Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2004, p. 1112-1117, Vol. 48, No. 4
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.4.1112-1117.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, 1307 Copenhagen K,1 Institute of Food Safety and Nutrition, Danish Veterinary and Food Administration, 2860 Søborg, Denmark2
Received 19 August 2003/ Returned for modification 26 September 2003/ Accepted 21 December 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study a bacterial biosensor strain, incorporating a transcriptional fusion between a tetracycline-inducible promoter and the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene (11), was introduced into the gastrointestinal tract of tetracycline-treated rats, and samples were subsequently analyzed for GFP expression on the single-cell level by FCM. The results indicate a significant difference between the intake concentration of tetracycline and the bioavailable drug concentration in the intestinal microhabitats hosting bacterial growth.
|
|
|---|
Grouping of animals and dosing with tetracycline. Twelve female, germfree Sprague-Dawley rats, approximately 2 months old and bred at the Institute of Food Safety and Nutrition, were originally obtained from IFFA Credo, Domaine des Oncins, L'Arbresle, France. The housing, feed, temperature, and light conditions were as previously described (13). The germfree state of the animals was verified by testing fecal samples for aerobic and anaerobic growth of bacteria and yeast cells. The 12 rats were caged individually and placed in four groups with three animals in each group. Starting from day 6, each group received drinking water containing tetracycline (tetracycline hydrochloride; Sigma product no. T3383) in the following various concentrations: group A, 0.0 µg/ml; group B, 5 µg/ml; group C, 10 µg/ml; and group D, 50 µg/ml. Fresh drinking water was prepared every 2 or 3 days and kept in the dark at all times. The tetracycline concentration in the drinking water was tested and confirmed on three separate days during the experiment (days 11, 20, and 27) by using the E. coli MC4100/pTGFP2 biosensor strain (data not shown).
Colonization of the animals. An overnight culture of the E. coli MC4100/pTGFP2 strain was washed twice in autoclaved 0.9% (wt/vol) saline water containing peptone, and 1 ml (approximately 109 CFU) was given to each rat by oral gavage on day -1 and on the day before euthanasia. In addition, two different Enterococcus faecalis strains were introduced into all animals (approximately 109 CFU), the first (strain OG1RF) on day 0 and the second (strain OG1SS::Tn916) on day 7. Tn916 confers resistance to tetracycline in the host cell. The results obtained by using these strains were reported previously (2).
Sampling and enumeration of bacteria in samples. Fresh fecal samples were obtained directly from the rats every 2 to 3 days. After the animals were euthanized (six on day 40 and six on day 41), samples were immediately taken from the contents of the stomach, jejunum, ileum, cecum, and colon. All samples were initially diluted 10-fold (wt/vol) in saline water containing peptone, thoroughly homogenized, further diluted, and plated on appropriate selective agar plates for CFU counting.
Flow cytometry. The flow cytometer used for the analysis was a FACScalibur (Becton Dickinson ICS, San Jose, Calif.) equipped with an argon ion laser (488-nm wavelength) capable of GFP excitation, which allowed subsequent detection of the green fluorescent cells in the FL1 channel. The voltages were set at 350 V for side scatter and 600 V for detector FL1, and the E01 setting was used for forward scatter (10 times multiplication of the signal). A threshold of 170 was set on the FL1 detector in order to eliminate nonfluorescent cells. All data analysis was performed with Cellquest software (BD Biosciences). An elliptical gate was defined in a bivariate dot plot around the cells of bacterial size expressing some green fluorescence as determined by side scatter and the FL1 detector (Fig. 1). The mean fluorescence of each sample was defined as the mean of the fluorescence detected per single cell within the region bounded by the cell gate. The relative induction of GFP was estimated by dividing the mean fluorescence detected in each sample by the mean fluorescence detected in a sample without tetracycline, i.e., the background fluorescence.
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. FCM analysis of samples extracted on the day of euthanasia from the colon segments of animals receiving either 0.0 (a) or 50 (b) µg of tetracycline/ml of drinking water. Region R1 in the dot plots defines the population of GFP-expressing bacteria.
|
Bioavailable tetracycline in the gastrointestinal tract. Intestinal samples for FCM were prepared from 10-fold dilutions of intestinal contents from the colon and cecum on the day of euthanasia. The samples were vortexed and allowed to settle for approximately 30 min. The supernatant was then filtered through a sterile 30-µm-pore-size filter to remove large particles. The appropriate dilutions were analyzed by FCM as described above.
Bioavailable tetracycline in sterile feces. A setup was prepared to correlate the bioavailable tetracycline in rat feces with the actual concentration of tetracycline added to the sample. Tetracycline was added to 10-fold dilutions (wt/vol) of sterile feces to achieve eight different concentrations in three replicates (total volume in each dilution, 1 ml). Subsequently, 20 µl of a washed exponential-phase culture of MC4100/pTGFP2 (optical density at 600 nm, 0.5) was added to these samples. After overnight incubation at 37°C on a shaker (200 rpm), the samples were vortexed and allowed to settle for approximately 30 min. The supernatant was then filtered through a sterile 30-µm-pore-size filter, diluted 200-fold, and analyzed by FCM as described above, but with slightly different voltage and threshold settings.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (8K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. CFU of biosensor E. coli MC4100/pTGFP2 (closed squares) and E. coli MC4100 (open squares) in fecal samples from rats not receiving tetracycline in drinking water. Each point represents a geometric average of values obtained for three animals. Error bars designate standard errors of the means.
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. CFU of biosensor E. coli MC4100/pTGFP2 (closed squares) and E. coli MC4100 (open squares) in fecal samples from rats receiving either 0.0 (a), 5 (b), 10 (c), or 50 (d) µg of tetracycline/ml of drinking water. Samples were taken from five segments of the gastrointestinal tract immediately after euthanasia. Each point represents a geometric average of values obtained for three animals. Error bars designate standard errors of the means.
|
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Relative mean fluorescence values estimated by FCM analysis of biosensor E. coli MC4100/pTGFP2 cells exposed to various concentrations of tetracycline in LB broth (a) and estimated bioavailable tetracycline concentrations in sterile diluted fecal samples supplemented with various tetracycline concentrations (b). Each point represents an average of three values. Error bars designate standard errors of the means. The line in panel b represents a linear regression of the obtained values (R2 = 0.979).
|
Bioavailable tetracycline in sterile feces. By comparing the relative mean fluorescence values obtained for the sterile fecal samples with the standard curve (Fig. 4a), it was possible to estimate the bioavailable tetracycline concentrations in these samples (Fig. 4b). The bioavailable tetracycline concentrations were found to be proportional to the tetracycline concentration added to the sterile fecal samples and constituted approximately 11% of the added tetracycline concentration.
|
|
|---|
The day after the reinoculation of the biosensor strain E. coli MC4100/pTGFP2 into the E. coli MC4100-colonized animals, the CFU counts for samples obtained from five segments of the gastrointestinal tract showed an approximately constant ratio between the two E. coli types throughout the gastrointestinal system (Fig. 3). In samples from the cecum and colon segments, between 2 and 8% of the E. coli MC4100 population carried the pTGFP2 plasmid. These findings indicate the ability of the biosensor strain to coexist with an isogenic strain in the intestine.
Increasing concentrations of tetracycline in drinking water caused an increase in the mean fluorescence of the E. coli MC4100/pTGFP2 biosensor bacteria extracted from the cecum and colon segments of the gut. This finding showed that the concentration of tetracycline encountered by active biosensor bacteria in these segments was proportional to the concentration of tetracycline in the drinking water. Pilot experiments indicated that drinking water containing 1 µg of tetracycline/ml or less did not induce a significant biosensor response in the rats and consequently did not affect the intestinal microbial population (data not shown). This finding is in line with that of other investigations showing that the minimum selective concentration of tetracycline in drinking water is between 1 and 10 µg/ml (8, 15). However, it is still possible that tetracycline concentrations below 1 µg/ml could have a long-term effect on the microbial population.
In order to correlate the observed induction of the biosensor with the actual bioavailable concentration of tetracycline in the bacterial growth habitat, a number of issues must be addressed. It has been suggested (16) that there is a lateral movement of intestinal bacteria, produced by growth in the mucus layer, into the luminal contents followed by excretion in feces. In connection with this lateral movement, it is plausible that the biosensor bacteria encounter various tetracycline concentrations; however, this is only translated into a GFP response if the cells are active and if protein synthesis occurs. Two factors point towards low bacterial activity in the luminal contents: first, previous studies of E. coli bacteria have shown that the major bacterial growth compartment in the gut is within the mucus layer and that little growth takes place in the luminal contents (14, 16, 21). Second, in a parallel study, inhibitory bioavailable tetracycline concentrations were measured in extracts from the cecum and colon segments and in fecal samples from groups B, C, and D (2). The measured concentrations represented between 6 and 10% of the administered drug concentration in drinking water in the cecum and colon segments and between 13 and 34% in the fecal samples. These ranges are similar to those measured in other investigations of fecal samples from tetracycline-treated mice (8, 15) and cause inhibition of growth and of protein synthesis in the E. coli biosensor cells, especially in group D. Furthermore, the FCM data showed a well-defined biosensor population with respect to green fluorescence, indicating that the cells did not respond to a different concentration of tetracycline when shed to the luminal contents (Fig. 1). This finding suggests a fast transition from the growth habitat in the mucus layer to the luminal contents. We propose that (i) the biosensor bacteria respond to the relatively low concentration of bioavailable tetracycline within the mucus layer, which constitutes a partially tetracycline-protective environment, and (ii) the biosensor bacteria do not respond to higher concentrations when shed into the luminal contents, due to the lack of protein synthesis. Consequently, it was possible to estimate the actual bioavailable tetracycline concentrations in the fraction of the gastrointestinal tract which hosted the growth of the biosensor bacteria by comparing the relative mean fluorescence values obtained from the animal experiment with the standard curve (Fig. 4a). The bioavailable tetracycline concentration within the bacterial growth habitat of the intestine was proportional to the concentration of tetracycline in the drinking water and represented approximately 0.4% of the intake concentration of the drug (Fig. 5). This is significantly less than the proportion of bioavailable tetracycline in sterile diluted fecal samples supplemented with tetracycline (Fig. 4b) and explains the ability of the sensitive E. coli cells to proliferate in the intestinal environment, even when tetracycline concentrations in drinking water, as well as in luminal contents, far exceeded inhibitory concentrations. The rapid plasmid loss observed in the intestinal system (Fig. 2) could reduce the plasmid copy number in some biosensor bacteria and cause a slight underestimation of the tetracycline concentration due to lower gfp expression. However, the experience gained in our laboratories with the biosensor strain shows that gfp expression is not very sensitive to the plasmid copy number. This view is supported by a recent study of the effect of plasmid copy number on protein expression levels (20). Additionally, the well-defined population of biosensor bacteria exposed to tetracycline (Fig. 1) indicates a homogeneous expression of gfp in all E. coli MC4100/pTGFP2 cells. Simultaneous colonization studies of two isogenic E. faecalis OG1 strains, one of which was tetracycline resistant, were performed with the animals used in the present study and were reported previously (2). The results of that study showed that the two isogenic E. faecalis strains were able to coexist in the intestines of rats receiving up to 50 µg of tetracycline/ml of drinking water, which is well above the inhibitory concentration for the sensitive strain and suggests the existence of tetracycline-depleted microhabitats in the intestinal environment. These findings further indicate that the in situ bioavailable tetracycline concentrations were much lower than the intake concentration.
![]() View larger version (7K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Estimated bioavailable tetracycline concentrations, within the bacterial growth habitat of the intestine, in animals receiving various tetracycline concentrations in drinking water. Each point represents an average value for samples extracted from the cecum and colon segments of three animals (two animals for the concentration of 10 µg/ml). Error bars designate standard errors of the means. The line represents a linear regression of the obtained values (R2 = 0.999).
|
We thank Pia Kringelum, Karin Vestberg, and Mansour Badaki for technical assistance. We also thank Maja Danielsen and Sarah G. Nielsen for assistance with the animal experiments. Finally, we thank Carlsberg's bequest in memory of brewer J. C. Jacobsen for providing M.I.B. with a scholarship during this work.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»