Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2005, p. 26-31, Vol. 49, No. 1
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.49.1.26-31.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Medical Service,1 Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Minneapolis VA Medical Center,3 Departments of Medicine,2 Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota,4 Microbiology Laboratory,5 Infectious Diseases Unit, HaEmek Medical Center,6 Technion School of Medicine, Afula, Israel7
Received 10 May 2004/ Returned for modification 16 August 2004/ Accepted 12 September 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
An understanding of the microbiological basis for the emergence of antibiotic resistance among pathogenic E. coli strains is needed to guide efforts to interrupt this process. At this time, it is unknown to what extent today's drug-resistant clinical E. coli strains are simply antibiotic-resistant versions of the same virulent clones of extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli that constitute most of the susceptible bacterial population (12) or if they represent a phylogenetically different assortment of clones (16, 25, 31). It is also unknown how the intrinsic virulence of such strains compares with that of susceptible strains. Previous studies of antibiotic resistance phenotypes to antibiotics other than TMP-SMZ have suggested that the resistant bacterial population may largely consist of low-virulence opportunists whose success derives more from antibiotic resistance than from pathogenic capability (19, 22, 38). However, such associations may depend heavily on the ecological context; for example, among isolates from food animals, antimicrobial resistance and virulence are only weakly linked, if at all (15, 18). Furthermore, to the extent that resistance does correlate with reduced virulence, it is unknown whether emerging resistance is caused by novel low-virulence, resistant clones (22) or by putative exchange of virulence determinants for resistance elements within preexisting susceptible, virulent clones (26, 39).
To clarify these issues within a clinically well-defined population, we determined the phylogenetic background and virulence characteristics of 100 E. coli isolates from urine samples from women with acute, uncomplicated cystitis from an outpatient clinic in Afula, Israel. We then compared the TMP-SMZ-, ampicillin-, and ciprofloxacin-susceptible and -resistant bacterial populations and used experimental approaches to explore the mechanisms underlying the observed association between resistance and virulence.
|
|
|---|
103 CFU of E. coli per ml (35). Exclusion factors were as follows: menopause, recurrent urinary tract infections, any anatomical or functional abnormality of the urinary tract, pyelonephritis, immunocompromised immune system, diabetes mellitus, and use of a urinary catheter. Consecutive clinic patients during the study period were assessed for study eligibility by medical record review by one of the investigators (R. Raz). The clinical microbiology laboratory bacteria collected from the urine samples from all eligible patients until approximately 50 isolates per primary susceptibility group, i.e., TMP-SMZ susceptible and resistant, had been accumulated. Isolates were collected and saved anonymously, without accompanying demographic or clinical data. Urine samples were plated on Chromagar Orientation (Hy Laboratories, Rehovot, Israel) using a calibrated 1-µl bacteriological loop. Suspected E. coli isolates were identified using Microscan Urine Combo 2 panels (Dade-Behring, Fla.) and a Microscan Walkaway-96 apparatus. Susceptibility to TMP-SMZ was interpreted using the Microscan DMS software and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) breakpoints. Resistance to ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and ceftazidime was screened for by agar dilution using NCCLS-specified breakpoints, with selective confirmation by disk diffusion and/or broth microdilution (27). E. coli ATCC 25922 was the reference strain.
Phylogenetic analysis and virulence genotyping. The isolates were assigned to one of the four main phylogenetic groups of E. coli (A, B1, B2, and D) (groups originally defined by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis [11]) by multiplex PCR (2). The isolates were also tested for 34 virulence-associated traits (hereafter referred to as virulence factors [VFs]) of extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli and, if positive for any pap (P-fimbria) element, for 13 papA (structural subunit) alleles, using established PCR and dot blot-based assays (20, 22). All testing was done in duplicate using independently prepared boiled lysates of each isolate, with appropriate positive and negative controls included in each run.
An aggregate virulence score was calculated as the sum of all VFs for which the isolates tested positive, with adjustment for multiple detection of the pap, sfa/foc, and kps operons.
O-antigen typing and RAPD analysis. O antigens were determined by the E. coli Reference Center, University Park, Pa., using 180 O-specific antisera by standard methods (29). Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis was performed by using arbitrary decamer primer 1247 (1), with visual analysis of profiles in ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels.
Conjugation. Bacterial mating in broth was performed as previously described (21). Candidate donor strains were grown together overnight in nonselective broth medium with recipient strain JM109 (which was nalidixic acid resistant [Nalr]) or a spontaneous Nalr derivative of E. coli Reference (ECOR) strain 44 (13, 28), i.e., ECOR44 (Nalr). Broth was then spread on agar plates supplemented with antimicrobial agents corresponding with resistance markers unique to the donor and recipient. Colonies from selective plates (putative transconjugants) were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disk diffusion. The genomic identity of the donor was confirmed by RAPD analysis, and the virulence genotype was assessed.
Statistical methods.
For statistical analysis, isolates were regarded as independent samples, regardless of clonal background, since each isolate was derived from a unique host and represented a separate cystitis episode. Comparisons of proportions were tested using Fisher's exact test or Pearson's
2 test for unpaired comparisons and McNemar's test for paired comparisons (all tests were two-tailed tests). Comparisons of aggregate VF scores were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. Multiple predictor variables were assessed simultaneously for their associations with VF score by using multiple linear regression. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
|
|
|---|
The differences in the prevalence of individual VFs (Table 1), aggregate VF scores (Table 2), and phylogenetic distribution (Table 3) according to susceptibility versus resistance to TMP-SMZ or ampicillin were minimal. Only five VFs differed significantly with the TMP-SMZ resistance phenotype, and only two VFs differed significantly with the ampicillin resistance phenotype. Of these VFs, several traits typically associated with chromosomal group B2, i.e., papG allele III (P-fimbria adhesin variant III), the F12 papA allele (P-fimbria structural subunit variant), and malX (a pathogenicity island marker [20]), exhibited weak associations with susceptibility. Conversely, three traits often associated with plasmids, i.e., afa/dra (Dr-binding adhesins), iutA (aerobactin receptor), and traT (serum resistance associated) (20), were associated with resistance (Table 1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Virulence genotype in relation to antimicrobial resistance phenotype among 100 E. coli isolates from women with acute uncomplicated cystitisa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Aggregate VF score in relation to antimicrobial resistance phenotype among 100 E. coli isolates from women with acute uncomplicated cystitis
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Phylogenetic background in relation to antimicrobial resistance phenotype among 100 E. coli isolates from women with uncomplicated acute cystitis
|
Phylogenetic distribution of VFs. The concurrent shifts in VF profiles (Tables 1 and 2) and phylogenetic distribution (Table 3) observed in association with resistance to TMP-SMZ, ampicillin, and ciprofloxacin suggested a possible underlying phylogenetic distribution of VFs. Consistent with this hypothesis, most individual VFs (n = 16) were associated with phylogenetic group B2 (Table 4). The only statistically significant exceptions were three VFs that were more prevalent in group D than in other groups; these traits included the F16 papA allele (26% for group D versus 5% for other groups [P = 0.01]), afa/dra (37% for group D versus 9% for other groups [P = 0.005]), and traT (84% for group D versus 58% for other groups [P = 0.04]). Consequently, aggregate VF scores differed markedly among the four phylogenetic groups; the aggregate VF scores were highest in group B2, intermediate in group D, and lowest in groups A and B1 (Table 5).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Virulence genotype in relation to phylogenetic group among 100 E. coli isolates from women with acute uncomplicated cystitisa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Aggregate VF score in relation to phylogenetic group among 100 E. coli isolates from women with acute uncomplicated cystitis
|
Conjugation. To assess whether TMP-SMZ and ampicillin resistance elements might be genetically linked with certain VFs (i.e., afa/draBC, iutA, and traT) on plasmids or other mobile elements, as suggested by the observed statistical associations (Table 1) and previously demonstrated in other collections (17, 21, 31), attempts were made to coordinately transfer resistance and VFs by conjugation. The 16 isolates that were resistant to both ampicillin and TMP-SMZ but were susceptible to nalidixic acid and were positive for afa/draBC, iutA, and/or traT, were mated with strains JM109 (traT positive) and/or ECOR44 (Nalr) (traT negative) (13). For 4 of the 16 donor strains, transfer of multiple resistance markers was achieved. One of the transconjugants had acquired multiple VFs (iutA, cvaC, iroN, and iss) along with resistance markers. A derivative was recovered from another mating on selective plates; the derivative had acquired iutA and traT, in the absence of resistance markers, as defined by a standardized disk diffusion assay. No transfer of afa/draBC was observed.
Clonal analysis of ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates by RAPD profiling and O-antigen typing. To determine whether any VF-deficient ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates might be derived from the same clonal group as any VF-replete ciprofloxacin-susceptible isolates, which would support possible exchange of VFs for resistance, RAPD analysis and O-antigen typing were used to compare the 20 group A isolates and, separately, the 19 group D isolates. Among the group D isolates, 14 unique RAPD profiles were observed overall. Ten of these profiles were unique to individual isolates, whereas four profiles were shared among two or three isolates each. The two ciprofloxacin-resistant group D isolates constituted one of the four multiple-isolate RAPD clades, which was uniquely characterized by the O153 antigen and a fim, iutA, kpsM II VF profile. Thus, these isolates appeared to be related to one another but unrelated to other group D isolates (P = 0.03 for the prevalence of this clonal group among resistant versus susceptible isolates), evidence against the clonal commonality hypothesis.
Among the 20 group A isolates, 13 unique RAPD profiles were observed. Nine profiles were unique to individual isolates, whereas four profile were shared among two or three isolates each. Three of the ciprofloxacin-resistant group A isolates exhibited unique RAPD profiles. Of these isolates, two were O antigen nontypeable (as was the fourth ciprofloxacin-resistant isolate; these were the only O antigen nontypeable group A isolates). The third isolate was O8, as was a single ciprofloxacin-susceptible isolate which, however, differed from the O8 ciprofloxacin-resistant isolate by RAPD profile. The fourth ciprofloxacin-resistant isolate (strain 618; O antigen nontypeable) was similar by RAPD analysis to two ciprofloxacin-susceptible isolates from serogroups O8 and O9, respectively. Its VF profile (fim, iroN, and iss) differed substantially from that of the ciprofloxacin-susceptible O9 isolate (strain 654 [fim, fyuA, and ompT]) but represented a subset of the VF profile of the O8 ciprofloxacin-susceptible isolate (strain 633), which in addition to fim, iroN, and iss (as in strain 618) also contained iha, iutA, cvaC, and traT.
These findings suggested that strain 618 might represent a ciprofloxacin-resistant variant of the clonal group represented by strain 633 with multiple VFs deleted, albeit O antigen nontypeable instead of O8. To determine whether such a variant could be derived experimentally from strain 633, a spontaneous Nalr derivative of strain 633 was selected by plating a dense suspension of strain 633 on Luria-Bertani agar containing nalidixic acid (32 µg/ml). The resulting Nalr derivative demonstrated no loss of VFs compared with the parent strain. Efforts to derive a spontaneous ciprofloxacin-resistant mutant of strain 633 by similar methods were unsuccessful.
|
|
|---|
That so few significant pathotypic or phylogenetic associations were observed with TMP-SMZ or ampicillin resistance and that the few observed shifts were comparatively modest and of borderline statistical significance cannot be attributed solely to sample size, since numerous highly significant differences were observed between the ciprofloxacin-susceptible and -resistant isolates and among the four phylogenetic groups, despite the small numbers. Instead, the overall similarity of the TMP-SMZ- and ampicillin-susceptible and -resistant populations suggests that the resistant isolates were primarily derived from susceptible isolates via acquisition of transferable resistance elements, with little or no change in virulence profile. Indeed, consistent with previous reports (17, 31), in one isolate, ampicillin and TMP-SMZ resistance were coordinately transferred by conjugation along with specific VFs (iutA and traT), presumably on a mobile plasmid. The observed association of afa/draBC with ampicillin resistance is in agreement with previous findings from women with gestational pyelonephritis (10). However, a direct linkage was not demonstrated in either that study or the present study.
The preserved virulence and predominantly group B2 background of the present TMP-SMZ- and ampicillin-resistant E. coli isolates, in contrast to the reduced virulence and shifts away from group B2 previously associated with ampicillin and sulfonamide resistance in isolates from patients with urosepsis (17), may relate to differences in the respective study populations. The present study included only patients with no known compromising conditions, which presumably obliged most isolates to exhibit a threshold level of virulence to be included in the study, whereas the previous study included many compromised (and possibly heavily antibiotic-exposed) hosts, in whom low-virulence strains could readily cause disease (17).
In contrast to ampicillin and TMP-SMZ resistance, ciprofloxacin resistance was associated with markedly reduced inferred virulence and with categorical shifts away from phylogenetic group B2, consistent with previous reports regarding clinically less-well-defined fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli strains from other contexts and locales (15, 22). How such presumably low-virulence strains could cause acute cystitis in otherwise healthy women is unclear. It is conceivable that these strains actually possessed unrecognized VFs that compensated for their lack of known VFs. However, there is evidence against this; an animal infection study found that experimental extraintestinal virulence was directly proportional to the number of conventional VFs detected, regardless of phylogenetic background or clinical source (14, 32). Comparative virulence assessment of the present ciprofloxacin isolates would be informative. If the isolates are indeed relatively avirulent, the fact that they caused acute cystitis may reflect enhanced host susceptibility. For example, there may have been an unrecognized lapse in host defenses, whether fixed or transient, or a high bacterial inoculum, possibly related to host behaviors, such as sexual activity, contraceptive practices, or prior antibiotic use (37). Similar considerations may also apply to the few susceptible isolates that exhibited low VF scores.
The marked phylogenetic differences noted between ciprofloxacin-resistant and -susceptible isolates suggest that these groups may represent, in part, distinct bacterial populations. Thus, the resistant isolates are not simply mutant derivatives of the susceptible isolates; accordingly, their relative lack of VFs does not necessarily represent loss of VFs in exchange for resistance (26, 39). Indeed, RAPD analysis and experimental data provided no evidence that mutation to quinolone or fluoroquinolone resistance caused loss of VFs. The predominance of phylogenetic groups A and D among the ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates suggested instead that fluoroquinolone resistance occurs more commonly among such strains, and based on the findings from RAPD analysis, possibly within specific clonal groups therein, whether due to greater ease of mutation to resistance or greater exposure to selection pressure among these clonal groups. Selection for ciprofloxacin resistance may have occurred in humans, e.g., within the predominantly non-group-B2 human gut flora (4, 13). However, the previously demonstrated similarity of ciprofloxacin-resistant human isolates to animal isolates from the ECOR collection (22) suggests a possible animal source, including perhaps antibiotic-exposed poultry (6), with subsequent food-borne transmission to humans (3, 24).
Limitations of this study include the small number of ampicillin-susceptible and ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates (which limited power for finding differences), the use of multiple comparisons (which increased the likelihood of type I errors), the fact that the isolates were from a single geographical locale, and the uncertain relationship between the molecular markers and in vivo virulence. As such, the findings regarding ciprofloxacin resistance in particular must be regarded as hypothesis generating, rather than definitive. Strengths and/or novel features of this study include the well-defined, homogenous clinical population, the analysis of TMP-SMZ resistance in relation to VF profiles and phylogenetic background, the comparative RAPD analysis of ciprofloxacin-resistant and -susceptible isolates, and the experimental assessment of genetic links between resistance and VFs.
In summary, we found that among E. coli isolates from women with uncomplicated cystitis, resistance to ciprofloxacin, but not to ampicillin or TMP-SMZ, was associated with marked reductions in inferred virulence and categorical shifts to non-B2 phylogenetic groups, which accounted for most of the virulence effects. This suggests that in E. coli the relationship between antimicrobial resistance and virulence varies according to resistance phenotype, with ciprofloxacin resistance usually occurring in intrinsically low-virulence non-B2 strains rather than via loss of VFs from virulent strains. The basis for the striking concentration of ciprofloxacin resistance within phylogenetic groups A and D remains to be determined but may include agricultural antimicrobial use. Confirmation of these findings in other populations is needed.
Ann Emery (Minneapolis VA Medical Center) helped prepare the manuscript.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»