Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2004, p. 1242-1248, Vol. 48, No. 4
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.4.1242-1248.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Functional Biology (Microbiology), Faculty of Medicine,1 Laboratory of Oral Microbiology, School of Stomatology, University of Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Spain2
Received 27 May 2003/ Returned for modification 9 December 2003/ Accepted 15 December 2003
|
|
|---|
30 mM) and by divalent cations (Ca2+ and Mg2+ at
4 mM). A slight cellular release of K+, cytosolic acidification, and a change in the membrane potential were observed in C. albicans cells treated with lactoferrin, suggesting that this protein directly or indirectly interacts with the cytoplasmic membrane. Mitochondrial inhibitors (carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone, 2,4-dinitrophenol, azide, and antimycin) as well as anaerobic conditions significantly reduced the killing effect of lactoferrin. These results suggest that low-strength conditions and the cellular metabolic state may modulate the candidacidal activity of human lactoferrin. |
|
|---|
Human lactoferrin (hLf) is a prominent host defense iron-binding glycoprotein (77 kDa) synthesized by polymorphonuclear neutrophils and acinar epithelial cells and is present at relatively high concentrations (0.2 to 2.2 mg/ml) in all mucosal bathing fluids (i.e., saliva), as well as in blood and milk, with the concentrations increasing significantly with various infections (21, 29). The antimicrobial mechanism of action of lactoferrin has not yet been totally elucidated. It is thought that lactoferrin exerts an antibacterial effect by limiting the availability of iron required for microbial growth (for a review, see reference 24) and/or by directly interacting with the bacterial surface (3), with subsequent damage to the outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria (12). It has also been hypothesized that the antimicrobial activity of this protein could be related to the interaction of the hLf amino acid sequences homologous to the antimicrobial hLf-derived peptides termed lactoferricin (residues 1 to 42) or kaliocin-1 (residues 153 to 183) with the bacterial membrane (5, 40). Although considerable attention has been focused on the antibacterial activity of lactoferrin (1, 13, 34), very little is known about its antifungal mechanism of action. Early reports demonstrated that hLf has an anti-Candida effect (2, 23). This effect was related to hLf adsorption to the C. albicans cell surface rather than iron deprivation (39), a suggestion recently supported in several reports demonstrating cell wall damage (31, 32, 42).
In this study we investigated the conditions optimal for the candidacidal activity of hLf in vitro, and some intracellular changes related to its killing effects are reported.
|
|
|---|
Yeast culture conditions. C. albicans ATCC 10231 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. C. albicans cells from glycerol stocks were cultured on SDA plates. For the experiments, yeast cells were grown at stationary phase and subcultured (1:400) in SDB to the mid-logarithmic growth phase in a shaker at 30°C. The cell number was determined by phase-contrast microscopy with a hemocytometer chamber, and in some experiments the number of CFU was determined by standard plate counting procedures. The cells remained in the yeast (blastoconidial) phase throughout the studies.
Antifungal activity assays. The anti-Candida effect of hLf was monitored by using C. albicans cell suspensions (105 cells/ml) in 5 mM potassium phosphate buffer (PPB; K2HPO4-KH2PO4 [pH 7.4]) incubated at 37°C. Killing assays under anaerobic conditions were performed as described previously (16, 27) in an anaerobic cabinet (model 1024; Forma Scientific Inc., Marietta, Ohio) or in the presence of the redox potential reducer L-cysteine (2.5 mM). The influences of K+ and Na+ at various concentrations on the killing effect of hLf were determined in PPB or sodium phosphate buffer (SPB; Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4 [pH 7.4]) at different molarities. The effects of divalent cations were determined in Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing different concentrations of CaCl2 and MgCl2 instead of PPB to avoid the possible precipitation of Ca2+ or Mg2+ by phosphate. The effect of the pH on the activity of hLf was tested in 5 mM PPB adjusted to different pHs (5.5 to 8.0) by varying the concentrations of K2HPO4 and KH2PO4. The effects of several respiratory inhibitors were evaluated by using C. albicans cells (105 cells/ml) that were incubated at 37°C for 2 h in 5 mM PPB (pH 7.4) with or without azide, CCCP, DNP, or antimycin A (16, 18) and then treated with hLf (5 µM) for 2 h. The cells used in the antimycin inhibition assays were cultured in the presence of 10 µM antimycin A (18). Aliquots from the mixtures were serially diluted, spread onto SDA plates, and incubated for 48 h at 30°C. The number of viable cells was determined by counting the colonies on the SDA plates. Cell viability was expressed as a percentage of the viability of the control, and the loss of viability was calculated as [1 - (CFU of hLf-treated cells/CFU of control cells)] x 100.
Spheroplast preparation and killing assays. Conversion of C. albicans cells to spheroplasts was carried out as described previously (10, 19). Cells growing in logarithmic phase were centrifuged at 1,500 x g for 10 min, and the pellet was washed in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA [pH 7.4]). Cell suspensions (106 cells/ml) were prepared in TE buffer containing 1 M sorbitol and were incubated with 30 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and Zymolyase 20T (150 U/g [wet weight]) at 30°C for 1 h to obtain spheroplasts. The spheroplasts were washed twice with 5 mM PPB (pH 7.4) containing 1 M sorbitol, and suspensions prepared in the same buffer were immediately used for the killing assays. To test for spheroplast formation, samples treated with 5% (wt/vol) sodium dodecyl sulfate were observed under a microscope. When required, spheroplasts were incubated for 30 min on ice with proteinase K (300 µg/ml), and proteolysis was stopped by adding phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (final concentration, 10 mM). After 3 min, the samples were washed twice as described above and used immediately.
For the killing assays, the spheroplast suspensions (105 cells/ml) were exposed to selected concentrations of hLf for 2 h at 37°C, and then aliquots were poured into regeneration SDA plates as described previously (20).
Measurement of cation concentrations. Determination of the extracellular K+ contents was performed as described previously (4), with slight modifications. For intracellular Na+ concentration determinations, the cells were loaded with Na+ after exposure (20 min) in Na+ loading buffer (10 mM morpholineethanesulfonic acid, 2% glucose, 0.1 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM KCl, 100 mM NaCl [pH 6.0]) (4). The cell suspensions were centrifuged (2,000 x g, 2 min) and then washed twice with ice-cold MgCl2 (20 mM) containing an isosmotic concentration of sorbitol. The cells (109 cells/ml) were rapidly resuspended in 5 mM PPB or 5 mM SPB (pH 7.4) for determination of the Na+ and K+ concentrations, respectively. Lactoferrin (5 µM) or nystatin (100 µg/ml) was added, and the mixture was incubated at 37°C. Samples (0.5 ml) were taken at intervals and centrifuged, and the supernatant was collected to determine the extracellular K+ content. For determination of the intracellular Na+ content, the pellet was treated with 0.5% (vol/vol) perchloric acid and heat (95°C for 1 h) and centrifuged to remove the cell debris. The supernatant was then analyzed for the intracellular Na+ content. The monovalent cation concentration was determined by flame photometry with samples of nontreated cells and hLf solutions without cells. The percentages of Na+ and K+ were calculated on the basis of the total cellular Na+ and K+ contents of untreated cells (which were considered 100%).
Measurement of intracellular pH. Flow cytometric analysis was performed with the pH indicator BCECF (43). Cell suspensions (5 x 106 cells/ml) in 5 mM PPB (pH 7.4) were incubated with BCECF-AM (final concentration, 15 µM) for 90 min. Subsequently, the cells were washed with the same buffer, and 105 cells/ml were incubated with 5 µM hLf for 2 h at 37°C. Amphotericin B (16 µg/ml) was used as a positive control (33). In parallel, the hLf-treated and untreated cells were analyzed with a fluorescence microscope (Leica DMR-XA; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
Measurement of 
in C. albicans cells.
The cytoplasmic transmembrane electrical potential (
) of C. albicans cells was measured as described previously (25). Cell suspensions (106 cells/ml) in 5 mM PPB (pH 7.4) were incubated with 5 µM hLf for 2 h at 37°C. The samples were reincubated for an additional 10 min with the membrane potential-sensitive fluorescent probe DiOC5(3) (final concentration, 0.5 µM) and immediately analyzed by cytofluorometry.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Killing effect of lactoferrin on C. albicans cells. (A) C. albicans cells were incubated with 1.25 µM (), 2.5 µM ( ), or 5 µM ( ) hLf in 5 mM PPB (pH 7.4). (B) Spheroplasts treated with proteinase K ( ), untreated spheroplasts ( ), and intact cells () of C. albicans were incubated with lactoferrin for 2 h. The results are the means ± standard deviations from duplicates of at least three independent assays.
|
Influences of external cation concentration, pH, and temperature on hLf killing activity.
As we had previously reported that monovalent cations (Na+, K+) adversely affect the bactericidal activity of lactoferrin in buffers with low ionic strengths (40), we tested the influence of monovalent cations (Na+, K+) and divalent cations (Ca2+, Mg2+) on the candidacidal activity of hLf. We found that the killing effect progressively decreased with increasing mono- and divalent cation concentrations in the buffer (Fig. 2). The killing activity was prevented at Na+ or K+ concentrations
30 mM (Fig. 2A) or Ca2+ or Mg2+ concentrations
4 mM (Fig. 2C). The inhibition observed with different molarities of PPB or SPB was independent of the different concentrations of phosphate anions present in each assay, because similar inhibition patterns were obtained in experiments performed with 10 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4) containing a similar range of NaCl or KCl concentrations (Fig. 2B). The inhibitory effects of Na+ and K+ were not reverted by addition of hLf (up to 30 µM) to cell suspensions prepared in 10 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4) that contained 50 mM NaCl or KCl (data not shown). The candidacidal activity of hLf (5 µM) was not significantly modified when the killing assays were performed in a solution in which 0.32 M sorbitol replaced 140 mM NaCl to maintain similar osmotic conditions (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Effects of extracellular cations on candidacidal effects of hLf. (A) C. albicans cells were suspended in SPB () or PPB ( ) (both at pH 7.4) adjusted to different molarities and then incubated with lactoferrin for 2 h. (B) The candidacidal effect of lactoferrin was also tested in 10 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4) containing either NaCl () or KCl ( ). (C) Killing activity of lactoferrin against C. albicans cells suspended in 10 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4) containing different concentrations of CaCl2 ( ) or MgCl2 ( ). The results are the means ± standard deviations from duplicates of three separate experiments.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Effects of pH and temperature on the candidacidal activity of lactoferrina
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of lactoferrin on intracellular cation contents. Extracellular potassium (A) and intracellular sodium (B) concentrations were determined by flame photometry of C. albicans cells treated with hLf () or nystatin ( ). Values (means ± standard deviations; n = 3) are given as percentages relative to the total cation contents determined after cell lysis.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effect of lactoferrin on intracellular pH of C. albicans cells. C. albicans cells preloaded with the pH-sensitive fluorescent dye BCECF-AM were exposed to hLf or amphotericin B (AmB) for 2 h, and then the intracellular BCECF-AM fluorescence intensities of treated and nontreated (control [C]) cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. GR-FL, green fluorescence. The micrographs show BCECF- loaded cells incubated in the presence (A) or the absence (B) of lactoferrin and examined by fluorescence microscopy. Bar, 5 µm.
|
Effect of hLf on transmembrane 
of C. albicans cells.
Analysis of the 
of the cytoplasmic membrane was performed with the fluorescent probe DiOC5(3). This probe is a charged lipophilic dye which partitions into the cytoplasm and is dependent on an intact 
for intracellular retention. The fluorescence intensity of DiOC5(3) decreased in yeast cells incubated with 5 µM hLf, indicating a depolarization of the cytoplasmic membranes of the C. albicans cells. Figure 5 shows the results of a representative experiment performed under candidacidal conditions in which cell suspensions in 5 mM PPB (pH 7.4) were exposed to hLf (5 µM) for 2 h. A similar result was obtained in control assays with cells treated with amphotericin B (Fig. 5), an antifungal agent that causes depolarization of C. albicans cell membranes (22).
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Effect of lactoferrin on C. albicans cytoplasmic membrane potential. C. albicans cells suspended in 5 mM PPB (pH 7.4) were treated with hLf or amphotericin B (AmB) or were not treated (control [C]) for 2 h. The fluorescent probe DiOC5(3) was then added to the incubation mixture, and the fluorescence distribution was analyzed by flow cytometry. GR-FL, green fluorescence.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Effects of cellular respiratory inhibitors on the candidacidal activity of lactoferrina
|
|
|
|---|
30 mM. Our data also show that CaCl2 or MgCl2 concentrations
4 mM inhibited the candidacidal effect of hLf. Previous work indicated that Ca2+ and Mg2+ inhibit the bactericidal effect of hLf due to the inability of hLf to bind to the cell surface (13). Even though the cause of the inhibitory effect on candidacidal activity was not investigated, it could be a consequence of different factors, such as the increase in the ionic strength or the formation of hLf tetramers in the presence of divalent cations (6). Furthermore, the inhibition did not appear to be related to an osmotic effect, because when the salt was replaced by an equimolar concentration of sorbitol, the killing effect of lactoferrin was not blocked. The candidacidal effect of lactoferrin was enhanced at acidic pH, probably due to the increase in the amount of negatively charged groups on the cell envelope, which facilitates electrostatic interactions between the cell surface and lactoferrin (pI = 8.7). Furthermore, the susceptibility of C. albicans cells was slightly modified by the temperature, with cell susceptibility to hLf decreasing at 4°C, in agreement with previous reports (37). The results presented above suggest that the candidacidal effect of hLf is concomitant with low ionic strength. We have also reported previously that the bactericidal effect of lactoferrin is dependent on the extracellular cation concentration (40). The differences in the ionic strengths of the test buffers could explain in part the discrepancies in the different candidacidal effects of hLf reported previously (26, 30, 42).
We assumed that the highly cationic protein hLf interacted with the C. albicans cytoplasmic membrane to exert its candidacidal effect, as has been described for many antimicrobial peptides. For instance, the antimicrobial mechanism of action of cationic peptides is believed to arise from the binding to the negatively charged plasma membrane, which results in the formation of transmembrane pore-like structures or structures resembling ion channels. In this case, the subsequent permeabilization of the membrane causes leakage of intracellular constituents, leading to cell death (for a review, see reference 15). Although previous studies have demonstrated that hLf causes alteration of C. albicans cell walls (31, 42), the interaction of this protein with the cytoplasmic membrane or intracellular organelles has not been reported. The cell wall destabilization caused by hLf could facilitate the translocation of the protein to the cytoplasmic membrane and then cause a small disruptive effect on the membrane. In this case, we could expect that the direct exposure of the membrane of cell wall-free spheroplasts would result in an increase in the antifungal effect of hLf. Nevertheless, the susceptibilities of the spheroplasts did not increase in the presence hLf concentrations
5 µM, thus indicating that the integrity of the C. albicans cytoplasmic membrane was not modified by lactoferrin. The increased resistance of spheroplasts to lactoferrin could be due to the absence of a cell wall compound required for hLf activity. It could also be due to modification of a membrane element (i.e., a protein) by other enzymes (i.e., proteases) present in the Zymolyase preparations (10), which would avoid the hypothetical interaction of hLf with a surface membrane element (i.e., protein), as previously suggested to explain the decreased activity of histatin 5 against spheroplasts (10). The last suggestion is supported by the significantly lower levels of susceptibility to hLf of spheroplasts treated with proteinase K than untreated spheroplasts.
The release of intracellular potassium was detected, even though lactoferrin was unable to disrupt the C. albicans cytoplasmic membrane (data not shown). However, the difference between the K+ release induced by lactoferrin (19% in 30 min) compared with that caused by nystatin (96% in 15 min) was significant. In contrast, Na+ efflux from cells previously loaded with sodium was not detected. This selective efflux differed from that reported for the majority of the antimicrobial cationic peptides (15). Interestingly, the low level of K+ efflux appears to be an early event related to the killing effect but is not the primary cause of cell death. This suggestion is based on the absence of a correlation between K+ efflux and the loss of viability of hLf-treated cells. For instance, the K+ release (approximately 19% of total intracellular K+) did not increase after 30 min of exposure to hLf; meanwhile, cell viability progressively decreased (approximately 85% until 2 h). How the selective K+ release is exactly generated is unknown at present, but the K+ release suggests that membrane components other than membrane phospholipids are involved. This could be a consequence of cell homeostatic mechanisms that compensate for intracellular ionic changes, as seems to be indicated by the decrease in the membrane 
and the intracellular acidification.
Cell susceptibility to certain candidacidal peptides is dependent on the metabolic state. For instance, histatin 5 targets mitochondria and induces the dissipation of the membrane potential, whereas human defensins HNP-1, HNP-2, and HNP-3 block the metabolic processes of C. albicans cells (16, 17, 28). The killing effects of these different human peptides are not observed under anaerobic conditions (16, 25, 27). In a similar way, the candidacidal effect of hLf was clearly higher against cells maintained under aerobic conditions than that against cells incubated under anaerobic conditions (85 and 19% loss of cell viability, respectively). Moreover, it was striking that the candidacidal activity of hLf against C. albicans cells preincubated with different respiration inhibitors or uncouplers (sodium azide, DNP, CCCP, and antimycin) was significantly decreased. The results presented above suggest that the in vitro candidacidal activity of hLf depends on mitochondrial energy as well.
Further studies exploring the intracellular events implicated in the candidacidal effect of lactoferrin are required; here we present evidence indicating that extracellular cation concentrations, as well as the metabolic state of C. albicans cells, modulate the in vitro candidacidal activity of hLf.
This work was supported by the University of Oviedo (CN-96-133-B1/Laboratory of Oral Microbiology).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»