Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2006, p. 3631-3637, Vol. 50, No. 11
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00448-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Evaluation of the Activities of Pyrimethamine Analogs against Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum Dihydrofolate Reductase-Thymidylate Synthase Using In Vitro Enzyme Inhibition and Bacterial Complementation Assays
Sasinee Bunyarataphan,
Ubolsree Leartsakulpanich,*
Supannee Taweechai,
Bongkoch Tarnchompoo,
Sumalee Kamchonwongpaisan, and
Yongyuth Yuthavong
National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, National Science and Technology Development Agency, 113 Paholyothin Road, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
Received 10 April 2006/
Returned for modification 2 June 2006/
Accepted 28 August 2006

ABSTRACT
Pyrimethamine analogs were examined as potential agents against
vivax malaria using a bacterial surrogate system carrying
Plasmodium vivax dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase (PvDHFR-TS),
in which the PvDHFR complemented chemically knocked out host
dihydrofolate reductase. The system was initially tested with
P. falciparum dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase and
was found to have good correlation with the parasite-based system.
The 50% inhibitory concentrations derived from PvDHFR-TS-dependent
bacteria were correlated with their corresponding inhibition
constants (
Ki) from an enzyme inhibition assay, pointing to
the likelihood that the potent enzyme inhibitors will also have
potent antimalarial activities. Active compounds against both
wild-type and S58R S117N (SP21) double-mutant
P. vivax include
analogs with structures which can avert a steric clash with
the asparagine (S117N) side chain of the mutant, similar to
those found for homologous
Plasmodium falciparum mutants, raising
the possibility that the same compounds can be developed against
both types of antifolate-resistant malaria. This rapid and convenient
drug screening system should be useful for development of new
antifolates against
P. vivax, for which a continuous culture
system is not yet available.

INTRODUCTION
Malaria caused by
Plasmodium vivax is a major public health
problem in Asia and South and Central America, where it is most
prevalent, with estimates of more than 70 to 80 million cases
annually (
23). The recent reports on a
P. vivax parasite resistant
to chloroquine (
3,
20), the drug commonly prescribed for
P. vivax infection, in addition to the lack of a protective vaccine,
highlight the need for new approaches to antimalarial chemotherapy.
One promising drug target for the treatment of
P. vivax infections
is dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), a key enzyme in folate biosynthesis
and utilization. Antifolates, such as pyrimethamine (Pyr), targeting
dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase (DHFR-TS) of the
parasite, have been exploited against chloroquine-resistant
Plasmodium falciparum, especially as components of combination
drugs (
2,
9). Nonetheless, these drugs are not recommended for
P. vivax treatment due to the preliminary observation that antifolates
were ineffective and that the parasite is inherently resistant
against them owing to predisposed mutations in the
dhfr-ts gene
(
18,
26). Recently, point mutations of DHFR were revealed to
have an association with antifolate resistance in
P. vivax in
vitro (
6,
8,
10,
13), leading to the conclusion that
P. vivax is initially sensitive to antifolates, and resistance developed
through mutations, similar to the case of
P. falciparum. This
is an important finding on the molecular basis for drug resistance
in
P. vivax that gives rise to opportunities for effective drug
design for
P. vivax therapy.
Several different methods for assessing antimalarial drug sensitivity have been developed (17). These methods mostly rely on culturing malaria parasites (16, 19, 25). Unlike the case for P. falciparum, an in vitro inhibitor susceptibility test for P. vivax is difficult because of the lack of a continuous in vitro culture for this parasite. Although an in vivo assay using rhesus monkeys has been used for drug sensitivity testing for P. vivax, this method is expensive and is not practical (21). In order to facilitate drug screening for P. vivax, we have modified a bacterial complementation system, previously described for selecting drug-resistant P. falciparum DHFR (PfDHFR) mutants generated from error-prone PCR (5), to determine the inhibitor efficacy of a Pyr library against bacteria expressing full-length P. vivax DHFR-TS (PvDHFR-TS) of either wild-type (WT) or S58R S117N (SP21) double mutant enzymes. Furthermore, the results from the bacterial complementation system are compared with the inhibition values obtained from the corresponding target enzyme assay. Highly potent inhibitors are identified as candidates for further lead development and optimization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plasmid construction.
The gene encoding bifunctional PvDHFR-TS was PCR amplified from
genomic DNA of
P. vivax, generously provided by M. Imwong and
S. Pukrittayakamee, in two steps (
13). First, oligonucleotide
primers, 5'vdrf (5'ATGGAGGACCTTTCAGATGTATTTGACATT3') and 3'vtsr
(5'GGCGGCCATCTCC ATGGTTATTTTATCGTG3'), were used to amplify
the
pvdhfr-ts sequence. The amplification reaction was set up
in a total volume of 50 µl, containing 200 ng genomic
template DNA, 2 mM MgSO
4, 200 µM (each) deoxynucleoside
triphosphates, and 1.5 U of
Pfu polymerase. The PCR was performed
for 32 cycles: the first cycle at 94°C for 5 min; the subsequent
30 cycles at 94°C for 1 min, 64°C for 2 min, and 72°C
for 2 min; and the final cycle at 94°C for 1 min, 64°C
for 2 min, and 72°C for 15 min. The obtained product was
used as a template for the second PCR step. The primers used
in the second PCR were 5'pvdhfr (5'AAGAATT
CATATGGAGGACCTTTCAGA3')
and 3'pvdhfrts (5'TATCTCGAG
AAGCTTCTTAGGCGGCCATC3'), containing
NdeI and HindIII restriction sites, respectively, as underlined.
The PCR (50 µl) was performed similarly to the first reaction,
but the annealing condition was set at 48°C for 1 min. The
obtained 1.8-kb amplified product was cloned into NdeI and HindIII
sites of pET17b to yield pETpvDHFR-TS.
A similar protocol was adopted for construction of pETpvSP21 with the S58R S117N double mutant.
Complementation.
Plasmids pET17b (Novagen), pETpfTM4 (harboring the WT pfdhfr-ts gene [4]), and pETpfK1 (harboring the C59R S108N mutation [4]) were individually transformed into BL21(DE3) bacteria, while pETpvDHFR-TS and pETpvSP21 were individually transformed into BL21(DE3)pLysS bacteria. BL21(DE3) carrying plasmid was grown on LB agar supplemented with 100 µg ml1 ampicillin, whereas BL21(DE3)pLysS-transformed cells were grown on LB agar supplemented with 100 µg ml1 ampicillin and 34 µg ml1 chloramphenicol. In order to test complementation, cells obtained after transformation were grown on minimal medium (MM) in the absence or presence of 4 µM trimethoprim (Tmp) at 37°C overnight in addition to the antibiotics required to maintain the acquired plasmids.
Inhibitor screening using bacterial system.
Nineteen Pyr analogs were studied for their inhibition activity against cells expressing either WT or SP21 mutant PvDHFR-TS. The structures of these compounds are shown in Table 2. All compounds were maintained at 20°C as 50 mM stock solutions in dimethyl sulfoxide for assay of Escherichia coli bacterial growth in liquid culture. The compounds were diluted to appropriate concentrations in liquid culture media. The assays were conducted with 96-well microplates by monitoring the growth at an optical density of 595 nm (A595). Each compound was assayed in triplicate and tested in at least three separate experiments. Each well contained 180 µl of precultured cells in MM containing 100 µg ml1 ampicillin, 34 µg ml1 chloramphenicol, and 4 µM Tmp, precultured cells at the final A595 of 0.07, and 20 µl of drug solution. In the case of BL21(DE3) for expression of PfDHFR-TSs, chloramphenicol was excluded. The final concentration of dimethyl sulfoxide was kept constant at 0.1%. Cultures were grown for approximately 6 h, where the control bacterial cells reached the late log phase. The A595 value for each well was determined by a microplate reader (iEMS reader; Labsystems, Finland). The average A595 of control culture omitting Pyr analogs was scored as 100% growth, and the average readings for the cultures at each drug concentration were divided by this value to obtain relative growth values. The concentrations that inhibited 50% bacterial growth (IC50s) were determined from dose-response curves.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2. Structures of inhibitors and their efficacies against PvDHFR-TSs of WT and SP21 determined by bacterial complementation assay (IC50) and enzyme inhibition assay (Ki)

|
Enzyme preparation and antifolate inhibition assay.
The WT and mutant PvDHFR-TS enzymes were expressed in
E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS and purified using a methotrexate-Sepharose column
according to previously described methods (
5,
13). The methods
used for determination of DHFR activities and for the study
of inhibition by antifolates were similar to that previously
described (
13). Inhibition constants (
Ki) of antifolates were
calculated using a nonlinear least-square fit of the data to
the Michaelis-Menten equation, assuming the inhibitor binds
competitively to the enzyme active site.

RESULTS
Bacterial complementation by malarial DHFR-TSs.
Prior to assessing compounds' efficacies against the bacteria
expressing plasmodial DHFR-TSs, the validity of using growth
complementation by parasite DHFR-TSs as the basis for inhibitor
screening was determined. Besides the PvDHFR-TS wild-type enzyme,
the SP21 double mutant carrying S58R and S117N was included,
since this mutant is the prevalent mutant found in the field.
We also tested the PfDHFR-TS wild type (TM4) and the equivalent
C59R S108N double-mutant homolog (K1) for comparison. Since
the BL21(DE3)pLysS strain contains its own DHFR, Tmp, a known
inhibitor specific to bacterial DHFR, was included to eliminate
the endogenous DHFR that can interfere with the testing system.
In this scenario, cell survival is based solely on the ability
of the expressed plasmodial DHFR-TSs to complement and rescue
the growth. The results showed that only transformed BL21(DE3)pLysS
cells expressing either WT or SP21 PvDHFR-TS were able to grow
(Fig.
1A and B), while host cells carrying the pET17b vector
could not survive in the presence of Tmp. In order to complement
the growth by PfDHFR-TSs, the BL21(DE3) strain without pLysS
encoding the T7 lysozyme was required (Fig.
1C and D). The results
indicate that DHFR-TS constructs were fully functioning in the
chemically knocked out host cells but PvDHFR-TSs were expressed
at higher levels than PfDHFR-TS. The concentration of Tmp at
4 µM was chosen in the screening experiment even though
the bacterial DHFR can be inhibited at lower concentrations
on MM agar to ensure the need for complementation by parasite
DHFR-TS.
Application of bacterial complementation as an antifolate antimalarial screening.
The validity of the above bacterial complementation system for
determining the biological activities of potential antifolate
inhibitors was assessed through the comparison of the inhibition
profile obtained from the bacteria expressing PfDHFR-TS and
that from the in vitro
P. falciparum assay. Since the
dhfr-ts gene from
P. falciparum is expressed in bacteria whose endogenous
DHFR activity is inhibited by Tmp, the susceptibilities to antifolates
displayed from the complemented bacteria reflect the susceptibilities
of the
Plasmodium dhfr-ts alleles. In this study, Pyr analogs
(P1, P30, P38, P20, P36, P34, and P64) with diverse antifolate
activities (
11,
24) were chosen as model compounds for screening
using bacteria expressing WT or C59R S108N PfDHFR-TS enzymes
in a 96-well plate format. The response of each bacterial construct
to the Pyr analogs was measured by its relative growth in the
presenpce of the analogs at 0 to 50 µM concentrations.
The results were then compared with their antiplasmodial activity
(IC
50) and enzyme inhibition constant (
Ki) values reported previously
by our laboratory (
11,
24) (Table
1). As shown in Fig.
2A, IC
50s
obtained from bacterial and parasite systems were well correlated
(
r2 = 0.82). The IC
50s obtained from both systems were also
well correlated with the
Ki values against PfDHFR (
r2 = 0.89
and 0.85 for the bacterial and parasite systems, respectively)
(Fig.
2B), although the IC
50s were in micromolar and the
Ki values were in nanomolar scales. In detail, the results show
that bacteria complemented with WT PfDHFR-TS behaved similarly
to the TM4 parasite, which is sensitive to Pyr (parent Pyr,
P1). Consistently, bacteria carrying C59R S108N mutant PfDHFR-TS
responded poorly to this compound, similarly to the K1 parasite,
which carries these double mutations. A similar pattern was
also observed for other selected analogs. It should be noted
that although the absolute IC
50s are different between the two
systems, the results are quite consistent, suggesting that the
bacterial system reflects the
Plasmodium system in general.
From the aforementioned observation, we therefore adopted the
bacterial complementation system to screen for effective Pyr
analogs against DHFR-TS of
P. vivax for which the long-term
in vitro culture is not available.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. Comparisons of inhibitor efficacies of pyrimethamine analogs against WT and C59R S108N double-mutant PfDHFR-TS, determined by bacterial complementation (IC50), in vitro parasite culture assay (IC50), and PfDHFR enzyme (Ki) inhibition screening methodsa
|
Enzyme inhibition and antimalarial activity against the surrogate host by the Pyr library.
Nineteen analogs from a library of 2,4-diaminopyrimidine (Pyr)
derivatives previously developed against
P. falciparum (
11,
24) were tested for their antimalarial activities (IC
50) against
bacteria expressing WT and SP21 PvDHFR-TS. At the same time,
Ki values of these compounds were determined against corresponding
purified recombinant PvDHFR-TS enzymes. Similar to the results
from the
P. falciparum system, the IC
50s of these compounds
against
P. vivax were in the micromolar range, whereas the compounds
inhibited the target enzyme (
Ki values) at the nanomolar level
(
11) (Table
2). The results showed that all except P36 inhibited
bacteria carrying WT
pvdhfr-ts with IC
50s of less than 5 µM.
The
Ki values of the compounds tested, except P25, P8, and P36,
are in the range of

2 nM and correspond well with those IC
50s.
The inhibition profile for the SP21 mutant reveals that P20,
P30, P33, P38, and P39 are potent inhibitors for both enzyme-
and cell-based assays in which the
Ki values and IC
50s are lower
than 1.2 nM and 3 µM, respectively. In contrast, compounds
P8, P16, P18, P23, P25, and P37 yielded
Ki values and IC
50s
greater than 7 nM and 50 µM and are therefore classified
as poor inhibitors for the SP21 mutant. It is noted that, unlike
the case for the WT, SP21 is less sensitive to analogs with
substituents at the
para position of the phenyl ring. While
compounds P13, P17, P31, and P40 inhibited the PvDHFR-TS-SP21
enzyme strongly, with
Ki values of about 2 nM, they only moderately
inhibited the bacteria bearing SP21 (IC
50,

10 µM). When
the IC
50s and
Ki values of each compound were plotted, a linear
relationship (
r2 = 0.81) was observed for the SP21 mutant (Fig.
3B), whereas in the case of the wild type, most data points
were clustered around an IC
50 of 3 µM and a
Ki value of
2 nM (Fig.
3A). The IC
50s for inhibition of growth of bacteria
bearing PfDHFR-TSs are correlated with those bearing PvDHFR-TSs
for both WTs (
r2 = 0.9) and double mutants (
r2 = 0.9) (Fig.
3C). Linear correlations were also obtained for
Ki values of
PfDHFR and PvDHFR-TS enzymes (
r2 = 0.9) (Fig.
3D).

DISCUSSION
The lack of a continuous
P. vivax culture and the difficulties
associated with the use of an animal model have impeded the
development of new antimalarials against
P. vivax malaria. It
is desirable to have a heterologous system that would simulate
the parasite so as to allow convenient inhibitor screening.
This study demonstrates the use of a bacterial complementation
system as another approach to assess the efficacies of antifolates
against
P. vivax, which enables us to identify leads to be modified
that alter the level of inhibition against PvDHFR-TS.
The bacterial model presented in this study is BL21(DE3)pLysS, a widely used expression host. Arguably, the DHFR-disrupted host, like E. coli PA414 (1), might be a better system, since the endogenous DHFR activity is absent and Tmp can be left out. However, that system did not give dependable results in our laboratory, and a small amount of thymidine is usually required in the culture, affecting the observed IC50. Studies using yeast as a heterologous system for antifolate screening have been described. However, inhibitor responses between the pathogen and yeast systems were not compared in those reports (7, 14, 22). It has been suggested that the proper heterologous host for antifolate screening should express only an amount of enzyme sufficient to support host cell growth, since a high level of expression is likely to increase the inhibitor necessary to inhibit host cell growth. Therefore, pLysS encoding the T7 lysozyme to diminish T7 RNA polymerase was supplied in the case of antifolate screening against vivax DHFR-TS.
As a surveillance tool, bacterial complementation has many advantages. The assay is very simple and rapid, where drug sensitivity determination can be accomplished within a day. In this study, the assay was performed with a 96-well titer plate, which can be automated and processed in a high-throughput format. The assay requires only media and basic laboratory equipment to support and follow cell growth, making the system relatively cheap and suitable for initial screening. The system can be easily adapted for the assessment of the relative sensitivities of various Plasmodium DHFR alleles against an antifolate inhibitor. In addition, the ease of genetic transformation in E. coli makes it suitable for screening DHFR inhibitors of similar pathogens in general.
It should be noted that our method may reflect only the interaction of the inhibitor and the target protein in a surrogate system and may not parallel an assay based on the parasite, since various factors, such as membrane transport, drug metabolism, and access to the target, are different for the two organisms. The differences in the Ki values and IC50s likely reflect the limitations imposed by these factors. However, a linear relationship was observed, indicating that the inhibitors can penetrate the cell, find the PvDHFR target, and exert a killing effect on the cell through disruption of folate metabolism. The fact that different linear Ki-IC50 relationships were obtained for the WTs and double mutants probably reflects the minor differences of the components between the two systems used. However, it is clear that the bacterial surrogate system works for the P. vivax DHFR inhibitors as well as those for P. falciparum and will therefore be useful in primary cell-based screening activities.
In this study, the full-length DHFR-TS construct, rather than the DHFR construct alone, was used, since the inhibitory properties of the compounds might be different for DHFR alone than for DHFR-TS. Since the inhibitors were designed to target malarial DHFR, the relationship between the bacterium- and enzyme-based screenings was examined. The assay results obtained from both enzyme inhibition and bacterial complementation assay systems support the idea of the association of point mutations with antifolate resistance in P. vivax, as indicated by higher Ki values and IC50s for the SP21 mutant tested against parental Pyr (P1). In this study, different derivatives of 2,4-diaminopyrimidine were screened for their inhibitor characteristics in order to identify inhibitors against P. vivax for further optimization. Inhibitors with p-substituent at C-5 of 2,4-diaminopyrimidine (P1, P13, P16, P17, P18, P21, and P23) are effective against the WT enzyme; however, they are less effective against the SP21 mutant. Compounds with bulky substituents at the p position (P18 and P23) also resulted in high Ki values against the double-mutant enzymes. These findings support the conclusion that the active sites of the PvDHFR and PfDHFR domains share similar features and indicate a steric clash between the p-substituent group of the inhibitors and Asn at position 117 in the PvDHFR domain, which was similar to, but stronger than, Asn at position 108 of the PfDHFR mutant (15, 27). Compounds either with no substituent on the phenyl ring (P20, P33, and P39) or with the substituent at other positions (P30 and P38), however, showed improvement in inhibitor efficacy toward the SP21 mutant by a factor of 2 to 38 for Ki values and 6 to 60 for IC50s.
These results are supported by the recently published crystal structures of WT and SP21 PvDHFRs in complex with P1 and P20 (12), where a large protein conformational change and inhibitor displacement were observed for the SP21-P1 complex compared to WT-P1, rendering resistance to the drug. Optimal conformation of the protein and favorable interactions of the inhibitor and protein were recovered upon the binding of SP21 with P20, which retains good activity against this mutant. The nature of the substituent (R) at position six of the pyrimidine ring is anticipated to influence the binding affinity of the inhibitor to the DHFRs. Finally, 5-m-substituted-phenyl analogues with a small 6-substituent (ethyl) showed more favorable binding to the mutant enzyme than longer 6-alkyl substituents, whereas this effect is rather small for 5-phenyl analogues (Table 2).
It is worth noting that although this series of compounds was previously developed against P. falciparum, several compounds exhibited similar action toward PvDHFR-TS (Fig. 3C and D). These compounds are therefore suitable for further selection as candidate agents against mixed infections, which are quite common in many areas of endemicity. In summary, this study introduced the simple bacterial complementation system for antifolate screening against P. vivax. Insight into the strategies for developing new inhibitors effective against the SP21 mutant was provided, which should benefit rational drug design of effective compounds targeted against antifolate-resistant parasites. The system is also useful for P. falciparum and has been validated against parasite-based assays. A similar system may also be generally valid for screening of other similar pathogens.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by EU, the UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO
Special Programme on Tropical Diseases, The Wellcome Trust,
Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV), and the Target Research
Unit Network of Thailand-TDR program.
We thank M. Imwong and S. Pukrittayakamee from Mahidol University for P. vivax's genomic DNA. We are grateful to D. Kongkasuriyachai of BIOTEC for critically reviewing the manuscript. S.K. is a Research Fellow of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI).

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 113 Paholyothin Rd., Klong 1, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand. Phone: 66-2-564-6700, ext. 3487. Fax: 662-564-6705. E-mail:
ubolsree{at}biotec.or.th.

Published ahead of print on 5 September 2006. 

REFERENCES
1 - Ahrweiler, P. M., and C. Frieden. 1988. Construction of a fol mutant strain of Escherichia coli for use in dihydrofolate reductase mutagenesis experiments. J. Bacteriol. 170:3301-3304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Anderson, A. C. 2005. Targeting DHFR in parasitic protozoa. Drug Discov. Today 10:121-128.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Baird, J. K. 2004. Chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium vivax. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:4075-4083.[Free Full Text]
4 - Chitnumsub, P., J. Yavaniyama, J. Vanichtanankul, S. Kamchonwongpaisan, M. D. Walkinshaw, and Y. Yuthavong. 2004. Characterization, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of bifunctional dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase from Plasmodium falciparum. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60:780-783.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Chusacultanachai, S., P. Thiensathit, B. Tarnchompoo, W. Sirawaraporn, and Y. Yuthavong. 2002. Novel antifolate resistant mutations of Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase selected in Escherichia coli. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 120:61-72.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - de Pécoulas, P. E., R. Tahar, T. Ouatas, A. Mazabraud, and L. K. Basco. 1998. Sequence variations in the Plasmodium vivax dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase gene and their relationship with pyrimethamine resistance. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 92:265-273.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Gerum, A. B., J. E. Ulmer, D. P. Jacobus, N. P. Jensen, D. R. Sherman, and C. H. Sibley. 2002. Novel Saccharomyces cerevisiae screen identifies WR99210 analogues that inhibit Mycobacterium tuberculosis dihydrofolate reductase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3362-3369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Hastings, M. D., and C. H. Sibley. 2002. Pyrimethamine and WR99210 exert opposing selection on dihydrofolate reductase from Plasmodium vivax. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:13137-13141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Hyde, J. E. 2002. Mechanisms of resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to antimalarial drugs. Microbes Infect. 4:165-174.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Imwong, M., S. Pukrittayakamee, L. Rénia, F. Letourneur, J.-P. Charlieu, U. Leartsakulpanich, S. Looareesuwan, N. J. White, and G. Snounou. 2003. Novel point mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase gene of Plasmodium vivax: evidence for sequential selection by drug pressure. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1514-1521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Kamchonwongpaisan, S., R. Quarrell, N. Charoensetakul, R. Ponsinet, T. Vilaivan, J. Vanichtanankul, B. Tarnchompoo, W. Sirawaraporn, G. Lowe, and Y. Yuthavong. 2004. Inhibitors of multiple mutants of Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase and their antimalarial activities. J. Med. Chem. 47:673-680.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 - Kongsaeree, P., P. Khongsuk, U. Leartsakulpanich, P. Chitnumsub, B. Tarnchompoo, M. D. Walkinshaw, and Y. Yuthavong. 2005. Crystal structure of dihydrofolate reductase from Plasmodium vivax: pyrimethamine displacement linked with mutation-induced resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:13046-13051.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Leartsakulpanich, U., M. Imwong, S. Pukrittayakamee, N. J. White, G. Snounou, W. Sirawaraporn, and Y. Yuthavong. 2002. Molecular characterization of dihydrofolate reductase in relation to antifolate resistance in Plasmodium vivax. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 119:63-73.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Ma, L., Q. Jia, and J. A. Kovacs. 2002. Development of a yeast assay for rapid screening of inhibitors of human-derived Pneumocystis carinii dihydrofolate reductase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3101-3103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - McKie, J. H., K. T. Douglas, C. Chan, S. A. Roser, R. Yates, M. Read, J. E. Hyde, M. J. Dascombe, Y. Yuthavong, and W. Sirawaraporn. 1998. Rational drug design approach for overcoming drug resistance: application to pyrimethamine resistance in malaria. J. Med. Chem. 41:1367-1370.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - Nguyen-Dinh, P., and W. Trager. 1980. Plasmodium falciparum in vitro: determination of chloroquine sensitivity of three new strains by a modified 48-hour test. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 29:339-342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Noedl, H., C. Wongsrichanalai, and W. H. Wernsdorfer. 2003. Malaria drug-sensitivity testing: new assays, new perspectives. Trends Parasitol. 19:175-181.[CrossRef][Medline]
18 - Peters, W. 1998. Drug resistance in malaria parasites of animals and man. Adv. Parasitol. 41:1-62.[Medline]
19 - Richards, W. H., and B. K. Maples. 1979. Studies on Plasmodium falciparum in continuous cultivation. I. The effect of chloroquine and pyrimethamine on parasite growth and viability. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 73:99-108.[Medline]
20 - Ruebush, T. K., II, J. Zegarra, J. Cairo, E. M. Andersen, M. Green, D. R. Pillai, W. Marquino, M. Huilca, E. Arévalo, C. Garcia, L. Solary, and K. C. Kain. 2003. Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax malaria in Peru. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 69:548-552.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21 - Russell, B. M., R. Udomsangpetch, K. H. Rieckmann, B. M. Kotecka, R. E. Coleman, and J. Sattabongkot. 2003. Simple in vitro assay for determining the sensitivity of Plasmodium vivax isolates from fresh human blood to antimalarials in areas where P. vivax is endemic. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:170-173.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22 - Sibley, C. H., and I. Macreadie. 2001. Novel approaches to tackling malarial drug resistance using yeast. IUBMB Life 52:285-289.[Medline]
23 - Sina, B. 2002. Focus on Plasmodium vivax. Trends Parasitol. 18:287-289.[CrossRef][Medline]
24 - Tarnchompoo, B., C. Sirichaiwat, W. Phupong, C. Intaraudom, W. Sirawaraporn, S. Kamchonwongpaisan, J. Vanichtanankul, Y. Thebtaranonth, and Y. Yuthavong. 2002. Development of 2,4-diaminopyrimidines as antimalarials based on inhibition of the S108N and C59R+S108N mutants of dihydrofolate reductase from pyrimethamine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. J. Med. Chem. 45:1244-1252.[CrossRef][Medline]
25 - World Health Organization. 1990. In vitro microtest (mark II) for the assessment of the response of Plasmodium falciparum to chloroquine, mefloquine, quinine, sulfadoxin/pyrimethamine and amodiaquine. WHO/MAP/87.2, revision 1. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
26 - Young, M. D., and R. W. Burgess. 1959. Pyrimethamine resistance in Plasmodium vivax malaria. Bull. W. H. O. 20:27-36.[Medline]
27 - Yuvaniyama, J., P. Chitnumsub, S. Kamchonwongpaisan, J. Vanichtanankul, W. Sirawaraporn, P. Taylor, M. D. Walkinshaw, and Y. Yuthavong. 2003. Insights into antifolate resistance from malarial DHFR-TS structures. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10:357-365.[CrossRef][Medline]
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2006, p. 3631-3637, Vol. 50, No. 11
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00448-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.