AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bogdanovich, T.
Right arrow Articles by Appelbaum, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bogdanovich, T.
Right arrow Articles by Appelbaum, P. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2005, p. 3325-3333, Vol. 49, No. 8
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.8.3325-3333.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Antistaphylococcal Activity of DX-619, a New Des-F(6)-Quinolone, Compared to Those of Other Agents

Tatiana Bogdanovich, Duygu Esel, Linda M. Kelly, Bülent Bozdogan, Kim Credito, Gengrong Lin, Kathy Smith, Lois M. Ednie, Dianne B. Hoellman, and Peter C. Appelbaum*

Department of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033

Received 2 March 2005/ Returned for modification 3 April 2005/ Accepted 10 April 2005


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The in vitro activity of DX-619, a new des-F(6)-quinolone, was tested against staphylococci and compared to those of other antimicrobials. DX-619 had the lowest MIC ranges/MIC50s/MIC90s (µg/ml) against 131 Staphylococcus aureus strains (≤0.002 to 2.0/0.06/0.5) and 128 coagulase-negative staphylococci (0.004 to 0.25/0.016/0.125). Among strains tested, 76 S. aureus strains and 51 coagulase-negative staphylococci were resistant to ciprofloxacin. DX-619 had the lowest MIC50/MIC90 values against 127 quinolone-resistant staphylococci (0.125/0.5), followed by sitafloxacin (0.5/4), moxifloxacin (2/8), gatifloxacin (4/16), levofloxacin (16/>32), and ciprofloxacin (>32/>32). Raised quinolone MICs were associated with mutations in GyrA (S84L) and single or double mutations in GrlA (S80F or Y; E84K, G, or V) in all S. aureus strains tested. A recent vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) strain (Hershey) was resistant to available quinolones and was inhibited by DX-619 at 0.25 µg/ml and sitafloxacin at 1.0 µg/ml. Vancomycin (except VRSA), linezolid, ranbezolid, tigecycline, and quinupristin-dalfopristin were active against all strains, and teicoplanin was active against S. aureus but less active against coagulase-negative staphylococci. DX-619 produced resistant mutants with MICs of 1 to >32 µg/ml after <50 days of selection compared to 16 to >32 µg/ml for ciprofloxacin, sitafloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin. DX-619 and sitafloxacin were also more active than other tested drugs against selected mutants and had the lowest mutation frequencies in single-step resistance selection. DX-619 and sitafloxacin were bactericidal against six quinolone-resistant (including the VRSA) and seven quinolone-susceptible strains tested, whereas gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin were bactericidal against 11, 10, 7, and 5 strains at 4x MIC after 24 h, respectively. DX-619 was also bactericidal against one other VRSA strain, five vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus strains, and four vancomycin-intermediate coagulase-negative staphylococci. Linezolid, ranbezolid, and tigecycline were bacteriostatic and quinupristin-dalfopristin, teicoplanin, and vancomycin were bactericidal against two, eight, and nine strains, and daptomycin and oritavancin were rapidly bactericidal against all strains, including the VRSA. DX-619 has potent in vitro activity against staphylococci, including methicillin-, ciprofloxacin-, and vancomycin-resistant strains.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The emergence of methicillin- and quinolone-resistant, and recently glycopeptide-intermediate, staphylococci, as well as the propensity of these organisms to cause serious systemic infections in immunocompromised hosts, necessitates other therapeutic modalities (2, 9, 10, 19, 24, 29). During 2002, two clinical strains of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) carrying vanA, one from Detroit, Mich., and one from our hospital, have been isolated (3, 28). Several months ago, a third VRSA was isolated in New York city (14).

Most methicillin-resistant staphylococci are also resistant to available quinolones, such as ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin (8, 23). Thus, the latter group of compounds may not be safely used in empirical therapy of patients with methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections. DX-619 is a new des-F(6)-quinolone (Fig. 1) with excellent activity against gram-positive organisms. The current study examined (i) the activity of DX-619 against 259 methicillin- and quinolone-susceptible and -resistant staphylococci compared to those of sitafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, ranbezolid, tigecycline, and quinupristin-dalfopristin by agar MIC testing and those of daptomycin and oritavancin by microdilution; (ii) the activities of the above-mentioned compounds against 13 staphylococci by time-kill analysis; and (iii) the capabilities of DX-619, sitafloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and ciprofloxacin to select for resistance in 10 staphylococci.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Chemical structure of DX-619.

