This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uh, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Uh, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H. Y.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2004, p. 2716-2718, Vol. 48, No. 7
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2716-2718.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns and Macrolide Resistance Genes of ß-Hemolytic Streptococci in Korea

Young Uh,1* In Ho Jang,1 Gyu Yel Hwang,1 Mi Kyung Lee,1 Kap Jun Yoon,1 and Hyo Youl Kim2

Departments of Laboratory Medicine,1 Infectious Disease, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, South Korea2

Received 28 December 2003/ Returned for modification 29 January 2004/ Accepted 29 February 2004


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
In 540 beta-hemolytic streptococci, the rates of resistance to tetracycline, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, and clindamycin were 80.0, 22.8, 20.2, and 19.1%, respectively. Of the erythromycin-resistant isolates, 63.3% had the constitutive macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) resistance phenotype, 23.9% had the M phenotype, and 12.8% had the inducible MLSB resistance phenotype. The constitutive MLSB resistance phenotype with the erm(B) gene was dominant in Korea.


arrow
TEXT
 
Current practice guidelines for the management of pharyngitis caused by Streptococcus pyogenes include the use of erythromycin as an alternative to penicillin when indicated and clindamycin for persons with multiple recurrent episodes (5). Macrolide or lincosamide therapy is also a recommended treatment option for S. agalactiae infection or for prophylaxis when streptococcal colonization among pregnant women is suspected (16). However, recent studies have shown that changes in the susceptibility of beta-hemolytic streptococci (BHS) to erythromycin and clindamycin have been substantial, although differences in rates of resistance to these agents have existed according to geographical location and investigators. The objectives of the present study were to investigate the incidence and possible trends in susceptibility among the BHS isolated from clinical specimens in a Korean hospital and to clarify the phenotypes and genotypes of erythromycin-resistant isolates.

A total of 540 strains of BHS were collected from clinical specimens between January 1990 and December 2000 at Wonju Christian Hospital, a 1,000-bed teaching hospital in South Korea. Multiple isolates from the same patient were avoided. The isolates were identified by standard methods. Beta-hemolytic strains with group F antigens were excluded. Susceptibility to penicillin G, erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, ceftriaxone (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.), vancomycin (Daewoong Lilly, Seoul, Korea), and chloramphenicol (Chongkundang, Seoul, Korea) was tested by the agar dilution method (14). The resistance phenotypes of erythromycin-resistant (intermediate and resistant) isolates were determined by the double-disk test with erythromycin (15 µg) and clindamycin (2 µg) disks (17). The presence of erm and mef class genes was determined by PCR amplification with previously described primers (11, 18) specific for erm(A) subclasses erm(TR), erm(B), erm(C), and mef(A).

The overall resistance rates of BHS were found to be 80.0% for tetracycline, 22.8% for chloramphenicol, 20.2% for erythromycin, and 19.1% for clindamycin, whereas all isolates were susceptible to penicillin G, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin (Table 1). The rates of resistance to erythromycin found in this study were as follows, in order of decreasing rank: S. agalactiae, 25.3%; S. pyogenes, 16.1%; group C streptococci, 9.1%; group G streptococci, 9.0%. S. agalactiae had the highest rate of clindamycin resistance (28.2%), followed by S. pyogenes (9.8%), group C streptococci (4.5%), and group G streptococci (1.5%). Of 109 erythromycin-resistant BHS isolates, 63.3% had the cMLSB phenotype (constitutive resistance to macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B [MLSB]), 23.9% had the M phenotype, and 12.8% had the iMLSB (inducible resistance to MLSB) phenotype. With the exception of two isolates, all MLSB-resistant strains carried the erm(B) gene (cMLSB phenotype), the erm(A) subclass erm(TR) gene (iMLSB phenotype), or the mef(A) gene (M phenotype).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of BHS

