AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Odabasi, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Odabasi, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2004, p. 1912-1915, Vol. 48, No. 5
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1912-1915.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Activity of Anidulafungin against Selected Clinically Important Mold Isolates

Zekaver Odabasi, Victor L. Paetznick, Jose R. Rodriguez, Enuo Chen, and Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner*

Laboratory of Mycology Research, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Texas—Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030

Received 5 November 2003/ Returned for modification 29 November 2003/ Accepted 21 January 2004


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Text
 References
 
In this study, we evaluated the in vitro activity of anidulafungin against selected mold isolates. Anidulafungin showed promising activity against Bipolaris spicifera, Exophiala jeanselmei, Fonsecaea pedrosoi, Madurella mycetomatis, Penicillium marneffei, Phialophora verrucosa, Pseudallescheria boydii, Sporothrix schenckii, and Wangiella dermatitidis.


   TEXT
Top
 Abstract
 Text
References
 
The incidence of invasive fungal infections has increased in the past two decades. Candida species and Aspergillus species are the most common etiologic agents causing invasive fungal infections. Although rare overall, Fusarium species are the second most common mold isolate after Aspergillus species (14, 15). Some other less common filamentous fungi, like Penicillium, Bipolaris, Pseudallescheria, and Scedosporium species, have also been emerging as causative agents of opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients (7, 14, 24, 26, 31).

Amphotericin B has been historically accepted as the "gold standard" for the treatment of most fungal infections, although it is known to have poor outcomes in immunocompromised patients with severe mold infections (13). Alternative therapeutic agents, like new azoles and echinocandins, are under clinical evaluation (18). The relatively recent approvals of caspofungin for aspergillosis and voriconazole for aspergillosis, fusariosis, and scedosporidiasis have revolutionized the field of antifungal therapy (2, 4, 5, 8-11, 19, 29, 30).

Anidulafungin is an echinocandin with excellent in vivo and in vitro activities against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. (17, 20-23, 27, 28). The in vitro activity of anidulafungin against less common but clinically emerging filamentous fungi has been evaluated in a limited number of studies (6, 22, 25). We sought to evaluate its in vitro activity against selected mold isolates in comparison with the activities of voriconazole and amphotericin B.

A collection of 74 clinical mold isolates (Table 1) were tested. Isolates were obtained from the Department of Pathology, University of Texas, Medical Branch, Galveston. All isolates were stored at –80°C, and each isolate was subcultured on potato dextrose agar slants (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, Md.) at least twice to ensure purity and viability. The quality control strains were Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and Candida krusei ATCC 6258.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Susceptibilities of 74 selected clinical mold isolates to anidulafungin, voriconazole, and amphotericin B

 
Anidulafungin (Vicuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., King of Prussia, Pa.), voriconazole (Pfizer Pharmaceutical Group, New York, N.Y.), and amphotericin B (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Conn.) were dissolved in 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (Fisher Chemicals, Fair Lawn, N.J.) and then were further diluted (1:50) in 2x RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, Mo.) buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 M morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer according to the recommendations of National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) approved standard M38-A (16) to yield two times the final strength required for the test. Amphotericin B was diluted 1:50 with 2x antibiotic medium 3 (AM3; BBL, Cockeysville, Md.) buffered with 0.1 M sodium phosphate to pH 7. Final drug concentrations were 0.03 to 16 µg/ml for all drugs. Serial dilutions of each drug were dispensed to microdilution plates and stored at –80°C until use.

In vitro testing was carried out following the NCCLS M38-A method. Briefly, each isolate was grown on potato dextrose agar slants at 35°C for a period of 7 days. The stock suspensions were prepared by covering the mature fungal colonies with 1 ml of sterile 0.85% saline and scraping gently. The turbidity of conidial spore suspensions was measured at 530 nm and adjusted to 80 to 82% transmittance, except for Pseudallescheria boydii and Rhizopus arrhizus, which were adjusted to 68 to 70% transmittance. The adjusted suspensions were diluted in distilled water 1:50 (except P. boydii, diluted 1:25) to obtain a final (2x) inoculum of 0.4 x 104 CFU/ml. Microtiter trays were thawed, and 100 µl of fungal suspensions was added to each well. Microdilution plates were incubated at 35°C, and MICs were read visually at the optically clear (MIC with 100% inhibition of growth [MIC-0]) and prominent growth inhibition (MIC at which 50% of the isolates tested are inhibited [MIC-2]) endpoints after incubation for 48 and 72 h, or longer if necessary.

All isolates produced enough visible growth after 48 to 72 h, except for Madurella mycetomatis, which produced visible growth at about 120 h. Zygomycetes grew rapidly within 24 h. MIC-2 ranges and median MICs of anidulafungin and MIC ranges and median MICs of voriconazole and amphotericin B at 48 and 72 h are summarized in Table 1. For the zygomycetes, as recommended in NCCLS standard M38-A, 24- to 48-h MICs are presented because of their rapid growth. For the other isolates, when comparing 48- and 72-h MIC-2s, most of the values were similar or had a 1-dilution increase at 72 h.

Anidulafungin demonstrated potent to moderate activity against Bipolaris spicifera (MIC-2 range, 1 to 8 µg/ml), Exophiala jeanselmei (0.125 to 2 µg/ml), Fonsecaea pedrosoi (0.5 to 4 µg/ml), Madurella mycetomatis (1 µg/ml), Paecilomyces spp. (0.03 to >16 µg/ml), Penicillium marneffei (2 µg/ml), Phialophora verrucosa (0.03 to 0.25 µg/ml), Pseudallescheria boydii (2 to 8 µg/ml), Sporothrix schenckii (2 to 4 µg/ml), and Wangiella dermatitidis (2 to 8 µg/ml). It showed no activity against the zygomycetes. None of the three drugs showed in vitro activity against Absidia spp., Alternaria spp., Scedosporium prolificans, and Scopulariopsis brevicaulis. The MICs of amphotericin B were the lowest for most of the zygomycetes. Echinocandins prevent fungal growth by inhibiting ß-glucan synthesis in the fungal cell wall. Therefore, we might expect echinocandins to have broad-spectrum antifungal activity because of the presence of ß-glucan in cell wall structures of many different fungal species (Z. Odabasi, V. L. Paetznick, J. R. Rodriguez, E. Chen, M. R. McGinnis, and L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, 43rd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. M-1021, 2003). However, echinocandins have thus far been used only against Aspergillus and Candida spp. Fungi having reduced ß-glucan in their cell wall, like Cryptococcus and zygomycetes, are usually resistant to echinocandins; thus, the ß-glucan content of the organism may be at least partially related to the suceptibility to these drugs (12, 22, 32). Caspofungin has shown activity against Exophiala jeanselmei, Fonsecaea pedrosoi, Paecilomycess variotii, and Scedosporium apiospermum but no activity against Rhizopus arrhizus, Paecilomyces lilacinus, and Scedosporium prolificans (3). This is similar to our findings with anidulafungin. In a previous study, anidulafungin showed variable activity against Bipolaris spp., Pseudallescheria boydii, and Sporothrix schenkii and some activity against three different Phialophora species (6). We found anidulafungin to be very active against five Phialophora verrucosa isolates. In another previous study, anidulafungin was also found to be active against one Acremonium spp., one Paecilomyces sp., and five Pseudallescheria boydii isolates (22), which is consistent with our findings.

In summary, against a limited number of isolates in our study, anidulafungin demonstrated promising in vitro activity for a variety of molds for which we have few alternative therapeutic options. Further investigation is warranted.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Michael McGiniss from the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, for supplying the strains used in this study.

This project was supported by a grant from Vicuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Texas—Houston Medical School, 6431 Fannin, JFB 1.728, Houston, TX 77030. Phone and fax: (713) 500-6733. E-mail: Luis.Ostrosky-Zeichner{at}uth.tmc.edu. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 

  1. Barry, A. L., M. A. Pfaller, S. D. Brown, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. A. Ghannoum, C. Knapp, R. P. Rennie, J. H. Rex, and M. G. Rinaldi. 2000. Quality control limits for broth microdilution susceptibility tests of ten antifungal agents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3457-3459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Consigny, S., N. Dhedin, A. Datry, S. Choquet, V. Leblond, and O. Chosidow. 2003. Successsful voriconazole treatment of disseminated fusarium infection in an immunocompromised patient. Clin. Infect. Dis. 37:311-313.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Del Poeta, M., W. A. Schell, and J. R. Perfect. 1997. In vitro antifungal activity of pneumocandin L-743,872 against a variety of clinically important molds. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1835-1836.[Abstract]
  4. Denning, D., P. Ribaud, N. Milpied, D. Caillot, R. Herbrecht, E. Thiel, A. Haas, M. Ruhnke, and H. Lode. 2002. Efficacy and safety of voriconazole in the treatment of acute invasive aspergillosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34:563-571.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Deresinski, S., and D. Stevens. 2003. Caspofungin. Clin. Infect. Dis. 36:1445-1457.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Espinel-Ingroff, A. 1998. Comparison of in vitro activities of the new triazole SCH56592 and the echinocandins MK-0991 (L-743,872) and LY303366 against opportunistic filamentous and dimorphic fungi and yeasts. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2950-2956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Fleming, R. V., T. J. Walsh, and E. J. Anaissie. 2002. Emerging and less common fungal pathogens. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 16:915-933.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Fortun, J., P. Martin-Davila, M. Sanchez, V. Pintado, M. Alvarez, A. Sanchez-Sousa, and S. Moreno. 2003. Voriconazole in the treatment of invasive mold infections in transplant recipients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 22:408-413.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Herbrecht, R., D. Denning, T. Patterson, J. Bennett, R. Greene, J. Oestmann, W. Kern, K. Marr, P. Ribaud, O. Lortholary, R. Sylvester, R. Rubin, J. Wingard, P. Stark, C. Durand, D. Caillot, E. Thiel, P. Chandrasekar, M. Hodges, H. Schlamm, P. Troke, and B. de Pauw. 2002. Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 347:408-415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Keating, G., and D. Figgitt. 2003. Caspofungin: a review of its use in oesophageal candidiasis, invasive candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis. Drugs 63:2253-2263.
  11. Klopfenstein, K., R. Rosselet, A. Termuhlen, and D. Powell. 2003. Successful treatment of Scedosporium pneumonia with voriconazole during AML therapy and bone marrow transplantation. Med. Pediatr. Oncol. 41:494-495.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Krishnarao, T. V., and J. N. Galgiani. 1997. Comparison of the in vitro activities of the echinocandin LY303366, the pneumocandin MK-0991, and fluconazole against Candida species and Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1957-1960.[Abstract]
  13. Lin, S. J., J. Schranz, and S. M. Teutsch. 2001. Aspergillosis case-fatality rate: systematic review of the literature. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32:358-366.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Marr, K. A., R. A. Carter, F. Crippa, A. Wald, and L. Corey. 2002. Epidemiology and outcome of mould infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34:909-917.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Morrison, V. A., R. J. Haake, and D. J. Weisdorf. 1993. The spectrum of non-Candida fungal infections following bone marrow transplantation. Medicine (Baltimore) 72:78-89.[Medline]
  16. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. Approved standard NCCLS document M38-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  17. Oakley, K. L., C. B. Moore, and D. W. Denning. 1998. In vitro activity of the echinocandin antifungal agent LY303,366 in comparison with itraconazole and amphotericin B against Aspergillus spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:2726-2730.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Odds, F., A. Brown, and N. Gow. 2003. Antifungal agents: mechanisms of action. Trends Microbiol. 11:272-279.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Pacetti, S., and S. Gelone. 2003. Caspofungin acetate for treatment of invasive fungal infections. Ann. Pharmacother. 37:90-98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Petraitiene, R., V. Petraitis, A. H. Groll, M. Candelario, T. Sein, R. Bell, C. A. Lyman, C. L. McMillian, J. Bacher, and T. J. Walsh. 1999. Antifungal activity of LY303366, a novel echinocandin B, in experimental disseminated candidiasis in rabbits. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2148-2155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Petraitis, V., R. Petraitiene, A. H. Groll, A. Bell, D. P. Callender, T. Sein, R. L. Schaufele, C. L. McMillian, J. Bacher, and T. J. Walsh. 1998. Antifungal efficacy, safety, and single-dose pharmacokinetics of LY303366, a novel echinocandin B, in experimental pulmonary aspergillosis in persistently neutropenic rabbits. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:2898-2905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Pfaller, M. A., F. Marco, S. A. Messer, and R. N. Jones. 1998. In vitro activity of two echinocandin derivatives, LY303366 and MK-0991 (L-743,792), against clinical isolates of Aspergillus, Fusarium, Rhizopus, and other filamentous fungi. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 30:251-255.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, and S. Coffman. 1997. In vitro susceptibilities of clinical yeast isolates to a new echinocandin derivative, LY303366, and other antifungal agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:763-766.[Abstract]
  24. Ponton, J., R. Ruchel, K. V. Clemons, D. C. Coleman, R. Grillot, J. Guarro, D. Aldebert, P. Ambroise-Thomas, J. Cano, A. J. Carrillo-Munoz, J. Gene, C. Pinel, D. A. Stevens, and D. J. Sullivan. 2000. Emerging pathogens. Med. Mycol. 38:225-236.[Medline]
  25. Serrano Mdel, C., A. Valverde-Conde, M. M. Chavez, S. Bernal, R. M. Claro, J. Peman, M. Ramirez, and E. Martin-Mazuelos. 2003. In vitro activity of voriconazole, itraconazole, caspofungin, anidulafungin (VER002, LY303366) and amphotericin B against Aspergillus spp. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 45:131-135.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Silveira, F., and M. Nucci. 2001. Emergence of black moulds in fungal disease: epidemiology and therapy. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 14:679-684.[Medline]
  27. Uzun, O., S. Kocagöz, Y. Çetinkaya, S. Arikan, and S. Ünal. 1997. In vitro activity of a new echinocandin, LY303366, compared with those of amphotericin B and fluconazole against clinical yeast isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1156-1157.[Abstract]
  28. Verweij, P. E., K. L. Oakley, J. Morrissey, G. Morrissey, and D. W. Denning. 1998. Efficacy of LY303366 against amphotericin B-susceptible and -resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in a murine model of invasive aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:873-878.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Vincent, A., J. Cabrero, J. Greene, and R. Sandin. 2003. Successful voriconazole therapy of disseminated Fusarium solani in the brain of a neutropenic cancer patient. Cancer Control 10:414-419.[Medline]
  30. Walsh, T., I. Lutsar, T. Driscoll, B. Dupont, M. Roden, P. Ghahramani, M. Hodges, A. Groll, and J. Perfect. 2002. Voriconazole in the treatment of aspergillosis, scedosporiosis and other invasive fungal infections in children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 21:240-248.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Walsh, T. J., and A. H. Groll. 1999. Emerging fungal pathogens: evolving challenges to immunocompromised patients for the twenty-first century. Transplant Infect. Dis. 1:247-261.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Zhanel, G. G., J. A. Karlowsky, G. A. J. Harding, T. V. Balko, S. A. Zelenitsky, M. Friesen, A. Kabani, M. Turik, and D. J. Hoban. 1997. In vitro activity of a new semisynthetic echinocandin, LY-303366, against systemic isolates of Candida species, Cryptococcus neoformans, Blastomyces dermatitidis, and Aspergillus species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:863-865.[Abstract]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2004, p. 1912-1915, Vol. 48, No. 5
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1912-1915.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Odabasi, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Odabasi, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS