Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2006, p. 3492-3495, Vol. 50, No. 10
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00391-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Deletions of the Endocytic Components VPS28 and VPS32 in Candida albicans Lead to Echinocandin and Azole Hypersensitivity
Muriel Cornet,1,2
Claude Gaillardin,1* and
Mathias L. Richard1
Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaire, Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique UMR1238, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR2585, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France,1
Microbiologie, Hôtel-Dieu, 1 Place du Parvis Notre-Dame, 75181 Paris Cedex 04, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris V, Paris Descartes, Paris, France2
Received 30 March 2006/
Returned for modification 27 April 2006/
Accepted 15 July 2006

ABSTRACT
Vps28p and Vps32p act in both the endocytic and the pH signaling
pathways in yeasts and are required for
Candida albicans virulence.
Here, we show that deletions of
VPS28 and
VPS32 increase the
susceptibility of
C. albicans to cell wall disruption agents,
echinocandin and azole antifungal agents.

TEXT
The incidence of invasive fungal infections is rising continuously,
and
Candida albicans is now a major cause of nosocomial infections
(
11,
15,
17). Although antifungal resistance among invasive
C. albicans isolates is not common, there is concern about the
development of azole resistance due to prophylactic use of fluconazole
(
13). Thus, in recent years, interest has focused on developing
and licensing new agents, such as echinocandins or new triazoles
(
7,
10,
12,
23).
Vacuolar protein sorting (Vps) factors act in the endosomal sorting complexes required for transmembrane protein recycling and degradation during the last steps of endocytosis (1). Recently, some Vps factors have been documented as required for activation of the Rim pathway, which governs pH sensing in fungi (2, 3, 9, 16, 24). We previously established that Vps28p and Vps32p affect virulence in C. albicans through Rim-dependent and -independent pathways (3). Here, we show that, in addition to virulence, these Vps factors affect cell wall maintenance and the susceptibility of C. albicans to antifungal agents.
We analyzed strains with VPS deleted for sensitivity to two cell wall-perturbing agents: calcofluor white (CFW) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). Homozygous deletions of VPS28 (vps28/) and VPS32 (vps32/) were constructed in the BWP17 strain as previously described (3, 6). Complementation of each mutant was achieved by reintroduction of the wild-type allele at the HIS1 locus. As controls for any Rim-mediated effect, we analyzed the rim101/ null mutant (4) and introduced RIM101SL, a truncated constitutively active allele of RIM101 (3, 5), into the vps28/, vps32/, and rim101/ mutants and into the DAY286 control strain at the HIS1 locus (Table 1) .
Both the
vps28/ and
vps32/ mutants
were hypersensitive to CFW and SDS, with the wild-type phenotype
partially restored by complementation (Fig.
1A). This suggests
a cell wall disorder compensated for by chitin accumulation
and corroborates previous reports of enhanced CFW binding to
the cell walls of
vps mutants (
3). Indeed, SDS hypersensitivity
reflects facilitated access of detergents to the mutant membrane,
whereas hypersensitivity to CFW, a known inhibitor of chitin
incorporation in the wall, results from disruption of the chitin-based
compensatory mechanism (
18,
19). Nikkomycin Z, a chitin synthase
inhibitor, was used to investigate this cell wall defect: an
increased sensitivity of the
vps28/ mutant was
observed, whereas no major effect was observed in the case of
the
vps32/ mutant, either on plates (Fig.
1B)
or in liquid assays (not shown). This suggests that the compensatory
mechanisms elicited by the two
vps mutations (e.g., chitin overproduction
versus chitin deposition) may differ. In
Saccharomyces cerevisiae,
deletions of
VPS28 and
VPS32 led to CFW hyperresistance, unlike
other
vps mutations affecting the same complexes, which also
suggests subtle differences in the precise compensatory mechanisms
triggered by
vps mutations (
22).
Mutations in the
VPS genes affect Rim101p activation (
3). Inactivation
of
RIM101 resulted in SDS, but not CFW or nikkomycin Z, susceptibility
(Fig.
1,
rim101/). SDS sensitivity elicited by
vps mutations, however, is independent of Rim101p activation,
since expression of
RIM101SL, while suppressing the SDS sensitivity
of the
rim101/ mutant, had no effect on
vps28/ and
vps32/ mutant susceptibilities (Fig.
1A).
Similarly, the CFW sensitivities of
vps mutants, which were
not bypassed by
RIM101SL and were not displayed by the
rim101/ mutant, appeared to be independent of an effect of
vps genes
on the Rim pathway. Expression of
RIM101SL, surprisingly, increased
the nikkomycin Z tolerance of the control strain (DAY286+
RIM101SL)
and of the
vps28/ mutant (Fig.
1B). This shows
that, although inactivation of the Rim pathway has no effect
on nikkomycin Z tolerance, constitutive activation of the pathway
increases tolerance for unknown reasons.
The yeast cell wall is constructed around large, intricate glucan molecules (8). Since VPS genes affect cell wall integrity, we tested them for a possible effect on susceptibility to antifungal drugs, like echinocandins, which specifically target ß-1,3-glucan synthesis.
The MICs of the echinocandins caspofungin (CAS) and micafungin (MCF) and of the azoles fluconazole (FLC) and voriconazole (VRC) were determined using the CLSI (formerly NCCLS) broth microdilution method (12a). We discarded experiments showing reduced growth of the strains with deletions compared to the DAY185 control (4). Both vps28/ and vps32/ null mutants showed MICs different from that of DAY185 (Table 1), but the results were not consistently reproducible.
Indeed, although the CLSI protocol is recommended for clinical MIC testing, agar plate assays seem to be more reliable for mutant analysis (20, 21). Agar plate assays, carried out on synthetic complete medium containing semi-inhibitory drug concentrations, confirmed that both vps28/ and vps32/ null mutants were more susceptible to FLC, VRC, CAS, and MCF than the isogenic DAY185 control strain (Fig. 2). Growth inhibitions in these assays were clear, thus validating MIC observations (Fig. 2 shows one example). Growth inhibition of the strains with VPS deleted was observed over the following concentration ranges (in µg/ml): 1 to 4 for FLC, 0.03 to 0.12 for VRC and CAS, and 0.015 to 0.06 for MCF. The slight growth defect observed for the vps32/ mutant on the no-drug control plates was confirmed by growth rate measurements (3) but was not significant enough (2.3 h versus 1.7 h) to account for the hypersensitivity of the strain. The susceptibilities of the strains with VPS deleted to amphotericin B and flucytosine were not affected (data not shown). Complementation restored the susceptibility of the control strain to all drugs tested (Fig. 2 and Table 1). The rim101/ deletion strain was also hypersensitive to FLC, VRC, CAS, and MCF, and introduction of the constitutive allele RIM101SL restored wild-type susceptibility (the rim101/ strain is hypersensitive to 0.12 µg/ml of CAS on agar plates [data not shown]). RIM101SL also restored normal resistance levels to azoles in VPS mutants (Fig. 2 and Table 1), confirming direct involvement of the Rim pathway in azole sensitivity, as in S. cerevisiae (14). The echinocandin hypersensitivity of the vps null mutants appeared to be independent of the Rim pathway, since the RIM101SL allele had no suppressive effect on the echinocandin hypersensitivity of vps28/ and vps32/ mutants.
In conclusion, our data show that deletions of
VPS28 and
VPS32 increase
C. albicans susceptibility to drugs that directly interfere
with cell wall assembly at the level of chitin synthesis and/or
deposition (nikkomycin Z and CFW) or at the level of ß-1,3-glucan
network construction (echinocandins) independently of the Rim
pathway. These data suggest that
vps mutations perturb localization
and/or recycling of surface proteins involved in cell wall maintenance.
They also lead to azole hypersensitivity, but the latter phenotype
seems to result directly from their effect on the Rim pathway.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Direction de la Recherche Clinique
of the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, by the Centre
National de la Recherche Scientifique, and by grants from Merck
& Company and Fujisawa, Inc., through funding of M.C.
Strains with RIM101 deleted, the reference strain BWP17, and UAU1 carrying a plasmid were generous gifts from A. P. Mitchell.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaire, INRA, CBAI, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France. Phone: 33 1 30 81 54 53. Fax: 33 1 30 81 54 57. E-mail:
claude.gaillardin{at}grignon.inra.fr.


REFERENCES
1 - Babst, M. 2005. A protein's final ESCRT. Traffic 6:2-9.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Blanchin-Roland, S., G. D. Costa, and C. Gaillardin. 2005. ESCRT-I components of the endocytic machinery are required for Rim101-dependent ambient pH regulation in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Microbiology 151:3627-3637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Cornet, M., F. Bidard, P. Schwarz, G. Da Costa, S. Blanchin-Roland, F. Dromer, and C. Gaillardin. 2005. Deletions of endocytic components VPS28 and VPS32 affect growth at alkaline pH and virulence through both RIM101-dependent and RIM101-independent pathways in Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 73:7977-7987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Davis, D., J. E. Edwards, Jr., A. P. Mitchell, and A. S. Ibrahim. 2000. Candida albicans RIM101 pH response pathway is required for host-pathogen interactions. Infect. Immun. 68:5953-5959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Davis, D. A., V. M. Bruno, L. Loza, S. G. Filler, and A. P. Mitchell. 2002. Candida albicans Mds3p, a conserved regulator of pH responses and virulence identified through insertional mutagenesis. Genetics 162:1573-1581.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Enloe, B., A. Diamond, and A. P. Mitchell. 2000. A single-transformation gene function test in diploid Candida albicans. J. Bacteriol. 182:5730-5736.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Herbrecht, R., D. W. Denning, T. F. Patterson, J. E. Bennett, R. E. Greene, J. W. Oestmann, W. V. Kern, K. A. Marr, P. Ribaud, O. Lortholary, R. Sylvester, R. H. Rubin, J. R. Wingard, P. Stark, C. Durand, D. Caillot, E. Thiel, P. H. Chandrasekar, M. R. Hodges, H. T. Schlamm, P. F. Troke, and B. de Pauw. 2002. Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 347:408-415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Klis, F. M., P. de Groot, and K. Hellingwerf. 2001. Molecular organization of the cell wall of Candida albicans. Med. Mycol. 39(Suppl. 1):1-8.[Medline]
