enzymes (4, 20, 29), the epidemiology and clinical features associated with infections caused by these organisms have not been well described.
In this report, we describe the epidemiology and microbiological characteristics of AmpC ß-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates and analyze the clinical characteristics of the patients infected by AmpC enzyme-producing K. pneumoniae isolates. In addition, we compared the clinical features and outcomes of bloodstream infections caused by AmpC ß-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates with those caused by TEM- or SHV-related ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates.
|
|
|---|
Microbiological analyses. (i) Antibiotic susceptibility testing. The MICs of the antibiotics tested were determined by the agar dilution method, as described by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (17). E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as the reference strain for quality control. The antimicrobials tested were piperacillin and piperacillin-tazobactam (Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Pearl River, N.Y.); cefoxitin (Choongwae Pharma Co., Seoul, Korea); cefotaxime (Handok Pharmaceuticals Co., Seoul, Korea); ceftazidime (Glaxo Korea Co., Seoul, Korea); aztreonam (Dong-A Biotech Co., Seoul, Korea); cefepime, cloxacillin, and amikacin (Yuhan Co., Seoul, Korea); clavulanic acid (Il-Sung Pharmaceuticals, Seoul, Korea); ciprofloxacin (Bayer Korea Co., Seoul, Korea); and gentamicin (Young Jin Pharmaceutical Co, Seoul, Korea).
(ii) Screening and confirmatory tests for ESBL-producing strains. ESBL production was examined by the disk diffusion method, as described previously (6). In brief, the diameters of the inhibition zones on cefotaxime and ceftazidime disks (30 µg each), alone and in combination with clavulanic acid (10 µg), were determined. An increase in the zone diameter of 5 mm or more when either of the antimicrobial agents was combined with clavulanic acid was considered evidence of ESBL production. Isolates that were resistant to cefotaxime, ceftazidime, or cefpodoxime but for which an increase in zone diameter of less than 5 mm was revealed were subjected to the double-disk diffusion test with cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and cefepime disks (27), as described by Thomson and Sanders (26), except that the ceftazidime and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid disks were placed 15 mm apart.
The production of AmpC ß-lactamase was phenotypically suspected in isolates that were resistant to either cefotaxime or ceftazidime, did not reveal the enhancement of the inhibitory zone when a clavulanic acid disk was present, and were resistant to both amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and cefoxitin (24). Two control organisms, E. coli ATCC 25922 and K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603, were inoculated in each set of tests for quality control.
(iii) Analytical IEF and enzyme inhibition assay. Isoelectric focusing (IEF) was performed with sonicated extracts by the method of Mathew et al. (16) by using a Mini IEF cell system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.). Enzyme activities were examined by overlaying the gel with 0.5 mM nitrocefin in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). An inhibition assay was performed by overlaying the gels with 0.5 mM nitrocefin with and without 0.3 mM cloxacillin or 0.3 mM clavulanic acid in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) (19). Strains carrying plasmids encoding the ß-lactamases TEM-1 (R1), TEM-3 (pCFF04), TEM-4 (pUD16), SHV-2 (pMG229), SHV-5 (pAFF2), and CMY-1 (pMVP-1) served as IEF standards (2, 6).
(iv) Transfer of resistance, plasmid analysis, and Southern hybridization. Logarithmic-phase cells of each isolate were mated with similar cultures of E. coli J53 Azir on Trypticase soy agar plates. Transconjugants were selected on Trypticase soy agar containing 100 µg of sodium azide (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) per ml and 64 µg of cefoxitin per ml (19). To confirm the presence of plasmids and to estimate their sizes, plasmids from clinical isolates and transconjugants were extracted, electrophoresed on a 0.7% agarose gel, and subjected to Southern hybridization by the protocol described previously (14, 23). PCR with a blaDHA-1-specific probe generated amplicons labeled with digoxigenin (DIG DNA labeling and detection kit; Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany).
(v) PCR and nucleotide sequences of ß-lactamase genes. The DHA-1-related genes from clinical isolates were amplified by PCR. The primers used for the amplification were DHA-1U (5'-CACACGGAAGGTTAATTCTGA-3') and DHA-1L (5'-CGGTTATACGGCTGAACCTG-3'), which correspond to nucleotides 20 to 1 and 961 to 980 of the DHA-1 structural gene, respectively. The PCR conditions were as follows: 5 min at 94°C; 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 45 s at 57°C, and 1 min at 72°C; and finally, 8 min at 72°C. The amplified product from isolate 18 was sequenced with primers DHA-1U, DHA-1L, and DHA-2U (5'-AAGAGATGGCGCTGAATGAT-3').
CMY-1-, TEM-, SHV-, and CTX-M-14-related genes were amplified as described previously (18, 19).
(vi)Test for induction of AmpC ß-lactamases. AmpC ß-lactamases were induced with cefoxitin, cefotaxime, and ceftazidime disks on Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco, Detroit, Mich.), as described previously (13).
(vii) PFGE. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed with a CHEF Mapper XA system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.), as described previously (9).
Clinical analysis. (i) Definitions. K. pneumoniae bacteremia was defined as the detection of K. pneumoniae in a blood culture specimen. Clinically significant K. pneumoniae bacteremia was defined as at least one positive blood culture, together with clinical features compatible with systemic inflammatory response syndrome.
The bacteremia was categorized as polymicrobial if additional microorganisms were recovered from the blood cultures. Nosocomial infection was defined as an infection that occurred later than 48 h after admission to the hospital, an infection that occurred less than 48 h after admission to the hospital in patients who had been hospitalized within 2 weeks prior to admission, and an infection that occurred less than 48 h after admission to the hospital in patients who had been transferred from another hospital or nursing home. Nosocomial bloodstream infections as well as other nosocomial infections were defined according to the criteria proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (5). Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count below 500/mm3.
The antimicrobial therapies were classified into empirical and definitive, with the former defined as the initial therapy provided before the results of blood culture were available and the latter defined as therapy provided after the results of antibiotic susceptibility tests had been reported. The antimicrobial therapy was considered appropriate if the treatment regimen included antibiotics active against K. pneumoniae in vitro and the dosage and route of administration were in conformity with present medical standards.
(ii) Review of medical records. We reviewed the medical records of the patients. The data collected included age; sex; underlying disease; site of infection; the severity of illness, as calculated by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (10); the duration of the hospital stay before the onset of bacteremia; the antimicrobial regimen; and any antimicrobial therapy within 30 days prior to the onset of bacteremia. The presence of the following comorbid conditions was also documented: neutropenia, presentation with septic shock, care in an intensive care unit, use of immunosuppressive agents within 30 days prior to the onset of bacteremia, corticosteroid use, postoperative state, and invasive procedures within 72 h prior to the onset of bacteremia. In addition, the patients were assessed for the presence of a central venous catheter, an indwelling urinary catheter, or mechanical ventilation. Since this study was retrospective, the patients' physicians, but not the researchers, had chosen the antimicrobial therapy regimens.
The main outcome measures used were the initial response to treatment and the 7- and 30-day mortality rates. The initial response to treatment was assessed 72 h after the start of antimicrobial therapy and was classified as follows: complete response for patients with resolution of fever, leukocytosis, and all signs of infection; partial response for patients with an abatement but not a complete resolution of fever, leukocytosis, and all signs of infection; failure for patients with no abatement or deterioration of any of the clinical parameters; and death (12).
(iii) Statistical analysis.
Student's t test was used to compare continuous variables, and the
2 or Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables. All P values were two tailed, with a P value <0.05 considered statistically significant. The SPSS (version 10.0) software package was used for these analyses.
|
|
|---|
Microbiological analyses. (i) IEF and enzyme inhibition assay. Each isolate produced one to three ß-lactamases of pI 5.4, 5.9, 7.6, 7.7, 8.0, 8.2, or >8.2 in various combinations. Among the ß-lactamases, those with pIs of 7.7 and 8.0 were inhibited by 0.3 mM cloxacillin but not by 0.3 mM clavulanic acid. The ß-lactamase production patterns, the number of isolates with each pattern, and the MICs of several antibiotics are summarized in Table 1.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Antimicrobial susceptibilities, pIs, and types of ß-lactamases for K. pneumoniae isolates from patients with bloodstream infections
|
One isolate produced a ß-lactamase with a pI of 8.0 which was inhibited by 0.3 mM clavulanic acid, and a CTX-M-14-specific PCR was performed with this isolate, as described previously (18). The PCR results were positive, and the isolate was considered to produce a CTX-M-14-like enzyme.
(iii) Transfer of resistance and plasmid analysis. To test the transmissibility of cefoxitin resistance, a conjugation experiment was performed with the isolates characterized to have a CMY-1-like or a DHA-1 ß-lactamase gene. Of the 14 isolates that produced CMY-1-like ß-lactamases, 6 isolates transferred cefoxitin resistance via plasmids of about 130 kb. For DHA-1-producing isolates, cefoxitin resistance was not transferred by conjugation, but plasmid analysis by Southern hybridization showed that 12 of 14 isolates harbored plasmids of about 150 kb containing blaDHA-1 and 2 had plasmids of about 110 kb (Fig. 1).
![]() View larger version (87K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Plasmid agarose gel electrophoresis and Southern hybridization of DHA-1-producing isolates. Lane V517, plasmid size standards from E. coli strain V517 (18); lanes 9 to 57, DHA-1-producing plasmids from the isolates corresponding to the isolate numbers listed in Table 5; lane P, plasmid from K. pneumoniae 502321.
|
(v) PFGE. Thirteen DHA-1-producing K. pneumoniae isolates and 14 CMY-1-like-producing isolates were included in the PFGE analysis. The DHA-1-producing isolates showed seven PFGE types, and the CMY-1-like-producing isolates revealed two PFGE types (Fig. 2).
![]() View larger version (120K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Dendrograms of 13 DHA-1-producing K. pneumoniae isolates (A) and 14 CMY-1-producing K. pneumoniae isolates (B). DHA-1 enzyme-producing isolates showed seven PFGE types, and CMY-1-like enzyme-producing isolates revealed two PFGE types. The strains were clustered by the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages. The scale indicates the percent genetic similarity. The molecular size marker is a bacteriophage lambda ladder (Bio-Rad). The numbers on the right of each lane correspond to the clinical isolate numbers in Tables 5 and 6.
|
When the distribution of ß-lactamases was assessed by year, DHA-1-producing isolates were consistently isolated from 1998 to 2001, whereas CMY-1-producing isolates first appeared in 2000 and persisted thereafter. SHV-12-like ESBL-producing isolates were isolated in most years, whereas TEM-52-like ESBL-producing isolates were not isolated after 2000 (Fig. 3).
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Distribution of ESBL subtypes from the isolates identified each year. DHA-1-producing isolates were consistently isolated from 1998 to 2001, but CMY-1-producing isolates first appeared in 2000.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with bloodstream infections due to AmpC ß-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates versus those of patients with infections due to TEM- or SHV-related ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Analysis of risk factors for bloodstream infections caused by AmpC ß-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates versus those caused by TEM- or SHV-related ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Clinical outcomes for patients with bloodstream infections caused by AmpC ß- lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates versus those caused by TEM- or SHV-related ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Clinical features and outcomes of bloodstream infections due to DHA-1-related AmpC ß-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae isolatesa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 6. Clinical features and outcomes of bloodstream infections due to CMY-1-related AmpC ß-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae isolatesa
|
|
|
|---|
In our study, on the basis of an analysis of the cases of K. pneumoniae bacteremia detected at a single institute in South Korea, DHA-1- and CMY-1-producing isolates were found to be common among the isolates resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins. Previous studies showed that CMY-1 is prevalent in Korea (8, 9, 19); however, it should be noted that DHA-1, an inducible AmpC ß-lactamase, is prevalent at the Seoul National University Hospital, a 1,500-bed university hospital. Since the first description of DHA-1 from a strain in Saudi Arabia in 1998 (1), DHA-1-producing clinical isolates have been reported in Taiwan (29).
The DHA-1 enzyme, which is mediated by 110-kb plasmid, was first identified from K. pneumoniae strain 502321 in Korea in 2000 (unpublished data). We cloned and sequenced nucleotides of the gene and found that the sequence of the bla gene of this isolate was identical to that of blaDHA-1. An E. coli DH10B isolate containing this clone showed a resistance pattern identical to that of E. coli HB101(pSAL-1) (28): resistance to streptomycin and sulfonamides.
It is noteworthy that several geographic clusters of AmpC ß-lactamase types have been described. These include a North American cluster (MIR-1 and ACT-1), a Central and South American cluster (FOX-1 and FOX-2), an Asian cluster (CMY-1 and MOX-1), and a Mediterranean and Middle Eastern cluster (CMY-2, CMY-2b, LAT-1, and LAT-2) (21). Because few laboratories test for the production of the AmpC ß-lactamase and even fewer laboratories test for induction, the occurrence of these enzymes in K. pneumoniae and E. coli isolates remains uncertain, as do their impacts on therapies and clinical outcomes.
In this study, we evaluated the clinical features and outcomes of bloodstream infections caused by AmpC-type ß-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates. In addition, these patients were compared to those infected with ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates. The clinical characteristics were similar to those caused by TEM- or SHV-related ESBL producers. Previous studies demonstrated that prior use of antibiotics (9, 12), the presence of a central venous catheter or a urinary catheter (22), and prior hospitalization and the use of extended-spectrum cephalosporins (9) are risk factors for infections caused by ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae or E. coli isolates.
Analysis of the clinical outcomes demonstrated high rates of failure of the initial antimicrobial therapy, especially cephalosporin treatment, in patients infected with AmpC ß-lactamase-producing organisms, as was the case for patients infected with TEM- or SHV-related ESBL producers. Although the number of patients was small and the patients were not controlled for the severity of disease, the 30-day mortality rate was higher in the DHA-1 group than in the CMY-1-like group (46 and 14.3%, respectively). The mortality rate for the patients who received extended-spectrum cephalosporins as definitive treatment was assessed: all four patients in the DHA-1 group died, and one of three patients in the CMY-1-like group died. This result might be partially explained by the fact that ß-lactamases had been induced by exposure to ß-lactam antimicrobials in DHA-1-producing isolates, thus providing higher levels of resistance.
In the present study, all but three AmpC ß-lactamase-producing isolates (one CMY-1 producer and two DHA-1 producers) were susceptible to cefepime. These results suggest that cefepime might be useful for the treatment of infections caused by AmpC ß-lactamase-producing organisms (29). However, a report (15) has described the inoculum effect of cefepime or cefpirome in an AmpC producer, which lacked an outer membrane protein. In our study, all the patients treated with extended-spectrum cephalosporins received cefotaxime or ceftazidime, but not cefepime, since cefepime was not available at the Clinical Research Institute of Seoul National University Hospital until recently. Nevertheless, further studies to determine whether cefepime can be used for the treatment of infections caused by plasmid-mediated AmpC ß-lactamase producers are needed.
It is difficult to distinguish organisms producing ESBLs from those producing plasmid-mediated AmpC ß-lactamases by phenotypic susceptibility testing. Resistance to cefoxitin indicates the possibility of AmpC-mediated resistance but also indicates reduced outer membrane permeability. Some phenotypic tests are available to help distinguish the difference between cefoxitin-resistant non-AmpC producers and cefoxitin-resistant AmpC producers. These include a three-dimensional test (26) and a new AmpC disk test (J. A. Black, E. S. Moland, and K. S. Thomson, Abstr. 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. D-534, 2002). In addition, the use of ß-lactamase inhibitors can help identify possible AmpC-producing organisms (25). However, none of these tests are standardized and they are time-consuming, especially for a clinical microbiology laboratory handling large numbers of isolates.
Reporting of a susceptibility testing result for AmpC ß-lactamase producers can be controversial if they show susceptibility to some extended-spectrum cephalosporins in vitro, because no standard method for the detection of these isolates is yet available. Moreover, there are few clinical data on the patients infected with these organisms. Although the number of patients in our study was small, the study has shown that the outcome of cephalosporin treatment for serious infections due to AmpC ß-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates was poor, even for infections caused by apparently susceptible organisms. Therefore, a standard test for the detection of the plasmid-mediated AmpC enzyme and new breakpoints for extended-spectrum cephalosporins are urgently necessary.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of the clinical features and outcomes of bloodstream infections caused by AmpC ß-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates.
H.P. and C.-I.K. contributed equally to the study. ![]()
|
|
|---|
-methoxy ß-lactams in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:2200-2209.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»