AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Braunstein, A.
Right arrow Articles by Shai, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Braunstein, A.
Right arrow Articles by Shai, Y.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2004, p. 3127-3129, Vol. 48, No. 8
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.8.3127-3129.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Activity and Potency of an Intravenously Injected Antimicrobial Peptide and Its DL Amino Acid Analog in Mice Infected with Bacteria

Amir Braunstein,{dagger} Niv Papo,{dagger} and Yechiel Shai*

Department of Biological Chemistry, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel

Received 28 January 2004/ Returned for modification 29 February 2004/ Accepted 19 April 2004


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Text
 References
 
We report that intravenous injection (3 mg/kg of body weight twice daily) of a diastereomer (containing 33% D amino acids) of an antimicrobial peptide, K6L9 (LKLLKKLLKKLLKLL-NH2), but not the all-L-amino-acid parental peptide, cures neutropenic mice infected with gentamicin-sensitive Pseudomonas aeruginosa and gentamicin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteria. Various biophysical experiments suggest a membranolytic-like effect.


   TEXT
Top
 Abstract
 Text
References
 
Antimicrobial peptides are natural antibiotics that constitute a major part of the innate immunity in all organisms (33). Many are positively charged, adopt an amphipathic structure when they are in contact with biological membranes (13, 16, 27, 29), and act through a non-receptor-mediated membrane lytic mechanism (2, 30). However, recent studies suggest other targets as well (9). Furthermore, because they act rapidly against the bacterial membrane, with a direct and destructive mode of action, they can escape the mechanisms involved in drug resistance, although there is some evidence that specific resistance might occur (14, 31). Therefore, antimicrobial peptides have been extensively studied for their potential use as antibiotics with new targets (3, 6, 13, 22, 25, 33).

Despite their advantages, systemic administration of antimicrobial peptides is difficult because they are inactivated by blood components. Therefore, the in vivo activities of membrane-active antimicrobial peptides have been reported in only a limited number of studies, and they were mainly administered intraperitoneally (4, 5, 7, 11, 15, 18, 23, 28). To overcome this limitation, we have developed a new family of nonhemolytic DL-amino acid antimicrobial peptides (diastereomers) which maintain their full activities in serum (17, 20, 26). In the present study we compared the in vitro activities of an all-L-amino-acid antimicrobial peptide and its diastereomer after systemic administration to bacteria-infected mice.

We synthesized an amphipathic all-L-amino-acid peptide (amphipathic-L) and its diastereomer (amphipathic-D) with the sequences LKLLKKLLKKLLKLL-NH2 (molecular weight, 1,804) and LKLLKKLLKKLLKLL-NH2 (underlined amino acids are the D enantiomers), respectively. The synthesis protocol was described previously (20). Treatment with trypsin (2 h) completely cleaved amphipathic-L, whereas amphipathic-D was protected by ~50%. Furthermore, serum inactivated amphipathic-L, and therefore, most experiments were performed only with the diastereomer.

The peptides were first investigated in vitro for their antibacterial and bactericidal activities against gentamicin-sensitive Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and a gentamicin-resistant strain of Acinetobacter baumannii resistant primarily due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production (8) isolated from the blood cultures of a patient with nosocomial pneumonia, as well as against their corresponding spheroplasts. The assay was done in sterile 96-well plates by a dilution assay protocol described in detail elsewhere (17, 20). The antibacterial activities were expressed as the MICs, i.e., the concentrations at which 100% inhibition of growth was observed after 18 to 20 h of incubation. A similar protocol was used, however, with the peptides dissolved in 30% human blood serum. Table 1 shows the biological activities of the peptides. Time-kill experiments (19) of amphipathic-D at its MIC against A. baumannii were performed and showed fast kinetics (Fig. 1A). Similar results were obtained with P. aeruginosa.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. MICs of the peptides and their hemolytic activities against human red blood cells

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. (A) In vitro time-kill curve of amphipathic-D at its MIC; (B and C) membrane depolarization in bacteria (filled triangles) and bacterial spheroplasts (filled circles) of gentamicin-resistant A. baumannii induced by amphipathic-D as a function of the peptide concentration (B) and time (C). The diastereomer at its MIC was added to bacteria or spheroplasts that had been preequilibrated with the fluorescent dye diS-C3-5 for 60 min. Fluorescence recovery was measured 1 to 120 min (at 5-min intervals) after the diastereomer was mixed with the bacteria, and its maximum was recorded. The arrows in panel B indicate the peptide's MICs.