9 - Kullas, A. L., M. Li, and D. A. Davis. 2004. Snf7p, a component of the ESCRT-III protein complex, is an upstream member of the RIM101 pathway in Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell. 3:1609-1618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Kullberg, B. J., J. D. Sobel, M. Ruhnke, P. G. Pappas, C. Viscoli, J. H. Rex, J. D. Cleary, E. Rubinstein, L. W. Church, J. M. Brown, H. T. Schlamm, I. T. Oborska, F. Hilton, and M. R. Hodges. 2005. Voriconazole versus a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 366:1435-1442.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Martin, G. S., D. M. Mannino, S. Eaton, and M. Moss. 2003. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N. Engl. J. Med. 348:1546-1554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Mora-Duarte, J., R. Betts, C. Rotstein, A. L. Colombo, L. Thompson-Moya, J. Smietana, R. Lupinacci, C. Sable, N. Kartsonis, and J. Perfect. 2002. Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 347:2020-2029.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - NCCLS. 2002. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast, 2nd ed. Approved standard M27-A2. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
13 - Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., J. H. Rex, P. G. Pappas, R. J. Hamill, R. A. Larsen, H. W. Horowitz, W. G. Powderly, N. Hyslop, C. A. Kauffman, J. Cleary, J. E. Mangino, and J. Lee. 2003. Antifungal susceptibility survey of 2,000 bloodstream Candida isolates in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3149-3154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Parsons, A. B., R. L. Brost, H. Ding, Z. Li, C. Zhang, B. Sheikh, G. W. Brown, P. M. Kane, T. R. Hughes, and C. Boone. 2004. Integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interaction data links bioactive compounds to cellular target pathways. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:62-69.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Patterson, T. F. 2005. Advances and challenges in management of invasive mycoses. Lancet 366:1013-1025.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - Penalva, M. A., and H. N. Arst, Jr. 2004. Recent advances in the characterization of ambient pH regulation of gene expression in filamentous fungi and yeasts. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 58:425-451.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 - Pfaller, M. A., R. N. Jones, S. A. Messer, M. B. Edmond, and R. P. Wenzel. 1998. National surveillance of nosocomial blood stream infection due to Candida albicans: frequency of occurrence and antifungal susceptibility in the SCOPE Program. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 31:327-332.[CrossRef][Medline]
18 - Popolo, L., and M. Vai. 1998. Defects in assembly of the extracellular matrix are responsible for altered morphogenesis of a Candida albicans phr1 mutant. J. Bacteriol. 180:163-166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Richard, M., P. De Groot, O. Courtin, D. Poulain, F. Klis, and C. Gaillardin. 2002. GPI7 affects cell-wall protein anchorage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans. Microbiology 148:2125-2133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20 - Sanglard, D., F. Ischer, O. Marchetti, J. Entenza, and J. Bille. 2003. Calcineurin A of Candida albicans: involvement in antifungal tolerance, cell morphogenesis and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 48:959-976.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 - Schuetzer-Muehlbauer, M., B. Willinger, G. Krapf, S. Enzinger, E. Presterl, and K. Kuchler. 2003. The Candida albicans Cdr2p ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter confers resistance to caspofungin. Mol. Microbiol. 48:225-235.[CrossRef][Medline]
22 - Shiflett, S. L., D. M. Ward, D. Huynh, M. B. Vaughn, J. C. Simmons, and J. Kaplan. 2004. Characterization of Vta1p, a class E Vps protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 279:10982-10990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23 - Walsh, T. J., H. Teppler, G. R. Donowitz, J. A. Maertens, L. R. Baden, A. Dmoszynska, O. A. Cornely, M. R. Bourque, R. J. Lupinacci, C. A. Sable, and B. E. dePauw. 2004. Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. N. Engl. J. Med. 351:1391-1402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24 - Xu, W., F. J. Smith, Jr., R. Subaran, and A. P. Mitchell. 2004. Multivesicular body-ESCRT components function in pH response regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans. Mol. Biol. Cell 15:5528-5537.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2006, p. 3492-3495, Vol. 50, No. 10
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00391-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Douglas, L. M., Martin, S. W., Konopka, J. B.
(2009). BAR Domain Proteins Rvs161 and Rvs167 Contribute to Candida albicans Endocytosis, Morphogenesis, and Virulence. Infect. Immun.
77: 4150-4160
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chauhan, N., Kruppa, M., Calderone, R.
(2007). The Ssk1p Response Regulator and Chk1p Histidine Kinase Mutants of Candida albicans Are Hypersensitive to Fluconazole and Voriconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 3747-3751
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Thevissen, K., Ayscough, K. R., Aerts, A. M., Du, W., De Brucker, K., Meert, E. M. K., Ausma, J., Borgers, M., Cammue, B. P. A., Francois, I. E. J. A.
(2007). Miconazole Induces Changes in Actin Cytoskeleton prior to Reactive Oxygen Species Induction in Yeast. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 21592-21597
[Abstract]
[Full Text]