Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2005, p. 418-420, Vol. 49, No. 1
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.49.1.418-420.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Institut Universitari d'Investigacions en Ciències de la Salut (IUNICS), Universitat de les Illes Balears (UIB), Palma de Mallorca,1 Departamento Médico, GlaxoSmithKline, Tres Cantos,2 Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza,3 Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal,4 Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid,6 Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Clínico, Salamanca, Spain5
Received 13 April 2004/ Returned for modification 5 August 2004/ Accepted 23 September 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacterial strains.
S. pyogenes isolates included in this study belong to the SAUCE II surveillance collection and were collected between November 1998 and October 1999 from patients with acute pharyngitis in 17 different hospitals selected on the bases of population and geographical location in Spain (10). Among 70 S. pyogenes isolates with reduced susceptibilities to ciprofloxacin (for MICs of
4 µg/ml, no NCCLS susceptibility breakpoint was available) collected during this period, a random sample of 30 isolates was selected for emm-typing studies. All but 6 of these 30 isolates were from pediatric samples. An additional 32 pharyngeal isolates were also selected from isolates susceptible to ciprofloxacin (MIC
1 µg/ml) so as to match the resistant strains in terms of location, age group, and temporal proximity during the same surveillance period.
emm gene typing. The emm gene types of the S. pyogenes isolates were determined by amplification and sequencing of the emm genes as described by Beall et al. (3). Lysates of the S. pyogenes isolates were prepared with mutanolysin as described previously (1). Primers GASM1 and GASM2 were used in PCRs carried out according to a method described previously (3). PCR products were sequenced with primer GASM1 with a dye terminator mix (Perkin Elmer, Applied Biosystems, Madrid, Spain) and were subjected to automated sequence analysis on a model 377 DNA sequencer (Perkin Elmer, Applied Biosystems). DNA sequences were subjected to homology searches against the bacterial DNA database with BLASTN. Sequences were given GenBank emm designations based on previously described criteria (3). We found a strong association between emm type 6 and resistance to ciprofloxacin. Thus, 19 of the ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates (63.3%) exhibited emm type 6, while only 1 ciprofloxacin-susceptible isolate (3.1%) exhibited this emm type. The remaining resistant isolates exhibited other emm types (Table 1). emm type distribution among susceptible isolates was highly heterogeneous. Up to 12 different emm types accounted for 100% of the susceptible isolates (data not shown).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Characteristics of pharyngeal ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pyogenes isolates collected in Spain (1998 to 1999)a
|
Results of PFGE analysis are shown in Fig. 1. Nine emm type 6 isolates presented PFGE pattern A, confirming our hypothesis that these isolates were genetically related. However, the remaining 10 emm type 6 isolates exhibited six different PFGE patterns. Moreover, the remaining ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates, which exhibited different emm types, also presented different PFGE patterns (Table 1). These findings suggest that ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pyogenes strains are the products of independent mutational events selected by the drugs from among a diverse population of S. pyogenes strains, presumably during treatment of other bacterial pathogens with these antibiotics. However, certain clones (of emm type 6 and PFGE pattern A) are preferentially selected and disseminated. Interestingly, eight of the nine isolates of this prevalent clone were also resistant to erythromycin (data not shown). The mechanism of resistance to erythromycin of these eight isolates is based on the presence of an efflux pump encoded by mefA as previously described (2). Moreover, all these isolates were collected from different patients in the same city. Thus, it is more probable that this specific clone was preferentially selected due to the use of macrolides than due to the use of quinolones, since all isolates were from children, in whom quinolone consumption, if any, is extremely low.
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Representative PFGE types of ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pyogenes isolated between 1998 and 1999 in Spain. S. pyogenes genomic DNA was isolated, restricted with SfiI, and analyzed by PFGE. Letters above the lanes refer to PFGE types, and the numbers below the lanes refer to the number of isolates of each type. Molecular size markers (in kilobases) are indicated on the left.
|
All ciprofloxacin-susceptible isolates demonstrated nucleotide sequences for the QRDRs of both gyrA and parC that were identical to those of the previously described susceptible strain ATCC 700294 (GenBank accession number AF220946) (data not shown). In contrast, mutations were identified only in parC, not in gyrA, in all the ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates. Specifically, two point mutations within the QRDR were identified in parC, with codon TCC (Ser-79; S. pyogenes coordinates) being replaced by TTC (Phe) or GCC (Ala) and with GAT (Asp-91) being replaced by AAT (Asn). Almost all ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates (25) showed only the replacement of Ser-79 by Ala, since the most prevalent ciprofloxacin-resistant clone (of emm type 6 and PFGE type A) contained this point mutation (Table 1). We found three isolates with a mutation in which Asp-91 was replaced by Asn and two isolates with this mutation together with a replacement of Ser-79 by Phe (Table 1).
Our results are consistent with previous reports which demonstrated that resistance to fluoroquinolones usually results from alterations in the QRDRs of either gyrA or parC or of both genes. This observation has been reported for S. pneumoniae (8, 9) and S. pyogenes; Yan et al. demonstrated that one isolate of S. pyogenes that was resistant to high levels of quinolones showed mutations in both gyrA and parC (15). Two recent studies conducted in the United States (12) and Germany (11) have confirmed the results reported by Yan et al. and identified S. pyogenes isolates with high levels of resistance to fluoroquinolones with mutations in both genes gyrA and parC. In these isolates, some mutations observed in parC were identical to those identified in our study, such as the replacement of Ser-79 by Phe (11, 12) and the replacement of Asp-91 by Asn (11). Recently, Alonso et al. showed that reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin is mainly associated with single mutations preferentially in parC, in which Ser-79 is replaced by Ala (R. Alonso, M. Galimand, and P. Courvalin, Letter, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3686-3687, 2002). In our study, nearly all the resistant isolates exhibited levels of resistance to ciprofloxacin (MIC = 4 µg/ml) similar to those reported by Alonso et al., and consistently, almost all the isolates showed the same mutation, Ser79Ala in parC.
The fact that quinolone resistance in S. pneumoniae arises through mutations of parC before changes in gyrA (6), together with the experimental observation that high levels of resistance to quinolones in S. pyogenes are associated with mutations in both gyrA and parC (15), suggests that the ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates identified in Spain are good candidates to become highly resistant to fluoroquinolones.
In summary, since the year 1988, in which ciprofloxacin was introduced into therapeutic practice in Spain, several clones of S. pyogenes have developed mutational alterations of key topoisomerases and exhibit reduced susceptibilities to ciprofloxacin. Certain clones may be selected and further disseminated, particularly if they combine resistance to macrolides and fluoroquinolones.
This study was supported by a grant from GlaxoSmithKline, Madrid, Spain.
Members of the Spanish Surveillance Group for Respiratory Pathogens are as follows: F. Marco and T. Jiménez de Anta, Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona; C. Fernández-Mazarrasa, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander; C. García-Riestra, B. Regueiro, A. Jato, and M. Prieto, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela; M. Casal and A. Ibarra, Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba; M. de la Rosa, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada; C. de la Torre and A. Gené, Hospital San Joan de Deus, Barcelona; C. García, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Zaragoza; E. Perea and L. Martínez, Hospital Virgen de la Macarena, Seville; J. Nogueira, Hospital Dr. Peset, Valencia; E. Pérez-Trallero and J. Larruskain, Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián; I. Trujillano, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Salamanca; J. Ruiz and E. Simarro, Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia; E. Cercenado, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid; A. M. Martín and F. Cañas, Hospital Insular, Las Palmas; J. Barrón and L. López, Hospital de Cruces, Bilbao; A. García, S. García, and M. Güeni, Hospital La Paz, Madrid; D. Romero and M. González, Hospital Nuestra Señora de Alarcos, Ciudad Real; A. Fenoll and J. Casal, Instituto Carlos III, Madrid; J. J. Granizo, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid; J. García-de-Lomas, C. Gimeno, and E. Esteban, Instituto Valenciano de Microbiología, Valencia; and R. Dal-Ré, GlaxoSmithKline S.A., Madrid, Spain.
Participants in the Spanish Surveillance Group for Respiratory Pathogens are listed in Acknowledgments. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»