This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pankey, G.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pankey, G.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2005, p. 5166-5168, Vol. 49, No. 12
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.12.5166-5168.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Synergy of Daptomycin plus Rifampin against Enterococcus faecium Resistant to both Linezolid and Vancomycin

George Pankey,* Deborah Ashcraft, and Nalini Patel

Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana

Received 20 May 2005/ Returned for modification 21 August 2005/ Accepted 27 September 2005


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
In vitro synergy testing of daptomycin plus rifampin was performed against 24 unique isolates of Enterococcus faecium resistant to both linezolid and vancomycin. Synergy testing showed that 21/24 (88%) were synergistic and 3/24 (12%) were indifferent by the Etest method. Time-kill assays revealed synergy for 18/24 (75%) and indifference for 6/24 (25%).


arrow
TEXT
 
Therapeutic failure due to antimicrobial-resistant gram-positive pathogens, such as linezolid- and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, is increasing. In an attempt to improve efficacy, an antimicrobial combination is frequently administered on an empirical basis. Many antimicrobial combinations have been studied for synergy in vitro and in vivo against enterococci (4, 9, 17, 19, 20), with no demonstrated correlation. We studied the in vitro combination of daptomycin (DAP) and rifampin (RIF) against linezolid- and vancomycin-resistant E. faecium.

Daptomycin has good in vitro activity against gram-positive bacteria, including vancomycin-resistant enterococci (1, 5, 8, 10-12, 21). Rifampin has shown synergy with other drugs in animal models for the treatment for gram-positive infections (2, 3, 7, 16, 17). In a synergy study with vancomycin-resistant E. faecium by Rand and Houck, it was suggested that, at subinhibitory daptomycin concentrations, daptomycin might bind to the bacterial cell, opening a channel that allows rifampin entry (19).

Standard laboratory powders of DAP (Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lexington, MA) and RIF (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were used in this study. Etest strips (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) of daptomycin and rifampin were also used. The daptomycin Etest contained a concentration gradient of daptomycin with a standard amount of calcium throughout the strip.

Twenty-four unique clinical Enterococcus faecium isolates with distinct plasmid DNA (by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis) that were resistant to both linezolid (Etest MICs, 8 to >256 µg/ml) and vancomycin (Etest MICs, >256 µg/ml) were collected from throughout the United States. All strains were identified by the Vitek system (bioMerieux Inc., Hazelwood, MO). Isolates were stored frozen at –70°C in Columbia broth with 20% glycerol. Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 was included as a quality control strain (6). Mueller-Hinton II broth (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Sparks, MD) was prepared in the laboratory and supplemented to the recommended 50 mg/liter calcium for the testing of daptomycin (15). Mueller-Hinton II agar plates (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Sparks, MD) were used for the Etest MIC determination and the Etest synergy method. Trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Sparks, MD) was used for the colony counts in the time-kill assay.

Daptomycin and rifampin MICs were determined by broth microdilution (BMD) and Etest. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI [formerly NCCLS]) interpretive standards for rifampin and enterococci are as follows: ≤1 µg/ml, susceptible; 2 µg/ml, intermediate; ≥4 µg/ml, resistant; for daptomycin and enterococci, the CLSI standard is that ≤4 µg/ml implies susceptibility (6).

BMD MICs were determined following 2003 CLSI guidelines (15). Etest MICs for daptomycin and rifampin were determined in triplicate, and testing was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. MICs between twofold dilutions were rounded up to the next twofold dilution for purposes of comparison with the BMD MIC.

Synergy testing was performed using an Etest method (18) and time-kill assay (TKA). The Etest method was performed in triplicate, the summation fractional inhibitory concentration ({Sigma}FIC) was calculated for each set of MICs, and the mean {Sigma}FIC was used for comparison to the TKA.

To evaluate the effect of the combinations, the FIC was calculated for each antibiotic in each combination. High-off-scale MICs (>256 µg/ml) were converted to the next twofold dilution (512 µg/ml). The following formulas were used to calculate the {Sigma}FIC: (i) FIC of drug A = MIC of drug A in combination/MIC of drug A alone; (ii) FIC of drug B = MIC of drug B in combination/MIC of drug B alone; (iii) {Sigma}FIC = FIC of drug A + FIC of drug B.

Synergy was defined by a {Sigma}FIC of ≤0.5. Antagonism was defined by a {Sigma}FIC of >4. Interactions represented by a {Sigma}FIC of >0.5 but ≤4 were termed indifferent (1a).

The TKA was chosen to be compared with the Etest method for all isolates following guidelines set by the CLSI (14) and was performed as described in our previous study (18). Each isolate was tested against daptomycin and rifampin alone and in combination at a concentration equal to the MIC to correlate with the Etest. Bottles were incubated at 35°C in ambient air for 24 h. Samples (0.5 ml) were removed from each bottle at 0 h and 24 h. TKA results which were discordant to the Etest method results were repeated and confirmed the initial TKA interpretation. Performing serial dilutions, plating with a spiral plater (which further dilutes and plates the sample), and using a concentration of drug equal to the MIC helped reduce the possibility of antibiotic carryover. Synergy was defined as a ≥2 log10 decrease in colony count at 24 h by the combination compared to the most active single agent, and the number of surviving organisms in the presence of the combination had to be ≥2 log10 CFU/ml below the starting inoculum (1a). Indifference was defined as <2 log10 increase in colony count at 24 h by the combination compared by the most active single agent. Antagonism was defined as a ≥2 log10 increase in colony count at 24 h by the combination compared with that by the most active single agent alone (13).

Some isolates showed resistance to rifampin: 15/24 (63%) by broth microdilution and 16/24 (67%) by Etest. All isolates were susceptible to daptomycin by both methods (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. MICs by Etest and broth microdilution and synergy testing by Etest and time-kill assay

The daptomycin Etest had 88% (21/24) ± 1 twofold dilution essential agreement with daptomycin BMD, suggesting adequate calcium content of the Etest strip when used with Becton Dickinson Mueller-Hinton II agar plates. The rifampin Etest had only 58% (14/24) essential agreement with rifampin BMD. The rifampin BMD MICs were lower for 17/24 (71%) isolates, higher for 5/24 (21%) isolates, and identical for 2/24 (8%) isolates when compared to rifampin Etest MICs.

Daptomycin and rifampin synergy ({Sigma}FIC ≤ 0.5) was found in 20/24 (83%) strains when tested by Etest. The TKA revealed 75% (18/24) synergy and 25% (6/24) indifference. Concordance of the Etest synergy method and the TKA was demonstrated in 15/24 (63%) isolates. For three isolates, the Etest method {Sigma}FICs were 0.6, 0.9, and 1.0 (indifference) but the TKA showed synergy. Six isolates showed synergy, with {Sigma}FICs of 0.2, 0.4, 0.2, 0.4, 0.3, and 0.2 but were indifferent by TKA (–1.4, –0.9, –1.4, –0.6, –1.0, and –0.5 log10 change, respectively, in CFU/ml). The synergy occurred despite significant daptomycin activity against all isolates. No antagonism was detected by either method (Table 1).

Synergy testing methods are not standardized for reproducibility and interpretation, making comparison of results from different studies extremely difficult.

In the TKA for synergy, drug concentrations are fixed and do not decrease over time, as they would in vivo. In addition, there are no standard concentrations at which antibiotics are tested. The inoculum size and time frame of the TKA add more variability to the test. The time parameter of 24 h can limit or alter results of the experiment if regrowth occurs with one or both antibiotics. Regrowth can be caused by use of a subinhibitory concentration of antibiotics, emergence of resistant subpopulations, or bacteria that adhere to the surface of the bottle and are subsequently released in the media. Another factor affecting regrowth is inactivation of the antibiotics in vitro.

The Etest synergy method used a concentration equal to the MIC for each drug. Depending on the drug, concentration ranges vary on Etest strips. A MIC-to-MIC placement of the strips seems to give a more accurate diffusion of the two drugs and indication of the effects (if any) that each drug has on the other in combination against the organism (18). Several abstracts have been presented on the technique using gram-positive bacteria: G. Pankey and D. Ashcraft, Abstr. 101st Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol., abstr. C92, 2001; G. Pankey, D. Ashcraft, and O. Prakash, Abstr. 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. E-1133, 2002; and G. Pankey, D. Ashcraft, and P. Pankey, Abstr. 41st Infect. Dis. Soc. Am., abstr. 229, 2003. The use of the Etest strips for synergy has yet to be standardized but has the potential to be a useful screening test for the determination of synergy.

Our Etest method was compared to TKA, but the two methods use totally different test systems, solid media versus liquid, respectively. However, both methods predict bactericidal activity in vitro. The Etest was able to detect slight hazes of growth and resistant subpopulations.

It is interesting that we could demonstrate in vitro synergy of daptomycin and rifampin against some E. faecium isolates. However, the mechanism of this in vitro synergy is unknown. The clinical benefit of in vitro synergy by daptomycin and rifampin against any strain of E. faecium remains speculation.

(Part of these data were presented at the 42nd annual meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, Boston, MA, October 2004.)


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Royanne Vortisch for laboratory assistance, Marion Stafford for editorial support, Pat Pankey for laboratory management, and Richard Goering, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, for performing the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis on the E. faecium isolates.

This study was funded by a grant from Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Ochsner Clinic Foundation, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA 70121. Phone: (504) 842-4006. Fax: (504) 842-5433. E-mail: gpankey{at}ochsner.org. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Akins, R. L., and M. J. Rybak. 2001. Bactericidal activities of two daptomycin regimens against clinical strains of glycopeptide intermediate-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:454-459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 1
  2. Anonymous.2005 . Instructions to authors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:1-20.
    3. 2
  3. Archer, G. L., J. L. Johnston, G. J. Vazquez, and H. B. Haywood III. 1983. Efficacy of antibiotic combinations including rifampin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis: in vitro and in vivo studies. Rev. Infect. Dis. 5(Suppl. 3):S538-S542.
    4. 3
  4. Brandt, C. M., M. S. Rouse, B. M. Tallan, N. W. Laue, W. R. Wilson, and J. M. Steckelberg. 1995. Effective treatment of cephalosporin-rifampin combinations against cryptic methicillin-resistant beta-lactamase-producing coagulase-negative staphylococcal experimental endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1815-1819.[Abstract]
    5. 4
  5. Caron, F., M. D. Kitzis, L. Gutmann, A. C. Cremieux, B. Maziere, J. M. Vallois, A. Saleh-Hghir, J. F. Lemeland, and C. Carbon. 1992. Daptomycin or teicoplanin in combination with gentamicin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to a highly glycopeptide-resistant isolate of Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:2611-2616.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 5
  6. Cha, R., R. G. Gruez, Jr., and M. J. Rybak.2003 . Daptomycin dose-effect relationship against resistant gram-positive organisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1598-1603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    7. 6
  7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2005. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Fifteenth informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pa.
    8. 7
  8. Craven, N., and J. C. Anderson. 1981. Therapy of experimental staphylococcal mastitis in the mouse with cloxacillin and rifampicin, alone and in combination. Res. Vet. Sci. 31:295-300.[Medline]
    9. 8
  9. Critchley, I. A., R. S. Blosser-Middleton, M. E. Jones, C. Thornsberry, D. F. Sahm, and J. A. Karlowsky. 2003. Baseline study to determine in vitro activities of daptomycin against gram-positive pathogens isolated in the United States in 2000-2001. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1689-1693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 9
  10. Dawis, M. A., H. D. Isenberg, K. A. France, and S. G. Jenkins. 2003. In vitro activity of gatifloxacin alone and in combination with cefepime, meropenem, piperacillin and gentamicin against multidrug-resistant organisms.J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51:1203-1211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 10
  11. Johnson, A. P., S. Mushtaq, M. Warner, and D. M. Livermore. 2004. Activity of daptomycin against multiresistant gram-positive bacteria including enterococci and Staphylococcus aureus resistant to linezolid. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 24:315-319.[CrossRef][Medline]
    12. 11
  12. Jorgensen, J. H., S. A. Crawford, C. C. Kelly, and J. E. Patterson. 2003. In vitro activity of daptomycin against vancomycin-resistant enterocooci of various Van types and comparison of susceptibility testing methods.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3760-3773.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 12
  13. Lewis, R. E., D. J. Diekema, S. A. Messer, M. A. Pfaller, and M. E. Klepser.2002 . Comparison of Etest, chequerboard dilution and time-kill studies for the detection of synergy or antagonism between antifungal agents tested against Candida species. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 49:345-351.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 13
  14. Lorian, V. (ed.). 1996. Antibiotics in laboratory medicine, 4th ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md.
    15. 14
  15. NCCLS.1999 . Methods for determining bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents. NCCLS document M26-A. NCCLS, Wayne, Pa.
    16. 15
  16. NCCLS.2003 . Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. NCCLS document M7-A6. NCCLS, Wayne, Pa.
    17. 16
  17. Norden, C. W. 1983. Experimental chronic staphylococcal osteomyelitis in rabbits: treatment with rifampin alone and in combination with other antimicrobial agents. Rev. Infect. Dis. 5(Suppl. 3):S491-S494.
    18. 17
  18. Oill, P. A., G. M. Kalmanson, and L. B. Guze. 1981. Rifampin, ampicillin, streptomycin, and their combinations in the treatment of enterococcal pyelonephritis in rats. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 20:491-492.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    19. 18
  19. Pankey, G. A., and D. S. Ashcraft. 2005. In vitro synergy of ciprofloxacin and gatifloxacin against ciprofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:2959-2964.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    20. 19
  20. Rand, K. H., and H. Houck. 2004. Daptomycin synergy with rifampin and ampicillin against vancomycin-resistant enterococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53:530-532.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    21. 20
  21. Smith, C. E., B. E. Foleno, J. F. Barrett, and M. B. Frosco. 1997. Assessment of the synergistic interactions of levofloxacin and ampicillin against Enterococcus faecium by the checkerboard agar dilution and time-kill methods. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 27:85-92.[CrossRef][Medline]
    22. 21
  22. Streit, J. M., R. N. Jones, and H. S. Sader.2004 . Daptomycin activity and spectrum: a worldwide sample of 6737 clinical gram-positive organisms. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53:669-674.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2005, p. 5166-5168, Vol. 49, No. 12
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.12.5166-5168.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Warren, R. E. (2008). Daptomycin in endocarditis and bacteraemia: a British perspective. J Antimicrob Chemother 62: iii25-iii33 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pankey, G.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pankey, G.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, N.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»