 
In order to test whether amphipathic-D obtained its biological function through bacterial plasma membrane perturbation, we performed transmembrane potential-depolarizing experiments with the intact bacteria and their spheroplasts using the potential sensitive dye diS-C3-5 (the protocol has been described in detail elsewhere [20, 32]). Figure 1B and C shows the concentration- and time-dependent dissipations of the transmembrane potential of A. baumannii, respectively. These data reveal a direct correlation between the kinetics of potential depolarization and killing of bacteria (Fig. 1A), which supports the notion that the bacterial membrane is a major target for the peptides. Furthermore, the finding of similar activities against the cell wall-deficient spheroplasts suggests a minor role for the bacterial wall in the killing mechanism. Similar results were obtained with P. aeruginosa and therefore are not shown.

Confocal fluorescence microscopy (Olympus FV500 confocal laser scanning microscope) was used to visualize the localization of rhodamine-labeled amphipathic-D (labeled specifically at the N terminus by a protocol described before [21]) when it was bound to P. aeruginosa (data not shown). Interestingly, the peptide initially bound primarily mostly to the septums of two separating bacteria, but it finally became equally distributed within the bacterial cytoplasm. Transmission electron microscopy (the protocol is described elsewhere [1]) revealed damage to the bacterial cell wall (data not shown).

Most importantly, the peptides were tested intravenously for their activities against female CD1 mice that were infected with inocula of 106 CFU of bacteria (n = 8). Treated mice were systemically injected with a daily dose of 6 mg/kg of body weight, divided into two injections of 3 mg/kg at 12-h intervals, starting 1 h after inoculation. The results, shown in Fig. 2, demonstrate that only the diastereomer cured mice infected with both types of bacteria. Inoculated mice became weak and less active as early as 1 day after inoculation (and treatment). The maximum loss of body weight occurred on day 2. Physical improvement of diastereomer-treated mice was noted on day 3, and 5 days after the bacterial challenge, all the survivors displayed normal activity and had recovered their initial weight. Nearly all deaths occurred between days 2 and 3 postinoculation with P. aeruginosa and between days 3 and 4 postinoculation with gentamicin-resistant A. baumannii. In order to decrease the influence of the immune system, all the mice were rendered transiently neutropenic by intravenously injecting 150 and 100 mg of cyclophosphamide per kg on days 0 and 3, respectively (12, 15).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. Mortality of infected mice after systemic treatment with phosphate-buffered saline (black bars), amphipathic-L (gray bars), amphipathic-D (empty bars), and gentamicin (dotted [rightmost] bars). Mortality was monitored for at least 10 days posttreatment.

 
The acute toxicities of the two peptides were also examined by intravenously injecting each mouse (n = 8) with two doses per day of a 0.25-ml solution containing peptide at 3 mg/kg (no mortality), 6 mg/kg (20% mortality), or 9 mg/kg (80% mortality) for 5 days. Note that no mortality was observed after doses of 6 mg/kg dissolved in 0.9 ml of buffer were injected. Blood samples were taken from the mice a week after the injection of amphipathic-D (3 mg/kg twice daily). The results of all differential and biochemistry tests (i.e., tests for neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, eosinophil, and basophil counts and creatine phosphokinase, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and creatinine levels) were within the range of normal values. The Weizmann Institute Animal Protection Committee approved all the protocols used with the animal models. The animals had access to food and water throughout all experiments. Furthermore, the animals were acclimatized to our animal facilities for 1 week before the experiments began.

In summary, this study demonstrates that the activity of a diastereomer, but not an all-L-amino-acid antimicrobial peptide, was preserved in blood and that the peptide cured animals infected with bacteria (including a gentamicin-resistant strain). The data suggest that although the diastereomer initially interacts with the bacterial cell wall, it is mainly targeted toward the plasma membrane because (i) the potencies toward intact bacteria and spheroplasts were similar (Table 1), (ii) the diastereomer depolarized the transmembrane potential of the bacteria at the same rate and concentration at which it showed biological activity, and (iii) the diastereomer acted similarly against both resistant and nonresistant bacteria. Although our data suggest that the protection of the mice was due to killing of the bacteria, previous studies have shown that positively charged antimicrobial peptides can bind to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and neutralize the LPS-stimulated inflammatory response by macrophages (i.e., cytokine production) (10, 24). It is possible, therefore, that the diastereomer further binds to and neutralizes the LPS released from the damaged bacteria. Further advances need to be made in order to overcome the toxicities of such compounds. These may include modification of their sequences, injection of the peptide at a low concentration, or the use of delivery systems.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This research was supported by the European Community. Y.S. is the Harold S. and Harriet B. Brady Professorial Chair in Cancer Research.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biological Chemistry, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100 Israel. Phone: 972-8-9342711. Fax: 972-8-9344112. E-mail: Yechiel.Shai{at}weizmann.ac.il. Back

{dagger} A.B. and N.P. contributed equally to the paper. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 

