Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2004, p. 1885-1886, Vol. 48, No. 5
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1885-1886.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Pediatrics, Downstate Medical Center, State University of New York, Brooklyn, New York,1 Arpida, Ltd., Münchenstein, Switzerland2
Received 19 November 2003/ Returned for modification 24 December 2003/ Accepted 29 January 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Iclaprim (formerly AR-100), a novel DHFR inhibitor, has potent activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Escherichia coli (C. G. Gemmell and G. Middlemas, Abstr. 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-2022, 2002; C. E. Good, A. Windau, S. Bajaksouzian, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum, Abstr. 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-2023, 2002; R. L. Then, Abstr. 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-2021, 2002; M. R. Jacobs, A. Windau, S. Bajaksouzian, and P. C. Appelbaum, Abstr. 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-2026, 2002; A. Windau, S. Bajaksouzian, P. C. Appelbaum, and M. R. Jacobs, Abstr. 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-2025, 2002). There are no data on the activity of iclaprim against Chlamydia spp.; however, trimethoprim has previously been reported to have no significant activity against C. trachomatis in vitro (1). Therefore, we compared the activity of iclaprim, a new DHFR inhibitor, with the activities of azithromycin and levofloxacin against C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae.
We tested 10 strains of C. trachomatis, including four clinical endocervical isolates: N16/CX, N17/CX, N18/CX, N19/CX, and ATCC strains HUW-43/CX (VR-879), JUW-36/CX (VR-886), IUW-12/UR (VR-880), LGV 434 (VR-902B), FIC-CAL3/CX (VR-346), and E-BOUR (VR-384B). Isolates of C. pneumoniae tested included three reference isolates, TW183 (VR-2282), CM-1 (VR-1360), and AR39 (ATCC 53592), and seven clinical isolates from adults and children with pneumonia, W6805, T2023 (ATCC VR-1310), T2043 (ATCC VR-1355), BAL-15, BAL-16, BAY255, and BAY493.
Antimicrobial agents were supplied as powders and solubilized according to manufacturers' instructions. Iclaprim (Arpida, Basel, Switzerland), azithromycin (Pfizer, New York, N.Y.), and levofloxacin (Ortho Pharmaceuticals, Raritan, N.J.) were used. In addition, TMP (Roche, N.J.) was tested against two isolates of C. pneumoniae (TW183 and CM-1). Susceptibility testing of C. pneumoniae was performed in cell culture by using HEp-2 cells grown in 96-well microtiter plates as previously described (3). Each experiment was set up in duplicate plates. Each well was inoculated with 0.1 ml of the test organism diluted to yield 103 to 104 inclusion-forming units per ml, centrifuged at 1,700 x g for 1 h, and incubated at 35°C for 1 h. Wells were then aspirated and overlaid with 0.2 ml of medium containing 1 µg of cycloheximide per ml and serial twofold dilutions of the test drug. After incubation at 35°C for 72 h, the cultures in one plate were fixed and stained for inclusions with fluorescein-conjugated antibody to the lipopolysaccharide genus antigen (Pathfinder; Bio-Rad Labs, Hercules, Calif.). The MIC was the lowest antibiotic concentration at which no inclusions were seen. The minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) was determined by aspirating the antibiotic-containing medium of the second plate, washing wells twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and adding antibiotic-free medium. Cultures were frozen at 70°C, thawed, passed onto fresh new cells, incubated for 72 h, and then fixed and stained as described above. The MBC was the lowest antibiotic concentration that resulted in no inclusions after passage. All assays were performed in triplicate.
The MICs and MBCs for C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The MICs and MBCs at which 90% of isolates were inhibited (MIC90s and MBC90s) of iclaprim for C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae were 0.5 µg/ml. The MIC90s and MBC90s of azithromycin and levofloxacin for C. trachomatis were 0.125 and 1 µg/ml, respectively. The MIC90s and MBC90s of azithromycin and levofloxacin for C. pneumoniae were 0.125 and 0.5 µg/ml, respectively. The MICs and MBCs of iclaprim for C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae indicate that its activity is comparable to those of both azithromycin and levofloxacin. By contrast to the activity of iclaprim, trimethoprim was inactive. The MICs and MBCs of trimethoprim for C. pneumoniae TW183 and CM-1 were
128 µg/ml.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Activity of iclaprim and other antibiotics against 10 strains of C. trachomatis
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Activity of iclaprim and other antibiotics against 10 isolates of C. pneumoniae
|
128 µg/ml (2). Whereas most bacteria are unable to utilize exogenous folate, Fan et al. demonstrated that C. trachomatis L2, C. psittaci 6BC, and C. psittaci strain francis appeared to both synthesize and to transport folate from the host cell in various degrees, depending on the strain (1). The relevance of this folate transport mechanism for in vitro or in vivo susceptibilities to trimethoprim and sulfonamides is not clear. Sulfonamides block the bacterial folic acid metabolism at a different site and have been used in a fixed combination with trimethoprim for synergistic effect. Iclaprim was synergistic when tested in combination with sulfonamides against a wide range of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (S. Hawser, L. Weiss, M. Fischer, D. Gillessen, I. Kompis, and K. Islam, Abstr. 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-2019, 2002). Although C. trachomatis is susceptible to sulfonamides, C. pneumoniae is not (1). Earlier studies of the synergy of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole against C. trachomatis found the combined activity to be only additive, with most of the activity being due to the sulfonamide, but it may be useful to perform synergy studies with iclaprim and sulfonamides to look for similar effects on C. trachomatis (2). However, based on its in vitro activity in this study, using iclaprim as a single drug for the treatment of chlamydial infections could be adequate. These data suggest that new DHFR inhibitors may have a potential role in the treatment of respiratory infections due to C. pneumoniae as well as genital infections caused by C. trachomatis. Studies to evaluate efficacy in patients using culture-based diagnostic methods are indicated.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»