Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2005, p. 781-782, Vol. 49, No. 2
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.49.2.781-782.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
The Biocide Triclosan Selects Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Mutants That Overproduce the SmeDEF Multidrug Efflux Pump
Patricia Sanchez,
Eduardo Moreno, and
Jose L. Martinez*
Departamento de Biotecnología Microbiana, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, CSIC, Campus Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain
Received 28 May 2004/
Returned for modification 8 August 2004/
Accepted 7 October 2004

ABSTRACT
The possibility that triclosan selects
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia mutants overexpressing the multidrug resistance pump SmeDEF
is analyzed. Five out of 12 triclosan-selected mutants were
less susceptible to antibiotics than the wild-type strain and
overproduced SmeDEF. Results are discussed in relation to current
debates on the potential selection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria
by household biocides.

TEXT
Triclosan (Irgasan) is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial compound
widely used in toothpastes, cleaning solutions, plastics, house
fabrics, and coatings for hospital devices. Triclosan resistance
can be due to mutations in genes encoding enoyl reductases,
to changes in membrane permeability, and/or to the expression
of efflux pumps (
13). The fact that some efflux pumps capable
of extruding triclosan are capable also of extruding antibiotics
(
7,
8,
12) has produced some concern in the scientific community
(
10). If triclosan can select mutants that overproduce multidrug
resistance (MDR) pumps, one of the highest risks for the emergence
of antibiotic-resistant populations will be bacteria with an
environmental origin, since one of the widest utilization of
triclosan is in household products. In the last years we have
characterized the SmeDEF efflux pump from
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (
2), an opportunistic bacterial pathogen with an environmental
origin. It has been shown that SmeDEF has a relevant role in
both intrinsic (
15) and acquired antibiotic resistance (
3) in
S. maltophilia. Herein we have analyzed whether triclosan might
select
S. maltophilia mutants that overproduce SmeDEF. To that
goal, 100 µl of overnight cultures of
S. maltophilia strain
D457, grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (
6), was poured onto
Mueller-Hinton plates (
6) containing triclosan (64 µg/ml).
From these plates, 12 mutants resistant to the biocide were
picked up and grown in LB agar plates without antibiotics to
avoid any possible induction of SmeDEF, and their susceptibility
to tetracycline was tested by disk plate assays. Five of the
mutants had reduced tetracycline susceptibility in comparison
with the parental strain. The susceptibilities to different
antibiotics of these five mutants were determined, and the results
are shown in Table
1. All mutants were less susceptible to tetracycline,
chloramphenicol, and ciprofloxacin, whereas the tobramycin MIC
was lower or did not change (strain EM5). This phenotype is
similar to that of the SmeDEF-overproducing strain D457R (
4)
and is thus compatible with SmeDEF overproduction in these mutants.
To test this possibility, the expression of
smeD (the first
gene of the operon) was evaluated by reverse transcriptase PCR
(RT-PCR). Briefly, 100 ng of total RNA from
S. maltophilia grown
to an optical density of 0.3 (

= 600 nm) was subjected to RT-PCR
analysis using the Ready-To-GO RT-PCR bead kit (Amersham Biosciences)
by following the manufacturer's instructions. Primers smeD1
(5'-CCAAGAGCCTTTCCGTCAT-3') and smeD2 (5'-TCTCGGACTTCAGCGTGAC-3')
were used (
3) to test SmeDEF efflux pump expression in these
mutants. To ascertain that no residual DNA was present in the
RNA preparations, PCRs were performed under the same conditions
except that no RT was added. The RT-PCR products were visualized
in 2% agarose-ethidium bromide gels. As shown in Fig.
1a, all
antibiotic-resistant triclosan mutants expressed
smeD at higher
levels than the wild-type parental strain. To further confirm
these data, the level of expression of SmeF, the porin of the
system, was analyzed by Western blotting as described previously
(
2). Whole-cell extracts from
S. maltophilia strains, obtained
from stationary-phase cultures and containing equal amounts
of proteins, as measured with bicinchoninic acid systems (Pierce),
were subjected to polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred
to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore), stained with
Ponceau S to confirm that equal amounts of protein had been
loaded in each track, and analyzed with a polyclonal antibody
raised against SmeF at a final dilution of 1:5,000. Horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated protein A (Sigma) was used at a final
concentration of 0.25 µg/ml, and detection of immunoreactive
bands was performed by chemiluminescence with the commercial
kit ECL-plus (Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's
instructions. The results are shown in Fig.
1b and indicate
that the triclosan-selected mutants overexpressed SmeF. Altogether
these data indicate that triclosan can select (at least in vitro)
S. maltophilia mutants that overproduce the multidrug efflux
pump SmeDEF.
Selection of antibiotic-resistant mutants by widely used biocides
has produced a strong debate in the last years (
1,
11,
13).
Several articles have indicated the risks of using antibacterial
household products without any restriction. In fact, work carried
out in vitro has demonstrated that biocides are able to select
bacteria overexpressing multidrug efflux pumps (i.e., AcrAB
[
12] in
Escherichia coli and MexCD-OprJ [
7] and MexJK [
8] in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Our results are in line with those
previous reports. There are two groups of
S. maltophilia triclosan-resistant
mutants. One group is formed by mutants in which the antibiotic
susceptibility was unaffected, and the other is formed by mutants
in which the antibiotic susceptibility was reduced as the consequence
of SmeDEF overexpression. A recent work has shown that there
is not a correlation between in-house utilization of common
antibacterial cleaning agents and the presence of antibiotic-resistant
bacteria in the home environment (
9). Two hypothesis may explain
the discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo data. First,
the probability of emergence and enrichment of resistant populations
in vitro might be different from that in vivo. Second, multidrug-resistant
mutants may be impaired for survival in the environment (
5,
14). In this case, even if these mutants are selected, they
should be displaced by other triclosan-resistant strains that
are not resistant to antibiotics. In vitro studies, like the
one presented here, are useful for predicting the capability
of an organism to become resistant in the future. The lack of
correlation between antibiotic resistance and the utilization
of housecleaning antibacterials in published field studies (
9)
reflects the current situation. However, as stated in reference
13, "There remain concerns about the unnecessary use of triclosan
and other biocides in the home and in clinical settings." More
studies are required to understand the behavior in natural environments
of antibiotic-resistant mutants selected by triclosan in order
to predict the future trend of the association between triclosan
and antibiotic resistance.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by grants BIO2001-1081 from MCyT and
08.2/0020/2001 from CAM. E.M. was the recipient of a fellowship
from CSIC.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Departamento de Biotecnología Microbiana, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, CSIC, Campus Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain. Phone: 34-91-5854542. Fax: 34-91-5854506. E-mail:
jlmtnez{at}cnb.uam.es.


REFERENCES
1 - Aiello, A. E., and E. Larson. 2003. Antibacterial cleaning and hygiene products as an emerging risk factor for antibiotic resistance in the community. Lancet Infect. Dis. 3:501-506.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Alonso, A., and J. L. Martinez. 2000. Cloning and characterization of SmeDEF, a novel multidrug efflux pump from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:3079-3086.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Alonso, A., and J. L. Martinez. 2001. Expression of multidrug efflux pump SmeDEF by clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1879-1881.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Alonso, A., and J. L. Martinez. 1997. Multiple antibiotic resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1140-1142.[Abstract]
5 - Alonso, A., G. Morales, R. Escalante, E. Campanario, L. Sastre, and J. L. Martinez. 2004. Overexpression of the multidrug efflux pump SmeDEF impairs Stenotrophomonas maltophilia physiology. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53:432-434.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Atlas, R. M. 1993. Handbook of microbiological media. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
7 - Chuanchuen, R., K. Beinlich, T. T. Hoang, A. Becher, R. R. Karkhoff-Schweizer, and H. P. Schweizer. 2001. Cross-resistance between triclosan and antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is mediated by multidrug efflux pumps: exposure of a susceptible mutant strain to triclosan selects nfxB mutants overexpressing MexCD-OprJ. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:428-432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Chuanchuen, R., C. T. Narasaki, and H. P. Schweizer. 2002. The MexJK efflux pump of Pseudomonas aeruginosa requires OprM for antibiotic efflux but not for efflux of triclosan. J. Bacteriol. 184:5036-5044.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Cole, E. C., R. M. Addison, J. R. Rubino, K. E. Leese, P. D. Dulaney, M. S. Newell, J. Wilkins, D. J. Gaber, T. Wineinger, and D. A. Criger. 2003. Investigation of antibiotic and antibacterial agent cross-resistance in target bacteria from homes of antibacterial product users and nonusers. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95:664-676.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Levy, S. B. 2002. Active efflux, a common mechanism for biocide and antibiotic resistance. Symp. Ser. Soc. Appl. Microbiol. 2002:65S-71S.
11 - Levy, S. B. 2001. Antibacterial household products: cause for concern. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7:512-515.[Medline]
12 - McMurry, L. M., M. Oethinger, and S. B. Levy. 1998. Overexpression of marA, soxS, or acrAB produces resistance to triclosan in laboratory and clinical strains of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 166:305-309.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 - Russell, A. D. 2004. Whither triclosan? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53:693-695.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Sanchez, P., J. F. Linares, B. Ruiz-Diez, E. Campanario, A. Navas, F. Baquero, and J. L. Martinez. 2002. Fitness of in vitro selected Pseudomonas aeruginosa nalB and nfxB multidrug resistant mutants. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 50:657-664.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Zhang, L., X. Z. Li, and K. Poole. 2001. SmeDEF multidrug efflux pump contributes to intrinsic multidrug resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:3497-3503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2005, p. 781-782, Vol. 49, No. 2
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.49.2.781-782.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Martinez, J. L.
(2009). The role of natural environments in the evolution of resistance traits in pathogenic bacteria. Proc R Soc B
276: 2521-2530
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hernandez, A., Mate, M. J., Sanchez-Diaz, P. C., Romero, A., Rojo, F., Martinez, J. L.
(2009). Structural and Functional Analysis of SmeT, the Repressor of the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Multidrug Efflux Pump SmeDEF. J. Biol. Chem.
284: 14428-14438
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pumbwe, L., Skilbeck, C. A., Wexler, H. M.
(2007). Induction of multiple antibiotic resistance in Bacteroides fragilis by benzene and benzene-derived active compounds of commonly used analgesics, antiseptics and cleaning agents. J Antimicrob Chemother
60: 1288-1297
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mima, T., Joshi, S., Gomez-Escalada, M., Schweizer, H. P.
(2007). Identification and Characterization of TriABC-OpmH, a Triclosan Efflux Pump of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Requiring Two Membrane Fusion Proteins. J. Bacteriol.
189: 7600-7609
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pumbwe, L., Glass, D., Wexler, H. M.
(2006). Efflux Pump Overexpression in Multiple-Antibiotic-Resistant Mutants of Bacteroides fragilis.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 3150-3153
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Piddock, L. J. V.
(2006). Clinically Relevant Chromosomally Encoded Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps in Bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
19: 382-402
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Poole, K.
(2005). Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother
56: 20-51
[Abstract]
[Full Text]