Previous Article
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2006, p. 3516-3517, Vol. 50, No. 10
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00667-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi Isolates with High-Level Resistance to Ciprofloxacin in Dhaka, Bangladesh

LETTER
Typhoid fever due to multidrug-resistant
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi is a global public health problem, with an estimated
30 million cases and 600,000 deaths annually (
7). Since the
beginning of the 1990s, there has been an increasing prevalence
of multidrug resistance to the first-line antimicrobials, such
as chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and co-trimoxazole, shifting
the drug of choice for the treatment of typhoid fever to fluoroquinolones
on the Indian subcontinent (
4,
5). Several clinical failures
due to infection with isolates of
S. enterica serovar Typhi
with decreased susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones but resistance
to nalidixic acid, and their emergence, incidence, and spread
have been reported from other developing countries (
2,
3). The
purpose of this report was to investigate whether such isolates
were present in Bangladesh during the period between January
and December 2005 by retrospective analysis of the data for
blood cultures and antimicrobial susceptibility tests performed
in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory of the International
Centre for Health and Population Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B).
This is the first report to document the prevalence of isolates
of
S. enterica serovar Typhi expressing high-level resistance
to ciprofloxacin in Bangladesh.
S. enterica serovar Typhi strains were isolated by blood culture by using the BactAlert 3D system (BioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the standard disk diffusion method of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), and the highly resistant isolates were subjected to MIC determination by Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). In 2005, 9,600 blood cultures were processed and S. enterica serovar Typhi was isolated from 428 patients (4.5%). Of these, 388 isolates (90.7%) of S. enterica serovar Typhi showed resistance to nalidixic acid. The ciprofloxacin susceptibilities of these isolates varied; 50 isolates (11.7%) had ciprofloxacin zone diameters of
21 mm (regarded as susceptible by CLSI), 368 (88.3%) had zone diameters of 16 to 20 mm (regarded as intermediate by CLSI), and 10 isolates (2.3%) had zone diameters of 15 mm or less (regarded as resistant by CLSI). On repeat testing, these 10 resistant isolates did not show any zone of inhibition by the disk diffusion method. The phenotypic pattern of resistance showed that 91.4% of the isolates were multidrug resistant (Table 1). The ciprofloxacin MICs of the 10 resistant isolates were also high and varied between 6.0 and 16.0 µg/ml, thus exceeding the CLSI resistance breakpoint of 4 µg/ml. The levels of resistance to nalidixic acid expressed by all 10 ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates were even higher (>256 µg/ml). All isolates, including the 10 highly resistant isolates, however, were susceptible to ceftriaxone, with zone diameters of
21 mm (regarded as susceptible by CLSI).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. Resistance phenotype and MICs of ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid for Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (n = 428), January to December 2005
|
In the mid-1990s, the emergence of
S. enterica serovar Typhi
and
S. enterica serovar Paratyphi A strains with decreased susceptibilities
to fluoroquinolones was reported from the Indian subcontinent
and southeast and central Asia. Disk diffusion testing revealed
that these isolates were resistant to nalidixic acid but sensitive
to ciprofloxacin, according to the current CLSI interpretive
criteria. However, the MICs of ciprofloxacin increased from
0.25 to 4 µg/ml, which are 10- to 100-fold higher than
those for the usual nalidixic acid-susceptible isolates, but
these isolates were still categorized as "susceptible" by current
CLSI criteria. This "susceptible" reporting prompted clinicians
to use ciprofloxacin, which resulted in delayed clinical responses
or treatment failures in the ciprofloxacin-treated cases of
typhoid fever caused by these isolates. Accordingly, the CLSI
currently recommends the routine use of disk diffusion testing
of nalidixic acid as a marker for the detection of reduced susceptibility
of
Salmonella spp. to fluoroquinolones. Resistance to nalidixic
acid in
S. enterica serovar Typhi has been reported to be mediated
by a single point mutation at the quinolone resistance-determining
region of the
gyrA gene. Complete resistance to fluoroquinolones
is usually associated with a double mutation in
gyrA, but multiple
mutations with the involvement of other genes have also been
mentioned (
1). The injudicious administration and rampant use
of quinolones in Bangladesh probably contributed to the high
prevalence of reduced susceptibility (>88%) and the emergence
of very high level or complete resistance (>4 µg/ml)
of isolates of
S. enterica serovar Typhi to fluoroquinolones.
The prevalence of multidrug resistance (resistance to two or
more drugs) is also high (91.4%). Alternative effective drugs
available for treatment of these resistant isolates are ceftriaxone
and cefixime, but they are expensive and one ceftriaxone-resistant
case of
S. enterica serovar Typhi infection has been reported
(
6). We therefore face the imminent prospect of encountering
untreatable typhoid fever in the near future. A national guideline
on the proper usage of antibiotics is required for urgent implementation
in Bangladesh. In addition, a reevaluation of the MIC breakpoint
criteria by the CLSI is necessary, as the current reference
standards are unable to differentiate between fully susceptible
isolates and isolates showing reduce susceptibility.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was funded by the ICDDR,B Centre for Health and Population
Research and its donors, who provide unrestricted support to
the center for its operations and research. Current donors providing
unrestricted support include the Australian International Development
Agency; the Canadian International Development Agency; Department
for International Development, United Kingdom; the government
of Bangladesh; the government of Japan; the government of Sri
Lanka; the government of The Netherlands; the Swedish International
Development Cooperative Agency; and the Swiss Development Cooperation.
We gratefully acknowledge these donors for their support and
commitment to the center's research efforts.

REFERENCES
1 - Hirose, K., A. Hashimoto, K. Tamura, Y. Kawamura, T. Ezaki, H. Sagara, and H. Watanabe. 2002. DNA sequence analysis of DNA gyrase and DNA topoisomerase IV quinolone resistance-determining regions of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and serovar Paratyphi A. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3249-3252.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Lee, K., D. Yong, J. H. Yum, Y. S. Lim, H. S. Kim, B. K. Lee, and Y. Chong. 2004. Emergence of multidrug resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi in Korea. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:4130-4135.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Murdoch, D. A., N. A. Banatvala, A. Bone, B. I. Shoismatulloev, L. R. Ward, and E. J. Threlfall. 1998. Epidemic ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella typhi in Tajikistan. Lancet 351:339.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 - Rahman, M. M., J. A. Haq, M. A. Morshed, and M. A. Rahman. 2005. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi with decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacinan emerging problem in Bangladesh. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 25:345-346.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Renuka, K., S. Sood, B. K. Das, and A. Kapil. 2005. High-level ciprofloxacin resistance in Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi in India. J. Med. Microbiol. 54:999-1000.[Free Full Text]
6 - Saha, S. K., S. Y. Talukder, M. Islam, and S. Saha. 1999. A highly ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella typhi in Bangladesh. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 18:387.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - World Health Organization. 1998. Typhoid fever. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 73:284.
| | | | | |
Dilruba Ahmed
Liton T. D'Costa
Khorshed Alam
G. Balakrish Nair
M. Anowar Hossain*
Clinical Laboratory Services Laboratory Sciences Division ICDDR,B Centre for Health and Population Research Dhaka, Bangladesh
|
| | | | | |
* Phone: 880-2-8826391, Fax: 880-2-8812529, E-mail: anowar{at}icddrb.org |
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2006, p. 3516-3517, Vol. 50, No. 10
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00667-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Thaver, D., Zaidi, A. K M, Critchley, J., Azmatullah, A., Madni, S. A., Bhutta, Z. A
(2009). A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis. BMJ
338: b1865-b1865
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dimitrov, T., Dashti, A. A., Albaksami, O., Udo, E. E., Jadaon, M. M., Albert, M. J.
(2009). Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi from Kuwait with Novel Mutations in gyrA and parC Genes. J. Clin. Microbiol.
47: 208-211
[Abstract]
[Full Text]