 

   MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bacteria. Sixty-two methicillin-resistant and 69 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains and 61 methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRCoNS) and 67 methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci (MSCoNS) were studied. Additionally, both recently isolated VRSA strains (VRS1 and VRS2) (3, 28), five glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) strains (NRS1, -12, -17, -56, and -63), and four vancomycin-intermediate coagulase-negative staphylococci (VICoNS) (NRS7, -8, -9, and -60) were obtained from the Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (NARSA) via Focus Technologies, Herndon, Va., and were tested separately. For the purpose of this study, strains with ciprofloxacin MICs of >2.0 µg/ml were defined as ciprofloxacin nonsusceptible (intermediate and resistant) (18). No species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci was attempted.

Antibacterials and susceptibility testing. DX-619 susceptibility powder was obtained from Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. Other antimicrobials were obtained from their respective manufacturers. For all drugs except daptomycin and oritavancin, agar dilution MICs using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton agar were used (18). For daptomycin (for which added calcium has been standardized only in broth) and oritavancin (which binds to agar and can be tested only in broth), microdilution was performed by standardized methodology, using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB; Difco) with added calcium for daptomycin testing (18). Vancomycin MICs were read after a full 24-h incubation. The antibacterial susceptibilities of VRSA strains were tested by the macrodilution method using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (18).

Time-kill studies. Tubes containing 5 ml cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (Difco) with doubling antibiotic concentrations were inoculated with 5 x 105 to 5 x 106 CFU/ml and incubated at 35°C in a shaking water bath. The methods were those described previously by our group (21), and added calcium was used for daptomycin testing (18). The strains used for time-kill studies were tested by the double-disk test for macrolide resistance, using erythromycin (30 µg) and clindamycin (2 µg) disks.

Time-kill assays were analyzed by determining the number of strains that yielded {Delta}log10 CFU/ml of –1, –2, and –3 at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h compared to counts at time zero. Antimicrobials were considered bactericidal at the lowest concentration that reduced the original inoculum by ≥3 log10 CFU/ml (99.9%) at each of the time periods and bacteriostatic if the inoculum was reduced by 0 to <3 log10 CFU/ml. The problem of bacterial carryover was addressed by dilution as described previously (21). Six strains were not tested with ciprofloxacin, four with levofloxacin, and one each with gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, and vancomycin due to resistance to the individual antibiotics.

Multistep resistance selection. Ten staphylococcal strains, including three ciprofloxacin-susceptible (MIC < 2 µg/ml) and seven ciprofloxacin-resistant (MIC > 32 µg/ml) strains, were used in the study. Initial inocula (ca. 5 x 108 to 1 x 109 CFU/ml) were prepared by suspending growth from an overnight Trypticase soy blood agar plate (Difco) in CAMHB. Glass tubes containing 1 ml of antibiotic-free or antibiotic-supplemented CAMHB were inoculated; antibiotic concentrations in the tubes ranged from four doubling dilutions above to three doubling dilutions below the MIC of each drug for each strain. The tubes were incubated at 35°C for 24 h. Daily passages were then performed for up to 50 days by taking a 10-µl inoculum from the tube nearest the MIC (usually 1 to 2 dilutions below) which had the same turbidity as the antibiotic-free controls. From time to time, an aliquot from a tube used as an inoculum for the successive passage was frozen at –70°C in double-strength skim milk for subsequent analysis. When an MIC for a strain stabilized at >32 µg/ml (minimum amount, 14 passages) during four successive passages, serial transfer in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotic was discontinued, and the strains were subjected to 10 passages in antibiotic-free medium to check the stability of acquired mutants. To determine whether resistant isolates obtained during and at the end of serial passages were indeed derived from the parental strains, the parental strains, intermediary clones with elevated MICs, and clones obtained after the final passage were examined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis using a CHEF DR III apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) as previously described (1, 17).

Single-step resistance studies. The frequency of spontaneous single-step mutation was determined by spreading cultures (approximately 1010 CFU/ml) in a 100-µl volume of phosphate-buffered saline. Mueller-Hinton agar plates (100-mm diameter) contained each compound at 1x, 2x, 4x, and 8x MIC. The plates were incubated aerobically at 35°C for 24 h. Confluent growth at 1x MIC with initial inoculum dilutions of 10—1, 10—2, 10—3, and >300 colonies at 10—5 made it unfeasible to reliably interpret growth on plates. Additionally, quinolone MICs taken from growth on these plates were, in >90% of cases, equal to or 1 dilution above those of the parent strains. By contrast, single colonies were reproducibly found at drug concentrations above the MIC. We therefore elected to analyze results obtained at 2x, 4x, and 8x MIC only. Because colonies obtained at these higher MICs often occurred on a background of confluent growth (see above), retesting by agar dilution MIC was performed. To ensure the reproducibility and reliability of results, resistance in single-step studies was defined as a MIC >4-fold higher than that for the parent. The resistance frequency was calculated at each MIC as the number of resistant colonies per inoculum.

MICs of resistant clones. The MIC of each resistant clone to each of the quinolones in resistance selection studies was determined by broth macrodilution, as described above. The effect of reserpine (20 mg/liter dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide) on MICs was also determined.

Determination of quinolone resistance mechanism. The PCR method was used to amplify quinolone resistance determinant regions (QRDR) in the gyrA, gyrB, grlA, and grlB genes using primers and cycling conditions described previously (7, 15). Template DNA for PCR was prepared using InstaGen Matrix, as recommended by the manufacturer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). After amplification, PCR products were purified from excess primers and nucleotides using a QIAquick PCR Purification kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) and sequenced directly using the CEQ8000 Genetic Analysis System (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA).

Determination of macrolide and methicillin resistance mechanisms. The presence of genes coding for macrolide resistance, ermA, ermB, ermC, and msrA, were studied by PCR as described by Sutcliffe and coworkers (27). The methicillin resistance determinant mecA gene was amplified by PCR from methicillin-resistant strains by using specific primers (20).


   RESULTS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Susceptibility. Staphylococcal MICs are listed in Tables 1 and 2. DX-619 MIC50 and MIC90 values were 0.06 and 0.5 µg/ml, respectively, against S. aureus and 0.016 and 0.125 µg/ml, respectively, against coagulase-negative staphylococci. The numbers of quinolone-resistant strains tested based upon ciprofloxacin MICs were as follows: methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, 20/69 (28.9%); methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), 56/62 (90.3%); methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci, 10/67 (14.9%); and MRCoNS, 38/61 (62.3%); three quinolone-intermediate strains were all methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci. When staphylococci were analyzed by ciprofloxacin susceptibility (breakpoints: susceptible, <1.0 µg/ml; intermediate, 2.0 µg/ml; and resistant, >4.0 µg/ml) (18), DX-619 MIC50 and MIC90 values for S. aureus were 0.008 and 0.016 µg/ml against ciprofloxacin-susceptible strains and 0.125 and 1.0 µg/ml against ciprofloxacin-resistant strains, and for coagulase-negative strains they were 0.016 and 0.03 µg/ml for ciprofloxacin-susceptible and 0.125 and 0.25 µg/ml for ciprofloxacin-resistant strains, respectively. DX-619 had the lowest MIC50s and MIC90s against ciprofloxacin-resistant strains (0.125 and 0.5 µg/ml), followed by sitafloxacin (0.5 and 4 µg/ml), moxifloxacin (2 and 8 µg/ml), gatifloxacin (4 and 16 µg/ml), levofloxacin (16 and >32 µg/ml), and ciprofloxacin (>32 and >32 µg/ml) against all quinolone-resistant staphylococci tested and for S. aureus as well as coagulase-negative staphylococci when they were analyzed separately (Table 2). For the three coagulase-negative strains, which were intermediate to ciprofloxacin, the MICs for DX-619 were 0.016 to 0.03 µg/ml. MICs of other quinolones were significantly higher in quinolone-resistant strains, with sitafloxacin being next most active against all strains.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Summary of MICs (µg/ml) for Staphylococcus strains.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. MIC range, MIC50, and MIC90 of DX-619 compared to those of other quinolones against quinolone-nonsusceptible staphylococci

 
Linezolid MICs, especially against coagulase-negative strains, were often at least 1 to 2 dilutions higher than that of ranbezolid. Vancomycin MICs were low against all strains, but teicoplanin was much less active against coagulase-negative strains. Quinupristin-dalfopristin and tigecycline were equally active against all strains. Lower ranbezolid MICs against coagulase-negative strains than against S. aureus and the relative inactivity of teicoplanin against coagulase-negative staphylococci are both noteworthy. Oxazolidinone, tigecycline, and quinupristin-dalfopristin MICs were not influenced by the methicillin susceptibility of staphylococcal strains. Microdilution MICs (not listed in Table 1) showed that oritavancin had an MIC range of 0.25 to 4.0 µg/ml, with MIC50 and MIC90 values of 2.0 µg/ml. Corresponding values for daptomycin were 0.125 to 2.0 µg/ml and 0.5 µg/ml, respectively.

The Hershey VRSA strain (VRS2) had the following MICs: DX-619, 0.25 µg/ml; sitafloxacin, 1.0 µg/ml; ciprofloxacin, >64.0 µg/ml; levofloxacin, 32.0 µg/ml; gatifloxacin, 8.0 µg/ml; moxifloxacin, 4.0 µg/ml; vancomycin, 32.0 µg/ml; teicoplanin, 4.0 µg/ml; linezolid, 1.0 µg/ml; ranbezolid, 1.0 µg/ml; tigecycline, 0.125 µg/ml; daptomycin, 0.5 µg/ml; oritavancin, 0.25 µg/ml; and quinupristin-dalfopristin, 1.0 µg/ml.

Mechanism of quinolone resistance. Seventy-six S. aureus strains resistant to ciprofloxacin were studied for the presence of mutations in quinolone resistance-determining regions in gyrA, gyrB, grlA, and grlB. The strains tested had at least one mutation in GyrA and one mutation in GrlA (Table 3). All quinolone-resistant S. aureus strains had the same mutation in GyrA: serine (S) at position 84 was replaced by leucine (L). Only four strains had a mutation in GyrB: arginine (R) at position 404 was replaced by leucine. All 76 strains had mutations in subunit A and only 18 in subunit B of topoisomerase IV. The modifications in GrlA were at position 80 by changing serine to phenylalanine (F) or tyrosine (Y) or at position 84 by changing glutamic acid (E) to lysine (K). Thirteen strains had double mutations; the mutations at position 80 were associated with a second mutation at position 84, by changing glutamic acid to glycine (G), lysine, or valine (V) (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Mutations detected in QRDR of 76 ciprofloxacin-resistant S. aureus strains

 
The MIC distributions by number of mutations are shown in Fig. 2. The mode was 0.125 µg/ml for DX-619 among strains with one mutation in QRDR of GrlA and 2, 4, 8, and >32 µg/ml for moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin, respectively. Sitafloxacin (data not shown) gave an MIC distribution between those of DX-619 and moxifloxacin. In strains with double mutations in GrlA, the mode was 1 µg/ml for DX-619 and 16 µg/ml, 16 µg/ml, >32 µg/ml, and >32 µg/ml for moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin, respectively. The presence of a mutation at position 84 in addition to the mutation at position 80 increased the MICs for the quinolones tested at least eightfold.



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. (A) MIC distributions of S. aureus strains with single and double mutations in GrlA. Cipro, ciprofloxacin; Levo, levofloxacin; Moxi, moxifloxacin. (B) MIC distribution of S. aureus with double mutation in GrlA. x axis, MIC (µg/ml); y axis, no. of strains.

 
Multistep resistance selection studies. Initial MICs (µg/ml) were as follows: DX-619, 0.004 to 0.5; ciprofloxacin, 0.125 to >64; sitafloxacin, 0.03 to 4; moxifloxacin, 0.06 to 16; and gatifloxacin, 0.06 to 16. All studied quinolones caused >4-fold increases or MICs of >32 µg/ml in less than 50 days. In three initially ciprofloxacin-susceptible strains, >4-fold increases in MICs were achieved within 10 to 20 days for DX-619, sitafloxacin, moxifloxacin, and ciprofloxacin and, with the exception of one strain that developed resistance after 43 days, within 20 to 30 days for gatifloxacin. After 50 days of continuous antibiotic exposure, the MICs of these strains increased to 0.25 to 16 µg/ml for DX-619, 32 to >32 µg/ml for ciprofloxacin, 16 to >32 µg/ml for sitafloxacin, >32 µg/ml for moxifloxacin, and 16 to >32 µg/ml for gatifloxacin. In all initially ciprofloxacin-resistant strains, moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin MICs increased to >32 µg/ml, sitafloxacin MICs increased to 16 to >32 µg/ml, and DX-619 MICs increased to 1 to >32 µg/ml after 50 days.

Cross-resistance occurred in all clones with acquired quinolone resistance (Table 4). The MICs of DX-619 were lowest against the resistant mutants selected (with the exception of DX-619-resistant mutants originating from SA096 and SA077, whose DX-619 MICs were higher than those of sitafloxacin), followed by those of sitafloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. For moxifloxacin-, gatifloxacin-, and ciprofloxacin-resistant clones, DX-619 MICs were ≥2 dilutions lower than the corresponding sitafloxacin MICs (except for the moxifloxacin-resistant clone of CN158 and the gatifloxacin-resistant clone of CN111). All selected mutants had stable resistance phenotypes, with no strains showing >1 dilution step decrease in MICs after 10 consecutive passages in antibiotic-free medium.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 4. Results of multistep resistance selection by DX-619 and other comparatorsa

 
Treatment with the efflux inhibitor reserpine lowered ciprofloxacin or sitafloxacin MICs in only 2/10 parent strains (ciprofloxacin MICs in strain CN227, 32 µg/ml to 8 µg/ml; sitafloxacin MICs in strain SA078, 2 µg/ml to 0.5 µg/ml with reserpine [data not shown in Table 4]). The contributions of the efflux mechanism to MIC levels differed with selective agents among mutants (Table 4). Of 10 DX-619-selected mutants, 6 had efflux for DX-619 and/or sitafloxacin. Sitafloxacin-resistant selected mutants had efflux for DX-619 (6/10) and sitafloxacin (5/10). Five gatifloxacin-resistant selected mutants had efflux for DX-619 and/or sitafloxacin. The ciprofloxacin-resistant clone of SA096 had efflux for all studied quinolones, while a ciprofloxacin-resistant clone of SA505 had efflux for sitafloxacin and gatifloxacin (Table 4).

We studied the QRDR nucleotide sequences of the gyrA, gyrB, grlA, and grlB genes of all mutant strains originating from S. aureus. The mutations identified are summarized in Table 4. Four out of six S. aureus parent strains were initially ciprofloxacin resistant; all had an S84L mutation in GyrA and either an S80F or an S80Y mutation in GrlA. Exposure to DX-619, sitafloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin in these strains resulted in various mutations in all four studied genes. In GyrA, three isolates had an E88K/V mutation, one had a G82C mutation, and one had an A119T mutation. In GrlA, the mutations were S81P (one strain) and E84V/A (two strains). Various mutations were found in GyrB: three mutants had a D437E mutation (in combination with V434S in one strain), and five mutants had a P456S mutation either alone (four of five) or with an L457F mutation (one of five). Several different mutations were found in GrlB: D432V (three mutants), S437T (one mutant), R444C (one mutant), E472V (one mutant), and E471K (two mutants).

All mutants (except a ciprofloxacin-resistant mutant of SA096) selected from two originally ciprofloxacin-susceptible strains acquired mutations in GyrA (S84L [except for the moxifloxacin-resistant mutant of strain SA505] and E88K [in the sitafloxacin-resistant mutant of SA505]) and GrlA (S80F/Y and/or E84K). The ciprofloxacin-resistant mutant of SA096 had no mutations in any of the QRDR; however, it had efflux for all studied quinolones. Additionally, three quinolone-resistant mutants of SA505 had L433I plus P456S mutations in GyrB (selected with moxifloxacin), a P451S mutation in GrlB (selected with sitafloxacin), and an S433T mutation in GrlB (selected with gatifloxacin). The DX-619-resistant mutant of SA096 had an E472G mutation in GrlB.

Single-step resistance selection studies. Frequencies of single-step mutations with DX-619, sitafloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin at 2x, 4x, and 8x MIC are summarized in Table 5. As can be seen, DX-619 and sitafloxacin had the lowest mutation frequencies of all quinolones at all MICs tested, with DX-619 selecting for fewer mutants than sitafloxacin.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 5. Frequencies of single-step resistance selection in staphylococci at different quinolone concentrations

 
Time-kill study. The staphylococcal MICs for the 13 strains tested by time-kill are presented in Table 6, and the results of time-kills are summarized in Table 7 and depicted graphically in Fig. 3. Among six S. aureus strains used for time-kill studies, three were resistant to erythromycin, two had an ermA gene, and one carried both ermA and ermB. The Hershey VRSA strain (VRS2) also had both ermA and ermB genes. Three of six S. aureus strains were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Three of six coagulase-negative staphylococci were resistant to erythromycin: two had an ermA and one had an ermC gene. Two of six strains were resistant to ciprofloxacin.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 6. MICs of strains tested by time-kills

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 7. Time-kill analyses for 12 staphylococci and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRS2; Hershey)

 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. Killing activities of DX-619 against vancomycin-nonsusceptible staphylococci. DX-619 was bactericidal at 2x MIC after 3 to 12 h regardless of the ciprofloxacin susceptibilities. The time-kill graphics of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRS1), vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA; NRS1), and vancomycin-intermediate coagulase-negative staphylococcus (NRS8) are shown.

 
DX-619 and sitafloxacin were bactericidal at 4x MIC after 24 h against all strains tested, regardless of their resistance to other quinolones. All other quinolones gave similar rates of killing relative to higher MICs. The killing activities of ciprofloxacin against five ciprofloxacin-resistant staphylococci and the VRSA strain were not studied.

Linezolid, ranbezolid, tigecycline, and quinupristin-dalfopristin were mainly bacteriostatic after 24 h. Vancomycin, at 4x MIC, was bactericidal against nine strains after 24 h. Oritavancin and daptomycin had bactericidal effects for all strains after 12 h at 4x MIC. Daptomycin and oritavancin were both rapidly bactericidal, with activity demonstrable as early as 3 h. DX-619 and sitafloxacin were bactericidal at 2x MIC against the VRSA strain after 3 to 6 h.

The killing activities of DX-619 were also tested against the vancomycin-resistant S. aureus strain isolated in Michigan (VRS1), five vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus strains (NRS1, NRS12, NRS17, NRS56, and NRS63), and four vancomycin-intermediatecoagulase-negative staphylococci (NRS7, NRS8, NRS9, and NRS60). DX-619 had low MICs against vancomycin-nonsusceptible staphylococci regardless of their vancomycin and ciprofloxacin resistances and was bactericidal at 2x MIC after 3 to 12 h (Table 8).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 8. Killing activities of DX-619 against vancomycin-nonsusceptible staphylococci

 

   DISCUSSION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Staphylococci are important nosocomial pathogens. They are able to adapt to the hospital environment by becoming resistant to many antibiotics, including methicillin, quinolones, and, as recently reported, vancomycin. DX-619 is a new des-F(6)-quinolone with expanded activity against gram-positive organisms (H. Inagaki, R. N. Miyauchi, M. Itoh, K. Kimura, M. Chiba, M. Tanaka, H. Takahashi, M. Takemura, and I. Hayakawa, Abstr. 43rd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-1054, 2003; S. Watanabe, T. Ito, and K. Hiramatsu, Abstr. 43rd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-1055, 2003; D. B. Hoellman, L. M. Kelly, K. A. Smith, B. Bozdogan, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum, Abstr. 43rd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-1056, 2003; K. Yanagihara, M. Tashiro, M. Okada, H. Ohno, Y. Miyazaki, Y. Hirakata, T. Tashiro, and S. Kohno, Abstr. 43rd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-1057, 2003; K. L. Credito, G. Lin, B. Bozdogan, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum, Abstr. 43rd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-1058, 2003; D. Esel, L. Kelly, B. Bozdogan, and P. C. Appelbaum, Abstr. 43rd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-1059, 2003; M. Tanaka, K. Fujikawa, Y. Murakami, T. Akasaka, M. Chiba, T. Otani, and K. Sato, Abstr. 43rd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-1060, 2003; Y. Kurosaka, S. Nishida, C. Ishii, Y. Sawada, K. Namba, T. Otani, and K. Sato, Abstr. 43rd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-1061, 2003; Y. Tsuchiya, K. Goto, M. Igarashi, T. Jindo, and K. Furuhama, Abstr. 43rd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-1062, 2003). The results of the current study confirm the low MICs of DX-619 against staphylococci. Regardless of the resistance of the staphylococci to older quinolones, DX-619 was more potent than other quinolones. The modal MIC distribution for quinolone-resistant S. aureus strains was at least 16-fold lower than that of moxifloxacin (Fig. 2). DX-619 was bactericidal against all strains tested, including both VRSA strains, five GISA strains, and four VICoNS. DX-619 MICs were low against both methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci.

All 76 quinolone-resistant S. aureus strains had mutations in GyrA (S84L) and GrlA (S80F/Y). Thirteen strains had a second mutation in GrlA (E84G/K/V). These mutations have been shown to be the main mechanism of quinolone resistance in clinical strains of S. aureus (12, 13, 22). A few mutations affecting the gyrB and grlB genes have also been described in quinolone-resistant S. aureus (13, 25). Only 4 out of 76 ciprofloxacin-resistant strains had mutations in GyrB (R404L), and 18 strains had various mutations in GrlB; some of the latter mutations have been reported previously (25).

In the present study, we found that DX-619 produced resistant clones with MICs of 1 to >32 µg/ml after <50 days of antibiotic selection compared to 16 to >32 µg/ml with ciprofloxacin-, sitafloxacin-, moxifloxacin-, and gatifloxacin-resistant clones. Cross-resistance studies showed that DX-619 and sitafloxacin had lower MICs than ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin in the clones resistant to the latter group of quinolones. In addition, DX-619 and sitafloxacin also had the lowest mutation frequencies of all quinolones at all MICs tested in single-step tests. We have no explanation for the confluent growth (which on retesting did not represent resistant mutants) found at 1x MIC in single-step experiments.

All but one resistant clone obtained during multistep selection had mutations in GyrA (S84L and E88K) and GrlA (S80F/Y and E84K/V/A). Some of the strains had mutations in GyrB and GrlB; however, no correlation was observed between the presence of mutations in the last two, in addition to mutations in GyrA and GrlA, and an increase in quinolone MICs. Also, though testing with reserpine demonstrated the presence of an efflux pump in some resistant clones, it did not seem to contribute to quinolone resistance (MICs for the relevant drugs were not substantially higher than those in clones without efflux present). The only exception was the ciprofloxacin-resistant clone of SA096, which did not have any detectable mutations present in the QRDR but had efflux for all tested quinolones. The clinical significance of a strain with the latter genotype is unknown.

The MIC and time-kill results for other compounds tested against staphylococci are similar to those described previously (4-6, 8, 9, 11, 16, 24, 26): daptomycin and oritavancin had the most rapid bactericidal activities, followed by vancomycin, teicoplanin, and quinupristin-dalfopristin, with tigecycline, linezolid, and ranbezolid being mainly bacteriostatic. The bacteriostatic activity of quinupristin-dalfopristin resulted from the presence of erm genes in seven strains; in the remaining six strains, the lack of the drug's usual rapid bactericidal activity could not be explained.

The results of this study indicate a potential role for DX-619 in the treatment of staphylococcal infections. However, interpretation of these in vitro results must be complemented by toxicity and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies before the drug can be recommended for clinical testing.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was supported by a grant from Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.

