This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poole, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poole, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, R. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2005, p. 4382-4385, Vol. 49, No. 10
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.10.4382-4385.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Strains Isolated from Community Wastewater from a Semiclosed Agri-Food System in Texas

T. L. Poole,1* M. E. Hume,1 L. D. Campbell,2 H. M. Scott,2 W. Q. Alali,2 and R. B. Harvey1

Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Agriculture Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,1 Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas2

Received 20 May 2005/ Returned for modification 6 July 2005/ Accepted 20 July 2005


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium strains (VRE) were isolated from human wastewater but not swine fecal waste from a semiclosed agri-food system in Texas. Forty-nine VRE isolates possessed vanA, and one possessed vanB. Twenty-one pulsed-field gel electrophoresis types were identified and segregated into three groups. There was evidence of clonal dissemination among geographically separated sites.


arrow
TEXT
 
Many factors are involved in the global dissemination of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), as evidenced by the emergence of Enterococcus faecium complex 17 (22). VRE are highly prevalent among hospitals in the United States (2, 6) and have been reported from hospital wastewater but have not been isolated from livestock or any healthy human population (4, 7, 10, 16, 18, 20). There has been speculation that VRE exist among the general population in the United States and that more should be done to identify community carriage of VRE so control measures can be instituted (14).

The vanA gene cluster, which confers high-level resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin, is located on transposon Tn1546 and consists of seven genes: vanR, vanS, vanH, vanA, vanX, vanY, and vanZ (1). Genotypic characterization of mobile genetic elements, such as Tn1546, can be done independently from chromosomal analysis of individual clones, thus providing information on the transmission of the mobile element (5, 19, 21).

The purpose of this study was to characterize the VRE isolated from human wastewater effluents located within an integrated semiclosed agri-food system in Texas. This is the first known report of VRE shedding from a largely nonclinical community population in the United States.

Study population. The study population and sampling procedures have been previously described (17). Briefly, the study population consisted of humans and swine at 18 geographically separated farm and non-farm sites in Texas. Thirteen sites housed both swine and human cohorts. Within the study group, swine worker facilities housed 3,000 people, while non-swine worker facilities housed 18,000 people. Wastewater effluent from swine worker and non-swine worker dormitories drained into a central lift station and proceeded to a wastewater treatment plant. Each of the seven facilities that yielded VRE had its own separate wastewater treatment plant, such that VRE dissemination between facilities via wastewater would not have been likely. Swine fecal samples consisted of composite feces and lagoon samples. The swine breeding program was self- sustaining, and swine were not moved between farm sites. Those used for food production were moved to a single slaughter facility, where they were processed and consumed within the system. Approximately 50,000 swine were slaughtered each year.

VRE. From October 2002 to August 2004, 1,252 human effluent and 1,270 swine fecal or effluent samples were analyzed for enterococci. VRE were isolated on M-enterococcus agar (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) containing 20 µg/ml vancomycin and were incubated for 48 h at 45°C. Isolates from M-enterococcus agar were identified as E. faecium by the API 20 Strep system (bioMerieux, Hazelwood, MO) and PCR as described by Jackson et al. (11).

The MICs of the antimicrobials were determined by broth microdilution according to methods described by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (3). Fifty enterococci that demonstrated high-level resistance to vancomycin (≥512 µg/ml) were isolated from human wastewater. No VRE were isolated from swine samples (Table 1). All VRE were susceptible to daptomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin. Ninety-two percent of the VRE exhibited macrolide and lincosamide resistance. Seventy-four percent of the VRE isolates exhibited high-level resistance to gentamicin (≥1,024 µg/ml).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Total number of samples selectively screened for all enterococci and VRE by year, host species, and sample origin

PCR genotyping of vanA, vanB, and vanC VRE has been previously described (8). Forty-nine E. faecium isolates possessed the vanA gene cluster, and one, VB, carried the vanB gene cluster. All VRE exhibiting high-level resistance to gentamicin were shown to possess the bifunctional gene (acc6'-aph2) that confers high-level resistance to aminoglycosides. Forty-three VRE isolates (86%) possessed the rRNA methylase gene (ermB) that confers macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B resistance.

The use of PCR fragment length polymorphism analysis to detect intergenic insertion sequences has been previously described (13, 19). PCR analysis of the intergenic regions of Tn1546 was done to detect heterogeneity among the 49 vanA isolates. Two types of Tn1546 element were identified. Thirty-nine VRE carried IS1251 in the vanSH intergenic region (Table 2, isolates not in boldface), and no other polymorphisms were detected. No insertion sequences were detected in the second type of Tn1546 element, carried by 10 isolates. To date, IS1251 has only been identified in VRE isolated from hospitals in the United States (9, 12, 13, 21). A number of polymorphic Tn1546 types have been identified among VRE in the United States (5, 9, 12, 13, 21); it would be of interest to know how many of the types are endemic to public hospitals in Texas.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Geographic location, PFGE type, and date of VRE isolate recoverya

All isolates were examined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) as previously described (15). Twenty-one PFGE types, arbitrarily designated A to U and represented by three groups (groups I, II, and III), were detected among the 50 VRE isolates (Fig. 1). Group I included 39 isolates (78%), the most predominant being PFGE type A (n = 23). All type A clones were indistinguishable by antimicrobial susceptibility profile and molecular analysis. Type A clones were disseminated among four geographically separated swine farm locations (TX1 to TX4) (Table 2). The distance between farm sites ranged up to 200 km. Twenty (87%) of the type A clones were isolated in June and July of 2003; however, three were isolated in April 2004.



View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Dendrogram illustrating relatedness of 21 PFGE types. The bar indicates the percent similarity coefficient.

All group I VRE were isolated from farm facilities with the exception of VRE 749 and 751 (85.3% similarity coefficient), both of which were isolated from a hospital facility (TX6) (Table 2) in June 2004.

At TX1 and TX3, VRE were only isolated once. VRE persisted through the duration of this study at TX2 and TX4. The greatest degree of heterogeneity among VRE was observed from those isolated at TX4. The presence of related VRE PFGE group I and II isolates from 2002 to 2004 may suggest the ability of VRE to persist in the study community or in community wastewater over extended periods of time. The presence of identical VRE clones (PFGE type A) at multiple geographically separated farm sites demonstrates the occurrence of clonal VRE dissemination.

All human subjects were enrolled at the central core facility (TX7) and were subsequently assigned living quarters. Individuals who had been in the system for long periods of time were selected for farm work; once assigned, there was very little movement of farm workers among farm sites. There was virtually no movement of non-farm workers among any sites. VRE carrier status was not known at the time of entry; however, none of the current farm workers would have entered the system during the time period of this study. As in any community population, individuals may have need of hospital (inpatient) or dispensary (outpatient) services from time to time. Each site is equipped with a dispensary. Because the medical histories and documentation of movement among workers were not available, the mechanism for dissemination to geographically separated sites is unknown. However, additional population studies and genetic analyses of the VRE in this study combined with VRE from hospital reservoirs in Texas could conceivably trace the origin of these isolates.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We express thanks to the appropriate administration of the State of Texas for ongoing cooperation with this research. We thank Reiley Street and Jacquline Kotzur for technical assistance.

Financial support was provided by the National Alliance for Food Safety, USDA-ARS cooperative agreement 58-6202-2-022, and USDA-CSREES-NRICGP Section 32.1 Epidemiologic Approaches to Food Safety, grant no. 2003-35212-13298.

Mention of a trade name, proprietary product, or specific equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the United States Department of Agriculture and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: USDA/ARS/SPARC, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX 77845. Phone: (979) 260-9360. Fax: (979) 260-9332. E-mail: poole{at}ffsru.tamu.edu. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Arthur, M., and P. Courvalin. 1993. Genetics and mechanisms of glycopeptide resistance in enterococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:1563-1571.[Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1993. Nosocomial enterococci resistant to vancomycin-United States, 1989-1993. Morbid. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 42:597-599.
    3. 3
  3. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. 2005. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals. Approved standard M31-A. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pa.
    4. 4
  4. Coque, T. M., J. F. Tomayko, S. C. Ricke, P. C. Okhyusen, and B. E. Murray. 1996. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci from nosocomial, community, and animal sources in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2605-2609.[Abstract]
    5. 5
  5. Donabedian, S. M., E. Hershberger, L. Thal, J. W. Chow, D. B. Clewell, B. Robinson-Dunn, and M. J. Zervos. 2000. PCR fragment length polymorphism analysis of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2885-2888.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Dunne, W. M., Jr., and W. Wang. 1997. Clonal dissemination and colony morphotype variation of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates in metropolitan Detroit, Michigan. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:388-392.[Abstract]
    7. 7
  7. Dunne, W. M., Jr., B. S. Dunne, and D. Smith. 1996. Watch out where the huskies go. ASM News 62:283.
    8. 8
  8. Dutka-Malen, S., C. Molinas, M. Arthur, and P. Courvalin. 1990. The VANA glycopeptide resistance protein is related to D-alanyl-D-alanine ligase cell wall biosynthesis enzymes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 224:364-372.[Medline]
    9. 9
  9. Handwerger, S., J. Skoble, L. Discotto, and M. Pucci. 1995. Heterogeneity of the vanA gene cluster in clinical isolates of enterococci from the northeastern United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:362-368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Harwood, V. J., M. Brownell, W. Perusek, and J. E. Whitlock. 2001. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. isolated from wastewater and chicken feces in the United States. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:4930-4933.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Jackson, C. R., P. J. Fedorka-Cray, and J. B. Barrett. 2004. Use of a genus- and species-specific multiplex PCR for identification of enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:3558-3565.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Jensen, L. B., P. Ahrens, L. Dons, R. N. Jones, A. M. Hammerum, and F. M. Aarestrup. 1998. Molecular analysis of Tn1546 in Enterococcus faecium isolated from animals and humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:437-442.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. MacKinnon, M., M. Drebot, and G. Tyrrell. 1997. Identification and characterization of IS1476, an insertion sequence-like element that disrupts VanY function in a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium strain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1805-1807.[Abstract]
    14. 14
  14. McDonald, L. C., M. J. Kuehnert, F. C. Tenover, and W. R. Jarvis. 1997. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci outside the health-care setting: prevalence, sources and public health implications. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 3:311-317.[Medline]
    15. 15
  15. Poole, T. L., M. E. Hume, K. J. Genovese, T. J. Anderson, C. L. Sheffield, K. M. Bischoff, and D. J. Nisbet. 2001. Persistence of a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in an anaerobic continuous-flow culture of porcine microflora in the presence of subtherapeutic concentrations of vancomycin. Microb. Drug Resist. 7:343-348.[CrossRef][Medline]
    16. 16
  16. Schwalbe, R. S., A. McIntosh, S. Qaiyumi, J. A. Johnson, and G. J. J. Morris. 1999. Isolation of vancomycin-resistant enterococci from animal feed in USA. Lancet 353:72.[CrossRef][Medline]
    17. 17
  17. Scott, H. M., L. D. Campbell, R. B. Harvey, K. M. Bischoff, W. Q. Alali, K. S. Barling, and R. C. Anderson. 2005. Patterns of antimicrobial resistance among commensal Escherichia coli from integrated multi-site housing and worker cohorts of humans and swine. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2:24-37.[CrossRef][Medline]
    18. 18
  18. Simjee, S., D. G. White, P. F. McDermott, D. D. Wagner, M. J. Zervos, S. M. Donabedian, L. L. English, J. R. Hayes, and R. D. Walker. 2002. Characterization of Tn1546 in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolated from canine urinary tract infections: evidence of gene exchange between human and animal enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4659-4665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    19. 19
  19. van den Braak, N., A. van Belkum, M. van Keulen, J. Vliegenthart, H. A. Verbrugh, and H. Endtz. 1998. Molecular characterization of vancomycin-resistant enterococci from hospitalized patients and poultry products in The Netherlands. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1927-1932.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    20. 20
  20. Welton, L. A., L. A. Thal, M. B. Perri, S. Donabedian, J. McMahon, J. W. Chow, and M. J. Zervos. 1998. Antimicrobial resistance in enterococci isolated from turkey flocks fed virginiamycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:705-708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    21. 21
  21. Willems, R. J. L., J. Top, N. van den Braak, A. van Belkum, D. J. Mevius, G. Hendriks, M. van Santen-Verheuvel, and J. D. A. van Embden. 1999. Molecular diversity and evolutionary relationships of Tn1546-like elements in enterococci from humans and animals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:483-491.
    22. 22
  22. Willems, R. J. L., J. Top, M. van Santen, D. A. Robinson, T. M. Coque, F. Baquero, H. Grundmann, and M. J. M. Bonten. 2005. Global spread of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium from distinct nosocomial genetic complex. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11:821-828.[Medline]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2005, p. 4382-4385, Vol. 49, No. 10
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.10.4382-4385.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poole, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poole, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, R. B.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»