Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2004, p. 4520-4527, Vol. 48, No. 12
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4520-4527.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences,1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Experimental and Clinical Microbiology, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy2
Received 5 May 2004/ Returned for modification 3 June 2004/ Accepted 27 July 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Therefore, sensitivity testing is useful for comparison of novel antimicrobial agents or combinations of agents for their effectiveness in vitro.
The aim of the present study was the comparative evaluation, under reproducible cultural conditions, of the efficacies of several antibiotics (rokitamycin, erythromycin, fusidic acid, pefloxacin, and polymyxin B), antifungal agents (amphotericin B and ornidazole), antiprotozoal agents (suramin), and antiviral agents (acyclovir and zidovudine [AZT]) as well as phenothiazines (chlorpromazine) on the growth rate, excystment, and cytopathogenicity of Acanthamoeba castellanii.
In this paper, we report that, among the pharmaceutical agents tested, rokitamycin and chlorpromazine are the drugs with the greatest potential for the treatment of Acanthamoeba infections.
|
|
|---|
Pharmaceutical agents. Rokitamycin, fusidic acid, and pefloxacin were kind gifts from Grunenthal Formenti Laboratories (Milan, Italy). Erythromycin, polymyxin B, amphotericin B, ornidazole, suramin, and chlorpromazine were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy). The antiviral drugs acyclovir and AZT were both a kind gift of Glaxo Wellcome (Greenford, United Kingdom).
Rokitamycin, erythromycin, and AZT were made up as stock solutions containing 20, 8, and 1 mg of drug/ml, respectively, in 95% (vol/vol) ethanol. Fusidic acid (0.5 mg/ml), pefloxacin (1 mg/ml), polymyxin B (8 mg/ml), suramin (8 mg/ml), and chlorpromazine (10 mg/ml) were dissolved in PYG medium. Ornidazole (0.8 mg/ml) and amphotericin B (2.5 mg/ml) were dissolved in PYG medium containing 3 and 2% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), respectively. An acyclovir stock solution was prepared directly in DMSO at a concentration of 20 mg/ml. All drug solutions were sterilized by filtration through a 0.22-µm-pore-size filter (Millex-GS; Millipore, Molsheim, France). Preliminary tests with ethanol and DMSO were performed to ensure that no trophozoite inhibition occurred at the concentrations used.
Experimental design. Experiments were performed in sterile 96-well plates (Corning). Serial twofold dilutions of the drugs were prepared in PYG medium. Control wells received 100 µl of PYG medium in place of drug dilutions. The amoebas, which were washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer (pH 7.2), were suspended in PYG medium at a density of 8 x 103 cells/ml. One hundred microliters of the calibrated trophozoite suspension was added to each well, and then the plates were sealed and incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Tests were performed in duplicate and were repeated at least three times.
Effects of drugs on Acanthamoeba growth. At 2, 3, and 6 days of incubation, the plates were observed with a Zeiss (Tilaval 31) inverted microscope to detect and count the viable trophozoites in each well. The total well area was 32.1536 mm2, but to facilitate our task, we counted the trophozoites included in the rectangle corresponding to the photographic field (the area of which was 0.3215 mm2). For each well we considered at least six of these rectangles; then, the total number of trophozoites growing in each well was calculated by the following formula: (total number of trophozoites in each rectangle/number of rectangles considered) x 100.
The amoebistatic or amoebicidal effects of the drugs. To investigate the types of actions exerted by the drugs, at the end of each experiment, the plates were centrifuged (at 100 x g for 2 min) and the culture medium was discarded, and after two washes with 200 µl of PBS, 200 µl of fresh PYG medium was added to each well. During the 21 days of incubation at 37°C, the plates were observed with the inverted microscope to determine whether the amoebal growth resumed and reached control levels. A set of experiments was performed to evaluate cell viability, which was determined by staining the amoebas with nigrosin and examining them with the inverted microscope in a hemacytometer (Nageotte chamber).
Effects of the drugs on cystic stage. To determine the effects of the drugs on the cystic stage, microplates were prepared as described above for the trophozoite assays. Acanthamoeba cysts were obtained from 10-day subcultures of trophozoites starved in PBS containing 2 mM 2-amino-2-methyl-1,3-propanediol (Sigma-Aldrich) at 25°C (14, 42). After two washes in PBS, they were suspended in PYG medium at a density of 8 x 103 cysts/ml. One hundred microliters of the calibrated cyst suspension was added to each well, and the plates were sealed and incubated at 37°C. After 3 days the wells were checked microscopically with the inverted microscope to detect cysts or viable trophozoites. The plates were then centrifuged (at 100 x g for 2 min) and the culture medium was discarded, and after two washes with 200 µl of PBS, 200 µl of fresh PYG medium was added to each well. During 21 days of incubation at 37°C, the plates were observed with the inverted microscope to determine the wells in which the Acanthamoeba excystment was completely inhibited.
Efficacies of combined drug treatments. The efficacies of the combined drug treatments were determined as described above by diluting the associated drugs contemporaneously, and then the calibrated trophozoite-cyst suspension was added to each well and the plates were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 and processed as described above.
Drug action on cytopathic effect of Acanthamoeba. Tests for the determination of the actions of the drugs on the cytopathic effect of Acanthamoeba were performed in 96-well plates, with A. castellanii trophozoites incubated on semiconfluent WKD cell monolayers. Amoebas not exposed to drugs and amoebas exposed to rokitamycin (4.6 µg/ml) or chlorpromazine (1.56 µg/ml) alone or in combination for 24 h at 37°C were washed twice with sterile PBS and suspended in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco-BRL/Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; Gibco-BRL/Life Technologies) at a density of 8 x 103/ml. Each cell suspension was seeded in aliquots of 100 µl/well into 20 wells of sterile microtiter plates that contained target cells. The plates were then incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The plates were observed with an inverted microscope at time intervals of 24 h for 5 days in succession to detect the destruction of the WKD cell monolayer in each well. These experiments were repeated at least three times, and the protective effects of the drugs were evaluated by estimating the percentage of cell damage compared with that for the control group. This parameter was evaluated for each sample by counting the number of wells containing destroyed WKD cell monolayers compared with the total number of wells inoculated.
WKD cells derived from a human cornea were maintained in continuous culture in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS, 100 U of penicillin G per ml, and 100 µg of streptomycin per ml and were grown in 25-cm2 sterile plastic flasks at 37°C in a humid atmosphere containing 5% CO2. In each experiment, 2 x 104 cells suspended in 100 µl of RPMI 1640 medium-10% FCS were seeded into each well of sterile 96-well plates; the cell viability was >95%, as determined by the nigrosin dye exclusion method. After 24 h of incubation at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere, the culture medium was aspirated and was replaced with the amoebic suspensions prepared as described above.
Statistics. Statistical differences between groups were determined by a two-tailed Student's t test. The difference was considered significant when P was <0.05.
|
|
|---|
After 6 days of incubation at 37°C the control cultures of A. castellanii produced about 4.2 x 103 amoebas/well, with doubling times of about 58 h. Under the same experimental conditions, except for pefloxacin, all the drugs tested inhibited Acanthamoeba growth; but the novel macrolide rokitamycin and the antipsychotic agent chlorpromazine were distinctly inhibitory (Fig. 1). The antibiotic fusidic acid and the antiprotozoal drug suramin had marginal effects on A. castellanii growth (growth curves not shown).
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Growth curves of A. castellanii suspended in PYG medium at a density of 8 x 103 trophozoites/ml in the absence (control) or in the presence of drugs and cultured in sterile microtiter plates at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Values are means ± the standard errors of at least six experiments.
|
10 µg/ml, scored on days 2, 3, and 6, are shown in Table 2. Results are presented as percent inhibition of cell growth compared with the growth of the control cultures run at the same time. In general, drug activity was dose dependent and decreased with the increase in the incubation time. Chlorpromazine was the most effective compound and caused 100% growth inhibition after 48 h at a concentration of 1.56 µg/ml. At this time, rokitamycin at a dose of 2.34 µg/ml already caused about 95% growth inhibition, whereas the macrolide erythromycin produced the same effect at a concentration of >12.5 µg/ml (Fig. 1). Under the same conditions, amphotericin B at concentrations ranging from 3.125 to 6.25 µg/ml inhibited A. castellanii growth by about 87 to 100%, while ornidazole and polymyxin B at doses of 6.25 µg/ml exerted about 70% inhibition. At 48 h of incubation AZT also showed effective antiamoebic activity, inhibiting the amoebal growth by 66% at 5 µg/ml. At 3 and 6 days of incubation, the lowest doses of fusidic acid (15.625 µg/ml) and suramin (25 µg/ml) were able to inhibit amoebal growth by 48 to 61% and 28 to 48%, respectively. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. MIC100s of the drugs tested for A. castellaniia
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Percent inhibition of A. castellanii growth by the drugs tested at concentrations 10 µg/mla
|
The trophozoite minimum amoebicidal concentration was defined as the lowest concentration of drug that did not cause complete growth resumption after 3 weeks of incubation. When amoebas in the wells were washed free of the drug-containing medium and resuspended in fresh PYG medium, it was observed that only rokitamycin and chlorpromazine, at concentrations of 75 and 50 µg/ml, respectively, exerted trophozoite amoebicidal activities. Nigrosin dye exclusion test experiments, carried out during trophozoite incubation with the drugs, confirmed these data. In fact, on day 6, amoebas incubated with rokitamycin (300 to 75 µg/ml) and chlorpromazine (100 to 50 µg/ml) showed a cell mortality rate of about 98%.
Effects of the drugs on the cystic stage. The drugs' abilities to prevent the excystment of A. castellanii were also investigated. In general, by day 3 of incubation all the drugs tested inhibited amoebic excystment, and this also occurred at the lowest concentrations tested. The minimum cysticidal concentration was defined as the lowest concentrations of the drugs that completely prevented amoeba excystment after 3 weeks of cyst reincubation in fresh PYG medium. Under these experimental conditions, only rokitamycin and chlorpromazine exerted complete cysticidal action, and this occurred at doses of 300 and 100 µg/ml, respectively (Fig. 2).
![]() ![]() View larger version (142K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Light microscopic images showing the inhibitory effects of rokitamycin and chlorpromazine on A. castellanii excystment. Cysts (8 x 103/ml) were exposed to drugs for 3 days, washed, and reincubated in fresh PYG medium at 37°C for 21 days. (A) Cysts before treatment; (B) trophozoites from untreated cysts; (C and D) partial excystment after treatment with subinhibitory doses of rokitamycin (150 µg/ml) (C) and chlorpromazine (50 µg/ml) (D); (E) complete inhibition of excystment induced by the combination rokitamycin (75 µg/ml) and chlorpromazine (25 µg/ml).
|
The MIC100s showed that the combination of rokitamycin and amphotericin B and the combination of rokitamycin and chlorpromazine exerted a higher level of efficacy than the single drugs, but only from day 3 of incubation (Table 3). Under our experimental conditions, the combination of rokitamycin and chlorpromazine also improved the amoebicidal activities of the drugs combined (trophozoite minimum amoebicidal concentrations, 37.5 and 12.5 µg/ml, respectively). In addition, this drug combination also showed synergistic cysticidal activity, which was observed at concentrations of 75 and 25 µg/ml, respectively (Fig. 2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. MIC100s of drug combinations for A. castellaniia
|
These experiments showed, in fact, that at 24 h of incubation untreated amoebas already caused monolayer destruction in all wells inoculated with target cells, whereas those pretreated with rokitamycin (4.6 µg/ml) or chlorpromazine (1.56 µg/ml), alone or in combination, did not induce cell damage. The protective effects of the drugs were also evident at successive incubation times, as indicated in Fig. 3 and Table 4, which show the morphological features of the target cell monolayers (at 96 h) and the percentage of cell damage compared with that for the control cells scored on day 5 of incubation, respectively. In this case, rokitamycin and chlorpromazine did not show any synergism. This lack of synergy was probably due to the short time (24 h) of coincubation of Acanthamoeba and the drugs. In fact, our data showed that both combinations, rokitamycin with amphotericin B and rokitamycin with chlorpromazine, exerted synergic effects only from day 3 of incubation.
![]() View larger version (170K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Morphological features of WKD cells cultured for 4 days at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere in the absence of A. castellanii trophozoites (8 x 102/well) (A) or the presence of A. castellanii trophozoites (8 x 102/well) untreated (B) or treated for 24 h with 4.6 µg of rokitamycin per ml (C) or 1.56 µg of chlorpromazine per ml (D).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Percent inhibition of A. castellanii cytopathic effect on WKD cells by rokitamycin and chlorpromazinea
|
|
|
|---|
Our study suggests that some of the compounds screened might have potential for the treatment of Acanthamoeba chronic infections.
In particular, we found that the new oral macrolide rokitamycin was strongly inhibitory for A. castellanii. Macrolide antibiotics comprise a large group of drugs characterized by large lactonic cycles with 12, 14, 15, or 16 atoms to which sugars and/or amino sugars are bound. They have been extensively used for the treatment of bacterial infections, as they are able to interfere selectively with protein biosynthesis by binding to the 50S component of the prokaryotic ribosome. The macrolides have broad-spectrum activities against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including actinomycetes and mycobacteria, as well as treponemes, mycoplasmas, chlamydiae, rickettsiae, and some protozoa (7, 11-13). Our data do not indicate any mechanism by which rokitamycin exerted its effect on Acanthamoeba. In general, its antiamoebic activity might be due to either the direct action on the protozoan or the inhibition of symbiotic bacterial flora. In our study, however, the second hypothesis must be discarded because the PCR results clearly indicated the absence of prokaryotic DNA in A. castellanii trophozoites (data not shown). It has been shown that the active 16-membered-ring macrolide rokitamycin, differently from the 14-membered-ring macrolide erythromycin, is rapidly accumulated by eukaryotic cells in large amounts at 37°C (15, 39). Our results show that erythromycin exerted a modest inhibitory effect on A. castellanii. The higher level of rokitamycin accumulation in the amoebas might explain the different antiamoebic activities of these two drugs. In addition, we observed that rokitamycin enhances the in vitro activity of amphotericin B against A. castellanii. Because this compound is sometimes used for the treatment of Acanthamoeba infections, these data suggest that the use of the combination of rokitamycin and amphotericin B might facilitate the inhibition and the elimination of these amoebas from host tissue.
Other investigators (34) have also reported that the 15-membered-ring macrolide azithromycin is effective against pathogenic Acanthamoeba in vitro. In that study, drug concentrations that were inhibitory for A. castellanii (at 30°C) were similar to those obtained in our experiments (at 37°C). In addition, azithromycin as well as rokitamycin exerted amoebistatic activities at their MICs. Furthermore, both of these macrolides were able to inhibit the cytopathic effect caused by Acanthamoeba trophozoites on different human target cells. On the whole, these results led to the in vitro screening of the activities of both macrolides, rokitamycin and azithromycin, against clinical Acanthamoeba isolates in order to further evaluate their possible use for the treatment of systemic infections.
Our study also demonstrates the in vitro effectiveness of chlorpromazine against A. castellanii. There is renewed interest in this phenothiazine compound, which was previously used as an antipsychotic agent (2), as an antibacterial, antifungal, and antiprotozoal drug (1, 5, 10, 17, 30, 38, 43).
Since 1984 it has been shown that phenothiazines have in vitro activities against the pathogenic free-living amoebas Naegleria fowleri, Acanthamoeba culbertsoni, and Acanthamoeba polyphaga (33). The mechanism of drug action is unclear. It may be due to the sensitivities of amoeba calcium regulatory proteins to the phenothiazine compounds, or it may be due to the lipophilic actions of the drugs on the amoeba plasma membrane.
Although accumulation of these compounds in the CNS makes them potentially useful chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of amoebic meningoencephalitis caused by N. fowleri and Acanthamoeba spp. in humans, their use was hampered by their toxicities. Our data show that the combination chlorpromazine and rokitamycin exhibited synergistic amoebistatic, amoebicidal, and cysticidal activities against A. castellanii. This is very interesting, because it suggests that the contemporaneous use of both of these chemotherapeutic agents might allow a chlorpromazine dosage reduction and, hence, a reduction of the side effects associated with the drug. Moreover, additional studies on the pharmacokinetics of rokitamycin are needed to clearly demonstrate if this compound can cross the blood-brain barrier and enter the CNS, since data on this are apparently not available in the literature. However, the contemporaneous use of rokitamycin and chlorpromazine could be suggested for the treatment of both Acanthamoeba keratitis and Acanthamoeba systemic infections.
We point out that the MICs presented in this work were obtained after a single drug exposure and that the protective effects of rokitamycin and chlorpromazine observed at lower doses can be extended to as long as 48 h by replacing the medium and adding fresh compounds (data not shown). Moreover, the same concentrations were also able to inhibit the cytopathic actions of A. castellanii trophozoites against human WKD cells for at least 5 days from the time of removal of chlorpromazine and rokitamycin from the culture medium. These findings indicate that the protective effects of these compounds in vitro are maintained for a rather long time.
Further in vitro and in vivo studies are in progress to analyze the susceptibilities of other pathogenic Acanthamoeba species to both of these drugs, alone and in combination, and the interaction of rokitamycin with other phenothiazine compounds not associated with severe side effects, such as thioridazine. Nevertheless, on the basis of all data reported here, rokitamycin and chlorpromazine appear to have great potential for the treatment of Acanthamoeba infections.
This work was supported by a grant (ex 60%) from the University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»