We thank NARSA and Focus Technologies, Herndon, Va., for provision of the Michigan VRSA and the vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus and VICoNS strains.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, P.O. Box 850, Hershey, PA 17033. Phone: (717) 531-5113. Fax: (717) 531-7953. E-mail: pappelbaum{at}psu.edu. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bannerman, T. L., G. A. Hancock, F. C. Tenover, and J. M. Miller. 1995. Pulsed-field electrophoresis as a replacement for bacteriophage typing of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:551-555.[Abstract]
  2. Blumberg, H. M., D. Rimland, D. J. Carroll, P. Terry, and I. K. Wachsmuth. 1991. Rapid development of ciprofloxacin resistance in methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 163:1279-1285.[Medline]
  3. Bozdogan, B., D. Esel, C. Whitener, F. A. Browne, and P. C. Appelbaum. 2003. Antibacterial susceptibility of a vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain isolated at the Hershey Medical Center. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52:864-868.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cercenado, E., F. Garcia-Garrote, and E. Bouza. 2001. In-vitro activity of linezolid against multiply resistant Gram-positive clinical isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 47:77-81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cuny, C., and W. Witte. 2000. In vitro activity of linezolid against staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 6:328-333.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Diekema, D. J., and R. N. Jones. 2000. Oxazolidinones. A review. Drugs 59:7-16.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Discotto L. F., L. E. Lawrence, K. L Denbleyker, and J. F. Barrett. 2001. Staphylococcus aureus mutants selected by BMS-284756. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:3273-3275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Henwood, C. J., D. M. Livermore, A. P. Johnson, D. James, M. Warner, A. Gardiner, and the Linezolid Study Group.2000 . Susceptibility of Gram-positive cocci from 25 UK hospitals to antimicrobial agents including linezolid. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 46:931-940.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hershow, R. C., W. F. Khayr, and P. C. Schreckenberger. 1998. Ciprofloxacin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: associated factors and resistance to other antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 5:213-220.
  10. Hiramatsu, K. 1998. The emergence of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin in Japan.Am. J. Med. 104:7S-10S.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Hoellman, D., G. Lin, L. M. Ednie, A. Rattan, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 2003. Antipneumococcal and antistaphylococcal activities of ranbezolid (RBX 7644), a new oxazolidinone, compared to those of other agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1148-1150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Hooper, D. C., and J. S. Wolfson. 1991. Mode of action of the new quinolones: new data. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 10:223-231.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Horii, T., Y. Suzuki, A. Monji, M. Morita, H. Muramatsu, Y. Kondo, M. Doi, A. Takeshita, T. Kanno, and M. Maekawa. 2003. Detection of mutations in quinolone resistance-determining regions in levofloxacin- and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: effects of the mutations on fluoroquinolone MICs. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 46:139-145.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Kacica, M., and L. C. McDonald. 2004. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus—New York.Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 53:322-323.[Medline]
  15. Linde H. J., M. Schmidt, E. Fuchs, U. Reischl, H. H. Niller, and N. Lehn. 2001. In vitro activities of six quinolones and mechanisms of resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1553-1557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Livermore, D. M. 2000. Quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid: where, when, which and whether to use? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 46:347-350.[Free Full Text]
  17. McDougal, L. K., C. D. Steward, G. E. Killgore, J. M. Chaitram, S. K. McAllister, and F. C. Tenover. 2003. Pulsed-field electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5113-5120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2003. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically—sixth edition: approved standard. NCCLS publication no. M7-A6. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  19. Nichols, R. L. 1999. Optimal treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 44:19-23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Oliveira, D. C., and H. de Lencastre. 2002. Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2155-2161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Pankuch, G. A., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1994. Study of comparative antipneumococcal activities of penicillin G, RP 59500, erythromycin, sparfloxacin, ciprofloxacin and vancomycin by using time-kill methodology.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:2065-2072.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Piddock, L. J. 1998. Mechanisms of fluoroquinolones resistance: an update 1994-1998. Drugs 58(Suppl. 2):11-18.
  23. Schmitz, F.-J., A. Fluit, S. Brisse, J. Verhoef, K. Koher, and D. Milatovic.1999 . Molecular epidemiology of quinolone resistance and comparative in vitro activities of new quinolones against European Staphylococcus aureus isolates. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 26:281-287.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Schmitz, F. J., A. C. Fluit, D. Hafner, A. Beeck, M. Perdikouli, M. Boos, S. Scheuring, J. Verhoef, K. Kohrer, and C. von Eiff. 2000. Development of resistance to ciprofloxacin, rifampin and mupirocin in methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:3229-3231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Sierra, J. M., F. Marco, J. Ruiz, M. T. Jimenez de Anta, and J. Vila. 2002. Correlation between the activity of different fluoroquinolones and the presence of mechanisms of quinolone resistance in epidemiologically related and unrelated strains of methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 8:781-790.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Stevens, D. L., L. G. Smith, J. B. Bruss, M. A. McConnell-Martin, S. E. Duvall, W. M. Todd, and B. Hafkin. 2000. Randomized comparison of linezolid (PNU-100766) versus oxacillin-dicloxacillin for treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:3408-3413.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sutcliffe J., T. Grebe, A. Tait-Kamradt, and L. Wondrack. 1996. Detection of erythromycin-resistant determinants by PCR.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2562-2566.[Abstract]
  28. Tenover, F. C., L. M. Weigel, P. C. Appelbaum, L. K. McDougal, J. Chaitram, S. McAllister, N. Clark, G. Killgore, C. M. O'Hara, L. Jevitt, J. B. Patel, and B. Bozdogan. 2004. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolate from a patient in Pennsylvania.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:275-280.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Voss, A., D. Milatovic, C. Wallrauch-Schwarz, V. T. Rosdahl, and I. Braveny. 1994. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 13:50-55.[CrossRef][Medline]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2005, p. 3325-3333, Vol. 49, No. 8
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.8.3325-3333.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bogdanovich, T.
Right arrow Articles by Appelbaum, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bogdanovich, T.
Right arrow Articles by Appelbaum, P. C.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS