Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2005, p. 5107-5111, Vol. 49, No. 12
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.49.12.5107-5111.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anaesthesia & Clinical Care Medicine, University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria,1 Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria,2 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria,3 Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria4
Received 24 August 2004/ Returned for modification 25 January 2005/ Accepted 6 July 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
A variety of mechanisms for antibiotic treatment failure are discussed. Atelectasis associated with ventilation/perfusion mismatch (15) is likely to influence the distribution of antibiotics in the interstitial lung tissue. Additionally, common therapeutic procedures during CS could theoretically substantially affect plasma and lung tissue concentrations of antibiotics in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) by the following mechanisms: (i) changes in micro- and macrocirculatory blood flow, (ii) increased volume of drug distribution, and (iii) capillary leak mediated by extracorporeal circulation.
Despite many theories, antibiotic concentration has rarely been measured in human lung tissue after major surgery such as CS.
Therefore, we decided to measure fluoroquinolone concentrations in human lung tissue after CS. Levofloxacin was chosen as the antibiotic because it is effective in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by susceptible pathogens (9, 13, 17). As a measuring method, we used in vivo microdialysis, an innovative clinical technique, most suitable to measure interstitial antibiotic concentrations in a clinical setting (14, 18). However, in vivo microdialysis has not been used in a complicated clinical setting such as open-heart surgery. Therefore, it was our aim to test in an initial step whether this technique can be applied without serious risk during CS. If in vivo microdialysis was found to be feasible during CS, our study could provide the unbound, i.e., microbiologically active, concentration of levofloxacin in the interstitial lung tissue and thus could lead to sufficient adjustment of dosing of the drug.
|
|
|---|
Patients. A total of six patients were studied. All patients were undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) during CPB. Inclusion criteria were as follows: female or male >19 years of age with a body mass index (BMI) between 20 and 35. Conventional antibiotic prophylaxis was not affected by the study. Preoperative demographic, hemodynamic, and laboratory data of study patients are presented in Table 1.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Preoperative demographic, hemodynamic, and laboratory data
|
In vivo probe calibration. To obtain extracellular concentrations from dialysate concentrations, the microdialysis probe calibration was performed in each patient according to the retrodialysis method (12). The principle of this method relies on the assumption that the diffusion process is quantitatively equal in both directions through the semipermeable membrane. Therefore, we added levofloxacin to the perfusion medium, and the disappearance rate (delivery) through the membrane was taken as the in vivo recovery.
Blood samples were kept on ice for a maximum of 60 min and were centrifuged at 4°C and 4,000 rpm for 10 min; cells were discharged and plasma was obtained. Plasma samples and dialysate samples were snap-frozen at 20°C and thereafter stored at 80°C until analysis.
Experimental study conduct. For CS, the following procedures routinely took place before study administration. For maintenance of fluid balance, 10 ml/kg of body weight Ringer's lactate solution was administered via a peripheral venous line before induction of anesthesia. After routine monitoring (electrocardiogram, pulsoxymetry, and invasive blood pressure monitoring), general anesthesia was induced via a peripheral vein. A median sternotomy was performed in all patients. All patients received heparin sodium (300 IU/kg) for CPB, and activated clotting time was kept above 400 seconds (Hemochrom 400; International Technidyne Corp., Edison, NJ). The extracorporeal circuit consisted of a membrane oxygenator (Monolyth; Sorin Biomedica Cardio, Saluggia, Italy), an open venous reservoir system (Monolyth; Sorin Biomedica Cardio, Saluggia, Italy), and a polyvinyl chloride tubing. Ringer's lactate solution (1,500 ml), mannitol 20% (100 ml), and heparin sodium (5,000 IU) were used to prime the circuit. During extracorporeal circulation, body core temperature was maintained at 36°C (normothermic CPB). Mechanical ventilation was terminated after cardioplegic arrest. For study purposes, the surgeon inserted a microdialysis probe into the pulmonary tissue by the following procedure. The surface of the skin localized on the chest wall was punctured by a 20-gauge intravenous plastic cannula after routine surgical skin surface disinfection. The tip of the flexible microdialysis catheter was then inserted through this cannula. Employing a gutter-like 1.4-mm slit needle (supplied in a CMA-60 microdialysis set; CMA Microdialysis, Stockholm, Sweden), the tip of the probe was inserted into the reinflated lung under visual control. The slit needle was retracted and peeled off the tube of the microdialysis catheter. Thereafter, the microdialysis probe was perfused with degassed Ringer's solution. After final inspection for air leakage or bleeding at the insertion site, the sternum was closed conventionally. After the end of surgery, the microdialysis probe was connected and perfused with Ringer's solution at a flow rate of 1.5 µl/min. This was performed by a microinfusion pump (CMA Microdialysis, Stockholm, Sweden). After a 30-min baseline sampling period, a dose of 500 mg of levofloxacin was administered intravenously by means of an infusion pump over a period of 30 min. Blood samples were drawn from the radial artery for 8 h to determine concentrations of levofloxacin initially in 30-min intervals and in 60-min intervals after 2 h. In vivo probe calibration was performed thereafter for a 30-min period. Simultaneously with blood sampling, microdialysis samples were collected. The probes were removed immediately after the end of sampling.