The erythromycin resistance rate of 20.2% (intermediate, 1.7%; resistant, 18.5%) in this study is similar to that reported in North America (18.6%) but higher than those in the Asia-Pacific region (10.9%), Europe (9.7%), and Latin America (2.7%) (7). The resistance of BHS to clindamycin was significantly higher in this study (19.1%) than in North America (6.8%), the Asia-Pacific region (4.7%), Europe (4.7%), and Latin America (0.9%) (7). Macrolide resistance among S. pyogenes isolates is an emerging concern. Erythromycin resistance among S. pyogenes isolates has remained variable but generally low in most countries. However, there have been reports from Japan in the 1970s (13) and more recently from Europe (2, 15) and Taiwan (8) of high percentages of isolates that are macrolide resistant. Erythromycin-resistant S. pyogenes was isolated for the first time in this study in 1994; after that time, the resistance rate ranged from 14.3 to 23.8% during the period of 1994 to 2000. Although there are far fewer reports of antimicrobial resistance in S. agalactiae compared with S. pyogenes, the increasing isolation of erythromycin-resistant S. agalactiae has also become alarming (3). Studies have documented that the erythromycin resistance rates for invasive S. agalactiae isolates during 1997 to 1999 were 14.3 and 25.4% in Canada and the United States, respectively (1). Investigators in Taiwan reported that 46% of S. agalactiae isolates were resistant to erythromycin (9). In this study, erythromycin-resistant S. agalactiae emerged in 1996; after that time, the resistance rate ranged from 18.7 to 40.0% during the period of 1996 to 2000 (Table 2). Most studies reported rates of resistance to erythromycin higher than those of clindamycin (1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 19). In contrast, the rate of resistance to clindamycin in our S. agalactiae isolates was higher than the rate of resistance to erythromycin. Among the BHS, S. agalactiae exhibited the highest rates of resistance to erythromycin, clindamycin, and tetracycline. Although the susceptibility data for group C and G BHS were sparse, our studies showed that all isolates were susceptible to penicillin G, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin and ≥90% of the isolates were susceptible to erythromycin and clindamycin. The rates of resistance to tetracycline and chloramphenicol were high for both group C and G streptococci.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Trend in antimicrobial susceptibilities of 143 S. pyogenes and 308 S. agalactiae isolates by year

It was noted that the prevalent phenotype of MLSB resistance of BHS is serogroup dependent. A study conducted in North America found that rates of the M phenotype of group A and B streptococci were 91.4 and 59.1%, respectively (4). In Europe, the distribution of frequencies of MLSB resistance phenotypes and genotypes of S. pyogenes are quite different according to geographical location; e.g., in Spain, 89.5% of S. pyogenes isolates had the M phenotype (15); in Italy, 47.4% of S. pyogenes isolates had the cMLSB phenotype (20); and in central and Eastern European countries, 60.5% of S. pyogenes isolates had the cMLSB phenotype (12). In Taiwan, 80.2% of erythromycin-resistant S. pyogenes isolates exhibited the M phenotype (8). The predominant MLSB resistance phenotype of S. agalactiae was cMLSB in Spain (3) and Taiwan (9), whereas the M phenotype was prevalent in North America (4). Kataja et al. (10) reported that nearly all (95%) of the erythromycin-resistant group C streptococcus isolates had the M phenotype, whereas 91% of the erythromycin-resistant group G streptococcus isolates had the iMLSB phenotype. In our study, S. pyogenes isolates showed a nearly equal distribution of MLSB resistance phenotypes (Table 3). The prevalence rate of the cMLSB resistance phenotype in S. agalactiae was much higher than in streptococci of other serogroups, and the M phenotype was more prevalent in group G streptococci.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Distribution of MLSB resistance phenotypes and genotypes among 109 isolates of erythromycin-resistant BHSa

We found that erythromycin and clindamycin resistance was relatively common, particularly among S. agalactiae; that the cMLSB resistance phenotype was dominant among erythromycin-resistant BHS; and that rates of S. agalactiae resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin showed an increasing trend in Korea.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Ilsan-dong 162, Wonju, Kangwon-do, South Korea. Phone: 82-33-741-1592. Fax: 82-33-731-0506. E-mail: u931018{at}wonju.yonsei.ac.kr. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Andrews, J. I., D. J. Diekema, S. K. Hunter, P. R. Rhomberg, M. A. Pfaller, R. N. Jones, and G. V. Doern. 2000. Group B streptococci causing neonatal blood stream infection: antimicrobial susceptibility and serotyping results from SENTRY centers in the western hemisphere. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 183:859-862.[CrossRef][Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Avanzini, C., K. Bosio, G. Volpe, G. Dotti, and D. Savoia. 2000. Streptococcus pyogenes collected in Torino (northwest Italy) between 1983 and 1998: survey of macrolide resistance and trend of genotype by RAPD. Microb. Drug Resist. 6:289-295.[Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Betriu, C., E. Culebras, M. Gómez, I. Rodríguez-Avial, B. A. Sánchez, M. C. Ágreda, and J. J. Picazo. 2003. Erythromycin and clindamycin resistance and telithromycin susceptibility in Streptococcus agalactiae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1112-1114.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Biedenbach, D. J., J. M. Stephen, and R. N. Jones. 2003. Antimicrobial susceptibility profile among ß-haemolytic Streptococcus spp. collected in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program—North America, 2001. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 46:291-294.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Bisno, A. L., M. A. Gerber, J. M. Gwaltney, Jr., E. L. Kaplan, and R. H. Schwartz. 2002. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 35:113-125.[CrossRef][Medline]
    6. 6
  6. Carroll, K. C., P. Monroe, S. Cohen, M. Hoffman, L. Hamilton, K. Korgenski, L. Reimer, D. Classen, and J. Daly. 1997. Susceptibility of beta-hemolytic streptococci to nine antimicrobial agents among four medical centers in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 27:123-128.[CrossRef][Medline]
    7. 7
  7. Gordon, K. A., M. L. Beach, D. J. Biedenbach, R. N. Jones, P. R. Rhomberg, and A. H. Mutnick. 2002. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of ß-hemolytic and viridans group streptococci: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-2000). Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 43:157-162.[CrossRef][Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Hsueh, P.-R., L.-J. Teng, C.-M. Lee, W.-K. Huang, T.-L. Wu, J.-H. Wan, D. Yang, J.-M. Shyr, Y.-C. Chuang, J.-J. Yan, J.-J. Lu, J.-J. Wu, W.-C. Ko, F.-Y. Chang, Y.-C. Yang, Y.-J. Lau, Y.-C. Liu, H.-S. Leu, C.-Y. Liu, and K.-T. Luh. 2003. Telithromycin and quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance in clinical isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes: SMART program 2001 data. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:2152-2157.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Hsueh, P.-R., L.-J. Teng, L.-N. Lee, S.-W. Ho, P.-C. Yang, and K.-T. Luh. 2001. High incidence of erythromycin resistance among clinical isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae in Taiwan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:3205-3208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Kataja, J., H. Seppälä, M. Skurnik, H. Sarkkinen, and P. Huovinen. 1998. Different erythromycin resistance mechanisms in group C and group G streptococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1493-1494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Kataja, J., P. Huovinen, M. Skurnik, The Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistance, and H. Seppälä. 1999. Erythromycin resistance genes in group A streptococci in Finland. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:48-52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Nagai, K., P. C. Appelbaum, T. A. Davies, L. M. Kelly, D. B. Hoellman, A. T. Andrasevic, L. Drukalska, W. Hryniewicz, M. R. Jacobs, J. Kolman, J. Miciuleviciene, M. Pana, L. Setchanova, M. K. Thege, H. Hupkova, J. Trupl, and P. Urbaskova. 2002. Susceptibility to telithromycin in 1,011 Streptococcus pyogenes isolates from 10 central and eastern European countries. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:546-549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Nakae, M., T. Murai, Y. Kaneko, and S. Mitsuhashi. 1977. Drug resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes isolated in Japan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 12:427-428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 14
  14. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2003. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing—thirteenth informational supplement. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
    15. 15
  15. Pérez-Trallero, E., C. Fernández-Mazarrasa, C. García-Rey, E. Bouza, L. Aguilar, J. García-de-Lomas, F. Baquero, and The Spanish Surveillance Group for Respiratory Pathogens. 2001. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of 1,684 Streptococcus pneumoniae and 2,039 Streptococcus pyogenes isolates and their ecological relationships: results of a 1-year (1998-1999) multicenter surveillance study in Spain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:3334-3340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. Schuchat, A. 2001. Group B streptococcal disease: from trials and tribulations to triumph and trepidation. Clin. Infect. Dis. 33:751-756.[CrossRef][Medline]
    17. 17
  17. Seppälä, H., A. Nissinen, Q. Yu, and P. Huovinen. 1993. Three different phenotypes of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in Finland. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 32:885-891.[Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. Sutcliffe, J., T. Grebe, A. Tait-Kamradt, and L. Wondrack. 1996. Detection of erythromycin-resistant determinants by PCR. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2562-2566.[Abstract]
    19. 19
  19. Wu, J.-J., K.-Y. Lin, P.-R. Hsueh, J.-W. Liu, H.-I. Pan, and S.-M. Sheu. 1997. High incidence of erythromycin-resistant streptococci in Taiwan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:844-846.[Abstract]
    20. 20
  20. Zampaloni, C., L. A. Vitali, M. Prenna, M. A. Toscano, G. Tempera, and S. Ripa. 2002. Erythromycin resistance in Italian isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes and correlations with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis. Microb. Drug Resist. 8:39-44.[CrossRef][Medline]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2004, p. 2716-2718, Vol. 48, No. 7
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2716-2718.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Amezaga, M. R., McKenzie, H. (2006). Molecular epidemiology of macrolide resistance in {beta}-haemolytic streptococci of Lancefield groups A, B, C and G and evidence for a new mef element in group G streptococci that carries allelic variants of mef and msr(D). J Antimicrob Chemother 57: 443-449 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Grivea, I. N., Al-Lahham, A., Katopodis, G. D., Syrogiannopoulos, G. A., Reinert, R. R. (2006). Resistance to Erythromycin and Telithromycin in Streptococcus pyogenes Isolates Obtained between 1999 and 2002 from Greek Children with Tonsillopharyngitis: Phenotypic and Genotypic Analysis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 256-261 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • von Both, U., Buerckstuemmer, A., Fluegge, K., Berner, R. (2005). Heterogeneity of Genotype-Phenotype Correlation among Macrolide-Resistant Streptococcus agalactiae Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 3080-3082 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uh, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Uh, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H. Y.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»