Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2004, p. 4606-4610, Vol. 48, No. 12
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4606-4610.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Antimicrobial Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado
Received 5 January 2004/ Returned for modification 24 May 2004/ Accepted 28 July 2004
|
|
|---|
3 of the following drugs: ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, tobramycin, and imipenem) increased from 4% in 1993 to 14% in 2002. The lowest dual resistance rates were observed between aminoglycosides or fluoroquinolones with piperacillin-tazobactam while the highest were for those that included ß-lactams and ciprofloxacin. Ongoing surveillance studies are crucial in monitoring antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and selecting empirical treatment regimens. |
|
|---|
The selection of appropriate antimicrobial therapy requires active surveillance of emerging resistance trends and continuing education among the health care providers and institution(s) involved. The objectives of this study were to analyze data from the Intensive Care Unit Surveillance Study (ISS) to assess the rates of resistance and multidrug resistance among P. aeruginosa isolates in intensive care units (ICUs) in the United States from 1993 to 2002 and to use these data to evaluate current recommendations for empirical antibiotic regimens.
(These data were presented as a poster presentation at the 43rd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy on 17 September 2003.)
|
|
|---|
In this study, independent of the research sponsor, we evaluated the susceptibility of nonduplicate isolates of P. aeruginosa from 1993 to 2002. Nonduplicate isolates consisted of initial or unique isolates from an individual patient. A total of 17 antimicrobials were included in the standardized custom microdilution MIC panel. With respect to this study, only the susceptibilities to commonly recognized antipseudomonal agents were evaluated, including the aminoglycosides (amikacin, tobramycin, and gentamicin); antipseudomonal cephalosporins (ceftazidime and cefepime); extended-spectrum penicillins (piperacillin); ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ticarcillin-clavulanate and piperacillin-tazobactam); fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin); aztreonam; and imipenem. In 2001, gentamicin was replaced with levofloxacin in the standardized MIC panel. For purposes of study analysis, any antimicrobial displaying intermediate susceptibility according to the NCCLS guidelines was considered resistant.
P. aeruginosa isolates were considered to be multidrug resistant if the isolate was resistant to at least three of the following four drugs: imipenem, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, and tobramycin. These agents were selected as representatives of the primary antibiotic classes used to treat P. aeruginosa infections in addition to availability of MIC data for the entire ISS study duration from 1993 through 2002. This study also evaluated dual resistance rates among ß-lactam antibiotics and aminoglycosides or fluoroquinolones. Dual resistance was defined as resistance to both agents within a two-drug combination regimen.
Statistical analysis.
All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software, version 8 (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.). Data are presented as percentages unless otherwise stated. The variables analyzed included resistance rates of individual antipseudomonal agents as well as multidrug resistance and dual resistance rates among commonly used antipseudomonal combinations over the 10-year period. Comparisons utilized a chi-square test for an R x C contingency table with nine degrees of freedom. A P value of
0.05 was considered significant.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Individual P. aeruginosa isolates by patient location and culture site, 1993 to 2002
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. In vitro antimicrobial resistance rates for P. aeruginosa, 1993 to 2002a
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Number of antipseudomonal drugs (imipenem, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, and tobramycin) to which P. aeruginosa isolates were resistant, 1993 to 2002. Resistance to at least three of these drugs was considered multidrug resistance. *, indicates P value of <0.05 for the 10-year study period.
|
0.0002). Among ß-lactam antibiotics, aztreonam, cefepime, and imipenem combinations showed dual resistance rates that were higher with ciprofloxacin or aminoglycosides than with piperacillin-tazobactam. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Resistance of P. aeruginosa isolates to both agents in potential combination regimensa
|
|
|
|---|
Decreasing susceptibility to all antipseudomonal agents was observed with the greatest declines involving ciprofloxacin (85 to 68%), imipenem (85 to 77%), tobramycin (91 to 84%), aztreonam (74 to 68%), piperacillin (89 to 85%), amikacin (93 to 90%), and ceftazidime (85 to 81%). Other surveillance studies have also shown decreasing susceptibility of P. aeruginosa isolates, particularly with fluoroquinolones and ß-lactam antibiotics. When comparing P. aeruginosa isolates from 1994-1998 and 1999, the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System reported resistance increases of 49 and 20% with quinolones and imipenem, respectively (11). The SENTRY study reported a decline in aztreonam susceptibility from 67 to 62.3%, 88 to 80.9% for imipenem, and 79.8 to 75.4% for ciprofloxacin in the United States from 1997 to 1999 (3). Data from The Surveillance Network (TSN) from 1999 to 2002 indicated the greatest decline in susceptibilities against P. aeruginosa isolates in ICU patients occurred with ciprofloxacin (74.4 to 57.9%), ticarcillin-clavulanate (72.1 to 56.9%), and ceftazidime (83.2 to 65%) (2). In the present study, piperacillin-tazobactam represents the ß-lactam with the lowest rate of resistance, with 90% of isolates remaining susceptible in 2002. Higher susceptibility rates with piperacillin-tazobactam were also reported in the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) study and the TSN program when compared to other ß-lactam antimicrobials (2, 13). Another interesting finding is the lower susceptibility rate with cefepime than with ceftazidime. This trend has also been reported in the MYSTIC and TSN programs (2, 13).
Susceptibility to aminoglycosides decreased significantly over the 10-year period in the present study. In 2002, amikacin and tobramycin susceptibilities fell to 90 and 84%, respectively. Gentamicin susceptibility testing was discontinued in 2001, with the last reported rate of 68% in 2000. However, not all studies have demonstrated a decrease in aminoglycoside susceptibilities. While the TSN study reported a decline in gentamicin susceptibility from 73% in 1999 to 69.4% in 2002, the susceptibility to amikacin remained similar over the 4-year period with rates of 91 and 90% in 1999 and 2002, respectively (2). In the SENTRY study, amikacin susceptibilities were 95% in 1997 and 97% in 1999 while tobramycin susceptibilities were 91% in 1997 and 92% in 1999 (3). The MYSTIC study data for 2000 also reported higher aminoglycoside susceptibility rates than the present study with tobramycin and gentamicin susceptibilities at 92 and 82%, respectively (13).
In the present study, multidrug resistance increased from 4% in 1993 to 14% in 2002. Flamm et al. reported multidrug resistance (defined as resistance to
3 of the following agents: amikacin, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, imipenem, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, or tobramycin) to occur in 29.5% of isolates from ICU patients with ticarcillin-clavulanate, ciprofloxacin, and gentamicin being most commonly involved in multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa (2). These large surveillance studies indicate multidrug resistance has risen significantly and provide cause for concern. In addition, these studies further stress the need for ongoing surveillance from multiple databases to measure the true magnitude of antimicrobial resistance.
Increasing multidrug resistance in P. aeruginosa isolates complicates the selection of empirical therapy in critically ill patients and highlights the importance of reporting dual resistance rates to commonly used combination therapy to furnish clinicians with comprehensive information. In the present study, combinations which included piperacillin-tazobactam resulted in the lowest rates of dual resistance, with >90% of P. aeruginosa isolates being susceptible to at least one agent in 2002. In comparison, regimens which included aztreonam, cefepime, and imipenem resulted >80% susceptibility to at least one agent in the combination. The highest rates of dual resistance occurred with ciprofloxacin-containing regimens, especially when combined with cefepime or imipenem. Trends in high cumulative rates of dual resistance between ciprofloxacin and imipenem or ceftazidime were also reported for P. aeruginosa from the 1994 to 2000 ISS data (12). However, increasing dual resistance in tobramycin and ß-lactam antibiotic combinations is noteworthy in the present study.
Several limitations of this study need to be mentioned. Molecular typing was not required for this study; therefore, contribution of clonal outbreaks within an institution to increased resistance rates cannot be evaluated. However, the susceptibility data from numerous institutions across the United States limit any significant impact of outbreaks within one institution or region. Secondly, documentation of infection was not required for this study, and thus, it is difficult to assess whether the organisms were true pathogens or mere colonizers. Finally, due to the unavailability of antimicrobial usage data for each institution, correlation of antimicrobial use with rising resistance cannot be evaluated during the study period.
As multidrug resistance rates increase among nosocomial pathogens such as P. aeruginosa, appropriate surveillance programs may assist in empirical antibiotic selection and reduce the number of nosocomial infections. This was illustrated by the Study on the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control, which reported a 32% decrease in nosocomial infection rates after implementation of a surveillance program, compared to an 18% increase in other institutions over a 5-year period (4). Such programs facilitate early detection of outbreaks as well as resistance patterns and allow for institution or alteration of infection control policies, especially within individual institutions where rates may be higher than those stated in national surveillance reports.
In conclusion, susceptibility of antipseudomonal agents against ICU isolates decreased while multidrug resistance and dual resistance rates increased from 1993 to 2002. Significant reduction in susceptibilities of P. aeruginosa isolates may compromise the ability to choose efficacious empirical regimens for treatment of this formidable pathogen in critically ill patients. The present nationwide surveillance study provides valuable information related to emerging trends in resistance, and dual resistance rates as provided in the present study are vital to clinicians in the selection of reliable empirical therapy for P. aeruginosa infections in ICU patients.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»