Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2004, p. 1168-1174, Vol. 48, No. 4
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.4.1168-1174.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, and Department of Bacteriology, Institute for Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen,1 Center for Microbial Interactions, BioCentrum-DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark2
Received 25 June 2003/ Returned for modification 25 September 2003/ Accepted 30 December 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mucoid and nonmucoid phenotypes of P. aeruginosa showing differences in their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns are regularly isolated simultaneously from CF patients with chronic lung infections. Ribotyping of phenotypic variants from the same patients (paired isolates) often reveals that these isolates are isogenic, but the majority of the paired isolates show significant differences in their antibiotic resistance patterns (7). Such observations could indicate that the P. aeruginosa cells growing in biofilms encounter different conditions in various compartments of the biofilm, with the selection of subpopulations with different resistance patterns. The spatial distribution of chromosomal ß-lactamase gene expression in P. aeruginosa cells growing in biofilms has not been examined before. The aim of the present study was to study in vitro the responses of P. aeruginosa cells growing in biofilms to ß-lactam antibiotics and the dynamics of ß-lactamase expression.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Strains, plasmids, and primers used in this study
|
|
View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic drawing of the translational fusion PampC -gfp(ASV). The NotI fragment indicated was cloned into shuttle vector pNB100, a modified plasmid pUCP22Not. The first 12 codons of ampC were maintained and fused to the gfp(ASV) open reading frame. The 5' region of the PampC fragment included the whole intergenic region of ampC-ampR. The translational fusion of PampC -gfp(ASV) was followed by translational stop codons in all three reading frames, in addition to the two strong transcriptional terminators T0 (the transcriptional terminator from phage lambda) and T1 (the transcriptional terminator from the rrnB operon of E. coli (1).
|
Primer extension.
RNA was isolated from an exponential-phase culture of P. aeruginosa 19676A-3 according to the protocol of the manufacturer of the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). Reverse transcription was performed according to protocol 2 of the manufacturer of the DisplayThermo-RT kit (Display System Biotech, Copenhagen, Denmark). The protocol was slightly modified, as nonlabeled primers were used (Table 1) and 80% of the nonlabeled dATP was replaced by [
-32P]dATP (6,000 Ci/mmol; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Reverse transcription was performed at 75°C for 10 min, annealing was performed at 56°C for 40 min after addition of the DisplayThermo-RT Terminator mixture, and finally, the reaction was continued at 65°C for 15 min. Approximately 10 µg of total RNA was used for the reverse transcription reaction.
To determine the transcriptional start site of ampC, the sizes of the reverse transcriptional products were correlated to the DNA sequence upstream of ampC by Sanger sequencing using the same primers. Denaturing gel electrophoresis was done according to the protocol of the manufacturer of the DNA Sequencing kit (U.S. Biochemicals, Cleveland, Ohio).
Flow-cell biofilms. Biofilms were studied in flow cells at 30°C (5). The procedure for the setup has previously been described by Christensen et al. (5). The flow-cell dimensions were 0.3 by 4.0 by 40 mm, and minimal medium was supplied at a constant flow rate of 3 ml/h with a peristaltic pump (Watson-Marlow, Falmouth, England). The minimal medium consisted of 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM CaCl2, nonchelated trace elements (45), 2 g of (NH4)2SO4 per liter, 6 g of Na2HPO4 · 2H2O per liter, 3 g of KH2PO4 per liter, 3 g of NaCl per liter, and 0.01% glucose (0.55 mM). An exponentially growing culture was diluted to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.1, and inoculation of the flow cell was done with a syringe. The flow-cell channels were exposed to imipenem or ceftazidime at various concentrations. We used SYTO 62 stain (Molecular Probes) to visualize the biofilms. Image acquisition was performed with a scanning confocal laser microscope (model TCS4D; Leica Lasertechnik GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). Image scanning for detection of Gfp was done at 488 nm (argon laser), while SYTO 62 was detected at 568 nm (He Ne laser). The sensitivities of the photomultipliers and the laser intensity were adjusted and thereafter kept constant throughout the experiment.
Antibiotic stability. The chemical stability of imipenem was evaluated by measuring the concentration by a microbiological method previously described by Lautrop et al. (31) with Streptococcus sp. strain EB68 grown on Danish blood agar (State Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark).
Susceptibility testing. MICs were determined with the Etest system (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) according to the instructions of the manufacturer.
|
|
|---|
Antibiotic stability. As we induced the P. aeruginosa isolates growing in biofilms for at least 4 to 5 h, it was of interest to know the degree of degradation of imipenem during the experiment, as the medium containing the antibiotic was not stored on ice. The half-life of imipenem was approximately 30 h at 30°C. Thus, the concentration of imipenem after 5 h was expected to be approximately 0.45 µg/ml and that after 12.3 h was expected to be 0.38 µg/ml, compared to the initial concentration of 0.5 µg/ml. The half-life of ceftazidime was 2.26 days at 30°C. Thus, with an initial concentration of ceftazidime of 100 µg/ml, the concentration was expected to be approximately 95.0 µg/ml after 4 h.
Inducibility of the monitor system.
The translational fusion of PampC to gfp(ASV), established in PAO1, i.e., PAO1-J32, expressed Gfp at an appropriate level for our experiments. Due to the instability of the Gfp encoded by the gfp(ASV) variant, no detectable level of Gfp was expressed in the absence of an inducer, whereas the level of expression in the presence of adequate levels of an inducer was significant. Two different ß-lactam antibiotics, ceftazidime and imipenem, were used for induction in our experiments. With ceftazidime as the inducer, the monitor system showed significant expression of an exponentially growing culture of PAO1-J32 in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium when ceftazidime was used at 2.5 to 10 µg/ml. The monitor system did not reveal detectable levels of Gfp expression below the ceftazidime MIC (0.8 µg/ml). In the presence of even sub-MICs of imipenem in LB medium down to 0.05 µg/ml (imipenem MIC, 4.0 µg/ml), the monitor system expressed Gfp at ample levels that were clearly detectable after 1 h (Fig. 2). The bacteria on LB agar plates inoculated with PAO1-J32 and incubated at 37°C for 18 h showed clearly detectable levels of induction in the presence of
40 µg of ceftazidime/ml within 2 h after an Etest strip containing a ceftazidime gradient was placed on the agar plate. The lowest concentration of ceftazidime revealing a barely detectable Gfp signal was 2.5 µg/ml. When the bacteria were exposed to an Etest strip with imipenem, the monitor system clearly showed Gfp expression in the presence of concentrations
0.10 µg/ml. Imipenem and ceftazidime at concentrations
0.10 and 10.0 µg/ml, respectively, allowed detectable Gfp expression by P. aeruginosa PAO1-J32 cells growing in biofilms in the flow cells.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Expression of PampC-gfp(ASV) in planktonic cell cultures of P. aeruginosa exposed to imipenem. The relative fluorescence units in planktonic PAO1 cells growing in response to imipenem were measured after 1, 2, and 3 h. The cells were induced during exponential growth. A relative fluorescence unit of 0 corresponded to completely repressed Gfp expression. Fully induced single cells showed very distinct, visible Gfp expression. OD450nm, optical density at 450 nm.
|
PAO1-J32 cells growing in biofilms in the flow cells showed significant induction of Gfp expression in the presence of 0.5 µg of imipenem/ml, i.e., one-eighth the MIC (measured with planktonic cells). A decrease in the temperature markedly influenced the level of Gfp expression, and expression was undetectable at, for example, 24°C when the bacteria were exposed to the same concentrations of antibiotics.
As imipenem is known to be a very strong inducer, it was not surprising that imipenem induced the expression of ampC much more potently, even at sub-MICs, than ceftazidime (26, 39). Figure 3 shows a 6-day-old biofilm of PAO1-J32 after 4 h of induction with imipenem at 0.5 µg/ml (Fig. 3A), as well as a noninduced biofilm showing no Gfp expression (Fig. 3B). It was remarkable that the biofilm was not induced completely, as the basal parts and the centers of the microcolonies remained uninduced (Fig. 3). To examine whether no induction in the center or basal part of the biofilm could be due to a lack of physiological activity, PAO1-BAD was established as a biofilm, and on day 6 the biofilm was induced with 0.5% L-arabinose for 4 h. This experiment verified the physiological activity of the bacteria in the biofilm, as the level of expression of Gfp was pronounced throughout each microcolony (data not shown). As we increased the concentration of imipenem to 10 µg/ml or even higher, PAO1-J32 showed full induction in the entire biofilm, thus verifying that a sufficient level of activity was present in the centers of the microcolonies to respond to the concentration of imipenem used (Fig. 4).
![]() View larger version (64K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Epifluorescence and scanning confocal laser micrographs of PAO1-J32 biofilms on day 6 showing the activity of the ampC promoter in response to imipenem exposure (0.5 µg/ml for 4 h) (A) and the activity of the ampC promoter in a noninduced biofilm (B). Each micrograph consists of a horizontal section and two vertical sections through the biofilms collected at the positions indicated by the white triangles in the horizontal section. The position of the horizontal image is indicated by the crossing lines in the vertical sections. The biofilms were stained red with SYTO 62, demonstrating the presence of biomass in the flow cell. The expression of Gfp indicates the expression of the AmpC ß-lactamase in the biofilm.
|
![]() View larger version (74K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Epifluorescence and scanning confocal laser photomicrographs of PAO1-J32 biofilms on day 6 showing the activity of the ampC promoter in response to imipenem exposure (10 µg/ml for 4 h) (A) and the same biofilm stained red with SYTO 62 to demonstrate the total biomass of the biofilm (B). Each micrograph consists of a horizontal section and two vertical sections through the biofilms collected at the positions indicated by the white triangles in the horizontal section. The position of the horizontal image is indicated by the crossing lines in the vertical sections. The expression of Gfp indicates the expressions of the AmpC ß-lactamase in the biofilm.
|
![]() View larger version (141K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Epifluorescence and scanning confocal laser photomicrographs of PAO1-J32 biofilms on day 6 showing the activity of the ampC promoter in response to ceftazidime exposure (100 µg/ml for 4 h). The micrograph consists of a horizontal section and two vertical sections through the biofilms collected at the positions indicated by the white triangles in the horizontal section. The position of the horizontal image is indicated by the crossing lines in the vertical sections. The biofilms were stained red with SYTO 62, demonstrating the presence of biomass in the flow cell. The expression of Gfp indicates the expression of the AmpC ß-lactamase in the biofilm.
|
![]() View larger version (125K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Epifluorescence and scanning confocal laser photomicrographs showing a time series of images of a horizontal section of a 6-day-old PAO1-J32 biofilm during induction with imipenem. Imipenem was administered from time zero (0 h), and the image of one microcolony was scanned every 10 min for 14 h. The result was increasing levels of AmpC ß-lactamase expression in the first 5 h, as demonstrated by Gfp expression, followed by decreased levels of expression that faded out completely after 10 h.
|
|
|
|---|
The biofilm as a diffusion barrier for antibiotics (the first hypothesis) has been subject to extensive research (10, 14, 19, 41, 42). For positively charged antibiotics, such as aminoglycosides (e.g., tobramycin), the biofilm affects the ability of the antibiotic to reach the cells deep within the biofilm matrix, as the exopolysaccharides of the biofilm are negatively charged and are known to function as an ion-exchange resin capable of binding to a large number of antibiotics attempting to reach the cells embedded in the biofilm (2, 14, 43). For relatively uncharged agents, such as the ß-lactam antibiotics, such binding to the exopolysaccharide matrix is unlikely to occur (14, 33). Nichols et al. (33) predicted from mathematical models that the biofilm would not afford protection against diffusion of ß-lactam antibiotics into the bacteria embedded in the biofilm as long as the level of chromosomal expression of ß-lactamase is low. However, P. aeruginosa cells growing in biofilms can secrete ß-lactamase to the surrounding environment, with ß-lactamase thereby accumulating within the extracellular polymer matrix, or ß-lactamase may be released to the polymer matrix due to lysis of the cells in the biofilm (6, 14, 17). Accordingly, Nichols et al. (33) reported that P. aeruginosa cells growing in biofilms and expressing high levels of chromosomal ß-lactamase would be exposed to reduced concentrations of ß-lactam antibiotics in the biofilm.
To correlate the previous results to the present observations, there may be multiple explanations for the differential levels of ampC expression in PAO1-J32 cells growing in biofilms exposed to 0.5 µg of imipenem/ml. That concentration of imipenem was found to be close to the lower limit of the concentration that causes detectable levels of Gfp expression by our monitor system. Therefore, even relatively small reductions in the inducing concentrations of imipenem present in the biofilm may cause the monitor system to cease to detect detectable levels of Gfp. The detection level of our monitor system was affected by the short half-life of gfp(ASV). In Pseudomonas putida it was measured to be approximately 3 h, and in Escherichia coli it was measured to be approximately 2 h (1). Although PAO1 does not produce high levels of chromosomal ß-lactamase, the accumulation of ß-lactamase in the biofilm due to secretion or lysis of cells may trap and hydrolyze the ß-lactam antibiotics and retard their penetration into the biofilm, thereby causing the concentration in the centers of the microcolonies to be lower and at levels below the detection limit of our monitor system.
Alginate has not been shown to be a key constituent in the resistance of P. aeruginosa cells growing in biofilms to ß-lactam antibiotics (14, 33). However, the accumulation of ß-lactamase may be a major mechanism of resistance to ß-lactam antibiotics in P. aeruginosa cells growing in biofilms (43). Therefore, as we used nonmucoid strain PAO1-J32 for our experiments, we have highlighted the importance of ß-lactamase in biofilm resistance to ß-lactam antibiotics.
The resistance of biofilms may be affected by altered microenvironments in the different compartments of the biofilm, as mentioned in the second hypothesis above. We registered physiological activity in the whole biofilm by means of the arabinose-induced Gfp monitoring system. However, there may still be a reduced level of activity in the center and basal compartments of the biofilm, as such differences may not be registered by the arabinose-induced Gfp monitoring system. Reduced oxygen tension, reduced accessibility to nutrients, and the accumulation of waste products may reduce the growth rate of the bacteria within the biofilm (32, 43). A retarded growth rate affects the bactericidal actions of the ß-lactam antibiotics because transpeptidase inhibition, which induces cellular injury, is directly related to the growth rate (14, 43). We could therefore expect both ß-lactamase accumulation and the differences in the growth rates of P. aeruginosa cells growing in biofilms to affect the differential gene expression illustrated in this study. The experiments illustrating the dynamic expression of ß-lactamase over time could be due to the reduced levels of imipenem in the biofilm caused by the accumulation of the AmpC ß-lactamase, which hydrolyzes imipenem at the surface of the biofilm, although the reduced level of imipenem over time due to chemical instability may also have caused a reduced level of induction of the AmpC ß-lactamase.
The antibiotic pressure exerted in the microbial environment selects for antibiotic resistance (35, 36). The different antibiotic concentrations in the different compartments of the biofilm may result in different selective pressures on the bacteria (4). Differences in the growth rates of the bacteria in the different compartments of the biofilm, differences in stress levels (e.g., due to nutrient or oxygen depletion), and differences in the selective effects of antibiotics may promote bacterial diversity. In the lungs of CF patients, the selection process is also affected by host factors, such as the effects of the immune system. A complex and heterogeneous environmental landscape provides the basis for different selective pressures that allow organisms with differences in fitness due to newly acquired characteristics to survive and proliferate (4). Thus, the results presented here emphasize the differential effects of two widely used ß-lactam antibiotics on communities of P. aeruginosa cells growing in biofilms.
This work was supported by grants from H:S (Hovedstadens Sygehusfaellesskab, Copenhagen, Denmark), The Danish Medical Research Council, The Danish Technical Research Council, and The Villum Kann Rasmussen Foundation (Denmark).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»