AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giacometti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Scalise, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giacometti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Scalise, G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2005, p. 4042-4045, Vol. 49, No. 10
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.10.4042-4045.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparative Efficacies of Quinupristin-Dalfopristin, Linezolid, Vancomycin, and Ciprofloxacin in Treatment, Using the Antibiotic-Lock Technique, of Experimental Catheter-Related Infection Due to Staphylococcus aureus

Andrea Giacometti,1* Oscar Cirioni,1 Roberto Ghiselli,2 Fiorenza Orlando,3 Federico Mocchegiani,2 Carmela Silvestri,1 Alberto Licci,1 Matteo De Fusco,2 Mauro Provinciali,3 Vittorio Saba,2 and Giorgio Scalise1

Institute of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy,1 Department of General Surgery, INRCA-IRRCS, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy,2 Experimental Animal Models for Aging Units, Research Department, INRCA-IRRCS, Ancona, Italy3

Received 17 May 2005/ Returned for modification 25 June 2005/ Accepted 24 July 2005


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We performed in vitro studies to elucidate the bactericidal activity of the antibiotics in an adherent-cell biofilm model. Efficacy studies were performed in a staphylococcal central venous catheter (CVC) infection rat model. Silastic catheters were implanted into the superior cava. Via the CVC the rats were challenged with 1.0 x 106 CFU of a live Staphylococcus aureus strain. Twenty-four hours later, the antibiotic-lock technique was started. All animals were randomized to receive daily isotonic sodium chloride solution, quinupristin-dalfopristin (Q/D), linezolid, vancomycin, or ciprofloxacin at the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) and at 1,024 µg/ml in a volume of 0.1 ml that filled the CVC. The main outcome measures were MICs and MBCs for both planktonic and adherent cells, quantitative culture of the catheters and surrounding venous tissues, and quantitative peripheral blood cultures. The killing activities of all antibiotics against the adherent bacteria were at least fourfold lower than those against freely growing cells, with the exception of Q/D, which showed comparable activities against both adherent and planktonic organisms. Overall, Q/D at 1,024 µg/ml produced the greatest reduction in the number of cells recovered from the catheters, while at the same concentration, Q/D and vancomycin demonstrated higher activities than ciprofloxacin or linezolid in reducing the number of organisms recovered from the blood cultures. This study points out that treatment outcome of device-related infections cannot be predicted by the results of a standard susceptibility test such as the MIC. Our findings suggest that the clinically used antibiotics cannot eradicate the CVC infection through the antibiotic-lock technique, even at a concentration of 1,024 µg/ml.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Central venous catheters (CVCs) pose a greater risk of device-related infection than does any other indwelling medical device (8). Organisms colonizing CVCs include coagulase-negative staphylococci (mainly Staphylococcus epidermidis), Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, and Candida albicans (2). Initial colonization is followed by development of a biofilm structure, where the organisms are encased in a polysaccharide matrix. Actually, bacteria, especially staphylococci, on central venous catheters are most often found in biofilms: this matrix protects them from the attack of antimicrobial therapy and from the immune system. For these reasons, infections associated with biofilms are difficult to treat, and it is estimated that sessile bacteria in biofilms are at least 1,000 times more resistant to antibiotics than their planktonic counterparts (7, 12, 13, 22). This antibiotic resistance of biofilms often leads to the failure of conventional antibiotic therapy and necessitates the removal of infected devices.

The management of those CVCs that do become associated with biofilm-based infection remains problematic (7, 9, 20, 22). Systemic antibiotic therapy is usually administered, but, although effective in eliminating circulating bacteria, it usually fails to sterilize the surfaces of the catheters, leaving the patient at continuing risk of complications or recurrence (4, 10, 14, 18). For these reasons, attention has turned to the in situ treatment of colonized catheters, named the lock technique, also known as intraluminal therapy. This technique involves the instillation of a concentrated antibiotic solution into a colonized catheter, in a volume chosen to fill the lumen but not to spill out into the circulation (4).

Two advantages of the lock technique are the possibility to obtain high concentrations of antimicrobial agents in the site of infection and the likelihood of low incidence of antibiotic toxicity. Vancomycin, teicoplanin, gentamicin, amikacin, minocycline, clindamycin, and several other drugs have been used as antibiotic locks (3-5, 18). On this basis, new bactericidal agents might be used therapeutically in this way. Furthermore, the emergence in recent years of organisms that are resistant to many conventional antibiotics has stimulated the search for naturally occurring antimicrobial agents that may have clinical usefulness.

The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of four clinically available antibiotics in a rat model of CVC infection using the antibiotic-lock technique (19). In addition, in vitro studies were performed to elucidate the bactericidal activity of the antibiotics in an adherent-cell biofilm model (21).


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Organisms. S. aureus, strain Smith diffuse, kindly provided by N. Balaban (Department of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA), was used. This is a highly encapsulated, slime-producing strain with exopolysaccharides which are antigenically identical to those of many clinical S. aureus strains tested (16).

Antibiotics used in the study. Vancomycin (Sigma-Aldrich S.r.l., Milan, Italy), quinupristin-dalfopristin (Q/D) (Aventis Pharma, S.p.A., Lainate, Milan, Italy), ciprofloxacin (Bayer S.p.A., Milan, Italy), and linezolid (Pharmacia S.p.A., Milan, Italy) solutions were made fresh on the day of assay.

Susceptibility testing with planktonic cells. MIC and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) were determined according to the procedures outlined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI [formerly NCCLS]) (17). The MIC was taken as the lowest drug concentration at which observable growth was inhibited. The MBC was taken as the lowest concentration of each drug that resulted in more than 99.9% reduction of the initial inoculum. Experiments were performed in triplicate.

Susceptibility testing with adherent cells. For use in the biofilm test, the biofilm MIC and MBC (MICb and MBCb, respectively) were determined with modifications. Biofilms (prepared as described below) were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) in order to discard unbound bacteria. Subsequently, serial twofold dilutions of antibiotics in Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth were added to wells containing adherent organisms. The polystyrene plates were incubated for 18 h at 37°C in air. The MICb was taken as the lowest drug concentration at which observable growth was inhibited. To determine the MBCb, the MH broth containing antibiotics was removed from each well and replaced with antibiotic-free MH broth; the plates were incubated again for 18 h at 37°C in air. The MBCb was taken as the lowest concentration of each drug that resulted in no bacterial growth following removal of the drug (13, 21).

Adherent biofilm formation for susceptibility testing. To develop biofilms, 50 µl of tryptic soy broth (TSB) (Oxoid S.p.A., Milan, Italy) containing 106 CFU/ml of bacteria was added under aseptic conditions to each well of a tissue culture-treated polystyrene 96-well plate (Becton Dickinson) containing 150 µl of TSB-2% glucose. After 24 h of incubation at 37°C, the growth medium was discarded and each well was washed three times with PBS under aseptic conditions to eliminate unbound bacteria. To evaluate the formation of adherent biofilm, the remaining attached bacteria were fixed with 0.2 ml of 99% methanol per well, and after 15 min plates were emptied and left to dry. Then, plates were stained for 5 min with 0.2 ml of 2% crystal violet per well. Excess stain was rinsed off by placing the plate under running tap water (6, 21). The plates were air dried, and the dye bound to the adherent cells was resolubilized with 0.2 ml of 33% (vol/vol) glacial acetic acid per well. The optical density (OD) of each well was determined photometrically at 570 nm by using the MR 700 Microplate Reader (Dynatech Laboratories, Guernsey, United Kingdom). The 0.00 value (negative control) was determined for every plate measuring the optical density of a well filled with PBS solution. The cutoff OD for the microtiter plate test was defined as 3 standard deviations above the mean OD of the negative control. Tests were performed in duplicate.

Animals. Adult male Wistar rats weighting 200 to 300 g were used for all the experiments. The study was approved by the animal research ethics committee of the INRCA-IRRCS, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Preparation of inoculum. S. aureus strain Smith diffuse was grown in brain heart infusion broth. When bacteria were in the log phase of growth, the suspension was centrifuged at 1,000 x g for 15 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the bacteria were resuspended and diluted into sterile saline to achieve a concentration of approximately 1 x 1010 CFU/ml.

