AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yustes, C.
Right arrow Articles by Guarro, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yustes, C.
Right arrow Articles by Guarro, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2005, p. 3498-3500, Vol. 49, No. 8
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.8.3498-3500.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Synergistic Interaction between Amphotericin B and Micafungin against Scedosporium spp.

Clara Yustes and Josep Guarro*

Unitat de Microbiologia, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain

Received 15 February 2005/ Returned for modification 23 March 2005/ Accepted 2 May 2005


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Text
 References
 
The in vitro interaction between amphotericin B and micafungin against 36 isolates of Scedosporium spp. has been evaluated using checkerboard assays and the minimal effective concentration endpoint. Synergy was found for 82.4% of Scedosporium prolificans isolates and for 31.6% of Scedosporium apiospermum isolates. Antagonism was not observed.


   TEXT
Top
 Abstract
 Text
References
 
The two species of Scedosporium, Scedosporium prolificans and S. apiospermum, have evolved into important agents of severe infections in immunocompromised patients (23). The outcome of these infections is very poor, and the most appropriate treatment is unknown. Although Scedosporium spp., particularly S. apiospermum, are more susceptible to azoles than polyenes, amphotericin B (AMB) is still the most-used drug (23). The high resistance of the two species, especially S. prolificans, to most of the conventional antifungal drugs forces testing of new possible therapeutic strategies (14). A promising approach might be to combine antifungal drugs with different active mechanisms. The advent of new echinocandins that can be combined with AMB or azoles has revived interest in finding antifungal combinations that are synergistic for refractory fungi (11, 12, 23).

Micafungin (MFG) is a novel echinocandin that exerts antifungal activity via inhibition of (1,3)-ß-D-glucan synthase, interfering with fungal cell wall synthesis. This drug shows in vivo and in vitro activity against a variety of common pathogenic fungi (16). The in vitro activity of echinocandins against Aspergillus spp. is limited when measured using a conventional MIC endpoint. However, it has been suggested that the minimal effective concentration (MEC) endpoint correlates better with the in vivo activity of the echinocandins than the MIC does (2). Since the MICs of echinocandins at which no growth is visible are manyfold higher than the levels of the drugs achievable in blood and tissues, some authors have used the MEC as an alternative clinically relevant endpoint to evaluate the effectiveness of echinocandins (8). The MEC is the lowest concentration of the drug to cause abnormal hyphal growth, which can easily be detected by the presence of short abundant branches (2, 13), and appears to be a stable in vitro measurement for determining the activity of caspofungin against molds (2). Using MEC as an endpoint, Arikan et al. (3) showed in vitro synergy of AMB and caspofungin against Aspergillus and Fusarium spp. In the present study, we have evaluated the in vitro activity, using the MEC endpoint, of MFG combined with AMB against clinical strains of Scedosporium.

Thirty-six clinical (80.5%) and environmental (19.4%) isolates of Scedosporium spp. (17 strains of S. prolificans and 19 of S. apiospermum) were tested. Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and Candida krusei ATCC 6258 were used for quality control. Inocula were prepared by following the NCCLS guidelines (17). Isolation and identification of the isolates were carried out by using standard microbiological procedures. Antifungal drugs were obtained as pure powders. AMB was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and MFG in water. The final concentrations of the drugs ranged from 0.12 to 8 µg/ml for AMB and from 0.06 to 32 µg/ml for MFG. Dilutions were made in RPMI 1640 medium buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 M MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid). Drug interactions were assessed by using checkerboard assays after incubation of the isolates for 48 h (for S. prolificans) or 72 h (for S. apiospermum) at 35°C in RPMI 1640 medium. Plates were scanned both visually and microscopically with a stereoscopic microscope at low magnification (x40). The MEC correlated with the visually assessed MIC that resulted in 50% reduction in turbidity compared to that of the growth control well, and the MEC was determined to be the lowest drug concentration to result in aberrant hyphal growth, characterized by an abundance of short branches (2, 13). The fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) was used to classify drug interactions (11). The FICI of the combination of AMB and MFG for each isolate was calculated using the MEC endpoint. Approximately 80% of the tests were repeated, and interactions showed mainly the same trends (data not shown).

The MECs and FICI values obtained for each isolate of S. apiospermum and S. prolificans tested are shown in Table 1. The high off-scale MEC of AMB, >8 µg/ml, was converted into the next highest concentration, 16 µg/ml, for calculation of the FICI, and the high off-scale MEC of MFG, >32 µg/ml, was converted into 64 µg/ml. The geometric mean of the MECs of AMB for all the S. apiospermum isolates was 4.62 µg/ml (range, 0.51 to >8 µg/ml), and that of MFG was 5.76 µg/ml (range, 1 to >32 µg/ml). These drugs were clearly less active against S. prolificans. For this species, the mean MECs of AMB and MFG were 11.56 and 64 µg/ml, respectively. Synergistic interaction was found for 14 (82.4%) of the 17 S. prolificans isolates and for 6 (31.6%) of the 19 S. apiospermum isolates. Antagonism was not detected.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. In vitro results of the AMB-MFG combination against isolates of Scedosporium spp.

 
This study has shown that the combination of AMB and MFG has potential for the treatment of scedosporiosis. In the case of S. prolificans, it is especially important because so far practically all the treatments tested have failed. Although recent studies have demonstrated that high doses of liposomal AMB (19, 20) and the new triazole albaconazole (6) have been effective in the treatment of animal-disseminated infections, the combinations AMB-MFG and azoles-terbinafine (15) also merit investigation. For S. apiospermum infections, more optimism exists because numerous clinical reports (9, 18, 24) and experimental data (4, 5) have demonstrated that voriconazole is effective in the treatment of severe infections. However, in some cases this drug has also failed (21), and it is in these cases where other alternatives, such as the combination AMB-MFG, could perhaps play some role. Peak levels of MFG in human serum have been reported to be up to 11 mg/liter (1, 7, 10). This level is within the range of concentrations of this drug which, when the drug is combined with AMB, produce synergistic effects.

This combination has also shown beneficial effects in animal models of other fungal infections (22). The mechanism to explain why this combination works is not clear. It can be speculated that MFG causes some structural alteration at the cell wall level which facilitates the action of AMB on the cell membrane at a lower concentration. However, the inverse effect, i.e., how echinocandin MICs are lowered by AMB, is more difficult to explain (3, 11).

In conclusion, our results indicate that the combination AMB-MFG shows an in vitro synergistic effect mainly against S. apiospermum. If this high activity is confirmed in appropriate animal studies, we would have a potential treatment for invasive scedosporiosis.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by a grant from Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias from the Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo of Spain (PI 020114).


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Unitat de Microbiologia, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Carrer Sant Llorenç, 21, 43201 Reus, Spain. Phone: 977-759359. Fax: 977-759322. E-mail: josep.guarro{at}urv.net. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 

  1. Andes, D. 2003. In vivo pharmacodynamics of antifungal drugs in treatment of candidiasis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1179-1186.[Free Full Text]
  2. Arikan, S., M. Lozano-Chiu, V. Paetznick, and J. H. Rex. 2001. In vitro susceptibility testing methods for caspofungin against Aspergillus and Fusarium isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:327-330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Arikan, S., M. Lozano-Chiu, V. Paetznick, and J. H. Rex. 2002. In vitro synergy of caspofungin and amphotericin B against Aspergillus and Fusarium spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:245-247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Capilla, J., and J. Guarro. 2004. Correlation between in vitro susceptibility of Scedosporium apiospermum to voriconazole and in vivo outcome of scedosporiosis in guinea pigs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:4009-4011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Capilla, J., C. Serena, F. J. Pastor, M. Ortoneda, and J. Guarro. 2003. Efficacy of voriconazole in treatment of systemic scedosporiosis in neutropenic mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3976-3978.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Capilla, J., C. Yustes, E. Mayayo, J. Fernández-Ballart, M. Ortoneda, F. J. Pastor, and J. Guarro. 2003. Efficacy of albaconazole (UR-9825) in treatment of disseminated Scedosporium prolificans infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1948-1951.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Denning, D. W. 2003. Echinocandin antifungal drugs. Lancet 362:1142-1151.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Ganesan, L. T., E. K. Manavathu, J. L. Cutright, G. J. Alangaden, and P. H. Chandrasekar. 2004. In vitro activity of nikkomycin Z alone and in combination with polyenes, triazoles or echinocandins against Aspergillus fumigatus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 10:961-966.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Girmenia, C., G. Luzi, M. Monaco, and P. Martino. 1998. Use of voriconazole in treatment of Scedosporium apiospermum infection: case report. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1436-1438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Jarvis, B., D. P. Figgitt, and L. J. Scott. 2004. Micafungin. Drugs 64:969-982.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Johnson, M. D., C. MacDougall, L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, J. R. Perfect, and J. H. Rex. 2004. Combination antifungal therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:693-715.[Free Full Text]
  12. Kontoyiannis, D. P., and R. E. Lewis. 2003. Combination chemotherapy for invasive fungal infections: what laboratory and clinical studies tell us so far. Drug Resist. Updates 6:257-269.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Kurtz, M. B., I. B. Heat, J. Marrinan, S. Dreikorn, J. Onishi, and C. Douglas. 1994. Morphological effects of lipopeptides against Aspergillus fumigatus correlate with activities against (1,3)-ß-D-glucan synthase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:1480-1489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Meletiadis, J., J. F. G. M. Meis, J. W. Mouton, J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela, J. P. Donnelly, P. E. Verweij, and the EUROFUNG Network. 2002. In vitro activities of new and conventional antifungal agents against clinical Scedosporium isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:62-68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Meletiadis, J., J. W. Mouton, J. F. Meis, and P. E. Verweij. 2003. In vitro drug interaction modeling of combinations of azoles with terbinafine against clinical Scedosporium prolificans isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:106-117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Nakai, T., F. Ikeda, S. Tawara, K. Nishimura, and M. Miyaji. 2003. In vitro antifungal activity of micafungin (FK463) against dimorphic fungi: comparison of yeast-like and mycelial forms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1376-1381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. Approved standard M38-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  18. Nesky, M. A., E. C. McDougal, and J. E. Peacock, Jr. 2000. Pseudallescheria boydii brain abscess successfully treated with voriconazole and surgical drainage: case report and literature review of central nervous system pseudallescheriasis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 31:673-677.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Ortoneda, M., J. Capilla, F. J. Pastor, C. Serena, and J. Guarro. 2004. Interaction of G-CSF and high doses of liposomal amphotericin B in the treatment of systemic murine scedosporiosis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 50:247-251.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Ortoneda, M., J. Capilla, F. J. Pastor, E. Mayayo, J. Fernández-Ballart, and J. Guarro. 2002. Liposomal amphotericin B and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy in a murine model of invasive infection by Scedosporium prolificans. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 49:525-529.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Perfect, J. R., K. A. Marr, T. J. Walsh, R. N. Greenberg, B. Dupont, J. de la Torre-Cisneros, G. Just-Nubling, H. T. Schlamm, I. Lutsar, A. Espinel-Ingroff, and E. Johnson. 2003. Voriconazole treatment for less-common, emerging, or refractory fungal infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 36:1122-1131.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Serena, C., F. J. Pastor, F. Gilgado, E. Mayayo, and J. Guarro. 2005. Efficacy of micafungin in combination in a murine model of disseminated trichosporonosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:497-502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Steinbach, W. J., and J. R. Perfect. 2003. Scedosporium species infections and treatments. J. Chemother. 15:16-27.
  24. Walsh, T. J., I. Lutsar, T. Driscol, B. Dupont, M. Roden, P. Ghahramani, M. Hodges, A. H. Groll, and J. R. Perfect. 2002. Voriconazole in the treatment of aspergillosis, scedosporiosis and other invasive fungal infections in children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 21:240-248.[CrossRef][Medline]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2005, p. 3498-3500, Vol. 49, No. 8
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.8.3498-3500.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yustes, C.
Right arrow Articles by Guarro, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yustes, C.
Right arrow Articles by Guarro, J.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS