Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2004, p. 4532-4541, Vol. 48, No. 12
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4532-4541.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Institut für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie,1 Institut für Organische Chemie, Lehrstuhl für Organische Chemie I, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany2
Received 6 May 2004/ Returned for modification 22 July 2004/ Accepted 18 August 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. NAD utilization model and inhibitor substrates. (A) Present model of NR, NMN, and NAD utilization pathway in H. influenzae. See text for more explanations. In extension to other isolates of the family Pasteurellaceae, the nadV gene, which encodes a nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase, is indicated in the transparency mode, which allows H. influenzae to utilize Nam as well. OM and IM, outer and inner membranes, respectively; PRPP, phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate. (B) Structure of the inhibitors 3-AAD and 3-AmPR.
|
Recently, we have unraveled the NAD uptake pathway in H. influenzae and have identified membrane and periplasmic protein components such as porins, enzymes, and transporters necessary for NAD, NMN, and NR utilization The present model is depicted in Fig. 1A, in which OmpP2 represents a porin with specificity toward NMN and NAD; e(P4) is a lipoprotein encoded by the gene hel (12) that encodes a nucleotide phosphatase necessary to hydrolyze NMN to NR; NadN was described as a nucleotidase located in the periplasm that is needed to hydrolyze NAD to AMP and NMN and that with lower levels of activity is able to dephosphorylate NMN to NR; and finally, PnuC was identified as a permease acting in NR uptake (1, 15, 19, 33, 35). In other recent studies it was shown that nadR encodes an NR kinase and adenylytransferase and is able to resynthesize NAD from NR and NMN (20, 37). In the study described in this report, we have further characterized the transporter PnuC, the growth inhibition produced by 3-aminopyridine riboside (3-AmPR) derivatives (Fig. 1B), the routes of uptake of 3-AmPR derivatives, and the effects of 3-AmPR derivatives on the NAD resynthesis pathway.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Relevant strains and plasmids used in this study
|
Construction of an nadV+ H. influenzae strain. The intention to construct an nadV+ H. influenzae strain was to relieve H. influenzae from NR-dependent growth and to enable genetic manipulation of the NR uptake pathway (Fig. 1A). The H. ducreyi nadV gene was characterized before (27, 45). We obtained H. ducreyi strain ATCC 27722 from the American Type Culture Collection. DNA was prepared from this strain, and nadV was amplified by PCR with oligonucleotides nadV5'EcoRV and nadV3'EcoRV (Table 2). A 2,000-bp fragment was obtained and subcloned into plasmid pSEhel, which was opened by digestion with SwaI (33). The SwaI sequence is located 7 bp downstream of the stop codon of the hel gene. The ligation resulted in plasmid pSEnadV. We amplified a 3,950-bp DNA fragment by PCR with pSEnadV as the template and oligonucleotides hel5'PstI and hel3'EcoRV (Table 2). This DNA fragment contains the intact hel gene, followed by nadV and the remaining 700-bp sequence of the hel downstream region. Subsequently, this DNA fragment was transformed into H. influenzae strain AK01 (14), and transformants were plated onto BHI agar plates supplemented with hemin but with no source of NAD. Growing colonies were obtained, and nadV integration into the chromosome was verified by PCR and Southern blot analysis. This construction yielded a H. influenzae nadV+ strain which was able to grow independently of external NAD sources. The resulting AK01 nadV+ strain was named SE01 (Table 1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Oligonucleotides used for plasmid and strain constructions
|
pnuC) and SE03 (
pnuC) (Table 1).
Genetic determination of PnuC topology.