  1. Avrahami, D., Z. Oren, and Y. Shai. 2001. Effect of multiple aliphatic amino acids substitutions on the structure, function, and mode of action of diastereomeric membrane active peptides. Biochemistry 40:12591-12603.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Bessalle, R., A. Kapitkovsky, A. Gorea, I. Shalit, and M. Fridkin. 1990. All-D-magainin: chirality, antimicrobial activity and proteolytic resistance. FEBS Lett. 274:151-155.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Boman, H. G. 1995. Peptide antibiotics and their role in innate immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13:61-92.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Chen, J., T. J. Falla, H. Liu, M. A. Hurst, C. A. Fujii, D. A. Mosca, J. R. Embree, D. J. Loury, P. A. Radel, C. Cheng Chang, L. Gu, and J. C. Fiddes. 2000. Development of protegrins for the treatment and prevention of oral mucositis: structure-activity relationships of synthetic protegrin analogues. Biopolymers 55:88-98.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Cirioni, O., A. Giacometti, R. Ghiselli, F. Mocchegiani, A. Fineo, F. Orlando, M. S. Del Prete, M. Rocchi, V. Saba, and G. Scalise. 2002. Single-dose intraperitoneal magainins improve survival in a gram-negative-pathogen septic shock rat model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:101-104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Devine, D. A., and R. E. Hancock. 2002. Cationic peptides: distribution and mechanisms of resistance. Curr. Pharm. Des. 8:703-714.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Goldstein, B. P., J. Wei, K. Greenberg, and R. Novick. 1998. Activity of nisin against Streptococcus pneumoniae, in vitro, and in a mouse infection model. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 42:277-278.[Free Full Text]
  8. Gunseren, F., L. Mamikoglu, S. Ozturk, M. Yucesoy, K. Biberoglu, N. Yulug, M. Doganay, B. Sumerkan, S. Kocagoz, S. Unal, S. Cetin, S. Calangu, I. Koksal, H. Leblebicioglu, and M. Gunaydin. 1999. A surveillance study of antimicrobial resistance of gram-negative bacteria isolated from intensive care units in eight hospitals in Turkey. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 43:373-378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hancock, R. E., and G. Diamond. 2000. The role of cationic antimicrobial peptides in innate host defences. Trends Microbiol. 8:402-410.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Hancock, R. E., and M. G. Scott. 2000. The role of antimicrobial peptides in animal defenses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:8856-8861.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Ingham, A., M. Ford, R. J. Moore, and M. Tizard. 2003. The bacteriocin piscicolin 126 retains antilisterial activity in vivo. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51:1365-1371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Joly-Guillou, M. L., M. Wolff, J. J. Pocidalo, F. Walker, and C. Carbon. 1997. Use of a new mouse model of Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia to evaluate the postantibiotic effect of imipenem. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:345-351.[Abstract]
  13. Lehrer, R. I., and T. Ganz. 1999. Antimicrobial peptides in mammalian and insect host defence. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11:23-27.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. McPhee, J. B., S. Lewenza, and R. E. Hancock. 2003. Cationic antimicrobial peptides activate a two-component regulatory system, PmrA-PmrB, that regulates resistance to polymyxin B and cationic antimicrobial peptides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol. 50:205-217.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Navon-Venezia, S., R. Feder, L. Gaidukov, Y. Carmeli, and A. Mor. 2002. Antibacterial properties of dermaseptin S4 derivatives with in vivo activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:689-694.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Nicolas, P., and A. Mor. 1995. Peptides as weapons against microorganisms in the chemical defense system of vertebrates. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 49:277-304.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Oren, Z., J. Hong, and Y. Shai. 1997. A repertoire of novel antibacterial diastereomeric peptides with selective cytolytic activity. J. Biol. Chem. 272:14643-14649.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Pacor, S., A. Giangaspero, M. Bacac, G. Sava, and A. Tossi. 2002. Analysis of the cytotoxicity of synthetic antimicrobial peptides on mouse leucocytes: implications for systemic use. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 50:339-348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Pag, U., M. Oedenkoven, N. Papo, Z. Oren, Y. Shai, and H. G. Sahl. 2004. In vitro activity and mode of action of diastereomeric antimicrobial peptides against bacterial clinical isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53:230-239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Papo, N., Z. Oren, U. Pag, H. G. Sahl, and Y. Shai. 2002. The consequence of sequence alteration of an amphipathic alpha-helical antimicrobial peptide and its diastereomers. J. Biol. Chem. 277:33913-33921.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Pouny, Y., D. Rapaport, A. Mor, P. Nicolas, and Y. Shai. 1992. Interaction of antimicrobial dermaseptin and its fluorescently labeled analogues with phospholipid membranes. Biochemistry 31:12416-12423.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Russell, P. E., R. J. Milling, and K. Wright. 1995. The need for new antibiotics: possible ways forward, p. 67-85. In P. A. Hunter, G. K. Darby, and N. J. Russell (ed.), Fifty years of antimicrobials: past perspectives and future trends. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  23. Scott, M. G., and R. E. Hancock. 2000. Cationic antimicrobial peptides and their multifunctional role in the immune system. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 20:407-431.[Medline]
  24. Scott, M. G., H. Yan, and R. E. Hancock. 1999. Biological properties of structurally related alpha-helical cationic antimicrobial peptides. Infect. Immun. 67:2005-2009.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Shai, Y. 2002. From innate immunity to de-novo designed antimicrobial peptides. Curr. Pharm. Des. 8:715-725.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Shai, Y. 1999. Mechanism of the binding, insertion and destabilization of phospholipid bilayer membranes by alpha-helical antimicrobial and cell non-selective membrane-lytic peptides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1462:55-70.[Medline]
  27. Shai, Y. 2002. Mode of action of membrane active antimicrobial peptides. Biopolymers 66:236-248.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Steinberg, D. A., M. A. Hurst, C. A. Fujii, A. H. Kung, J. F. Ho, F. C. Cheng, D. J. Loury, and J. C. Fiddes. 1997. Protegrin-1: a broad-spectrum, rapidly microbicidal peptide with in vivo activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1738-1742.[Abstract]
  29. Tossi, A., L. Sandri, and A. Giangaspero. 2000. Amphipathic, alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides. Biopolymers 55:4-30.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Wade, D., A. Boman, B. Wahlin, C. M. Drain, D. Andreu, H. G. Boman, and R. B. Merrifield. 1990. All-D amino acid-containing channel-forming antibiotic peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:4761-4765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Weidenmaier, C., S. A. Kristian, and A. Peschel. 2003. Bacterial resistance to antimicrobial host defenses—an emerging target for novel antiinfective strategies? Curr. Drug Targets 4:643-649.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Wu, M., E. Maier, R. Benz, and R. E. Hancock. 1999. Mechanism of interaction of different classes of cationic antimicrobial peptides with planar bilayers and with the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 38:7235-7242.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Zasloff, M. 2002. Antimicrobial peptides in health and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 347:1199-1200.[Free Full Text]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2004, p. 3127-3129, Vol. 48, No. 8
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.8.3127-3129.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Braunstein, A.
Right arrow Articles by Shai, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Braunstein, A.
Right arrow Articles by Shai, Y.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS