This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Effron, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Effron, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2005, p. 2119-2121, Vol. 49, No. 5
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.5.2119-2121.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Differences in Interactions between Azole Drugs Related to Modifications in the 14-{alpha} Sterol Demethylase Gene (cyp51A) of Aspergillus fumigatus

G. Garcia-Effron, E. Mellado, A. Gomez-Lopez, L. Alcazar-Fuoli, M. Cuenca-Estrella, and Juan L. Rodriguez-Tudela*

Servicio de Micología, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

Received 3 December 2004/ Returned for modification 5 January 2005/ Accepted 20 January 2005


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The combined activity of different azole drugs was investigated. Thirty-one Aspergillus fumigatus strains were tested, including two cyp51A– and one cyp51B– gene-knockout strain and azole-susceptible and -resistant strains with different resistance mechanisms. The combination of itraconazole and voriconazole was synergistic for all strains except for those with gene knockouts.


arrow
TEXT
 
Invasive aspergillosis (IA) treatment is complicated due to several factors such as problems associated with the diagnosis of IA, the seriousness of the underlying diseases, and the limited number of therapeutic options (3, 15). In addition, there has been an increase in reported cases of antifungal drug resistance (2, 4, 5, 10). Azole-resistant clinical strains have shown two distinct patterns of in vitro resistance associated with amino acid substitutions in the Cyp51A protein (G54 and M220) (7, 17, 20, 22). Spontaneous azole-resistant laboratory mutants with some Cyp51A substitutions have been isolated as well (16, 17, 22). These data suggest that azole resistance among clinical strains may become more common in the future associated with the spread of prophylaxis, preemptive treatments, specific therapies with azole agents, and the use of demethylase inhibitors as pesticides in agriculture (8, 11, 12, 27).

It is necessary to increase the number of therapeutic options for treating IA. In this sense, some reports have documented in vivo and in vitro encouraging results with drug combinations. The description of two different 14-{alpha} sterol demethylase-like genes (cyp51A and cyp51B) in Aspergillus spp. (19) opens the possibility that each enzyme could interact differently with azole drugs. The aim of this study was to explore the in vitro activity of azole drug combinations against a collection of Aspergillus fumigatus strains.

(Part of this work was presented at the 43rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, Ill., 14 to 17 September 2003.)

Strains. Thirty-one Aspergillus fumigatus strains from the Mycelial Collection of the Spanish National Center for Microbiology were used throughout this work. These strains were divided in four groups according to their azole antifungal drug MIC patterns and the Cyp51A amino acid substitutions: group 1, itraconazole (ITC)-susceptible group (S group), including eight azole-susceptible strains, without substitutions on Cyp51A; group 2, the knockout (KO) group, including two strains with cyp51A-targeted gene disruption and one strain with cyp51B-targeted gene disruption (data not published); group 3, the G54 group, 12 azole-resistant strains (itraconazole MICs of ≥8 µg/ml) with a G54 substitution in Cyp51A (7); and group 4, the M220 group, eight azole-resistant strains that show an M220 substitution in Cyp51A (20). A. fumigatus ATCC 204305 and Aspergillus flavus ATCC 204304 were included as control isolates in each set of MIC determinations. See Table 1 for details.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Antifungal susceptibility results of individual azole agents for A. fumigatus strains used in this work

Data analysis. The significance of the differences in MICs and summation of the fractional inhibitory concentration ({Sigma}FIC) were determined by Student's t test (unpaired, unequal variance). A P value of <0.01 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was done with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 12.0; SPSS S.L., Madrid, Spain).

Antifungal susceptibility testing. Antifungal agents utilized were ITC (Janssen Pharmaceutical S.A., Madrid, Spain), voriconazole (VRC) (Pfizer S.A., Madrid, Spain), and fluconazole (FLC) (Pfizer). The individual MICs were determined following the microdilution method recommended by NCCLS, document M-38A (23), with modifications (5, 25, 26). The concentrations assayed ranged from 0.015 to 8 µg/ml for ITC and VRC and from 1.25 to 640 µg/ml for FLC. Experiments were repeated at least three times on three separate days.

Drug interaction evaluation. In vitro drug interaction was evaluated as described earlier (1, 14, 18) with a two-dimensional, two-agent broth microdilution checkerboard technique, using 96-well flat-bottomed microtitration plates. The combinations assayed were ITC-FLC, VRC-FLC, and ITC-VRC. Different concentration intervals were used if the strains were ITC susceptible or ITC resistant. To determine the nature of the in vitro interaction between drugs, the data obtained were analyzed using methods described before (1, 14, 18). The {Sigma}FIC interpretations were as follows: (i) a value of ≤0.5 was considered synergy, (ii) indifference was defined as a value between >0.5 and ≤4, and (iii) values of >4 were considered as antagonistic (14, 24).

All strains' individual MICs and {Sigma}FIC are shown in Table 1. The in vitro drug interaction for the S group showed a {Sigma}FIC interpreted as indifferent for all the combinations tested except for four strains, where ITC-VRC showed a synergistic pattern (arithmetic mean [AM], 0.440; range, 0.386 to 0.461). All combinations exhibited indifferent patterns against knockout strains (ITC-FLC: AM, 0.940; range, 0.88 to 1.00; ITC-VRC: AM, 0.827; range, 0.73 to 1.00; VRC-FLC: AM, 0.677; range, 0.5 to 0.87). Notably, in comparison with the rest of the isolates analyzed (Table 1) FLC MICs were significantly lower (P < 0.01) in both cyp51A-knockout strains.

On the other hand, the combination ITC-VRC exhibited a synergistic pattern against all strains included in the G54 group (AM, 0.194; range, 0.115 to 0.263). For ITC-FLC combination, synergy was observed for all strains except one (CM-2266) (Table 1) (AM, 0.194; range, 0.085 to 0.526). This group presented a uniform behavior for the combination VRC-FLC with an indifferent pattern (AM, 0.777; range, 0.510 to 1.250). Finally, the combinations ITC-FLC and VRC-FLC showed indifferent values of {Sigma}FIC for all strains in the M220 group (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Summary of azole drug individual MICs and interaction interpretation using the {Sigma}FIC

Overall, the combination ITC-VRC showed synergy (AM, 0.271; range, 0.169 to 0.439, excluding KO group) (Table 2) for 24 out of 28 strains (85.71%). Notably, all strains with {Sigma}FIC of >0.5 belonged to ITC-susceptible or to KO groups. In general, except for the G54 group, the combinations that had FLC as one of the components presented an indifferent pattern (for ITC-FLC combination: AM, 0.898; range, 0.085 to 2.000; for VRC-FLC combination: AM, 1.139; range, 0.520 to 2.150).

Some reports have documented successful treatments of Scedosporium prolificans infections with terbinafine plus azole compounds (13). Both agents inhibit ergosterol biosynthesis by blocking different steps in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway: the azole drugs target lanosterol 14-{alpha} sterol demethylase, while terbinafine inhibits squalene epoxidase (9). Our results, obtained with the combination VRC-ITC, suggest that a similar effect could occur with Cyp51A and Cyp51B inhibition, indicating that these enzymes could act in the same pathway but on different substrata or that they might be aiming at different steps in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway. This hypothesis was reinforced by the fact that all combinations show indifferent patterns for the KO group due to the lack of one of the enzymes and the consequent blockade of one of the possible pathways (Table 2).

Therapeutic options to treat IA are scarce, and A. fumigatus azole drug resistance is emerging (6, 21). In addition, therapeutic options are narrowing since azole antifungal drugs exhibit structural resemblances and cross-resistance is expected (17). An alternative to face this problem is the use of drug combinations as a potential therapeutic option, which could be exploited clinically. Despite the results obtained in this work, further in vitro and in vivo studies are needed before proposing an azole combination as a possible IA treatment. Functional analysis of both Cyp51s and in vivo models to test the results obtained here are needed to confirm this indirect evidence. These experiments are under way in our laboratory.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported in part by grants MPY1120/03 from Instituto de Salud Carlos III and SAF2002-02089 from the Ministry of Science and Technology. E. Mellado held a contract Ramón y Cajal from the Ministry of Science and Technology. L. Alcazar-Fuoli has a predoctoral fellowship from Instituto de Salud Carlos III.

We thank D. W. Denning and J. Mosquera, University of Manchester (United Kingdom), for providing strains CM-1244 (AF-72), CM-1252 (AF-90), CM-1245 (AF-91), CM-2158 (AF-1422), CM-2159 (F/6929), CM-2160 (F/7075), CM-2161 (Br130), CM-2162 (Br181), and CM-2164 (SO/3829). We also thank E. Dannaoui, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon I (France), for the gift of the strain CM-2097 (AF-1237). We thank Gema del Rio and María José Casas for invaluable technical assistance.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Servicio de Micología, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Carretera Majadahonda-Pozuelo Km 2, 28220 Madrid, Spain. Phone: 34-91-8223919. Fax: 34-91-5097966. E-mail: juanl.rodriguez-tudela{at}isciii.es. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Afeltra, J., R. G. Vitale, J. W. Mouton, and P. E. Verweij. 2004. Potent synergistic in vitro interaction between nonantimicrobial membrane-active compounds and itraconazole against clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus resistant to itraconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1335-1343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Chryssanthou, E. 1997. In vitro susceptibility of respiratory isolates of Aspergillus species to itraconazole and amphotericin B. Acquired resistance to itraconazole. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 29:509-512.[Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Clark, T. A., and R. A. Hajjeh. 2002. Recent trends in the epidemiology of invasive mycoses. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 15:569-574.[Medline]
    4. 4
  4. Dannaoui, E., E. Borel, F. Persat, M. F. Monier, M. A. Piens, et al. 1999. In-vivo itraconazole resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus in systemic murine aspergillosis. J. Med. Microbiol. 48:1087-1093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    5. 5
  5. Denning, D. W., S. A. Radford, K. L. Oakley, L. Hall, E. M. Johnson, and D. W. Warnock. 1997. Correlation between in-vitro susceptibility testing to itraconazole and in-vivo outcome of Aspergillus fumigatus infection. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40:401-414.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Denning, D. W., K. Venkateswarlu, K. L. Oakley, M. J. Anderson, N. J. Manning, D. A. Stevens, D. W. Warnock, and S. L. Kelly. 1997. Itraconazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1364-1368.[Abstract]
    7. 7
  7. Diaz-Guerra, T. M., E. Mellado, M. Cuenca-Estrella, and J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela. 2003. A point mutation in the 14{alpha}-sterol demethylase gene cyp51A contributes to itraconazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1120-1124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. Dyer, P. S., J. Hansen, A. Delaney, and J. A. Lucas. 2000. Genetic control of resistance to the sterol 14{alpha}-demethylase inhibitor fungicide prochloraz in the cereal eyespot pathogen Tapesia yallundae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:4599-4604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Ghannoum, M. A., and L. B. Rice. 1999. Antifungal agents: mode of action, mechanisms of resistance, and correlation of these mechanisms with bacterial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12:501-517.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Gomez-Lopez, A., G. Garcia-Effron, E. Mellado, A. Monzon, J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela, and M. Cuenca-Estrella. 2003. In vitro activities of three licensed antifungal agents against Spanish clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3085-3088.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Hof, H. 2001. Critical annotations to the use of azole antifungals for plant protection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:2987-2990.[Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Hollomon, D. W. 1993. Resistance to azole fungicides in the field. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 21:1047-1051.[Medline]
    13. 13
  13. Howden, B. P., M. A. Slavin, A. P. Schwarer, and A. M. Mijch. 2003. Successful control of disseminated Scedosporium prolificans infection with a combination of voriconazole and terbinafine. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 22:111-113.[Medline]
    14. 14
  14. Johnson, M. D., C. MacDougall, L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, J. R. Perfect, and J. H. Rex. 2004. Combination antifungal therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:693-715.[Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Latge, J. P. 1999. Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12:310-350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. Manavathu, E. K., G. J. Alangaden, and P. H. Chandrasekar. 2003. Differential activity of triazoles in two-drug combinations with the echinocandin caspofungin against Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51:1423-1425.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    17. 17
  17. Mann, P. A., R. M. Parmegiani, S. Q. Wei, C. A. Mendrick, X. Li, D. Loebenberg, B. DiDomenico, R. S. Hare, S. S. Walker, and P. M. McNicholas. 2003. Mutations in Aspergillus fumigatus resulting in reduced susceptibility to posaconazole appear to be restricted to a single amino acid in the cytochrome P450 14{alpha}-demethylase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:577-581.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. Meletiadis, J., J. W. Mouton, J. F. Meis, and P. E. Verweij. 2003. In vitro drug interaction modeling of combinations of azoles with terbinafine against clinical Scedosporium prolificans isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:106-117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    19. 19
  19. Mellado, E., T. M. Diaz-Guerra, M. Cuenca-Estrella, and J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela. 2001. Identification of two different 14-{alpha} sterol demethylase-related genes (cyp51A and cyp51B) in Aspergillus fumigatus and other Aspergillus species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2431-2438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    20. 20
  20. Mellado, E., G. Garcia-Effron, L. Alcazar-Fuoli, M. Cuenca-Estrella, and J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela. 2004. Substitutions at methionine 220 in the 14{alpha}-sterol demethylase (Cyp51A) of Aspergillus fumigatus are responsible for resistance in vitro to azole antifungal drugs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:2747-2750.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    21. 21
  21. Mosquera, J., and D. W. Denning. 2002. Azole cross-resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:556-557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    22. 22
  22. Nascimento, A. M., G. H. Goldman, S. Park, S. A. Marras, G. Delmas, U. Oza, K. Lolans, M. N. Dudley, P. A. Mann, and D. S. Perlin. 2003. Multiple resistance mechanisms among Aspergillus fumigatus mutants with high-level resistance to itraconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1719-1726.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    23. 23
  23. NCCLS. 2002. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. M-38A. NCCLS, Wayne, Pa.
    24. 24
  24. Odds, F. C. 2003. Synergy, antagonism, and what the chequerboard puts between them. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52:1.
    25. 25
  25. Petrikkou, E., J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela, M. Cuenca-Estrella, A. Gomez, A. Molleja, and E. Mellado. 2001. Inoculum standardization for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi pathogenic for humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:1345-1347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    26. 26
  26. Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L., E. Chryssanthou, E. Petrikkou, J. Mosquera, D. W. Denning, and M. Cuenca-Estrella. 2003. Interlaboratory evaluation of hematocytometer method of inoculum preparation for testing antifungal susceptibilities of filamentous fungi. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5236-5237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    27. 27
  27. Vanden Bossche, H., L. Koymans, and H. Moereels. 1995. P450 inhibitors of use in medical treatment: focus on mechanisms of action. Pharmacol. Ther. 67:79-100.[CrossRef][Medline]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2005, p. 2119-2121, Vol. 49, No. 5
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.5.2119-2121.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Boyken, L., Rice, C., Tendolkar, S., Hollis, R. J., Diekema, D. J. (2008). In Vitro Survey of Triazole Cross-Resistance among More than 700 Clinical Isolates of Aspergillus Species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 2568-2572 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cowen, L. E., Steinbach, W. J. (2008). Stress, Drugs, and Evolution: the Role of Cellular Signaling in Fungal Drug Resistance. Eukaryot Cell 7: 747-764 [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Effron, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Effron, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»