Determination of levofloxacin in microdialysis and plasma samples. Total levofloxacin levels in plasma and free concentrations in microdialysates were measured by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (19). The plasma proteins were removed via methanol precipitation. Both sample matrices were diluted with Ringer's solution 1:10 or 1:1,000 prior to the injection. Levofloxacin was added as an internal standard to both sample matrices. The high-performance liquid chromatography system consisted of a System Gold solvent delivery module 126, an automatic sampler 508 (Beckman-Coulter, Fullerton, CA), and a fluorescence detector FP-920 operated at 310/467 nm (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan). The separations were carried out with a BDS Hypersil C18 column (Thermo Hypersil-Keystone, Bellefonte, PA) at 45°C. The mobile phase consisted of a phosphate buffer and 1.5% acetonitrile, adjusted to pH 3 with tetrabutylammonium hydroxide. Calibration standards for plasma samples were prepared by spiking drug-free plasma with levofloxacin. For the quantitation of microdialysis samples, levofloxacin standard solutions in Ringer's solution were used. The assay was sensitive for levofloxacin with a limit of quantification of 0.02 µg/ml in plasma and in microdialysates.
Data analysis and calculations. Statistical analysis was performed using a commercially available computer program (Statistica; StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK). Data are presented as means and standard errors of the means. Median values and ranges were used when data were not normally distributed.
Pharmacokinetic data were fitted by a commercially available computer program (Kinetica 2.0.2; Innaphase, Philadelphia, PA). The time versus levofloxacin concentration profiles for plasma and interstitial lung tissue were measured, and the following pharmacokinetic parameters were determined: maximum drug concentration (Cmax), time to maximum drug concentration (Tmax), the area under the concentration curve (AUC), and the AUC for plasma/AUC for tissue (AUCplasma/AUCtissue) ratio as a value for drug penetration into the interstitial compartment.
|
|
|---|
Preoperative demographic, hemodynamic, and laboratory data are given in Table 1. The average age of patients was 60.2 ± 8 years. Patients presented with a weight of 85 ± 11.5 kg, a height of 169.4 ± 7.8 cm, and had a BMI of 25.3 ± 2.0 kg/m2.
After administration of 500 mg of levofloxacin intravenously, plasma concentration rose rapidly with a median peak of 15.9 µg/ml (range, 6.7 to 18.8 µg/ml) within 20 min (range, 20 to 40 min) after the end of drug infusion (Fig. 1A; Table 2).
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. These panels show the time (hours) versus concentration (µg/ml) profiles of levofloxacin in plasma (A) and in pulmonary fluid (B) of each patient.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Main pharmacokinetic parameters of levofloxacin in plasma and pulmonary tissue
|
The time versus median values of concentration profiles for levofloxacin in plasma and in pulmonary interstitial space fluid are shown in Fig. 2.
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. This graph shows the time (hours) versus median concentration (µg/ml) of levofloxacin in plasma and interstitial lung tissue and additionally the MIC90s for the potential respiratory pathogens.
|
For fluoroquinolones, the pharmacodynamic parameter that best correlates with the outcome is the AUC/MIC ratio. The AUCtissue ratio is shown in Table 2 for single subjects, and other major pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters are also shown.
Median levofloxacin levels exceeded MICs (MIC90s) for the potential respiratory pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC90, 0.5 µg/ml) in all patients (10, 11). However, the AUCtissue/MIC ratio was exceeding the critical value of 30 in only three out of six patients. The MIC90 for Klebsiella species (MIC90, 2.0 µg/ml) (11, 23) prophylaxis was exceeded in pulmonary fluid only in three out of six patients. However, the MIC90 for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC90, 8 µg/ml) (11, 23) exceeded pulmonary fluid concentrations of levofloxacin by far (Table 2; Fig. 2).
No correlation between BMI and AUCtissue (r = 0.64; P > 0.05) nor between CPB time and AUCtissue (r = 0.51; P > 0.05) was observed. Additionally, no correlation between fluid balance and AUCtissue (r = 0.56; P > 0.05) was detected in our patients.
Three bypasses were performed in four patients, and the remaining two patients received two grafts. Surgical time was 240 ± 13.8 min (range, 190 to 285 min).
All patients were treated with norepinephrine intravenously (median dosage of 0.048 µg/kg/min; range, 0.012 to 0.13 µg/kg/min). Only two of six patients needed inotropic support with dobutamine (no. 2, 2.23 µg/kg/min; no. 5, 4.76 µg/kg/min).
The mean duration of intensive-care unit stay was 1.9 ± 0.7 days. Discharge from hospital was possible after 8.9 ± 1.6 days.
|
|
|---|
Levofloxacin penetrated within 40 min into lung tissue (Table 2). Over the observation period of 8 h, tissue concentrations of levofloxacin were higher than the MIC90 for S. pneumoniae in all subjects. However, for fluoroquinolones, the pharmacodynamic parameter that best correlates with outcome is the AUCtissue/MIC ratio. An unbound AUCtissue/MIC ratio of 30 to 40 is associated with high rates of bacterial killing and thus maximizes the efficacies of fluoroquinolones (8). The AUCtissue/MIC was far below 35 in the majority of our patients (Table 2). The MIC90s for Klebsiella species and P. aeruginosa were far higher than lung tissue concentrations of levofloxacin. Therefore, the usual dosing scheme for levofloxacin seems inadequate for treatment of pneumonia caused by Klebsiella and P. aeruginosa after CPB. However, the AUCtissue of levofloxacin observed in our patients after CS was comparable to the concentrations measured by Zeitlinger et al. in the muscle tissue of sepsis patients (25).
Discussion of the method of in vivo microdialysis. Most drugs do not exert their effects within the plasma compartment but in defined target tissues. From the scientific and clinical point of view, it is desirable to determine drug levels from the site of action because penetration from the central compartment to the site of action might be very variable depending on various factors (3). For antibiotics the site of action is the interstitial space fluid. Therefore, the most relevant antibiotic concentration is the interstitial antibiotic concentration (7). However, drug concentrations in the interstitial compartment could not be evaluated by routine techniques so far. Nevertheless, this would be of special interest because the dosing of therapeutic and prophylactic antibiotics could be adjusted to the interstitial drug levels in order to guarantee adequate dosing and minimal side effects.
In the six patients taking part in our study, no side effects or adverse events were observed. Therefore, we conclude that measurement of interstitial drug concentration is possible in clinical practice, even if the patient is undergoing complicated surgery such as CABG with CPB. Additionally, our data show that it is important to reevaluate clinical dosing schemas by means of direct in vivo measurements.
The goal of antibiotic therapy is to reach tissue concentrations of the antibiotic exceeding the MIC90 for the most relevant pathogens. It is desirable that all patients receiving the antibiotic exhibit tissue concentrations higher than the MIC90. As shown in Fig. 1C, 500 mg of levofloxacin in patients undergoing CABG with CPB was only sufficient in three out of six patients to reach interstitial concentrations over the MIC90 for the most prevalent pathogens. Therefore, we conclude that levofloxacin administered with the usual dose of 500 mg is not associated with sufficient lung tissue concentrations necessary to be effective against all K. pneumoniae strains. Additionally, the MIC90 of levofloxacin for P. aeruginosa was not reached, by far, immediately after CABG with CPB (Fig. 2). Since 750 mg of levofloxacin is recommended as the maximum dosage (20), it seems reasonable to increase the dosage in the setting we examined. Whether this would lead to an adequate increase in tissue concentration remains to be shown. This is surprising, because levofloxacin should qualify in the mentioned dosage for excellent coverage against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens (9, 13, 17). However, the results of the present study could have been strongly influenced by changes in macro- and microcirculation, increased volume of drug distribution, capillary leakage, and atelectasis associated with CABG with CPB. However, no correlations (r < 0.5; P > 0.05) between BMI and AUCtissue, CPB time and AUCtissue, and fluid balance and AUCtissue were detected in our patients. The amount of atelectasis formation and capillary leakage were not evaluated because of ethical and technical reasons.
Another important aspect in the interpretation of our data is the fact that many pathogens enter the respiratory system via the bronchial pathway. Several authors have shown that levofloxacin concentration in the epithelial lining fluid is substantially higher than the concentration of levofloxacin in plasma (4, 8). Therefore, "low" levofloxacin concentrations measured in lung interstitial fluid might be less important for infections caused by pathogens entering the lung via the bronchial system than for pathogens entering the lung via the circulation.
The differences of antibiotic penetration were reasonably small (Table 2) compared to interindividual penetration differences in the muscle tissue of sepsis patients (25). Direct comparison with the interstitial concentration of levofloxacin in lung tissue after CS evaluated by other authors is, due to the lack of data, impossible.
In conclusion, closed-chest microdialysis is a feasible and safe method to measure drug concentrations in the human lung in vivo. Especially in high-risk patients, e.g., cystic fibrosis patients, the measurement of interstitial drug concentration seems important to achieve optimal dosing for therapy and prophylaxis. This is strongly supported by our data showing unexpectedly low lung tissue concentrations of levofloxacin in patients undergoing CABG during CPB.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://ec.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»