Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2006, p. 3476-3478, Vol. 50, No. 10
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00402-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Pathology, University of Southern California, and Saban Research Institute of Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California,1 Department of Microbiology, The University of Texas Health Center at Tyler, Tyler, Texas2
Received 31 March 2006/ Returned for modification 17 May 2006/ Accepted 14 July 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Southern blot analysis with an erm(38)-derived probe (8, 9) indicated that M. mageritense strain 961635 had DNA similar to that of erm(38) of M. smegmatis. Genetic complementation of the erm(38) knockout variant M. smegmatis ermKO4, using methods described elsewhere (9), isolated a 2.8-kbp M. mageritense DNA fragment that conferred resistance (MIC
128 µg/ml) to clarithromycin, clindamycin, erythromycin, spiramycin, and the ketolide HMR3004, but not to quinupristin (streptogramin B). Sequencing of the M. mageritense DNA fragment identified a gene encoding a 251-amino-acid polypeptide that was 77% identical to Erm(39) of M. fortuitum (GenBank accession no. AAR92235) and 71% identical to the first 264 amino acids of Erm(38) of M. smegmatis (GenBank accession no. AAN86837). The M. mageritense erm gene sequence was submitted to the Nomenclature Center for MLS Genes maintained by Marilyn C. Roberts (11, 12) and was designated erm(40). Using erm(40)-specific primers (MM1 and MM2) (Table 1) and methods described elsewhere (9), this gene was detected by PCR in 11/11 clinical isolates of M. mageritense.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. PCR primers used in this studya
|
Sequencing of the erm genes and surrounding DNA of the erm-positive species was enabled by using different combinations of the consensus primers (Table 1). The encoded amino acid sequences of the erm genes of M. boenickei, M. goodii, M. houstonense, M. neworleansense, M. porcinum, and M. wolinskyi, along with the previously described erm genes of M. fortuitum (9) and M. smegmatis (8), were found to be highly conserved, with a mean identity of 77% (range, 68 to 99%) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Following the guidelines of Roberts (11), the erm alleles in different RGM fall into three existing Erm classes: Erm(38) for M. goodii and M. smegmatis; Erm(39) for M. boenickei, M. fortuitum, M. houstonense, M. neworleansense, and M. porcinum; and Erm(40) for M. mageritense and M. wolinskyi. Furthermore, the predicted phylogenic relationship between the amino acid sequences of the RGM erm alleles and other closely related Erm classes (Fig. 1A) showed that the RGM erm genes formed a distinct clade of the erm phylogenic tree. This clade was consistent with the phylogeny of RGM predicted by molecular analysis of other genes (6). Furthermore, the RGM Erm node appears to have "emerged" more recently than the other Erm classes, which are largely derived from antibiotic-producing Actinomycetales (e.g., Streptomyces). This suggests that the RGM erm genes were acquired after the divergence of the RGM from other members of this order.
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (A) Phylogram showing the predicted relationships of the RGM Erm proteins, with the representative alleles of the eight most closely related Erm classes, and rooted on Erm(C) of Staphylococcus aureus (GenBank accession no. AAA20192). The Erm class representatives (with GenBank accession numbers) are Erm(30) of Streptomyces venezuelae (AAC69328), Erm(31) of S. venezuelae (AAC69327), Erm(36) of Micrococcus luteus (AAL68827), Erm(I) of Streptomyces mycarofaciens (A60725), Erm(N) of Streptomyces fradiae (CAA66307), Erm(U) of Streptomyces lincolnensis (CAA55770), Erm(W) of Micromonospora griseorubida (P43433), and Erm(X) of Corynebacterium jeikeium (AAK28910). For the RGM Erm proteins, Erm(38), Erm(39), and Erm(40), the allele (or RGM species) is indicated by the letters after the right parenthesis: bo, M. boenickei; fo, M. fortuitum; go, M. goodii; ho, M. houstonense; ma, M. mageritense; ne, M. neworleansense; po, M. porcinum; sm, M. smegmatis; and wo, M. wolinskyi. The scale bar shows the evolutionary distance (i.e., the amount of divergence, or time since splitting, from a theoretical common ancestor). (B and C) The genetic organization of the folD regions of erm gene-positive and erm gene-negative RGM, respectively. The shaded genes are similar (>64% amino acid identity) to M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv genes Rv3342 (GenBank accession no. CAA17114), Rv3355c (GenBank accession no. NP_217872), and folD (GenBank accession no. NP_217873). Other genes are those encoding TR, a putative tetR family transcriptional regulator, and pgaE, a putative polyketide synthase, and zeta toxin-like, containing a zeta toxin conserved domain (Pfam06414) and 50% amino acid identity to conserved hypothetical genes of Polaromonas spp. (GenBank accession no. EAM36411) and Xanthomonas oryzae (GenBank accession no. AAW75612). ORF, open reading frame with a likely ribosome binding site (AAGGGA).
|
Sequencing of the folD regions of M. abscessus (isolates MAB30 and MC719) and M. chelonae (strain ATCC 35752T) revealed that the 3342 and folD genes were separated by 0.8 kbp of DNA (GenBank accession no. DQ144643 and DQ144644) (Fig. 1C). Although a possible open reading frame was identified in this region, BLAST analysis (1) revealed no convincing alignments with other sequences (all had <30% identity). In fact, BLAST searching of the current completely sequenced mycobacteria (through the NCBI website [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/]) suggested that the pgaE and TR genes were found only in erm-positive RGM species and M. peregrinum and M. senegalense. This in turn suggested that M. peregrinum and M. senegalense originally had erm genes that were subsequently deleted.
As previously found for M. fortuitum and M. smegmatis (8, 9), M. boenickei, M. houstonense isolate 14133, M. neworleansense, and M. porcinum appeared susceptible to clarithromycin (MIC < 4 µg/ml) on standard susceptibility testing (10). However, as demonstrated with M. houstonense isolate 14133, overnight incubation in clarithromycin (0.1 µg/ml) increased the clarithromycin MIC to > 128 µg/ml. The clarithromycin MIC remained at
2 µg/ml for organisms incubated in the absence of macrolide. Thus, these results provide further evidence that macrolide resistance in RGM species can be inducible. Intriguingly, M. houstonense isolate 2014 and M. mageritense isolate 961635 were constitutively resistant to macrolide-lincosamide-ketolide agents (MIC > 128 µg/ml), yet reverse transcription-PCR analysis (using methods described elsewhere [8, 9]) indicated that the erm mRNA levels were
10-fold higher in organisms preincubated for 2 h in 0.1 µg/ml clarithromycin or HMR3004 (data not shown). Thus, the results were consistent with RGM erm genes being inducible at the molecular level, even in organisms deemed constitutively resistant by standard susceptibility testing.
In conclusion, erm genes are present in a range of pathogenic RGM species, including species that are considered macrolide susceptible as currently defined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (formerly NCCLS) (10). This, with the finding that all RGM erm genes are inducible at the molecular level, suggests that the results of routine susceptibility testing with macrolides should be interpreted with caution, especially for species of the M. fortuitum and M. smegmatis groups. Furthermore, induction of macrolide-lincosamide-ketolide resistance needs to be considered when assessing new macrolide-ketolide agents for potential antimycobacterial activity.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The RGM erm regions and the erm gene-encoded polypeptides have been submitted to GenBank under the following accession numbers: M. boenickei, DQ144638 and AAZ76615; M. goodii, DQ144639 and AAZ76618; M. houstonense, DQ144640 and AAZ76622; M. mageritense, AY570506 and AAS76623; M. neworleansense, DQ144641 and AAZ76625; M. porcinum, DQ447745 and ABE01848; and M. wolinskyi, DQ144642 and AAZ76628. The folD regions of M. abscessus, M. peregrinum, and M. senegalense have been submitted to GenBank under accession numbers DQ144643, DQ435604, and DQ435605, respectively.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aac.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»