We performed protein fusion constructions of pnuC with phoA and lacZ genes. The locations of the insertions have been chosen according to a computerized transmembrane topology model of PnuC. To establish a topology model we used various programs: the TMPRED server, available at http://bioweb.pasteur.fr/seqanal/protein/; the PRED-TMR server, available at http://biophysics.biol.uoa.gr/cgi-bin/PRED-TMR/PRED-TMR; the DAS server, available at http://www.sbc.su.se/
miklos/DAS/maindas.html; the TMHMM server, available at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/ (38); and the SOSUI server, available at http://sosui.proteome.bio.tuat.ac.jp/welcomeE.html. We used plasmid pSWFII (kindly provided by M. Ehrmann) as a donor for the phoA gene. pSWFII was digested with EcoRV and SmaI to obtain a 1,430-bp phoA sequence with no encoding signal sequence. The lacZ gene was obtained from E. coli strain C600. The gene fragment was amplified by using the oligonucleotides 5'-lacZ and 3'-lacZ (Table 2); the amplified fragment includes the stop codon but not the ribosome binding site or the initiation start codon. Plasmid pSEpnuC (15) was used as a template for PCR amplification of the whole plasmid to introduce StuI restriction sites into pnuC, which were used to generate phoA (in which a blunt end was generated with the EcoRV and SmaI fragments) or lacZ fusions (in which a blunt end was generated with SmaI). The oligonucleotides used for the amplification of plasmids with flanking StuI restriction sites are listed in Table 2. After PCR amplification the products were religated and transformed into E. coli strain BL21 (Novagen/Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and plated onto LB agar with chloramphenicol (30 µg/ml). Single colonies were picked, and plasmid DNA was prepared as described above. Isolated pSEpnuC(StuI) plasmids were cut with StuI, dephosphorylated with shrimp alkaline phosphatase (Amersham Bioscience, Freiburg, Germany), and ligated with fragments of either the phoA or the lacZ gene added to the mixture. Each of these ligated fragments was then transformed into E. coli strain CC118 (26). Transformants were plated onto LB agar with chloramphenicol (30 µg/ml) supplemented either with the substrate 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal; 40 µg/ml) for the ß-galactosidase (LacZ) or with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate (XP; 40 µg/ml) for the alkaline phosphatase (PhoA). Colonies active in the presence of X-Gal and XP and also single white colonies were isolated and purified. Subsequently, plasmid DNA was prepared and analyzed for phoA or lacZ fragment insertion by restriction analysis. Finally, the junctions between phoA, lacZ, and pnuC were verified by DNA sequencing (data not shown).
Cloning of E. coli pnuC and expression in H. influenzae.
The pnuC gene of E. coli strain C600 (New England Biolabs, Inc., Frankfurt, Germany) was subcloned. Specific oligonucleotides were used to generate a DNA fragment encoding the pnuC gene. The oligonucleotide E.copnuC5' was used for the 5' end, and oligonucleotide E.copnuC3' was used for the 3' end (Table 2). The 827-bp pnuC DNA fragment generated was cut with restriction enzymes EcoRV and BamHI and ligated to plasmid pACYC184, which was opened by digestion with EcoRV and BamHI (34). Subsequently, the ligation mixture was transformed into E. coli strain LE392 (New England Biolabs) (23) and plated onto LB agar supplemented with chloramphenicol (30 µg/ml). Colonies were isolated, plasmid DNA was prepared, and PCR analysis was performed to identify the cloned E. coli pnuC fragment. Verification that the fragment had been inserted was done by restriction digestion (data not shown). Subsequently, pnuC-positive clones were transformed into H. influenzae strain SE02 (nadV+
pnuC) and H. influenzae strain REI1012 (
hel). REI1012 was previously constructed as a mutant from which the complete hel gene, which encodes the outer membrane lipoprotein e(P4), was deleted and in which a kanamycin resistance-conferring gene, kanR, replaced hel (19).
Construction of His-tagged PnuC and NadR expression systems. Plasmid pSEpnuC was used to construct N'- and C'-terminal His-tagged PnuC hybrid proteins, while chromosomal DNA of strain AK01 was used to construct the C'-terminal His-tagged NadR chromosomal DNA. For construction of the His-tag at the C' terminus, PCR amplification was undertaken with oligonucleotides pnuC5'CHis and pnuC3'CHis for pnuC and oligonucleotides nadRItopo5' and nadRItopo3' for nadR (Table 2). Purified pnuC- and nadR-encoding DNA fragments were cloned into the pCRT7-CT-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) according to the directions in the manufacturer's manual, thus creating pnuC and nadR fragments carrying the V5 epitope and a six-His tag at their C' termini. The ligation mixture was transformed into TOP10F' E. coli cells and plated onto LB agar with ampicillin (100 µg/ml), and Ampr colonies were selected. Plasmids pCRT7-TOPOpnuCHis6 and pMMNadR-His6 were obtained. Plasmids were prepared from isolated colonies; and the constructs were verified by restriction analysis, DNA sequencing, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and Western blot analysis with anti-His antiserum (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for poly-His domains by standard methods (21, 41) (data not shown).
