This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Song, J.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Song, J.-H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2004, p. 4926-4928, Vol. 48, No. 12
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4926-4928.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Emergence in Asian Countries of Staphylococcus aureus with Reduced Susceptibility to Vancomycin

Jae-Hoon Song,1,2* Keiichi Hiramatsu,3 Ji Yoeun Suh,2 Kwan Soo Ko,2 Teruyo Ito,3 Maria Kapi,3 Sungmin Kiem,1 Yeon-Sook Kim,4 Won Sup Oh,1 Kyong Ran Peck,1 Nam Yong Lee,5 and and the Asian Network for Surveillance of Resistant Pathogens (ANSORP) Study Group{dagger}

Division of Infectious Diseases,1 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine,5 Asian-Pacific Research Foundation for Infectious Diseases (ARFID), Seoul,2 Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejon, South Korea,4 Department of Bacteriology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan3

Received 10 June 2004/ Returned for modification 12 August 2004/ Accepted 19 August 2004


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
To investigate the prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin among methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains in Asian countries, a total of 1,357 clinical isolates of MRSA collected from 12 Asian countries were screened by using brain heart infusion agar plates containing 4 mg of vancomycin per liter. The presence of strains that were heterointermediately resistant to vancomycin (hVISA) was confirmed by population analysis. Of 347 (25.6%) MRSA isolates that grew on the screening agar plates, 58 isolates (4.3%) were hVISA. hVISA strains were found in India, South Korea, Japan, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. However, neither vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus nor vancomycin-resistant S. aureus isolates were found among MRSA isolates from Asian countries in this survey.


arrow
TEXT
 
Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections is becoming increasingly more complicated due to the emergence of various types of antimicrobial resistance. As a consequence of selective pressure of glycopeptide use, the first strain of S. aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (MIC, 8 mg/liter) (strain Mu50) was reported from Japan in 1997 (10). Since then, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) isolates have been reported from the United States, Europe, and the Far East (12, 19). Moreover, three reports of isolates of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) (MIC, ≥32 mg/liter) in 2002 and 2004 from the United States have added more serious concern (4, 5, 6).

Although the incidence of VISA or VRSA remains low, there is an increasing number of reports from many countries of strains of S. aureus showing heterointermediate resistance to vancomycin (hVISA) (1, 8, 13, 16, 20) since the first report of the prototype strain (Mu3) by Hiramatsu et al. (11). Generally, hVISA strains are defined as strains of S. aureus that contain subpopulations of vancomycin-intermediate daughter cells but for which the MICs of vancomycin for the parent strain are only 1 to 4 mg/liter (9, 11). Although the clinical significance of hVISA is controversial, there have been reports that suggested vancomycin treatment failure associated with hVISA (2, 11, 15, 20).

In this study, a total of 1,357 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) clinical isolates were collected from 12 centers in 12 Asian countries that were part of the Asian Network for Surveillance of Resistant Pathogens during the period from January 1997 to March 2000. The number of MRSA isolates from each country ranged from 28 (the Philippines) to 457 (South Korea) (Table 1). Each strain was isolated from a specimen from a different patient.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Prevalence rates of hVISA among MRSA isolates from Asian countries by screening method and by population analysis

Isolates of S. aureus were confirmed as hVISA strains by a population analysis in which all isolates representing one or more colonies on brain heart infusion agar plates containing 4 mg of vancomycin per liter were tested within 48 h of specimen collection as described previously (11). A strain was considered to be an hVISA strain if it contained subpopulations of cells that grew on the 4-mg/liter vancomycin plate at a frequency of 10–6 or higher (11). Mu50 (VISA, Japan) and Mu3 (hVISA, Japan) strains were used as controls (10, 11). Population analyses were conducted at the Asian-Pacific Research Foundation for Infectious Diseases (ARFID), Seoul, South Korea, and at Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.

Of 1,357 MRSA isolates, 347 (25.6%) showed growth of cells on the screening plates (brain heart infusion agar plates containing 4 mg of vancomycin per liter). The rate of screen-positive strains was the highest for strains from South Korea (42%) and Japan (29.9%), while it was less than 10% for strains from Singapore, Sri Lanka, and Saudi Arabia (Table 1). hVISA strains from Asian countries showed features typical of the population analysis profile of the Mu3 strain (Fig. 1). All of these isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, with the MICs for them being ≤2 µg/ml. Of 347 screen-positive strains, 58 strains (4.3% of total MRSA strains) were finally confirmed as hVISA by population analysis (Table 1). Heterointermediate resistance to vancomycin was found among MRSA isolates from Japan (8.2%), India (6.3%), South Korea (6.1%), the Philippines (3.6%), Vietnam (2.4%), Singapore (2.3%), and Thailand (2.1%), but it was not found among strains from China, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, or Taiwan.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Population analysis profile of hVISA strains from Asian countries. Two hVISA strains, Korea 116 and India 93, contained subpopulations that grew in the presence of a vancomycin concentration of 4 mg/liter at frequencies of ≥10–6.

Given the high prevalence of MRSA strains and the popular use of glycopeptides in Asian countries (7), the emergence of VISA or VRSA strains in this region might be anticipated. The emergence of hVISA strains is another cause for concern with regard to the epidemiology of infections and implications for clinical practice. Since the first report of hVISA from Japan (11), hVISA strains have been found in many parts of the world (1, 13, 17, 20). Based on the published reports, the prevalence rate of hVISA varied widely from 0% (16) to 73.7% (1). Among South Korean isolates of MRSA, hVISA has been found with very low frequencies (0 to 0.5%) (18). However, our data showed that 6.1% of MRSA isolates were heterointermediately resistant to vancomycin. A previous report from Germany, which included 91 MRSA isolates from South Korea for screening for VISA, showed that 2.1% of South Korean MRSA isolates were hVISA (3). The frequency of hVISA strains may vary according to the characteristics of bacterial strains tested, specimen sources or types of infections (1), screening methods, media and test conditions (18), the local epidemiology or situation with regard to antibiotic selective pressure (14), and the unstable nature of the vancomycin resistance phenotype (9, 14). Our study confirmed the presence of hVISA strains in India, the Philippines, Singapore, and Vietnam for the first time. India showed a relatively high rate of hVISA strains (6.3%). However, the relationship between vancomycin usage and the prevalence of hetero-VRSA isolates in Asian countries could not be evaluated in this study, because data on vancomycin usage were not available.

The clinical significance of hVISA strains is still controversial. The presence of hVISA may be a significant indicator of the potential decline of the therapeutic effectiveness of vancomycin against MRSA infections (9). However, the clinical significance of hVISA is difficult to evaluate because there are very few cases and because conventional susceptibility tests in a microbiology laboratory cannot detect hVISA strains. Therefore, prospective controlled clinical studies to ascertain the clinical relevance of hVISA are hard to perform in clinical practice. At present, sporadic case reports show contradictory data on the clinical outcomes of hVISA infections. Some reports suggest that hVISA was not associated with the failure of vancomycin treatment (13), while other reports document the failure of vancomycin to treat hetero-VRSA infections, sometimes with fatal outcomes (1, 2, 11, 15, 20). Although there have been no data from controlled clinical studies which document the increased mortality from hVISA infections, clinicians should bear in mind that an inadequate response to vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA infections could be due to heteroresistance to vancomycin (9, 17). However, it is difficult to confirm the presence of heteroresistance in clinical practice because conventional microbiological methods, including MIC determination, cannot detect hVISA. Therefore, if hVISA infection is strongly suspected based on clinical features, population analysis has to be performed at a reference laboratory.

In summary, data from an international survey of VISA and hVISA strains among MRSA strains from Asian countries showed that hVISA strains were found in some Asian countries. Given the prevalence of hVISA strains (6.1, 8.2, and 6.3% in South Korea, Japan, and India, respectively) and the high prevalence of MRSA strains in the Asian region, continued regional surveillance of S. aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and clinical studies to evaluate the relevance of hVISA should be performed.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was partly supported by the SBRI (Samsung Biomedical Research Institute) (grant C-A4-216) and by the National Fund of the Ministry of Education, Tokyo, Japan.

Investigators with the Asian Network for Surveillance of Resistant Pathogens (ANSORP) Study Group that participated in this survey are as follows: Jae-Hoon Song (Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, coordinating center), Yonghong Yang (Beijing Children's Hospital, Beijing, China), Quan Lu (Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai, China), Thomas So and T. K. Ng (Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong), Anan Chongthaleong (Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand), Cheng-Hsun Chiu and Jien-Wei Liu (Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan), M. K. Lalitha (Christian Medical College, Vellore, India), Jennifer Perera (University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka), Ti Teow Yee (National University of Singapore, Singapore), Farida Jamal (Universiti Putra Malaysia), Adeeba Kamarulzaman and Navaratnam Parasakthi (University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), Pham Hung Van (University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam), and Celia Carlos (Research Institute of Tropical Medicine, Manila, the Philippines).


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Infectious Diseases, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Asian-Pacific Research Foundation for Infectious Diseases (ARFID), 50 Il-won dong, Kangnam-ku, Seoul 135-710, South Korea. Phone: 82-2-3410-0320. Fax: 82-2-3410-0328. E-mail: jhsong{at}smc.samsung.co.kr Back

{dagger} Contributing members of the ANSORP Study Group are listed in Acknowledgments. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Ariza, J., M. Pujol, C. Cabo, C. Peña, N. Fernándes, J. Liñares, J. Ayats, and F. Gudiol. 1999. Vancomycin in surgical infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcal aureus with heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin. Lancet 353:1587-1588.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. 2
  3. Bert, F., J. Clarissou, F. Durand, D. Delefosse, C. Chauvet, P. Lefebvre, N. Lambert, and C. Branger. 2003. Prevalence, molecular epidemiology, and clinical significance of heterogeneous glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in liver transplant recipients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5147-5152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. 3
  5. Bierbaum, G., K. Fuchs, W. Lenz, C. Szekat, and H. G. Sahl. 1999. Presence of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin in Germany. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18:691-696.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. 4
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2002. Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin—United States, 2002. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 51:565-567.[Medline]
  8. 5
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2002. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus—Pennsylvania, 2002. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 51:902.[Medline]
  10. 6
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2004. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus—New York, 2004. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 53:322-323.[Medline]
  12. 7
  13. Diekema, D. J., M. A. Pfaller, F. J. Schmitz, J. Smayevsky, J. Bell, R. N. Jones, M. Beach, and the SENTRY Participants Group. 2001. Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-1999. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2(Suppl. 2):S114-S132.[CrossRef]
  14. 8
  15. Ferraz, V., A. G. Duse, M. Kassel, A. D. Black, T. Ito, and K. Hiramatsu. 2000. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus occurs in South Africa. S. Afr. Med. J. 90:1113.
  16. 9
  17. Hiramatsu, K. 2001. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a new model of antibiotic resistance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 1:147-155.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. 10
  19. Hiramatsu, K., H. Hanaki, T. Ino, K. Yabuta, T. Oguri, and F. C. Tenover. 1997. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40:135-136.[Free Full Text]
  20. 11
  21. Hiramatsu, K., N. Aritaka, H. Hanaki, S. Kawasaki, Y. Hosoda, S. Hori, Y. Fukuchi, and I. Kobayashi. 1997. Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin. Lancet 350:1670-1673.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. 12
  23. Kim, M.-N., C. H. Pai, J. H. Woo, J. S. Ryu, and K. Hiramatsu. 2000. Vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in Korea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3879-3881.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. 13
  25. Kim, M.-N., S. H. Hwang, Y.-J. Pyo, H.-M. Mun, and C. H. Pai. 2002. Clonal spread of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin in a university hospital in Korea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1376-1380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. 14
  27. Liu, C., and H. F. Chambers. 2003. Staphylococcus aureus with heterogenous resistance to vancomycin: epidemiology, clinical significance, and critical assessment of diagnostic methods. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3040-3045.[Free Full Text]
  28. 15
  29. Moore, M. R., F. Perdreau-Remington, and H. F. Chambers. 2003. Vancomycin treatment failure associated with heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in a patient with endocarditis and in the rabbit model of endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1262-1266.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. 16
  31. Schmitz, F. J., A. Krey, R. Geisel, J. Verhoef, H. P. Heinz, A. C. Flui, and the SENTRY Participants Group. 1999. Susceptibility of 302 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 20 European university hospitals to vancomycin and alternative antistaphylococcal compounds. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18:528-530.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. 17
  33. Sierdzki, K., R. G. Roberts, S. W. Haber, and A. Tomasz. 1999. The development of vancomycin resistance in a patient with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 340:517-523.[Free Full Text]
  34. 18
  35. Walsh, T. R., A. Bolmström, A. Qwärnström, P. Ho, M. Wootton, R. A. Howe, A. P. MacGowan, and D. Diekema. 2001. Evaluation of current methods for detection of staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2439-2444.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. 19
  37. Walsh, T. R., and R. A. Howe. 2002. The prevalence and mechanisms of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56:657-675.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. 20
  39. Wang, S. S. Y., P. L. Ho, P. C. Y. Woo, and K. Y. Yuen. 1999. Bacteremia caused by staphylococci with inducible vancomycin heteroresistance. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29:760-767.[Medline]


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2004, p. 4926-4928, Vol. 48, No. 12
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4926-4928.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Sun, W., Chen, H., Liu, Y., Zhao, C., Nichols, W. W., Chen, M., Zhang, J., Ma, Y., Wang, H. (2009). Prevalence and Characterization of Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from 14 Cities in China. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 3642-3649 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Florescu, I., Beuran, M., Dimov, R., Razbadauskas, A., Bochan, M., Fichev, G., Dukart, G., Babinchak, T., Cooper, C. A., Ellis-Grosse, E. J., Dartois, N., Gandjini, H., on behalf of the 307 Study Group, (2008). Efficacy and safety of tigecycline compared with vancomycin or linezolid for treatment of serious infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or vancomycin-resistant enterococci: a Phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study. J Antimicrob Chemother 62: i17-i28 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kohno, S., Yamaguchi, K., Aikawa, N., Sumiyama, Y., Odagiri, S., Aoki, N., Niki, Y., Watanabe, S., Furue, M., Ito, T., Croos-Dabrera, R., Tack, K. J. (2007). Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Japan. J Antimicrob Chemother 60: 1361-1369 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Park, H. S., Yoon, Y. M., Jung, S. J., Kim, C. M., Kim, J. M., Kwak, J.-H. (2007). Antistaphylococcal activities of CG400549, a new bacterial enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (FabI) inhibitor. J Antimicrob Chemother 60: 568-574 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wang, G., Hindler, J. F., Ward, K. W., Bruckner, D. A. (2006). Increased Vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates from a University Hospital during a 5-Year Period. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 3883-3886 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ip, M., Yung, R. W. H., Ng, T. K., Luk, W. K., Tse, C., Hung, P., Enright, M., Lyon, D. J. (2005). Contemporary Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clones in Hong Kong. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 5069-5073 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ishizawa, K., Suzuki, T., Yamaya, M., Jia, Y. X., Kobayashi, S., Ida, S., Kubo, H., Sekizawa, K., Sasaki, H. (2005). Erythromycin increases bactericidal activity of surface liquid in human airway epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 289: L565-L573 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Song, J.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Song, J.-H.