Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2005, p. 3428-3434, Vol. 49, No. 8
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.49.8.3428-3434.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
*
Songtao Zhou,
Richard Siehnel,
Chuck Klanke,
Alan Curnow,
Jeremy Howard, and
Gerlinde Layh-Schmitt
,
Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Mason, Ohio 45040
Received 9 February 2005/ Returned for modification 22 March 2005/ Accepted 30 May 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Unlike eukaryotic systems, protein synthesis in bacteria is initiated with a formylmethionine residue (Fig. 1) (9). During elongation of the nascent protein, the formyl group is removed by the action of a peptide deformylase enzyme. Subsequently, the deformylated N-terminal methionine is cleaved to form the mature protein. In the absence of either the deformylase or MAP enzyme, newly synthesized, unprocessed proteins are rendered incapable of folding into functional secondary or tertiary structures. This leads to disruption of cellular processes and results in the arrest of culture growth (2, 10).
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Role of formylmethionine in bacterial protein biosynthesis. The enzymes involved and utilization of formylmethionyl (Metf) in the initiation and processing of bacterial proteins as reviewed by Meinnel et al. (9) are shown. THF, tetrahydrofolate.
|
|
|
|---|
Cloning and purification of full-length MAP protein. For antibody generation, full-length MAP was cloned and expressed in E. coli strain TOPO IOF' (QIAGEN). Briefly, the MAP gene was generated from total E. coli DNA by PCR using MAP-specific primers (forward primer, ATGGCTATCTCAATCAAGACC; reverse primer, TTCGTCGTGCGAGATTATCGC). The PCR product was cloned into the pCRT7/CT-TOPO plasmid vector of the pCRT7TOPOTA expression system from QIAGEN according to the manufacturer's protocol. Colonies were selected on Luria broth (LB) agar plates for ampicillin resistance. The correct insertion of the PCR product into the pCRT7/CT TOPO vector was examined by applying PCR using one MAP-specific primer (forward) and one vector-specific primer (T7 reverse priming site). Several clones containing the vector with the PCR fragment in the correct orientation were confirmed by DNA sequencing. Thereafter, BL21 cells were transformed with the TOPO vector containing the correct insert and protein expression was induced by isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). Cloning of the MAP gene lacking the stop codon results in His-tagged protein (tag sequence derived from vector), which was then purified via Ni2+ columns according to the manufacturer's protocol (QIAGEN).
Monoclonal antibody preparation. The purified His-tagged MAP protein was separated on an sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel, blotted onto nitrocellulose. and stained with Ponceau red. The band corresponding to the MAP protein was cut out and used as the antigen to generate mouse monoclonal antibodies in an in-house facility (unpublished data).
Culture conditions for the MAP-attenuated (MAPr) strain. The parental strain and the MAPr strain, with the arabinose-regulatable MAP gene, were grown overnight at 37°C on LB agar plates containing 10 mM arabinose. To examine the effect of MAP down-regulation on cells, LB medium without arabinose was inoculated with the overnight cultivated bacteria to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.05. Depletion of MAP in the MAPr strain was achieved by sequential transfer of cultures into fresh medium without arabinose at a dilution of 1:10 after reaching an OD600 of 0.4. After three rounds of growth and dilution, the residual arabinose and/or MAP protein was diminished to levels that began to alter the culture growth rate. At various time points, 2-ml samples of the cultures were removed and analyzed directly or harvested by centrifugation and frozen at 80°C for further analyses. MAP expression levels in the MAPr strain in comparison to parental cultures were then monitored by immunoblot analysis (see below). Finally, the recovered cells were assessed for morphological changes and viability using microscopic methods (see below) and for MAP inhibition activity by surface-enhanced laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS) (see below).
Protein determination. Cell pellets were lysed in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 140 mM NaCl, and 0.3% SDS. After incubation at 37°C for 30 min, protein concentrations were determined using the BCA protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, Illinois) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblot analysis. For protein separation, the Laemmli system with 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels was used (6). Briefly, 10 µg of total protein from the whole-cell lysates was used for separation and blotting. Immunoblotting was based on the procedure of Towbin et al. (13) and carried out as described previously (7). Blots were probed with a monoclonal antibody against MAP (described above) and a secondary anti-mouse immunoglobulin G antibody conjugated to alkaline phosphatase.
Cell viability staining and fluorescence microscopy. To evaluate whether the decrease in growth rate after arabinose depletion in the MAPr strain or after chemical inhibition of MAP was due to cell death or inhibition of cell division, cell viability was determined by staining with Live/Dead reagent according to the supplier's instructions (Molecular Probes) followed by examination with a fluorescence microscope (Leitz).
MIC determination. The MICs were determined as described previously (11). Briefly, bacterial cultures (5 x 105 CFU/ml) were incubated overnight in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth in the presence of test compounds in duplicate samples in a twofold broth dilution series.
Screening of compounds in whole-cell assays. Several chemical compounds, from both cell-based and purified enzyme screens that were nonlytic to mammalian erythrocytes and had previously been shown (unpublished results) to inhibit MAP activity in vitro (50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] of up to 30 µM) as well as inhibit cell growth (50% effective concentration of <500 µM and MIC of <128 µg/ml), were incubated with 150-µl bacterial cell cultures in 96-well microtiter plates at 37°C to an OD600 of 0.3. Next, various concentrations of inhibitors were added (0, 8, 16, 32, 63, 125, 250, and 500 µM), and culture growth was monitored for four hours. Cultures without compounds served as controls. Bacterial cultures were collected, recovered by centrifugation, and frozen at 80°C after 1, 2, 3, and 4 h of incubation in the presence and absence of inhibitors. All tests were carried out in triplicate. Frozen cells were used to screen for MAP inhibition using SELDI-TOF MS (see below).
SELDI-TOF MS. Frozen bacterial culture pellets were lysed with 10 µl B-PER II reagent (Pierce) per ml of culture adjusted to an OD600 of 0.1. Metal-binding (immobilized metal affinity capture IMAC-Cu) ProteinChips from Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc. (Hercules, CA) were prepared according to the supplier's standard protocol. Briefly, culture lysates were incubated for 30 min at ambient temperature on the IMAC-Cu ProteinChips, washed five times with phosphate-buffered saline and three times with H2O, air dried, and then loaded twice with 0.5 µl of saturated sinapinic acid matrix dissolved in 50% acetonitrile with 0.5% trifluoroacetic acid. The enriched proteins on the ProteinChip surfaces were detected on a PBS II ProteinChip reader from Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc. using the following instrument parameters: mass range, 3,000 to 15,000 m/z; laser intensity, 220 arbitrary units; sub positions, 20; and shots per sub position, 10 to 15. Spectra were normalized by total signal intensity and compared by overlaying profiles using Ciphergen ProteinChip software version 3.0.2.
Enzyme add-back experiments. To confirm that the mass shift of 131 Da detected in proteins from the MAPr strain or in parental cultures incubated with MAP inhibitors was due to unprocessed N-terminal methionine residues, purified, recombinant MAP enzyme was preincubated with the cell lysates prior to spotting the sample onto the SELDI-TOF ProteinChips as described above.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Growth kinetics and MAP protein expression in the MAPr strain. (A) Cultures of the MAPr strains were sequentially diluted into LB with or without 10 mM arabinose as described in Materials and Methods. After three dilutions and growth in medium without arabinose, the MAPr strain growth kinetics began to diverge (315 min). The time points displayed on the immunoblot in panel B are indicated by asterisks. (B) The relative level of MAP protein expressed from each culture was determined by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting, all performed as described in Materials and Methods. Lane 1, MAPr strain grown in LB plus 10 mM Ara and collected at the 430-min time point indicated in panel A; lane 2, MAPr strain after removal of Ara and collected at the 430-min time point; lane 3, parental strain grown in LB; lane 4, parental strain grown in LB plus 10 mM Ara.
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Morphological changes in E. coli due to MAP inhibition by genetic attenuation or chemical inhibition. Parental or MAPr strains were grown in the presence or absence of arabinose and stained with a fluorescence viability stain as described in Materials and Methods. (A) Control, parental strain grown in LB; (B) MAPr strain in LB plus 10 mM arabinose at the 430-min time point in Fig. 2A; (C) parental strain grown in LB plus 500 µg/ml compound C (Table 2); (D) MAPr strain after dilution of arabinose at the 430-min time point in Fig. 2A.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Whole-cell biomarkers of MAP attenuation with 131-Da mass difference
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Biomarkers detected by SELDI-TOF MS. Cultures of parental and MAPr strains after the dilution of arabinose were collected and prepared for SELDI-TOF MS as described in Materials and Methods. Spectra were collected over a range of 3,000 to 15,000 m/z, but to demonstrate specific biomarkers, the range from 4,000 to 4,225 m/z is presented. (A) Protein peaks detected in the control, parental culture; (B) protein peaks detected in the MAPr culture; (C) protein peaks from the MAPr strain after treatment of the whole-cell lysate with purified recombinant MAP enzyme prior to spotting onto SELDI-TOF ProteinChips.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Whole-cell screening of MAP inhibitors
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Growth kinetics of the parental E. coli strain in the presence or absence of compound C. Cultures of the parental strain were grown in LB, and at the indicated time, 63 µM compound C was added the culture medium. The growth kinetics were monitored by OD600.
|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Dose-dependent detection of unprocessed proteins by SELDI-TOF MS. Parental strain cultures were incubated with increasing concentrations of compound C. Samples were collected at 1-h intervals after the addition of compound C and analyzed by SELDI-TOF MS. (A to D) Dose-dependent increase of unprocessed protein at a m/z of 4,176; (E to H) dose-dependent increase of unprocessed protein at a m/z of 12,782.
|
|
|
|---|
One clear advantage of this method is that it allows for a direct measure of the activity of an inhibitor as it acts on the MAP enzyme in whole cells, thus indicating that the compound gets into the cell and affects growth by inhibition of the target enzyme. As shown in Table 2, even the IC50 values in conjunction with MICs did not provide a complete picture for this set of compounds. For example, three compounds (designated C, I, and J) had the lowest MICs measured, but only compounds C and J had a direct effect on MAP activity as judged by the SELDI-TOF MS assay. One explanation for why a compound with a low IC50 and MIC (i.e., compound I) does not show MAP inhibition in the intact cell might be that it kills the cells by some other mechanism prior to actually inhibiting the MAP enzyme. Additional studies with this compound to screen for nonspecific membrane disruption in liposomes showed that it had membrane activity consistent with a mechanism of disrupting the physiochemical properties of the membrane (4). Therefore, even a compound with acceptable IC50 and MIC data could still have unacceptable side effects that would preclude it from further consideration for advancement. Importantly, this compound was flagged by the SELDI-TOF MS assay as one that does not hit the target enzyme in whole cells. On the other hand, the MIC for compound H was considerable poorer than the other SELDI-TOF MS-positive compounds. This is the expected profile for compounds that have poor cell permeability. Importantly, even with the lower MIC, the fact that inhibition of MAP was detected in whole cells suggests that further expansion of this compound class may be warranted to increase cell permeability. Thus, the SELDI-TOF MS assay, by direct measurement of MAP inhibition in whole cells, provides additional confidence for advancing compound classes that cannot be achieved solely by IC50 and MIC measurements.
Upon comparing the SELDI-TOF MS data from the genetically attenuated MAPr cultures with those from parental cultures inhibited with chemical compounds, the similarities in morphology (Fig. 3), growth kinetics (Fig. 2A and 5), and unprocessed Met are demonstrated; however, why are eight biomarkers detected in the MAPr strain after arabinose depletion (Table 1) and only three or four biomarkers detected by compound inhibition (Table 2)? This can be explained by considering what is being measured in each case. Since the SELDI-TOF MS measurements are made on whole-cell lysates, the proteins detected will be a combination of newly synthesized (and perhaps unprocessed proteins) and the background of existing proteins (fully processed) in the cell. Thus, by the nature of the genetic attenuation protocol to deplete arabinose through three rounds of growth and dilution (Fig. 2A), it is likely that a larger pool of unprocessed proteins will accumulate in the attenuated strain through this process. Upon inhibition with a potent chemical inhibitor, growth arrest can occur more rapidly such that the synthesis and detection of unprocessed proteins may never reach a level that can be sufficiently detected over the existing protein background. This was demonstrated in experiments with compound C and actinonin (an inhibitor of peptide deformalyse), which both arrested cell growth at high concentrations to such an extent that insufficient newly synthesized proteins were produced to detect as unprocessed biomarkers (data not shown; see additional details regarding actinonin and peptide deformylase below). Thus, one important consideration for the success of a SELDI-TOF MS approach (or any biomarker approach that targets essential gene products) is the need to grow cells at sublethal doses of inhibitor in order to capture cells in a state that is meaningful for biomarker detection. Otherwise, one might detect only common markers that are a consequence of cell death rather than the specific mechanism of inhibition.
Beyond the direct benefit for compound screening for MAP inhibitors, two overall themes from this research stand out when considering reapplication for other targets. First, clearly, the use of genetically attenuated strains of E. coli to down-regulate a target enzyme can provide benefits when evaluating the potency and specificity of inhibitor compounds. This is particularly useful in cases like MAP where no known benchmark compounds were available as a starting point for drug discovery. Using the attenuated strain (MAPr) was also instrumental to our ability to develop and optimize the SELDI-TOF MS assay to measure the effect of MAP attenuation in whole cells. Without the MAPr strain for developing and optimizing the assay, we may have tried a few compound classes without success and given up on the assay. The MAPr strain provided the necessary positive control for assay development. Thus, it is clear that using the genetic attenuation approach would be beneficial for evaluating other bacterial targets.
Second, at the outset, our hypothesis was that we could detect specific biomarkers of MAP inhibition using a global profiling approach on the SELDI-TOF chips. Much to our surprise, we detected eight biomarkers associated with MAP inhibition. Fortunately, these markers arose as a result of inhibiting the MAP enzyme activity, thereby allowing for the direct measurement of the unprocessed, newly synthesized protein. Thus, the SELDI-TOF MS profiling approach should also be useful in evaluating other protein processing targets. To investigate this possibility, we incubated E. coli EMG-2 cells with actinonina known inhibitor for the bacterial peptide deformylase enzyme (3). Noting that this enzyme is required to remove the formyl group from the initiator N-formylmethionine prior to MAP action (Fig. 1) (12), one would expect actinonin treatment to produce a mass shift of 159 Da (28 for the formyl group and 131 for Met). Evaluation of whole-cell lysates at sublethal doses of actinonin produced the expected 159-Da mass shift for many of the same small protein biomarkers as detected for MAP (data not shown), thus demonstrating that the SELDI-TOF MS approach could be applied to whole-cell evaluation of other protein processing targets.
What about profiling for targets without specific protein mass shifts? Clearly, the majority of targets in bacterial systems will not result in a specific and detectible protein mass shift. However, the ability to evaluate protein profiles and detect biomarker peaks in whole-cell lysates that are consistent with hitting a given target may be sufficient to screen compound classes. Given that antibacterial compounds that ultimately result in the arrest of cell growth and/or cell death have a dramatic effect on cellular function, it is likely that various classes of inhibitors (protein synthesis, cell wall, replication, etc.) would produce a unique profile of biomarkers that are diagnostic for that class. As such, one might expect to use a SELDI-TOF MS profiling approach to detect biomarkers for new targets as well. However, in order for this approach to be effective, it is imperative that a specific benchmark inhibitor or genetically attenuated strain of bacteria be evaluated as the positive control. Only then will it be possible to develop sufficient confidence in a biomarker profile to effectively use it in the selection of inhibitor compound classes.
These authors contributed equally to the work. ![]()
Present address: Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45229. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»