For the construction of PnuC with a His tag at the N' terminus, PCR was performed with plasmid pSEpnuC and oligonucleotides PnuC5'pIVEXHis and PnuC3'pIVEXHis (Table 2). For subcloning of the poly-His sequence, the PCR fragment was ligated into plasmid pIVEX2.4b (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany), which was opened by digestion with XhoI and PstI. After ligation, transformation, and plating, Ampr colonies were purified and the plasmids yielded by the colonies were prepared. The plasmid obtained was pIVEXpnuCHis6. We verified the constructs by restriction analysis, PCR analysis, and DNA sequencing (data not shown). In addition, the transformed E. coli clones were tested by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis by standard methods (21, 41) by using anti-His antiserum (Qiagen) for poly-His domains.
To express the C'- and N'-terminal PnuC hybrid proteins in H. influenzae, each fusion protein construct was further subcloned into plasmid pACYC184. For subcloning of the fusion protein constructs, pCRT7-TOPOpnuCHis6 and pIVEXpnuCHis6 were used as the templates and oligonucleotides CT-Topo5' and CT-Topo3' and oligonucleotides pIVEX2.4b5' and pIVEX2.4b3', respectively (Table 2), were used. pACYC184 was digested with restriction enzymes EcoRI and ScaI; the respective PCR fragments were ligated; the samples were transformed into E. coli (LE392) and plated onto LB agar with tetracycline (12 µg/ml); Tetr colonies were isolated; and the plasmids were tested by PCR, restriction analysis, and DNA sequence analysis (data not shown). Finally, the resulting plasmids were termed pSEpnuC-His6 (C'- and N'-terminal constructs). Subsequently, the plasmids were transformed into H. influenzae SE02, and cell extracts were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting, which demonstrated that His-tagged PnuC hybrid proteins were produced (see Fig. 3).
![]() View larger version (50K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. PnuC localization in H. influenzae determined by Western blot analysis with PnuC proteins with His tags at the N' and C' termini. Lanes 1 and 2, controls consisting of cell extracts of SE02 (nadV+ pnuC)(pACYC184) supernatant (lane 1) and membrane pellet (lane 2); lanes 3 and 4, C'-terminal His-tagged PnuC constructs of the SE02(pSEpnuC-His6C) supernatant (lane 3) and membrane pellet (lane 4); lanes 5 and 6, N'-terminal His-tagged PnuC constructs of the SE02(pSEpnuC-His6N) supernatant (lane 5) and membrane pellet (lane 6). Numbers on the left are molecular sizes (in kilodaltons).
|
PhoA and LacZ activities.
To determine the enzyme activity of pnuC-phoA and pnuC-lacZ fusions, the alkaline phosphatase and ß-galactosidase assays were performed by the methods described earlier (24, 29). The activities were expressed in Miller units of absorption, expressed as
OD405/(OD600 1 x 1 milliliter x 1 minute).
Cell fractionation and cell extracts. H. influenzae SE02 was transformed with C'- and N'-terminal versions of pSEpnuC-His6 and control plasmid pACYC184. Transformants were then used to prepare cellular and membrane extracts. Strains were grown in 25 ml of BHI medium (see above) to an OD490 of 2. After centrifugation at 3,000 x g for 5 min, the pellets were resuspended in 100 µl of HEPES (50 mM; pH 7.5) containing protease inhibitor (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Cells were opened by shearing the cells with glass beads in a cell shredder (Bio 101, Savant Instruments Inc., New York, N.Y.). To remove whole cells, the lysates were centrifuged at 3,000 x g at 4°C for 5 min. The cell extracts were centrifuged in an ultracentrifuge (Optima TL; Beckman Coulter, Krefeld, Germany) at 300,000 x g for 20 min. The supernatants were stored overnight (ON) at 4°C, while the pellets were resuspended in 40 µl of HEPES (50 mM; pH 7.5) supplemented with Triton X-100 (2%) and agitated ON at 4°C. Subsequently, the samples were diluted 1:3 in HEPES (50 mM; pH 7.5) and incubated for 1 h at 37°C prior to SDS-PAGE analysis.
Nicotinamide nucleotide reagents and 3-aminopyridine derivatives.
[Carbonyl-14C]NAD was obtained from Amersham Bioscience, and [14C]NMN was prepared from [carbonyl-14C]NAD as described before (19). 3-Aminopyridine adenine dinucleotide phosphate (3-AADP) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany), and 3-AAD was synthesized as described before (8) and further processed to the 3-AmPR analog as described previously for the generation of NR from NAD (19). The reaction products were verified by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) (see below) and monitoring with UV light. 3-AAD was furthermore characterized by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with the inclusion of correlation spectroscopy (400 MHz; measured on a Bruker AMX-400 instrument with D2O as the solvent and HOD [
4.70] as the internal standard [data not shown]).
TLC analysis. Reaction samples were separated by TLC in a solvent system consisting of 1 M ammonium acetate (pH 5) and ethanol (40:60) (18) on Cellulose F plates (Merck). By using radioactively labeled samples, after separation, the plates were dried and exposed to radiation-sensitive film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, N.Y.). Spots were identified by comparison with reference samples of 14C-labeled NAD, NMN, NR, and Nam.
[Carbonyl-14C]NAD uptake studies. NAD uptake studies were performed with H. influenzae strains SE01, SE02(pSEpnuCE. coli) and REI1012(pSEpnuCE. coli). Uptake analysis was done as described before (19).
Determination of 3-AAD synthesis with purified NadR. Purified His-tagged NadR was used to demonstrate the synthesis of 3-AAD. The reaction mixture consisted of 3-AmPR (0.8 mM), ATP (5 mM), and MgCl2 (10 mM) in HEPES (100 mM; pH 7.5) to which His-tagged NadR protein (50 µg/ml) was added. The reaction was carried out at 37°C ON. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was inactivated by heating at 100°C for 5 min and centrifugation (16,000 x g, 5 min), and the supernatant was subjected to high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. HPLC was carried out on a Symmetry C18 column (4.6 by 250 mm; 5 µm; Waters) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min with isocratic elution with sodium dihydrogen phosphate (50 mM; pH 5.5) containing tetrabutylammonium bromide (8 mM) and methanol (8%); UV detection from 200 to 500 nm was carried out with a photodiode array detector, with monitoring at 254 nm. The reaction mixture was monitored for the presence of the 3-AmPR substrate and the 3-AAD product, whose identities were confirmed by analysis of the UV spectra of their peaks (data not shown).
3-AmPR and 3-AAD inhibition of NAD biosynthesis. An in vitro assay was established to investigate whether the presence of 3-AmPR or 3-AAD interferes with NAD synthesis by NadR. The reaction mixture consisted of [14C]NR or [14C]NMN (40 µM) and ATP (2 mM) with 3-AmPR or 3-AAD (0.5 and 1 mM, respectively), MgCl2 (10 mM), and His-tagged NadR (50 µg/ml). The reaction volume was 40 µl in HEPES-NaOH (100 mM; pH 7.5), and incubation was carried out for 40 min at 37°C. The reactions were stopped by incubation at 100°C for 10 min, and the denatured protein was removed by centrifugation. Subsequently, the supernatants (sample volume, 10 µl) were analyzed by TLC (see above).
Inhibitor analysis with 3-aminopyridine derivatives and isolation of resistant mutants.
Inhibitor analyses were performed as described before (11). H. influenzae strains AK01, SE01 (nadV+), SE02 (nadV+
pnuC), and SE03 (
pnuC) were used in the experiments. In brief, incubation was done with substrate (NADP)/inhibitor (3-AADP) ratios of 1:50 and 1:100. Cells were diluted so that the samples contained 105 CFU and were inoculated into BHI growth medium supplemented with hemin and with NADP and 3-AADP at various ratios. After 24 h, the cells were serially diluted onto BHI agar plates, and the numbers of viable cells were counted. In a second assay, growth analyses were performed with different H. influenzae NAD uptake mutants, Pasteurella multocida A3, and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Growth was monitored after 24 h of incubation on BHI medium supplemented with hemin and NR (15 µM) and a 1:100 fold excess of 3-AmPR, 3-AAD, or 3-AADP compared to the amount of NR.
A growth selection method was established to isolate mutants that were able to grow in the presence of 3-AmPR. Selection was performed on BHI agar plates supplemented with 3-AmPR (65 µM). Then, strain SE01 (nadV+) was plated and a few single growing colonies were observed. These were further isolated by growing them on BHI agar containing 3-AmPR. Subsequently, chromosomal DNA was generated from these isolates and used to amplify the nadR and pnuC gene fragments by PCR. The pnuC- and nadR-coding regions were then sequenced. Each clone was sequenced at least twice.
|
|
|---|
pnuC nadV+) and REI1012 (
hel) (19). With REI1012 (
hel), which is unable to utilize NMN (19), no uptake of NMN was observed (Fig. 2A), even if the cells were transformed with plasmid pSEpnuCE. coli. However, in SE02(pSEpnuCE. coli) NR uptake occurred at levels comparable to those in wild-type H. influenzae (Fig. 2B). This indicates that NR and not NMN serves as the substrate for PnuC derived from E. coli and most likely also serves as the substrate for the PnuC of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium. Therefore, NMN must be dephosphorylated to NR prior to uptake. Considering the distant relationship of the paralogous PnuC proteins of H. influenzae and E. coli, we claim that in general PnuC proteins most likely act as NR transporters. Early characterization of NMN uptake in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium via PnuC probably did not consider the phosphatase activities contained in the periplasm and prepared NR was never used as the substrate.
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. [14C]NR and [14C]NMN uptake by PnuC derived from E. coli and expressed in H. influenzae. (A) Percent accumulation of 14C-labeled material derived from [14C]NMN by strains REI1012 ( hel) pSEpnuCE. coli and SE01 (nadV+); (B) percent accumulation of 14C-labeled material derived from [14C]NR by strains SE02 (nadV+ pnuC) pSEpnuCE. coli and SE01. Experiments were performed at least in triplicate, and standard deviations are indicated. t/min, time (in minutes).
|
pnuC) mutant transformed with His-tagged PnuC-encoding plasmids took up [14C]NR at a level similar to that for wild-type H. influenzae (data not shown). Subsequently, in cell fractionation, SDS-PAGE, and Western blot analyses, the His-tagged PnuC proteins were found to be associated with the cytosolic membrane fraction (Fig. 3, lanes 4 and 6).
PnuC topology.
All integral membrane proteins have common basic architectural principles and cross the membrane in an alternating fashion, thereby exposing hydrophilic loops in the cytosolic and periplasmic compartments, while the hydrophobic
helices traverse the membrane (16). PnuC belongs to a class of abundant cytoplasmic integral membrane proteins that act as solute transporters. These proteins constitute ion gradient-linked, ATP-driven, or group translocation systems (16). The topologies of many transmembrane proteins have been genetically resolved by using phoA and lacZ protein fusions (22, 25, 26). We also chose this approach and generated numerous protein fusions between PnuC and both PhoA and LacZ (see Material and Methods). Only five to seven transmembrane helices were predicted on the basis of computerized transmembrane modeling in silico. We designed phoA and lacZ insertions to determine the secondary protein structures experimentally. The activities of alkaline phosphatase and ß-galactosidase fused to the appropriate reading frame of PnuC were significant enough to ascribe the cellular location of each fusion junction. The calculated PhoA activities (in Miller units) for fusion point amino acid (aa) positions were as follows: for aa D39, 240; for aa V94, 80; for aa A150, 60; and for aa E196, 70. These were about 30- to 240-fold higher than those determined for PhoA fused to the predicted cytosolic domains at the fusion junction: for aa E10, 2; for aa S63, 1; for aa Q179, 1; and for aa K220, 2. The value was 1 Miller unit for the negative control. The PhoA activities of the PhoA fusion proteins in the periplasm differed fourfold (between 240 and 60 Miller units). A possible explanation, as indicated before (28), could be that the activities and levels of expression of PhoA fusions tend to decrease with fusion protein length and that long fusion proteins will be more unstable than shorter ones.
LacZ protein hybrid constructs in the cytoplasmic domains of PnuC produced significant ß-galactosidase activities (in Miller units): for aa E10, 1,325; for aa S63, 200; for aa S118, 400; for aa Q179, 650; for aa K220, 450; and for the negative control, 2.5. No LacZ fusions could be generated with the periplasmic domains, as described for PhoA. For aa E10, aa S63, aa Q179, and aa K220 the LacZ activities that were determined and the lack of PhoA activities at the same insertion site confirm conclusively the expected locations of these domains. As a result, we can determine a topology model of the secondary protein structure when it is aligned to its transmembrane segments (Fig. 4). According to the resulting model, PnuC spans the membrane eight times, and both the N' and the C' termini are located on the cytosolic face.
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Model of H. influenzae PnuC secondary structure. The model is based on several transmembrane prediction programs and the activities of the PnuC-PhoA and PnuC-LacZ fusions generated. White circles, positions of PnuC-PhoA fusions with high levels of activity; gray circles, positions of PnuC-LacZ fusions with high levels of activity; gray diamonds, positions of PnuC-LacZ and PnuC-PhoA fusions with high levels of LacZ activity but low levels of PhoA activity; shaded boxes, conserved amino acids in PnuC homologs of Yersinia pestis, Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas syringae, S. enterica serovar Typhimurium, Shigella flexneri, Vibrio cholerae, and E. coli. Positively and negatively charged amino acids are superimposed onto the model.
|
3-AmPR and growth deficiency in H. influenzae.
As reported earlier, 3-AmPR derivatives inhibit H. influenzae growth (5, 11) but not Staphylococcus aureus or E. coli growth (11). Godek and Cynamon (11) showed that 3-AmPR inhibits growth if the molar ratio between NR and 3-AmPR is about 1:10. To resolve the route of entry, we adopted their assay using the compounds 3-AADP, 3-AAD, and 3-AmPR and investigated H. influenzae NAD uptake mutants, including hel, ompP2, nadN, pnuC, and nadV+ strains. We assessed the viable cell count after 24 h of incubation of strains AK01, SE01 (nadV+), SE02 (nadV+
pnuC), and SE03 (
pnuC) with commercially obtained 3-AADP (Fig. 5). We found that for wild-type strain AK01, the inhibitory action of 3-AADP was similar to that of 3-AAD observed by Godek and Cynamon (11). The inhibitory effect was also observed under anaerobic growth conditions (Fig. 5, bars 1a). For the other mutants (listed in Table 3) we monitored the growth in BHI supplemented with NR and aminopyridine derivatives 3-AADP, 3-AAD, and 3-AmPR.
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. 3-AADP growth inhibition study with different H. influenzae mutant strains. In the growth analysis (bars labeled 1b to 4) strains were grown under aerobic conditions (in BHI medium) in the presence of 3-AADP and NADP at molar ratios of 1:50 and 1:100. For the experiment, cells were diluted, inoculated at 105 CFU/ml (see arrow), and grown ON in the presence of 3-AADP. After 24 h the cells were plated and viable cells were counted (number of CFU per milliliter). Strain names and genotypes are provided at the bottom. Additionally, strain AK01 (lane 1a) was tested under anaerobic incubation conditions with a GasPak 150 incubator in a BBL GasPak generator with a catalyst (Baxter Diagnostics), but otherwise, the same procedure was applied to strain AK01 and the other strains tested.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Growth ability on aminopyridine derivatives
|
pnuC) (Fig. 5, bars 3) were sensitive to 3-AADP, whereas strain SE02 (nadV+
pnuC) (Fig. 5, bars 4) was resistant. These differences (Fig. 5) suggest that PnuC is an effective entry gate for the 3-AmPR substrate. The result obtained with strain SE03 suggests that if PnuC is missing, then a second NR uptake route (as yet undefined) (15) remains active and permits 3-AmPR to be taken up. However, with a 1:100 excess of 3-AADP in an nadV+ and
pnuC background, the second uptake route does not seem to be effective enough to compete with the function of NadV, which synthesizes NMN derived from Nam and therefore bypasses the inhibitor entry route.
The other strains tested, H. influenzae
ompP2::cat, REI1012 (
hel), REI1010 (nadN), and GK04 (
hel nadN), were resistant to the inhibitors 3-AADP and 3-AAD (NR-3-AADP and NR-3-AAD each at a ratio of 1:100) but were sensitive to 3-AmPR (NR-3-AmPR at a ratio of 1:100) (Table 3). For example, the ompP2 mutant had a decrease in the Vmax for the uptake of NAD and NMN but not for the uptake of NR (1). It seems plausible that the facilitated diffusion of 3-AADP and 3-AAD in an ompP2 mutant is also decreased and, therefore, that this mutant is resistant to 3-AADP and 3-AAD; however, the entry of 3-AmPR is not affected. nadN and hel mutants lacking NAD nucleotidase and nucleotide phosphatase activities in the periplasm (16), and therefore, 3-AAD(P) is not further hydrolyzed to 3-AmPR. Hence, nadN and hel mutants are resistant to 3-AAD(P) but sensitive to 3-AmpR (Table 3). To summarize, in the wild-type strain, 3-AAD(P) crosses the outer membrane via OmpP2 and becomes a substrate for NadN and e(P4). This leads to the product 3-AmPR, which can be transported further into the cell by PnuC, and a less active NR uptake pathway, which has not yet been identified (15). Therefore, these mutant analyses indicate that 3-AADP, 3-AAD, and 3-AmPR follow the same uptake pathway as NADP, NAD, and NR (1, 15, 19, 33).
To investigate the inhibitory effects of 3-AmPR derivatives on other members of the family Pasteurellaceae, we examined the growth of P. multocida A3 and A. actinomycetemcomitans (Table 3). However, after ON growth in BHI medium supplemented with NR and 3-AADP, 3-AAD, or 3-AmPR, each at a 1:100 ratio, we could not observe any growth inhibition, indicating that at least under these conditions 3-AmPR does not seem to act as an inhibitor. To investigate NAD utilization, [14C]NR uptake was measured in these bacterial strains. No differences in uptake compared with that of H. influenzae were found (data not shown). Therefore, we can indeed show that NR uptake is present in these organisms but that 3-AmPR is not an uptake inhibitor. What else could be responsible for such a phenotype? One possibility might be that the NadV homologs in A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. multocida possess higher levels of activity. It is relevant that the nadV that we cloned into H. influenzae (15) is derived from H. ducreyi and is more related to the nadV derived from Shewanella and Mycoplasma than to that derived from A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. multocida (27). A putatively more active form of NadV in these two bacterial species may lead to elevated internal concentrations of NMN derived from Nam, and cells would thereby be less sensitive to 3-AmPR. Other possibilities include different specificities of PnuC or NadR, which might have result in a lower affinity for 3-AmPR. Taken together, the results of these experiments indicate that 3-AmPR is effective against H. influenzae, but evaluation of its potential to target isolates of the family Pasteurellaceae would certainly require more investigations on the NAD utilization of bacterial species of this family.
Mutant analysis of 3-AmPR-resistant H. influenzae isolates.
To test the ability of H. influenzae to acquire 3-AmPR resistance mutations, a growth selection assay was performed to screen for survivors on 3-AmPR-supplemented growth medium. As a test strain we used SE01 (nadV+), which has the ability to utilize both NR and Nam but which is sensitive to the presence of AAD or 3-AmPR (Table 3). We used that strain because it allows us to obtain mutants for NR uptake and NMN resynthesis without interfering with essential growth functions, since NadV scavenges Nam and produces NMN in a PnuC- and an NadR-independent way. Among the mutants isolated, we focused on those mutations which could affect either transport (PnuC) or the biosynthesis of NAD (NadR). We identified mutations that mapped to the nadR gene (Table 4) but not to pnuC and a few mutants with no mutations in either allele, indicating other origins of 3-AmPR resistance. Recently, NadR was characterized in vitro and shown to exhibit a C'-terminal NR kinase and a N'-terminal adenylyltransferase domain (20, 37). The mutations that we found almost all clustered in the C'-terminal half of NadR, and we found some of them in the P loop or Walker B region (Table 4), according to protein structural and sequence identification (20, 37). These mutations could indicate that while growth is possible by utilizing Nam and converting it into NMN via NadV (27), the synthesis of 3-AAD is blocked most likely because phosphorylation of 3-AmPR via the mutated NR kinase domain of NadR is insufficient to produce the 3-AAD precursor, AMN. We do not know why we could not isolate pnuC mutants in this screen, even knowing that
pnuC confers 3-AmPR resistance (Fig. 5; Table 3). It might be that mutations in PnuC occur at a lower frequency and that a higher number of resistant mutants would be required to obtain those.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Mutant analysis of nadR conferring 3-AmPR resistance in H. influenzae
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. HPLC analysis of His-tagged NadR synthesis of 3-AAD in vitro. The 3-AAD reaction is shown as a control consisting of the reaction mixture described in Material and Methods without His-tagged NadR (A) and the same reaction with His-tagged NadR (0.05 mg/ml) (B). The appearance of 3-AAD and the disappearance of 3-AmPR were monitored. The peaks identified in the graph were verified by UV spectral analysis (data not shown). The x axis corresponds to the retention time (t), and the y axis corresponds to UV absorption at 254 nm.
|
Conclusions.
This study focused on the 3-AAD utilization pathway of H. influenzae in which the major NR permease, PnuC, is involved. We report a detailed topology analysis of PnuC, its membrane localization, and a functional comparison of H. influenzae PnuC with E. coli PnuC, in which we show that NR serves as the final substrate for PnuC-based uptake. Considering the distant relationship of the PnuC proteins of H. influenzae and E. coli, we claim that other annotated PnuC proteins represent NR-specific permeases. Following previous inhibitor studies (11) with 3-AmPR and H. influenzae, we demonstrated that 3-AAD is converted to 3-AmPR for uptake by the NAD to NR processing and utilization pathway. In in vitro studies, we show that resynthesis from 3-AmPR to 3-AAD can be achieved by NadR. For confirmation we identified various nadR mutants, selected for by growth in the presence of 3-AmPR in an nadV+ background. In addition, we showed that wild-type H. influenzae and a
pnuC mutant are sensitive to 3-AmPR. However, if nadV+ is present, then
pnuC mutants are resistant to 3-AmPR, indicating that the bulk entry of 3-AmPR occurs via PnuC. This phenotype could be explained by assuming that the amount of NMN produced via NadV is large enough to allow sufficient NAD synthesis for growth if less 3-AmPR can enter the cell, e.g., because of a
pnuC mutation. No inhibitory effect of 3-AmPR against other isolates of the family Pasteurellaceae could be found, e.g., P. multocida and A. actinomycetemcomitans. It could be that the inherited ability for Nam utilization might be much more efficient in these organisms than in the nadV+ H. influenzae strain constructed. Under these circumstances, elevated levels of production of NMN derived from Nam would compensate for the higher level of competitive 3-AmPR influx via PnuC. This may indicate that during evolution Nam utilization may have had preference over NAD utilization for these organisms. Further investigations are needed to characterize the molecular mechanism of NR and Nam utilization in Pasteurella and Actinobacillus spp.
This work was supported by "Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft" grant Re1561/1, Sonderforschungsbereich 630, and the "Fonds der Chemischen Industrie."
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»