Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2005, p. 3009-3010, Vol. 49, No. 7
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.49.7.3009-3010.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Compound Efflux in Helicobacter pylori
Amy Kutschke and
Boudewijn L. M. de Jonge*
Infection Discovery, Cancer and Infection Research Area, AstraZeneca R&D, Boston, 35 Gatehouse Drive, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451
Received 9 February 2005/
Returned for modification 27 March 2005/
Accepted 28 March 2005

ABSTRACT
Susceptibility testing with a variety of structurally unrelated
compounds showed that
hefC in
Helicobacter pylori is involved
in multidrug efflux. This efflux was shown to depend on the
proton motive force, as demonstrated by ethidium bromide accumulation
experiments. Thus,
H. pylori contains an active multidrug efflux
mechanism.

TEXT
Efflux of compounds is a phenomenon commonly observed in bacteria
(
2,
10). Through this process, organisms are protected from
possible toxic effects of metabolite accumulation or external
compounds, and compound efflux results in a decreased susceptibility
for a variety of antibiotics. Efflux can be mediated through
specific pumps, as is often seen with gram-positive organisms,
or through pumps that transfer a broad range of substrates (including
antibiotics, detergents, and dyes), as is frequently the case
with gram-negative bacteria (
7). There are several families
of these so-called multidrug efflux pumps. One of these is the
resistance-nodulation-division (RND) family, whose members play
a role in the decreased susceptibility to structurally diverse
antibacterial compounds in different organisms (
4,
5,
7,
8,
11,
12). The only known exception seems to be the RND family
of efflux pumps in
Helicobacter pylori, for which no role in
antibacterial compound efflux could be identified. Genetic inactivation
of three putative RND pumps identified on the basis of sequence
homology in this organism did not result in an increased susceptibility
for 19 antibacterial agents tested, many of which are prone
to efflux in other organisms (
1). In the present study, we have
reexamined this anomaly by testing susceptibilities for additional
antibacterial agents and using a susceptibility method that
is more sensitive than the disk diffusion method used previously.
(Part of these studies was presented at the 2004 ASM General Meeting, New Orleans, La.).
Susceptibilities were determined for a wild-type strain of H. pylori (ARHp80) and its three isogenic mutants that had the putative RND cytoplasmic membrane protein, HefC (HP0607, JHP0554), HefF (HP0969, JHP0903), or HefI (HP1329, JHP1249), genetically inactivated (1). Broth microdilution MICs were determined in 96-well plates using twofold serial dilutions of compound. Cells (
106 CFU/ml starting inoculum in 150 µl total volume) were suspended in bisulfiteless Brucella broth (Difco) that was supplemented with 0.1% lactic acid (Sigma) and 5% fetal calf serum (Biowhittaker). The plates were incubated at 37°C under 5% O2, 10% CO2, and 85% N2 atmosphere for 48 h, and subsequently the optical density was read at 640 nm (Titertek Multiskan Ascent plate reader). The MICs were defined as the lowest concentration that showed at least a 70% decrease in transmission. The susceptibilities of the hefF and hefI mutants did not differ significantly (more than fourfold) from the isogenic parental strain for the 20 compounds tested. (Table 1). This result was not unexpected for the hefI mutant, as it was demonstrated earlier that this gene is not or poorly expressed in vitro (1). The similar susceptibilities for the parental strain and the hefF mutant indicate that hefF does not play a role in efflux of these compounds under these conditions. In contrast, 9 of the 20 compounds tested showed at least an eightfold lower MIC in the hefC mutant, and the extent could be as high as 32-fold (penicillin G) or 64-fold (novobiocin) (Table 1). Decreased MICs were seen for compounds belonging to different structural classes, consistent with the hypothesis that the product of hefC participates in multidrug efflux.
These results appear to be in disagreement with a previous study
that failed to establish a role for
hefC in efflux (
1). However,
an unfortunate choice of compounds and a methodology that may
not be sensitive enough to detect relatively small differences
in susceptibilities between the mutant and parental strains
may have impacted that study. This assertion is based on the
reexamination of 12 compounds from that study. Nine of these
(amoxicillin, cefaclor, ceftazidime, aztreonam, ciprofloxacin,
nalidixic acid, clarithromycin, chloramphenicol, and gentamicin)
were not subject to efflux, while three (clindamycin, tetracycline,
and cefotaxime) were found to be prone to HefABC-mediated efflux,
with all three showing an 8- to 16-fold decrease in MIC for
the
hefC mutant. It is possible that this magnitude might not
be easily detected when using the disk diffusion susceptibility
testing employed in the previous study (
1).
The energy needed for compound efflux by members of the RND family is derived from the proton-motive force (7, 9). To determine whether HefABC-mediated efflux depended on this, the accumulation of ethidium bromide was measured according to published procedures (3), with some modifications. Ethidium bromide was used because it is actively effluxed by H. pylori as evidenced by the 16-fold reduction in MIC for the hefC mutant compared to the parental strain (Table 1), and its accumulation in cells can be easily detected using fluorescence detection. Exponentially grown cells were resuspended in prewarmed Brucella broth (37°C) to an (OD600) equivalent to 5.0, and ethidium bromide was added to a final concentration of 20 µg/ml. Fluorescence was measured using excitation at 544 nm and emission at 590 nm (Fmax 96-well plate reader; Molecular Devices). Carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP; 200 µM final concentration; Sigma) was added to collapse the proton-motive force. An increased rate of accumulation of ethidium bromide was observed in the hefC mutant compared to the parental strain before the addition of CCCP (Fig. 1), as is expected for strains with a reduced efflux capability. Similar differences have been reported with other members of the RND family of efflux pumps (3, 6). The slow and gradual rather than complete lack of accumulation of ethidium bromide in the wild-type strain is likely caused by the inability of H. pylori to maintain an optimal proton motif force under the experimental (aerobic) conditions used, which are unfavorable for this organism. Even less favorable conditions disallowing H. pylori to maintain a proton motif force, such as incubation at room temperature rather than at 37°C or incubation in a phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7) rather than growth medium, resulted in an accumulation of ethidium bromide similar to one seen with the hefC mutant (data not shown).
Accumulation of ethidium bromide increased rapidly to the levels
of the
hefC mutant for the wild-type strain upon addition of
the uncoupler CCCP (Fig.
1). Again, these data are in agreement
with studies using other organisms (
3,
6) and can be interpreted
as a reduction in compound efflux due to the loss of the proton-motive
force driving efflux. Taken altogether, the results indicate
that
hefC is involved in energy-dependent multidrug efflux in
H. pylori. Based on the 27% sequence homology of
hefC to
Escherichia coli acrB as well as its genomic arrangement compared to other
components of the efflux system, it is postulated that HefC
acts as the inner membrane component of a three-component efflux
system common for RND systems.
In conclusion, this study shows that, similar to other gram-negative organisms, H. pylori contains an active multidrug efflux mechanism and therefore compound efflux needs to be taken into account when determining resistance mechanisms in this organism.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Jeanette Jones for her excellent contributions in the
development of the microdilution susceptibility test methodology
and Richard Alm for determining the sequence homology.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Infection Discovery, Cancer and Infection Research Area, AstraZeneca R&D Boston, 35 Gatehouse Drive, Waltham, MA 02451. Phone: (781) 839-4535. Fax: (781) 839-4500. E-mail:
boudewijn.dejonge{at}astrazeneca.com 

REFERENCES
1 - Bina, J. E., R. A. Alm, M. Uria-Nickelsen, S. R. Thomas, T. J. Trust, and R. E. W. Hancock. 2000. Helicobacter pylori uptake and efflux: basis for intrinsic susceptibility to antibiotics in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:248-254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Borges-Walmsley, M. I., and A. R. Walmsley. 2001. The structure and function of drug pumps. Trends Microbiol. 9:71-79.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Giraud, E., A. Cloeckaert, D. KerBoeuf, and E. Chaslus-Dancla. 2000. Evidence for active efflux as the primary mechanism of resistance to ciprofloxacin in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1223-1228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Haman, K. E., W. Pan, B. G. Spratt, J. T Balthazar, R. C. Judd, and W. M. Schafer. 1995. Resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to antimicrobial hydrophobic agents is modulated by mtrRCDE efflux system. Microbiology 141:611-622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Li, X. Z., H. Nikaido, and K. Poole. 1995. Role of the MexA-MexB-OprM in antibiotic efflux in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1948-1953.[Abstract]
6 - Lin, J., O. Michel, and Q. Zang. 2002. CmeABC functions as a multidrug efflux system in Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2124-2131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Nikaido, H. 1996. Multidrug efflux pumps of gram-negative bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 178:5853-5859.[Free Full Text]
8 - Nikaido, H., M. Basina, V. Y. Nguyen, and E. Y. Rosenberg. 1998. Multidrug efflux pump AcrAB of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium excretes only those ß-lactams antibiotics containing lipophilic side chains. J. Bacteriol. 180:4686-4692.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Paulsen, I. T., M. H. Brown, and R. A. Skurray. 1996. Proton-dependent multidrug efflux systems. Microbiol. Rev. 60:575-608.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Putman, M., H. W. van Veen, and W. N. Konings. 2000. Molecular properties of bacterial multidrug transporters. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64:672-693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Sanchez, L., W. Pan, M. Vinas, and H. Nikaido. 1997. The acrB homolog of Haemophilus influenzae codes for a functional multidrug efflux pump. J. Bacteriol. 179:6855-6857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Visalli, M. A., E. Murphy, S. J. Projan, and P. A. Bradford. 2003. The acrAB multidrug efflux pump is associated with reduced levels of susceptibility to tigecycline (GAR-936) in Proteus mirabilis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:665-669.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2005, p. 3009-3010, Vol. 49, No. 7
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.49.7.3009-3010.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Anoushiravani, M., Falsafi, T., Niknam, V.
(2009). Proton motive force-dependent efflux of tetracycline in clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori. J Med Microbiol
58: 1309-1313
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
de Jonge, B. L. M., Kutschke, A., Uria-Nickelsen, M., Kamp, H. D., Mills, S. D.
(2009). Pyrazolopyrimidinediones Are Selective Agents for Helicobacter pylori That Suppress Growth through Inhibition of Glutamate Racemase (MurI). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 3331-3336
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Boyanova, L.
(2009). Prevalence of multidrug-resistant Helicobacter pylori in Bulgaria. J Med Microbiol
58: 930-935
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Megraud, F., Lehours, P.
(2007). Helicobacter pylori Detection and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
20: 280-322
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nishizawa, T., Suzuki, H., Kurabayashi, K., Masaoka, T., Muraoka, H., Mori, M., Iwasaki, E., Kobayashi, I., Hibi, T.
(2006). Gatifloxacin Resistance and Mutations in gyrA after Unsuccessful Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Japan.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 1538-1540
[Abstract]
[Full Text]