Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2005, p. 408-413, Vol. 49, No. 1
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.49.1.408-413.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
R. M. Alden Research Laboratory, Santa Monica,1 UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California,2 Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Romainville, France3
Received 30 May 2004/ Returned for modification 31 August 2004/ Accepted 25 September 2004
|
|
|---|
0.5 µg/ml. XRP 2868 MICs for only two strains, one being Clostridium clostridioforme (MIC, 16 µg/ml) and the other being Clostridium difficile (MIC, 32 µg/ml), were >2 µg/ml. Depending on its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, XRP 2868 has potential for use against infections with gram-positive anaerobes and deserves further clinical evaluation. |
|
|---|
XRP 2868 is a new oral streptogramin that is comprised of a mixture of 70% RPR 132552A (group A, PII component) and 30% RPR 202868 (group B, PI component). Pankuch et al. (5) studied the activities of XRP 2868 against 261 pneumococci and 150 Haemophilus influenzae strains and found that XRP 2868 "showed potent activity" against all strains "irrespective of their susceptibility to other agents."
Barriere et al. (J. C. Barriere, E. Bacque, N. Berthaud, G. Dutruc-Rooset, G. Doerflinger, and G. Puchault, Abstr. 41st Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-359, p. 207, 2001) noted that XPR 2868 has an antibacterial spectrum that "includes gram-positive cocci, fastidious gram-negative bacilli,...and anaerobes" and suggested that it was of potential value for the therapy of respiratory tract infections. Berthaud et al. (N. Berthaud, N. Diallo, B. Prevost, S. Lannier-Bonnamour, A. De Usatorre, and J. Hodgson, Abstr. 41st Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-360, p. 207, 2001) noted that XRP 2868 has bactericidal activity against Staphylococcus aureus in a biofilm model.
In order to extend information about XRP 2868, we studied its comparative in vitro activities against 266 clinical isolates of anaerobic gram-positive organisms.
Strains were isolated from clinical specimens obtained from adult patients between 1996 and 2002 and identified by standard criteria (2, 3). Strains were consecutive isolates. S. aureus ATCC 29213 and Eubacterium lentum ATCC 43055 were tested simultaneously. The numbers and species of clinical isolates tested are given in Table 1.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Comparative in vitro activities of XRP 2868 against 264 recent clinical isolates of gram-positive anaerobic species, actinomycetes, and lactobacilli
|
Susceptibility testing was performed according to methods in National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards standards (4), using an agar dilution method with brucella agar supplemented with hemin, vitamin K1, and 5% laked sheep blood and an inoculum of 105 CFU per spot. Daptomycin was supplemented with Ca2+ (50 mg/liter) as suggested by the manufacturer and in accordance with previously published findings (1). XRP 2868 was dissolved in dimethylformamide, according to the manufacturer's instructions, in a ratio of 30% RPR 202868 (PI component) and 70% RPR 132552A (PII component).
The results of our study are shown in Table 1. Overall, XRP 2868 had excellent activity against a broad range of gram-positive anaerobic bacteria, including actinomycetes, clostridia, eubacteria, Propionibacterium species, and peptostreptococci. Overall, XRP 2868 MICs for 95% (254 of 266) of isolates were
0.5 µg/ml. XRP 2868 MICs for only two strains, one being Clostridium difficile and the other being Clostridium clostridioforme, were >2 µg/ml. XRP 2868 was generally similar to or 1 dilution more active in vitro than pristinamycin and often 1 to 4 dilutions more active than quinupristin-dalfopristin. For the C. clostridioforme isolate for which the XRP MIC was 16 µg/ml, pristinamycin MICs were 16 µg/ml, quinupristin-dalfopristin MICs were 8 µg/ml, daptomycin MICs were 8 µg/ml, and ampicillin, clarithromycin, and telithromycin MICs were >32 µg/ml. The vancomycin MICs were 1 µg/ml, and the linezolid and clindamycin MICs were 2 µg/ml. In comparison, for the C. difficile isolate for which the XRP MIC was 32 µg/ml, pristinamycin MICs were 16 µg/ml; clarithromycin, telithromycin, and clindamycin MICs were >32 µg/ml; linezolid MICs were 8 µg/ml; ampicillin and quinupristin-dalfopristin MICs were 2 µg/ml; daptomycin MICs were 1 µg/ml; and vancomycin MICs were 0.5 µg/ml.
Daptomycin had decreased activity (MIC > 4 µg/ml) against 14 strains of Actinomyces spp. and all Clostridium ramosum, E. lentum, and Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Linezolid showed decreased activity (MIC, 4 µg/ml) against all strains of C. ramosum, 2 strains of C. difficile, and 15 strains of Lactobacillus spp. Ampicillin MICs were >1 µg/ml for eight strains of Clostridium spp. and three strains of Lactobacillus casei.
Depending on its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, XRP 2868 has potential for use against infections with gram-positive anaerobes and deserves further clinical evaluation.
We acknowledge support from Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Romainville, France.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»