Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2004, p. 1426-1429, Vol. 48, No. 4
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.4.1426-1429.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mae Sot, Tak 63110,1 Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand,2 Australian Centre for International Tropical Health and Nutrition, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia,3 Centre for Tropical Diseases, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom4
Received 22 August 2003/ Returned for modification 2 November 2003/ Accepted 27 December 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
A double-site enzyme-linked lactate dehydrogenase enzyme immunodetection (DELI) assay has recently been developed (2) for assessing in vitro drug susceptibility that relies on the detection of P. falciparum-specific lactate dehydrogenase. The DELI method offers some unique advantages over the present standard isotopic assay. Its sensitivity allows the measurement of drug response with very low parasite densities (as low as 0.005% in one study [4]). In addition, since it is a nonisotopic, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), equipment is simplified to the needs of running a straightforward ELISA.
To further evaluate the potential of the DELI microtest for the monitoring of in vitro drug susceptibilities of field isolates, we compared the DELI assay to the present standard isotopic microtest for the susceptibilities first of the K1 laboratory strain and then of 86 fresh clinical isolates to eight antimalarial drugs (chloroquine, quinine, mefloquine, lumefantrine, artesunate, dihydroartemisinin, atovaquone, and doxycycline).
Eighty-six fresh isolates for the assay comparison were obtained between March 2001 and June 2002 from patients with acute falciparum malaria attending the clinics of the Shoklo Malaria Research Unit.
For the isotopic microtest (7), the fresh isolates were adjusted to an optimum density of 0.5 to 1.0% parasitized erythrocytes and a hematocrit of 1.5% with freshly washed group O erythrocytes and complete RPMI medium with 10% heat-inactivated heterologous sera or commercial AB sera.
For the DELI microtest (2), the infected red blood cells were diluted in culture medium at the same hematocrit (1.5%) as that used for the isotopic microtest but at a parasitemia level of 0.2% and were distributed in the same manner in the appropriate antimalarial predosed plates. The plates were incubated at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2 and were frozen after 42 h.
Concentration-response data were analyzed by a nonlinear regression function to determine the 50% effective concentration (EC50), defined as the concentration of the drug which inhibited 50% of (i) the uptake of [3H]hypoxanthine into the nucleoprotein of the parasites (for the isotopic assay) or (ii) the production of lactate dehydrogenase as determined by optical density values from test wells compared to those obtained from drug-free control wells (for the DELI method).
The effect of parasite density on EC50s was assessed in three field isolates for chloroquine, quinine, mefloquine, and artesunate. There was a nonsignificant trend for lower EC50s with decreasing parasitemias (0.5 to 0.005% infected red blood cells) for each drug and which proved almost significant for chloroquine (r = 0.55, P = 0.053) and artesunate (r = 0.53, P = 0.064). Where the parasite density was known and high enough to necessitate dilution, optimal responses were consistently obtained when the parasitemia level was adjusted to 0.1 to 0.2% (approximately 4,000 to 8,000 parasites/µl of blood).
Table 1 shows a comparison of the EC50s for the K1 parasite clone determined by the DELI and isotopic assays. The DELI assay showed a greater variability than did the isotopic assay and a nonsignificant trend to overestimate in vitro responses to all drugs.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Comparative EC50s of eight drugs for the K1 parasite clone
|
20.05, 2 = 15.1, P < 0.001). For doxycycline, only 2 of 86 isolates (2%) were unable to be assessed by the DELI assay, compared to 29 of 86 isolates (25%) by the isotopic assay (
20.05, 2 = 20.5, P < 0.001). These differences suggest that the successful interpretation of dose response with these two drugs is influenced by the assay used, with the DELI assay proving the more reliable in the case of doxycycline. Overall, geometric mean EC50s were significantly higher by the DELI assay for chloroquine, lumefantrine, and atovaquone but lower for artesunate and dihydroartemisinin. No differences in mean EC50s were seen between the two assays for quinine, mefloquine, and doxycycline. Differences between the two methods became more apparent at higher EC50s, particularly for artesunate, where levels were underestimated by the DELI assay (Fig. 1) (n = 79, rs = -0.732, P < 0.001) and atovaquone, showing a tendency to overestimate responses (Fig. 2) (n = 64, rs = 0.793, P < 0.001). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Comparative EC50s of eight drugs for field isolates
|
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Differences between responses to artesunate in vitro plotted against their means with 95% limits of agreement.
|
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Differences between responses to atovaquone in vitro plotted against their means with 95% limits of agreement.
|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»