This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soley, C.
Right arrow Articles by Brilla, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soley, C.
Right arrow Articles by Brilla, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2005, p. 3056-3058, Vol. 49, No. 7
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.7.3056-3058.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Activities of Levofloxacin and Comparable Agents against Middle Ear Fluid, Nasopharyngeal, and Oropharyngeal Pathogens Obtained from Costa Rican Children with Recurrent Otitis Media or Failing Other Antibiotic Therapy

Carolina Soley,1 Adriano Arguedas,1,2* Wendy Porras,1 Silvia Guevara,1 Cecilia Loaiza,1 Alexandra Pérez,1 Guillermo Rincón,1 Malka Schultz,1 Jorge Arguedas,1 and Roberto Brilla3

Instituto de Atención Pediátrica,1 Universidad de Ciencias Médicas,2 Laboratorio Centro de Investigaciones Médicas, San José, Costa Rica3

Received 21 January 2005/ Returned for modification 16 February 2005/ Accepted 24 March 2005


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
This study analyzes the in vitro activities of levofloxacin and other commonly used antimicrobials against middle ear fluid, nasopharyngeal, and oropharyngeal pathogens obtained from children with otitis media at risk of having a resistant pathogen. Levofloxacin proved to be very active against these pathogens and had intermediate activity against Streptococcus pyogenes.


arrow
TEXT
 
Otitis media (OM) is the most common cause for outpatient consultation for children and one of the most common causes of antimicrobial usage in pediatrics (9). In recent years, there has been concern regarding the increment of bacterial resistance to commonly used antibiotics among pathogens isolated from the middle ear fluid (MEF), nasopharynxes, and oropharynxes of children with upper respiratory tract infections (2, 3, 11). Therapeutic options for children with resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae are limited (1, 7). The new fluoroquinolones have excellent in vitro activities against respiratory isolates that are resistant to current first- and second-line antibiotics (4, 6, 8, 12, 14), and recent clinical trials have suggested a potential role of these agents in the treatment of selected children with OM (5, 10).

As part of a clinical trial, Costa Rican children, 3 months to 48 months old, with OM and no history of conjugate S. pneumoniae vaccine usage from whom baseline MEF, nasopharyngeal, and oropharyngeal samples were obtained were considered candidates for this analysis. Patients also had to have evidence of recurrent OM or OM failure or two of any of the following risk factors: an age of ≤24 months, occurrence of the first OM episode at ≤6 months of age, day care attendance, frequent contact with children ≤8 years of age, or antimicrobial exposure in the previous 3 months. Recurrent OM was defined as a history of three or more OM episodes in the previous 6 months or four or more episodes in the previous 12 months. OM failure was defined as persistent signs and symptoms of OM after 48 h of appropriate antimicrobial therapy or an OM episode occurring within 7 days of the last dose of an antibiotic prescribed for a previous otitis media episode (1, 2, 5, 7, 10).

The original study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Centro América. Informed consent was obtained from the parents of each study participant before inclusion in the study.

Diagnostic tympanocentesis was performed according to our standard procedures (3) for all patients who had intact tympanic membranes. For patients with a perforated tympanic membrane, a deep aspiration of the MEF was attempted. Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal samples were obtained before antimicrobial therapy began by means of deep insertion of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs (Copan Diagnostics Inc., Corona, CA) before antimicrobial therapy began. Samples were transferred to the local research laboratory for processing according to our standard procedures (2, 3).

MICs were determined by Etest (epsilometer; AB Brodisk, Solna, Sweden) for penicillin, amoxicillin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, and levofloxacin, and the interpretation of results was performed according to NCCLS recommendations (13). In the case of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), disk diffusion testing was performed and interpreted by following NCCLS recommendations (13).

Between May 2003 and February 2004, samples were obtained from 298 patients. The mean age of study participants was 19.6 months (range, 3 to 48 months), and 199 (67%) patients were less than 24 months old. MEF pathogen distributions were as follows: 74 S. pneumoniae, 84 H. influenzae, 19 Moraxella catarrhalis, and 11 Streptococcus pyogenes isolates. Beta-lactamase production was observed in 7 (8.3%) H. influenzae strains and 19 (100%) M. catarrhalis strains. The antibacterial activities of the various agents evaluated are depicted in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Antimicrobial activities against middle ear fluid pathogens obtained from Costa Rican children with otitis media

Among the S. pneumoniae isolates obtained, the prevalences of strains that were susceptible, intermediate, and resistant to the indicated drugs were as follows: to penicillin, 85.1%, 6.7%, and 8.1%, respectively; to cefuroxime, 91.8%, 2.7%, and 5.4%, respectively; to ceftriaxone, 97.2%, 2.7%, and 0%, respectively; and to TMP-SMX, 14.8%, 22.9%, and 62%, respectively. To amoxicillin and levofloxacin, 100% of the isolates were susceptible. Among the strains that were intermediate (five isolates) or resistant (six isolates) to penicillin, 100% were susceptible to levofloxacin.

Among the H. influenzae isolates tested, the corresponding percentages of strains that were susceptible, intermediate, and resistant to the indicated drugs were as follows: to amoxicillin, 75%, 14.2%, and 10.7%, respectively; to cefuroxime, 95.2%, 4.7%, and 0%, respectively; and to TMP-SMX, 41.5%, 12.9%, and 45.4%, respectively. To ceftriaxone and levofloxacin, 100% of the strains were susceptible. All the S. pyogenes isolates were susceptible to penicillin, cefuroxime, and ceftriaxone; however, 81.8% and 18.2% of the isolates were susceptible and intermediate, respectively, to levofloxacin.

A total of 344 pretherapy nasopharyngeal and/or oropharyngeal pathogens were isolated: 161 S. pneumoniae, 125 H. influenzae, 46 M. catarrhalis, and 12 S. pyogenes isolates. Beta-lactamase production was observed in 9 (7.2%) H. influenzae strains and 46 (100%) M. catarrhalis strains. The antibacterial activities of the various agents evaluated are depicted in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Antimicrobial activities against nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal pathogens obtained from Costa Rican children with otitis media

Among the S. pneumoniae strains, the prevalences of strains that were susceptible, intermediate, and resistant to the indicated agents were as follows: to penicillin, 80.7%, 14%, and 4.6%, respectively; to cefuroxime, 91.8%, 4%, and 3%, respectively; to ceftriaxone, 97.6%, 2.4%, and 0%, respectively; and to TMP-SMX, 13.6%, 16.8%, and 69.4%, respectively. To amoxicillin and levofloxacin, 100% of the strains were susceptible. Among the strains that were intermediate (23 isolates) or resistant (7 isolates) to penicillin, 100% were susceptible to levofloxacin.

Among the H. influenzae isolates, the percentages of strains that were susceptible, intermediate, and resistant to the indicated agents were as follows: to amoxicillin, 78.6%, 5.9%, and 15.3%, respectively; to cefuroxime, 96%, 3.2%, and 0.8%, respectively; and to TMP-SMX, 44.8%, 5.6%, and 49.6%, respectively. To ceftriaxone and levofloxacin, 100% of the isolates were susceptible. Among the S. pyogenes tested, all the isolates were susceptible to penicillin, amoxicillin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, and levofloxacin.

Levofloxacin activities against MEF, nasopharyngeal, and/or oropharyngeal isolates that were nonsusceptible to two or more antimicrobial classes are noted in Table 3. Levofloxacin was 100% active against these resistant pathogens.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. In vitro activities of levofloxacin against MEF, nasopharyngeal, and oropharyngeal pathogens nonsusceptible to two or more antimicrobial classesa

Although the current antimicrobial recommendations apply to most of the patients with OM, there is a group of children that may present with multidrug-resistant pathogens and for whom a third-line antimicrobial alternative may be needed (2, 3, 7). The percentage of resistant pathogens obtained in our study population was lower than anticipated; however, the overall activity of levofloxacin was excellent against S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, including those isolates resistant to other commonly used agents (6, 8, 12, 15).

If, based on the results from controlled clinical trials and safety information, fluoroquinolones are approved for use in pediatric patients with recurrent OM or OM failures, baseline information about the susceptibility pattern to fluoroquinolones will be needed together with a continuous microbiological surveillance program.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Harris Stutman for his expert review of the manuscript.

A partial research grant was received from Pfizer Inc. for antimicrobial testing.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Instituto de Atención Pediátrica, P.O. Box 607-1150, San José, Costa Rica. Phone: (506) 222-9234. Fax: (506) 221-3894. E-mail: aarguedas{at}iped.net. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Family Physicians, Subcommittee on Management of Acute Otitis Media. 2004. Diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics 113:1451-1465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. 2
  3. Arguedas, A., R. Dagan, C. Soley, C. Loaiza, K. Knudsen, N. Porat, A. Pérez, E. Brilla, and M. Herrera. 2003. Microbiology of otitis media in Costa Rican children, 1999 through 2001. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 22:1063-1068.[Medline]
  4. 3
  5. Arguedas, A., C. Loaiza, A. Pérez, F. Vargas, M. Herrera, G. Rodríguez, A. Gutiérrez, and E. Mohs. 1998. Microbiology of acute otitis media in Costa Rican children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 17:680-689.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. 4
  7. Arguedas, A., C. Soley, E. Brilla, W. Porras, S. Guevara, C. Loaiza, A. Pérez, H. Sierra, G. German, G. Rincón, M. Schultz, and J. Arguedas. 2004. In-vitro activity of levofloxacin against middle ear fluid, nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal pathogens, obtained from Costa Rican children with otitis media, abstr. G-2086. Abstr. 44th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  8. 5
  9. Arguedas, A., L. Sher, E. López, X. Sáez-Llorens, K. Hamed, K. Skuba, and P. Pierce. 2003. Open label, multicenter study of gatifloxacin treatment of recurrent otitis media and acute otitis media treatment failure. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 22:949-955.[Medline]
  10. 6
  11. Boswell, F. J., J. Andrews, G. Jevons, and R. Wise. 2002. Comparison of the in vitro activities of several new fluoroquinolones against respiratory pathogens and their abilities to select fluoroquinolone resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 50:495-502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. 7
  13. Dagan, R., A. Arguedas, and U. B. Schaad. 2004. Potential role of fluoroquinolone therapy in childhood otitis media. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 23:390-398.[Medline]
  14. 8
  15. Jones, R. N., and M. A. Pfaller. 2000. In vitro activity of newer fluoroquinolones for respiratory tract infections and emerging patterns of antimicrobial resistance: data from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Clin. Infect. Dis. 31(Suppl. 2):S16-S23.
  16. 9
  17. Klein, J. O., and C. D. Bluestone. 1982. Acute otitis media. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 1:66-73.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. 10
  19. Leibovitz, E., L. Piglansky, S. Raiz, D. Greenberg, K. Hamed, J. M. Ledeine, J. Press, A. Leibermann, R. Echols, P. Pierce, M. Jacobs, and R. Dagan. 2003. Bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of oral gatifloxacin for the treatment of recurrent/nonresponsive acute otitis media: an open label, noncomparative, double tympanocentesis study. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 22:943-949.[Medline]
  20. 11
  21. Leibovitz, E., S. Raiz, L. Piglansky, D. Greenberg, P. Yagupsky, D. Fliss, A. Leiberman, and R. Dagan. 1998. Resistance pattern of middle ear fluid isolates in acute otitis media recently treated with antibiotics. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 17:643-649.
  22. 12
  23. Low, D. E., J. de Azavedo, K. Weiss, T. Mazzulli, M. Kuhn, D. Church, K. Forward, G. Zhanel, A. Simor, Canadian Bacterial Surveillance Network, and A. McGeer. 2002. Antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Canada during 2000. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1295-1301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. 13
  25. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twelfth informational supplement. Document M100-S12. NCCLS, Wayne, Pa.
  26. 14
  27. Nelson, J. D., and G. H. McCracken. 2002. Fluoroquinolone use in children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 21:A7-A8.[CrossRef]
  28. 15
  29. Powis, J., A. McGeer, K. Green, O. Vanderkooi, K. Weiss, G. Zhanel, T. Mazzulli, M. Kuhn, D. Church, R. Davidson, K. Forward, D. Hoban, A. Simor, the Canadian Bacterial Surveillance Network, and D. E. Low. 2004. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates obtained in Canada in 2002. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:3305-3311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2005, p. 3056-3058, Vol. 49, No. 7
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.7.3056-3058.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Stone, K. C., Dagan, R., Arguedas, A., Leibovitz, E., Wang, E., Echols, R. M., Janjic, N., Critchley, I. A. (2007). Activity of Faropenem against Middle Ear Fluid Pathogens from Children with Acute Otitis Media in Costa Rica and Israel. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 2230-2235 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soley, C.
Right arrow Articles by Brilla, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soley, C.
Right arrow Articles by Brilla, R.