Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 2004, p. 860-866, Vol. 48, No. 3
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.3.860-866.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departments of Medical Microbiology,1 Otolaryngology, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, 28040 Madrid, Spain2
Received 12 May 2003/ Returned for modification 4 October 2003/ Accepted 5 December 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of delayed administration of amoxicillin on the course of experimental AOM caused by either a penicillin-sensitive or a penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae strain.
|
|
|---|
Antibiotic Amoxicillin trihydrate (SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Worthing, England) was used in the in vitro studies.
For in vivo (therapeutic) use, amoxicillin in commercial vials (Clamoxyl; SmithKline Beecham S.A., Madrid, Spain) was reconstituted in apyrogen sterile distilled water to the desired concentrations.
In vitro studies MICs and MBCs of amoxicillin were determined by microdilution as previously described (18, 19). Modal values from three separate determinations were considered. In vitro susceptibilities were also determined for 52 strain B isolates collected from animals receiving treatment (5 and 20 mg of amoxicillin/kg of body weight administered 21, 24, and 27 h after bacterial inoculation) and for 4 isolates collected from untreated controls 48 h after bacterial inoculation. Retest was performed using the E-test method (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Animals Eight- to 9-week-old adult female Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) weighing 49 ± 5 g each were purchased from the Centre d'Élevage R. Janvier (Le Genest, St.-Isle, France) and managed as previously described (25). The study was performed in accordance with prevailing regulations regarding the care and use of laboratory animals in the European Community and approved by our ethical committee for animal experimentation.
Experimental otitis Overnight cultures of the organisms were kept in aliquots at -70°C. On the day of the experiment, a freshly thawed aliquot of S. pneumoniae was incubated for 4 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere in brain heart infusion broth (Oxoid, Unipath, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England) enriched with 5% horse serum (Biomerieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France). The number of viable bacteria was determined by colony counting. Animals were inoculated bilaterally with approximately 106 CFU of S. pneumoniae per 20 µl, which was introduced directly into the ME bullae. The tympanic membranes were left intact and swelled without rupture during the inoculation. A normal tympanic aspect and correct inoculation were verified with an operating microscope. AOM was defined as otorrhea through a perforation in the tympanic membrane and/or inflammatory signs accompanied by changes in the membrane's normal yellowish-pink appearance, that is, development of a gray, dark brownish-yellow, or whitish opaque area with a very rough surface texture. OME was defined as no inflammatory signs in the tympanic membrane with the presence of air fluid levels or ME fluid (MEF) with or without signs of negative ME pressure. Animals showing otoscopic signs of both AOM and OME were considered to have intermediate otitis media (IOM). Three animals (six ears) were inoculated with 20 µl of sterile culture medium/ear to examine the possible role of the broth as an inductor of otitis media.
Treatment regimens and efficacy studies Amoxicillin was administered subcutaneously (s.c.) in 500 µl as a single dose of 5 mg/kg and as repeated doses (three shots) of 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg. Different times of treatment initiation (postinoculation [p.i.]) were evaluated. For strain A, amoxicillin at 5 mg/kg was administered at 2, 5, 8, 18, or 21 h p.i. For strain B, three different administration schedules were used: (i) 2, 5, 8, 10, 18, or 21 h p.i. for the 5-mg/kg dose; (ii) 2, 5, and 8 h p.i. for the 5-mg/kg dose administered as three shots; and (iii) 21, 24, and 27 h p.i. for the 5-, 10-, and 20-mg/kg doses administered as three shots. Animals in the control groups received apyrogen sterile distilled water as a placebo. Groups of 6 to 10 animals per treatment and control groups were included. Efficacy was evaluated at 48 h p.i. for single and repeated doses. For strain B, additional experiments were carried out in parallel with two antibiotic doses (5 and 20 mg/kg; three shots). Treatment was initiated at 2 or 21 h p.i., and bacteriological evaluation took place 27 and 46 h after treatment initiation.
Treated and control animals were studied longitudinally for the presence of otorrhea, changes in weight, otoscopic aspects, and composition of ME samples. At different periods, otoscopic aspects were examined in both ears and ME samples were obtained from both ears by washing the ME fossae with 20 µl of saline solution injected and withdrawn with a 0.33-mm needle via the epitympanic membranes. Bacterial counts in ME washing fluid (MEWF) were then determined. Aliquots of serial 10-fold dilutions in saline were plated onto sheep's blood agar and incubated for 24 h at 35°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Bacterial counts are expressed as log10 numbers of CFU per 20 µl; the lowest detectable bacterial count was 4 CFU/20 µl (0.60 log10 CFU/20 µl). To evaluate the presence of polymorphonuclear leukocytes, 3 µl of MEWF was extended over a 6-cm2 slide surface for Gram staining and observed under a high-power (magnification, x1,000) microscope.
Pharmacokinetic studies
Amoxicillin concentrations in MEF without washing were determined in groups of 10 animals bilaterally inoculated with strain B under the same conditions as previously indicated in the experimental otitis model. One group received a single 5-mg/kg dose of amoxicillin administered s.c. 5 h after bacterial inoculation, and other groups received a single dose of the antibiotic (5 or 20 mg/kg) administered s.c. 21 h after bacterial inoculation. MEF samples were obtained with a 0.33-mm needle via the epitympanic membranes 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 min after antibiotic administration. Aliquots of MEF samples having
2 µl of exudate were pooled and frozen at -70°C until determination of antibiotic levels.
Antibiotic concentrations were determined, after filtration, by a microbiological assay using Micrococcus luteus ATCC 9341 (15). Standard curves for determination of antibiotic concentrations were derived from standard solutions prepared in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.0. Calibration standard responses were linear over the range of 0.063 to 4 µg/ml. The lower limit of quantitation was 0.063 µg/ml. Assay variability for individual samples was <10%.
Antibiotic concentration-time curves for each antibiotic dose were analyzed by a noncompartmental approach using the Win-Nonlin program (Pharsight, Mountainview, Calif.), and areas under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) were determined by the trapezoidal rule. The duration for which the drug concentration was above the MIC was calculated graphically from the semilogarithmic representation of the concentration-time curve and the regression line representing the apparent elimination rate constant.
Statistical analysis The number of ear samples with a positive count divided by the total number of ear samples was calculated to give the percentage of positive ear samples in each group of animals. To detect differences in eradication rates in each group, the Fisher exact test was used. Bacterial counts for untreated and treated animals are expressed as arithmetic mean log10 numbers of CFU per 20 µl of MEWF, culture-negative samples being included in the calculation of means by assuming a value at the detection limit. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the reduction in log10 numbers of CFU and loss of body weight at 48 h in each group, and our calculations controlled for basal log10 numbers of CFU, basal weights, and differences by groups. When the analysis of covariance P value was significant (P < 0.05), contrast between groups was made using the Tukey-Kramer test to adjust the type I experimentwise error.
|
|
|---|
Experimental otitis and therapeutic efficacy Animals inoculated with sterile culture medium showed neither clinical nor otoscopic signs of disease, and at 48 h the MEWF was culture negative.
Table 1 summarizes the bacteriological and clinical efficacies for strain A, evaluated at 48 h p.i., of amoxicillin administered in a single dose (5 mg/kg) at different intervals. After inoculation with 6.61 ± 0.43 log10 CFU (mean ± standard deviation [SD] of amounts for four experiments), bilateral AOM was obtained at 48 h p.i. in 95% of all ears from animals that did not receive the antibiotic. Most MEWF specimens contained between 6.7 and 8.6 polymorphonuclear cells per field, with intra- and extracellular organisms. Animals showed lethargy and significant weight loss, and 100% of ears showed otorrhea. The antibiotic reduced the number of culture-positive ear specimens as well as the number of organisms recovered compared to numbers for untreated controls (P < 0.001). However, the number of culture-negative ear specimens was much higher and the number of colonies was lower when the antibiotic was administered within the 8 h after bacterial challenge than when the drug was administered at 18 h and thereafter (P < 0.05). The amount of body weight lost was significantly smaller in animals treated between 2 and 8 h than in those treated later and in untreated controls (P < 0.001). Most (90%) ears from animals treated early (between 2 to 8 h) showed OME in the otoscopic examination, while the majority (85%) of those from animals receiving delayed treatment (18 and 21 h) showed AOM.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacteriological and clinical efficaciesa of amoxicillin administered in a single dose (5 mg/kg) at different intervals after inoculation of animals with S. pneumoniae strain A
|
18 h p.i. On the other hand, animals showing bacteriological eradication (those treated 2 and 5 h p.i.) had OME. There was not a clear pattern in animals showing moderate bacteriological success (those treated 8 and 10 h p.i.), which had different otoscopic appearances (AOM, OME, and IOM). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Bacteriological and clinical efficaciesa of amoxicillin administered in a single dose (5 mg/kg) at different intervals after inoculation of animals with S. pneumoniae strain B
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Evolution of results of otoscopic examination and analysis of culture-positive MEWF at different intervals after inoculation of animals with 6.09 ± 0.25 (mean ± SD) log10 CFU of S. pneumoniae strain B per eara
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Bacteriological and clinical efficaciesa of amoxicillin administered in three different doses (three shots) at 21, 24, and 27 h after inoculation of animals with S. pneumoniae strain B
|
Table 5 presents the results obtained in studies carried out in parallel with strain B to rule out the possible influence of the evaluation time point. In these studies, two antibiotic doses (5 and 20 mg/kg; three shots) were used, treatment was started at 2 or 21 h p.i., and bacteriological evaluations were made 27 and 46 h after treatment initiation. When antibiotic treatment (5 mg/kg) was started 2 h p.i., significant differences in bacteriological results (P < 0.001) between treated and untreated animals were found, regardless of whether evaluation took place 27 or 46 h after treatment initiation. When antibiotic treatment (5 or 20 mg/kg) was started 21 h p.i., no significant differences in numbers of culture-positive samples between treated and untreated animals were observed. A significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the colony counts versus those in untreated controls was observed in animals treated with 5 mg of amoxicillin/kg and evaluated at either 27 or 46 h after starting the treatment. However, after administration of 20 mg/kg, a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the colony counts was observed only when evaluation was performed 27 h after treatment initiation. No significant differences in either numbers of culture-positive samples or colony counts were found when the results obtained with the 5- and 20-mg/kg doses were compared.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Bacteriological efficacies, evaluated 27 and 46 h after initiation of treatment, of two amoxicillin doses administered 2 and 21 h after inoculation of animals with S. pneumoniae strain B
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 6. MEF pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data in relation to eradication of S. pneumoniae strain B after treatment of animals with a single dose of amoxicillin
|
|
|
|---|
The decrease in efficacy observed with the delayed administration of the antibiotic cannot be explained by selection of subpopulations for which MICs were higher since this possibility was discarded by testing the in vitro susceptibilities of the organisms recovered. Furthermore, such results cannot be explained by the bacterial burden present at the time of treatment initiation because the antibiotic efficacy was greater at 5 h than at 21 h, when the bacterial burden was significantly lower in untreated controls. As a single 5-mg/kg dose of amoxicillin failed when administered 21 h after bacterial inoculation, additional experiments (also with delayed administration) were carried out in which three shots were used and the antibiotic dose was increased to 10 and 20 mg/kg. The dosing intervals (every 3 h) were chosen based on the amoxicillin half-life in gerbil serum that is approximately one-third of that obtained in humans (4, 21). Although the administration of three shots of amoxicillin at 5 mg/kg did not significantly reduce the number of culture-positive samples or the effect of the infection on weight loss, colony counts in ME samples were significantly reduced compared to those in untreated animals and animals receiving the single dose. When the antibiotic was administered in three shots at higher doses (10 and 20 mg/kg), the clinical, otoscopic, and bacteriological results were not better than those obtained with the lower dose. These results indicate that antibiotic efficacy is lower when treatment is delayed, and the administration of higher doses does not improve efficacy. However, the administration of repeated doses of amoxicillin decreased the bacterial burden. These results are in agreement with those previously described for the peritonitis and muscle infection models (6, 8, 11, 16), but this model adds a new variable due to the clearing effect of otorrhea, a factor commonly associated with AOM. Furthermore, our work shows the relation among the in vitro antibiotic susceptibility of the pathogen, the time at which the drug is administered, and the in vivo efficacy.
The results of experiments done in order to evaluate the influence that different periods between treatment initiation and efficacy evaluation might have on outcome confirmed that the early administration of the antibiotic leads to better results than the delayed administration, regardless of the time of evaluation.
From the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic perspective, early antibiotic treatment resulted in amoxicillin concentrations in ME samples that were 2.4 times higher than those obtained with delayed administration, with 95 and 10% bacteriological eradication, respectively. With the dose increased to 20 mg/kg (with delayed treatment), the antibiotic concentration achieved in ME samples at 90 min was similar to that obtained with the early administration of the low dose but the efficacy of the treatment was not improved. On the other hand, the antibiotic half-life in the ME samples was longer with early administration than with delayed administration, which may be due to the presence of otorrhea at the time of delayed administration. Consequently, the t > MIC was greater with the low dose administered early than with the high dose administered late (4.5 versus 2.5 h, equivalent to 100 versus 83.3% of the dosing interval, respectively). However, the differences in half-lives, AUC/MIC ratios, and t > MIC between the two regimens (5 mg/kg administered early and 20 mg/kg administered late) do not explain the differences in efficacy (95 versus 11.5%) found between the regimens. Moreover, the high dose in the delayed-administration regimen achieved very favorable pharmacodynamic parameters, including the t > MIC (83.3% of the dosing interval), but in this case, they were not predictive of antibiotic efficacy.
The diminished efficacy of penicillin in experimental infections caused by penicillin-sensitive pneumococci after late administration of the antibiotic was reported by Eagle in 1949 (6), suggesting that the different metabolic statuses of the bacteria could explain such an effect. The activity of beta-lactams against different organisms in a stationary or logarithmic phase of growth is controversial (8, 11, 16), probably due to the very different methodologies used for its evaluation. Although the number of organisms in our experimental model remained relatively stable between 5 and 18 h, an active growth phase occurred between 2 and 5 h, with colony counts starting to decrease at 21 h. As suggested by Knudsen et al. (16), the stationary phase may reflect two different conditions: (i) a balanced rate of growth and death of bacteria, where the generation time is not affected (during the first hours), and (ii) slower growth due to a longer generation time (after the first hours). It is possible that organisms were in the logarithmic phase of growth during the first period (2 to 5 h) of our experimental model, in the early stationary phase of growth between 5 and 10 h, and in the stationary phase of growth afterwards. As the organisms approached the stationary phase, the efficacy of amoxicillin would be diminished. Another factor that may explain the results obtained in this study is the presence of bacterial biofilms, where generation time is increased. Recently, Ehrlich et al. (9) have shown, in a chinchilla experimental model of AOM, the early development of mucosal biofilms. In such biofilms, bacteria may be protected from both antibiotics and antibodies. There are also several reports showing that bacteria living in biofilms are in general less susceptible to antibiotics than free-living bacteria (20, 29).
What could be the clinical relevance of our results for human medicine? With few exceptions, most authorities recommend antibiotic treatment for AOM although bacteriological and clinical failures occur occasionally even when the organism involved is susceptible to the prescribed drug (22). However, most clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of antibiotic treatment of AOM do not stratify results according to the times at which clinical symptoms appeared and antibiotic treatment was initiated or according to the presence or absence of otorrhea in patients at the time that the first dose was administered. Such an approach could provide more information on the actual efficacy of antibiotics in the treatment of AOM as well as explain some failures. In order to attain the maximal drug efficacy and avoid resistance, it is recommended that antibiotics and doses be chosen based on results of local antimicrobial susceptibility studies, that the organism most probably involved be taken into account, and that the drug be administered for short time periods (5, 13, 14). As far as the delay of antibiotic treatment is concerned, it is not easy to extrapolate the results obtained in the animal model to human medicine, but our results suggest that if antibiotics are indicated in cases of AOM they should be administered very early, as recently proposed by Handley (14), especially in countries where the organism may have diminished susceptibility to the administered drug. This attitude should lead to the achievement of maximal efficacy and at the same time may prevent serious complications (28).
This work was supported by the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS 01/0120) and Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa (G03/103), Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. A.P. was aided by scholarships from the FIS (Madrid, Spain).
Participants from the Spanish Pneumococcal Infection Study Network (G03/103) were as follows: Ernesto Garcia (Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Madrid, Spain); Julio Casal, Asuncion Fenoll, and Adela G. de la Campa (Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain); Emilio Bouza (Hospital Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain); Fernando Baquero (Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain); Francisco Soriano and José Prieto (Fundación Jiménez Díaz and Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain); Roman Pallares (general coordinator) and Josefina Liñares (Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain); Javier Garau and Javier Martinez de la Casa (Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain); Cristina Latorre (Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain); Emilio Perez-Trallero (Hospital Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain); Juan Garcia de Lomas (Hospital Clinico, Valencia, Spain); and Ana Fleites (Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain).
Contributing participants in the Spanish Pneumococcal Infection Study Network are listed in Acknowledgments. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»