Rat CVC-associated infection model. Animals underwent catheterization. Briefly, a Silastic catheter was inserted into the jugular vein and was advanced into the superior vena cava. The proximal portion of the catheter was tunneled subcutaneously to exit in the midscapular space. A rodent restraint jacket was used to protect the catheter and to allow access to it. Twenty-four hours after CVC placement, blood cultures were obtained from the catheters to ensure sterility (19). Via the CVC, the rats were challenged with 1.0 x 106 CFU of live S. aureus strain Smith diffuse. Six animals (control group 24 h) were sacrificed 24 h after the bacterial challenge to verify the presence of infection by quantitative culture of the catheters and surrounding venous tissues. Contemporaneously, the antibiotic-lock technique was started for the other groups: the drugs were allowed to dwell for 1 h, and the catheters were then flushed with a heparin solution. Twelve animals for each group were randomized to receive daily isotonic sodium chloride solution, Q/D, linezolid, vancomycin, or ciprofloxacin at the MBCb and 1,024 mg/ml in a volume of 0.1 ml that filled the CVC. As described above, each compound was allowed to dwell for 1 h and the catheter was then flushed with a sterile heparin solution.

Evaluation of treatment. The measurements of the in vivo results were quantitative peripheral blood cultures and quantitative culture of the catheters and surrounding venous tissues.

On day 7 the animals were killed. Peripheral blood was obtained by aseptic percutaneous transthoracic cardiac puncture and quantitatively cultured on sheep blood agar. All plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h and evaluated for the presence of the staphylococcal strain. The organisms were quantitated by counting the number of CFU per plate.

The location of the distal tip of the CVC in the superior vena cava was confirmed visually, and the catheters and surrounding venous tissue were removed aseptically. The explanted catheters or venous tissues were placed in tubes containing 10 ml of PBS solution and sonicated for 5 min to remove the adherent bacteria. The wash fluid was quantitatively cultured by performing serial dilutions (0.1 ml) of the bacterial suspension in 10 mM of sodium HEPES buffer (pH 7.2) (Sigma-Aldrich) to minimize the carryover effect and by culturing each dilution on blood agar plates. As mentioned above, all plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h and evaluated for the presence of the staphylococcal strains.

The limit of detection for both methods was approximately 1 log10 CFU/ml.

Statistical analysis. MICs are presented as the geometric mean of three separate experiments. Quantitative culture results from all groups are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. The bacterial counts obtained from peripheral blood, explanted CVCs, and peripheral tissues were compared by using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Significance was accepted when the P value was ≤0.05.


   RESULTS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Susceptibility testing with planktonic cells. According to the broth microdilution method recommended by the CLSI, Q/D, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, and linezolid exhibited MICs of 1.00, 1.00, 0.25, and 2.00 µg/ml, respectively. The pattern of susceptibility was confirmed by the MBC determination, which exhibited for all antibiotics values twofold higher (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Antimicrobial activities of Q/D, linezolid, vancomycin, and ciprofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus strain Smith planktonic and adherent cells

 
Susceptibility testing with adherent cells. The production of the biofilm was photometrically confirmed: the strain showed a mean OD570 of 0.415 ± 0.031. The activities of all antibiotics against the adherent bacteria were at least two- to fourfold lower than those for freely growing cells. In detail, Q/D, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, and linezolid exhibited against the adherent organisms MICb values of 2.00, 2.00, 1.00, and 4.00 µg/ml, respectively. In contrast, the MBCb, defined as the lowest concentration of each drug that resulted in no bacterial growth following removal of the drug, showed an important increase in the values able to kill the cells, with the exception of Q/D, which showed comparable activities against both adherent and planktonic organisms (Table 1).

Evaluation of treatment. All animals included in the control group at 24 h demonstrated evidence of CVC infection, with quantitative culture results from catheters and surrounding tissues of 6.5 x 106 ± 1.8 x 106 CFU/ml.

Quantitative peripheral blood cultures obtained on day 7 by transthoracic cardiac puncture provided evidence that at the MBCb all drugs exerted weak antimicrobial activity, with results not significantly different from those for untreated controls.

On the contrary, at 1,024 µg/ml, the antimicrobial activity of all compounds was evident. In particular, Q/D demonstrated higher activities than ciprofloxacin, linezolid, and vancomycin in reducing the number of organisms recovered from the blood cultures (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Efficacy of Q/D, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, and linezolid in a rat model of CVC infection induced by S. aureus strain Smith diffuse

 
Similar results were obtained when the quantitative cultures were performed with the explanted catheters or venous tissues. Nevertheless, under these conditions, Q/D at 1,024 µg/ml produced the greatest reduction in the bacterial numbers: its activity was statistically higher than those of other drugs (Table 2).


   DISCUSSION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
In the industrialized world, biofilm-associated infections are becoming more important and staphylococci are the most frequently isolated organisms associated with biomaterials (7, 8). Biofilms have a variety of attributes that contribute synergistically to the process of antibiotic insensitivity. These attributes include, but are not limited to, a lower growth rate, an exopolysaccharide matrix, a change in gene expression, an optimal three-dimensional structure, and the production of potentially resistant genes (7). The resistance to antimicrobial agents of the sessile bacterial communities is at the basis of many persistent and chronic bacterial infections. Once a biofilm has been established, the embedded bacteria are less accessible and susceptible to a wide range of antibiotics. This ability to suppress antimicrobial efficacy is due to the thickness and chemical composition of the biofilm that prevents the perfusion of antibiotics up to inhibitory or bactericidal levels. In addition, the microenvironment of the biofilm or the metabolic state of the cells within the matrix may inhibit the efficacy of the antibiotics.

Several reports point out the problem of lack of reliability when conventional culture techniques are used to predict antibiotic susceptibilities of biofilm communities. This can explain part of the clinician's failure to eradicate biofilm-related infections. At present, antibiotic susceptibility is measured by standards set out by CLSI in which the MIC of an antibiotic is determined for bacteria in planktonic form only. Therefore, many attempts have been made to create experimental biofilm models that reproduce those formed in the human body so as to evaluate susceptibility tests in comparison to the classical method defined by CLSI (1, 11, 17).

The aim of the present study was to elucidate the bactericidal activity of four clinically available antibiotics in an adherent-cell biofilm model and to assess the efficacy of the compounds in a rat model of CVC infection using the antibiotic-lock technique. We examined the in vitro activities of Q/D, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, and linezolid against S. aureus strain Smith diffuse both in the planktonic state and after adhesion to polystyrene 96-well plates. The staphylococcal strain displayed biofilm formation capabilities. Evidence was found in this work that significant discordance exists between data obtained by the CLSI methods using planktonic cells and those obtained testing matrix-embedded organisms. In fact, the cells in suspension were susceptible to the antibiotics as determined by CLSI guidelines. In contrast, the antimicrobial agents were less active against adherent bacteria.

These results have been confirmed by the in vivo experiments. In fact, even at 1,024 µg/ml no agent produced eradication of the staphylococcal infection of the device. Nevertheless, at this concentration, Q/D, the combination agent that demonstrated in vitro the highest activity, demonstrated the greatest reduction in the number of cells recovered from the catheters, with a 4-log10 decrease of the bacterial count compared with that of the controls.

Today it is well known that biofilm-embedded bacteria are scarcely affected by antibiotic treatment even if they are defined as susceptible on the basis of in vitro tests. However, these organisms usually become rapidly susceptible to an antibiotic when dispersed from a biofilm, which suggests that resistance of bacteria in a biofilm is not acquired via mutation or mobile genetic elements. Organisms that colonize the CVC originate either from the skin insertion site, migrating along the external surface of the device, or from the hub, due to manipulation by health care workers, migrating along the inner lumen, and generally colonization and biofilm formation may occur within 3 days of catheterization. It has been shown that catheters in place for less than 10 days tended to have more extensive biofilm formation on the external surface of the catheter; for longer-term catheters (up to 30 days), biofilms were more extensive on the internal lumen (11). Various antibiofilm strategies directed at disruption of adherent bacteria are the focus of intense research to improve the detection of biofilm organisms and their eradication. Our study indicates that treatment outcome of device-related infections cannot be predicted by the results of a standard susceptibility test such as the MIC. In addition, our findings highlight that the clinically used antibiotics cannot eradicate the CVC infection through the antibiotic-lock technique, even at a concentration of 1,024 µg/ml.

In conclusion, our data confirm that the clinicians should follow the dogma that infected devices have to be removed in order to achieve cure.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by grants from the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (PRIN 2003).


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Clinica delle Malattie Infettive, c/o Ospedale Regionale, Via Conca, 71, 60200 Ancona, Italy. Phone: 39 071 5963715. Fax: 39 071 5963468. E-mail: anconacmi{at}interfree.it. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Amorena, B., E. Gracia, M. Monzon, J. Leiva, C. Oteiza, M. Perez, J. L. Alabart, and J. Hernandez-Yago. 1999. Antibiotic susceptibility assay for Staphylococcus aureus in biofilms developed in vitro. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 44:43-55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Atela, I., P. Coll, J. Rello, E. Quintana, J. Barrio, F. March, F. Sanchez, P. Barraquer, J. Ballús, A. Cotura, and G. Prats. 1997. Serial surveillance cultures of skin and catheter hub specimens from critically ill patients with central venous catheters: molecular epidemiology of infection and implications for clinical management and research. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1784-1790.[Abstract]
  3. Benoit, J. L., G. Carandang, M. Sitrin, and P. Arnow. 1997. Intraluminal antibiotic treatment of central venous catheter infections in patients receiving parenteral nutrition at home. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:743-744.
  4. Berrington, A., and F. K. Gould. 2001. Use of antibiotic locks to treat colonized central venous catheters. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 48:597-603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Capdevila, J. A., J. Gavalda, and A. Pahissa. 1996. Antibiotic-lock technique: usefulness and controversies. Antimicrob. Infect. Dis. Newsl. 15:9-13.[CrossRef]
  6. Christensen, G. D., W. A. Simpson, J. J. Younger, L. M. Baddour, F. F. Barrett, D. M. Melton, and E. H. Beachey. 1985. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J. Clin. Microbiol. 22:996-1006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Costerton, J. W., P. S. Stewart, and E. P. Greenberg. 1999. Bacterial biofilm: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284:1318-1322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Donlan, R. M., and J. W. Costerton. 2002. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15:167-193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Fux, C. A., J. W. Costerton, P. S. Stewart, and P. Stoodley. 2005. Survival strategies of infectious biofilm. Trends Microbiol. 13:34-40.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Fux, C. A., P. Stoodley, L. Hall-Stoodley, and J. W. Costerton. 2003. Bacterial biofilms: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 1:667-683.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Fux, C. A., S. Wilson, and P. Stoodley. 2004. Detachment characteristics and oxacillin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm emboli in an vitro catheter infection model. J. Bacteriol. 186:4486-4491.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Hall-Stoodley, L., J. W. Costerton, and P. Stoodley. 2004. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2:95-108.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Labthavikul, P., P. J. Petersen, and P. A. Bradford. 2003. In vitro activity of tigecycline against Staphylococcus epidermidis growing in an adherent-cell biofilm model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3967-3969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Maki, D. G. 2004. Infections caused by intravascular devices used for infusion therapy: pathogenesis, prevention and management, p. 155-212. In A. I. Bisno and F. A. Waldvogel (ed.), Infections associated with indwelling medical devices, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  15. Morikawa, K., M. Nonaka, Y. Yoshikawa, and I. Torii. 2005. Synergistic effect of fosfomycin and arbekacin on a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-induced biofilm in a rat model. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 25:44-50.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Nagl, M., P. Hengster, E. Semenitz, and W. Gottardi. 1999. The postantibiotic effect of N-chlorotaurine on Staphylococcus aureus. Application in the mouse peritonitis model. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 43:805-809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2003. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically: Approved standard M7-A6. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  18. Raad, I. 1998. Intravascular-catheter-related infection. Lancet 351:893-898.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Rupp, M. E., P. D. Fey, and G. M. Longo. 2001. Effect of LY33328 against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a rat model central venous catheter-associated infection model. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 47:705-707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Shorr, A. F., C. W. Humphreys, and D. L. Helman. 2003. New choices for central venous catheters. Potential financial implications. Chest 124:275-285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Stepanovic, S., D. Vukovic, I. Dakic, B. Savic, and M. A. Svabic-Vlahovic. 2000. Modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. J. Microbiol. Methods 40:175-179.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Stewart, P. S., and J. W. Costerton. 2001. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria biofilm. Lancet 358:135-138.[CrossRef][Medline]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2005, p. 4042-4045, Vol. 49, No. 10
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.10.4042-4045.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giacometti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Scalise, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giacometti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Scalise, G.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS