| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2006, p. 3977-3983, Vol. 50, No. 12
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00575-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Medical Microbiology, CINIMA (Center for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam), Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam,1 Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, CINIMA, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam,2 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam,3 Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands4
Received 10 May 2006/ Returned for modification 17 July 2006/ Accepted 12 September 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Coagulase-negative staphylococci, particularly Staphylococcus epidermidis, are the major cause of BAI (16, 39, 48).
The pathogenesis of BAI is a complex, multifactorial process influenced by physicochemical properties of the biomaterial, adherence of host proteins, bacterial virulence factors, and alterations of the host defense (7, 48). The production of extracellular polysaccharides (slime) leads to the formation of a biofilm by bacteria adherent to the biomaterial surface (18, 33, 43). This biofilm is believed to facilitate bacterial persistence by impairing host defenses and impeding antibiotic penetration (13, 19). Established implant infections are highly persistent despite antibiotic treatment and often necessitate removal of the implant (16, 39). The persistence of S. epidermidis in peri-implant tissue has also been demonstrated (7, 47) and has been associated with abscess formation (7).
To prevent biomaterial-associated infections, antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for various medical conditions requiring biomaterial implants (15, 23), but a major concern is the development of resistance (32, 35, 37). Therefore, new strategies for prophylaxis or treatment of biomaterial-associated infections are required. A promising class of antimicrobial agents are the cationic antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). These molecules are an important first line of defense against microorganisms and have been identified in all living organisms studied, including plants, insects, humans, and other mammals (26). A general characteristic of AMPs is an amphipathic structure with both hydrophobic and cationic domains (22, 40, 44). Most AMPs are believed to directly target the negatively charged microbial cell membrane and mediate killing by membrane disruption or pore formation (40, 49, 52), although for some AMPs an intracellular target has been proposed (10, 29, 42).
Bactericidal peptide 2 (BP2) is a small synthetic antimicrobial peptide designed based on lipopolysaccharide-binding domains of various naturally occurring proteins and has the structural elements for an amphipathic conformation (2). The aim of the present study was to characterize the antimicrobial spectrum of BP2 in vitro and to assess its potential for prevention or treatment of experimental murine biomaterial-associated S. epidermidis infection.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Microorganisms. The microbicidal activity of BP2 was assessed against Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633, Escherichia coli ML-35 (30), Staphylococcus aureus 42D (51), Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62a (ATCC 35984), Streptococcus oralis J30 (17), and Burkholderia cepacia ATCC 25416 and against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Bacteroides fragilis, Brucella abortus, enteropathogenic E. coli, and Clostridium perfringens, methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates of S. epidermidis and S. aureus, and vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant isolates of Enterococcus faecium. Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans clinical isolates were used to test fungicidal activity.
The oxacillin susceptibility of S. aureus and S. epidermidis isolates and the vancomycin susceptibility of E. faecium isolates were determined by Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Animals. Specific-pathogen-free C57BL/6 mice (Harlan, Horst, The Netherlands), aged 6 to 8 weeks old and weighing 15 to 20 g, were used. Mice were housed in individual cages in a pathogen-free environment and provided with sterile food and water. The Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Amsterdam approved all experiments.
Plasma. Fresh blood was obtained from healthy volunteers, using 8-ml citrate-containing Vacutainer tubes (BD Vacutainer Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Plasma was obtained after centrifugation at 800 x g for 20 min.
Microbicidal assays. The microbicidal activity of BP2 was quantified with a minimal bactericidal/fungicidal concentration (MBC/MFC) assay, essentially as described by Harwig et al. (24). This assay is often used to assess the microbicidal activities of antimicrobial peptides (6, 34). We chose this method rather than the CLSI (formerly NCCLS) standard MBC assay for antibiotic activity testing since the CLSI method uses Mueller-Hinton medium, in which cationic peptides may aggregate (45). Overnight cultures in Trypticase soy broth (TSB; Difco, Detroit, MI) were diluted 100-fold in fresh TSB and cultured for 3 h at 37°C. B. abortus was grown in the presence of 5% CO2, C. perfringens and B. fragilis were grown anaerobically, and all other bacteria were cultured aerobically. Fungi were cultured for 48 h at 30°C in 0.7% (wt/vol) yeast nitrogen base (Difco) supplemented with 0.15% (wt/vol) L-asparagine (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and 1% (wt/vol) glucose (Merck). Bacteria and fungi were washed twice with 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, plus 0.06% (wt/vol) TSB, the optical density at 620 nm was measured, and the bacteria and fungi were diluted to 2 x 106 CFU/ml in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, plus 0.06% (wt/vol) TSB (incubation buffer), based on an established relationship between optical density and the number of CFU. Twenty-five-microliter aliquots of twofold serially diluted BP2 were prepared in a low-protein-binding polypropylene microtiter plate (Costar, Corning, NY). To each of the wells, 25 µl bacteria or fungi was added. After 2 h of incubation on a rotary shaker at 150 rpm at 37°C (bacteria) or 30°C (fungi), duplicate 10-µl aliquots were plated on blood agar plates. The plates were inspected for growth after 24 h (bacteria) or 48 h (fungi). The MBC/MFC was defined as the lowest concentration of BP2 at which <0.1% of an inoculum of 106 CFU/ml survived after 2 h of exposure. At least two independent experiments were performed, with each sample plated out in duplicate. When the MBCs of the independent experiments differed, the experiments were repeated, and the median value for all four independent assays was defined as the MBC.
To study killing kinetics, inocula and BP2 were prepared as described above. At sampling time points, 10-µl samples were mixed with 20-µl aliquots of 0.05% (wt/vol) of the polyanionic agent sodium polyanetholesulfonate, which instantly neutralized BP2. Sodium polyanetholesulfonate did not affect the viability of the microorganisms tested. The number of viable microorganisms was assessed by quantitative culture of serial 10-fold dilutions in incubation buffer.
To determine the influence of human plasma on BP2 activity, bacterial suspensions were diluted to 107 CFU/ml in incubation buffer, and 10-µl aliquots were added to 80 µl of various concentrations of human plasma prepared in incubation buffer. Ten-microliter aliquots of BP2 were added, and the killing kinetics was determined as described above.
Experimental biomaterial-associated infection model. (i) Biomaterial implants. In a laminar-flow cabinet, 1-centimeter-long segments of polyvinylpyrrolidone-grafted silicon elastomer catheters (SEpvp; Bioglide Medtronic PS Medical, Goleta, CA), with an external diameter of 2.5 mm and a wall thickness of 0.6 mm, were cut and stored in sterile petri dishes.
(ii) S. epidermidis RP62a inoculum. S. epidermidis strain RP62a (ATCC 35984) was used as the challenge strain. This strain is capable of producing slime, determined as described by Christensen et al. (11). A log-phase culture of S. epidermidis RP62a in TSB was centrifuged at 3,000 x g for 10 min, and the pelleted bacteria were washed twice with 50 ml of sterile pyrogen-free 0.9% NaCl (saline; Baxter, Lessines, Belgium). After the final centrifugation, the pellet was resuspended in saline, the optical density at 620 nm was measured, and the suspension was diluted to 4 x 107 CFU/ml in saline. Twenty-five microliters of this suspension (106 CFU) was used as the inoculum.
(iii) Subcutaneous biomaterial implantation and administration of the bacterial inoculum. Mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection with FFM mix (1 ml of fentanyl citrate [Hypnorm; also called Fluanisone], 1 ml of midazolam, and 2 ml of distilled water; 0.07 ml mix per 10 g of body weight) and were placed in a laminar-flow cabinet. The backs of the mice were shaved and disinfected with 70% ethanol. On each side, an incision of 0.3 cm was made 1 cm lateral to the spine. Subsequently, 1-cm-long SEpvp segments were implanted subcutaneously with minimal tissue damage, using a transponder. The incisions were closed with a single 0/6 vicryl stitch (9).
In the treatment protocol, the S. epidermidis inoculum was injected along the implants immediately following surgery. One hour later, BP2 (5 mg/kg in 50 µl) was injected along the implants. In the prophylaxis protocol, BP2 (5 mg/kg in 50 µl) was injected along the implants immediately after implantation, and 3 h later the inoculum (25 µl) was injected along the implants. All injections were performed with a highly accurate repetitive injector (Stepper model 4001-025; Tridak Division, Brookfield, Conn.).
(iv) Sample collection. One day after challenge, mice were anesthetized with FFM mix and subsequently sacrificed by cardiac puncture. Standardized biopsies (12 mm in diameter) were taken from the implantation sites as described previously (8). Each biopsy included skin, subcutaneous tissue, and the implant.
The biomaterial implants were separated from the tissue, rinsed twice with 10 ml pyrogen-free saline, and placed in a sterile tube containing 1 ml of 0.9% NaCl. The tissue samples were placed in a tube and weighed, and a volume of saline corresponding to four times the weight was added. The weight of the tissue samples varied between 60 and 250 mg.
(v) Quantitative culture of biomaterial implants. Tubes containing the implants in 0.5 ml of NaCl were sonicated for 30 s in a water bath sonicator (Elma Transsonic T460, 35 kHz; Elma, Singen, Germany) to dislodge adherent bacteria. The number of viable S. epidermidis cells was assessed by quantitative culture of serial 10-fold dilutions of the sonicate. In addition, the sonicated implants were cultured in 80 ml of modified thioglycolate broth (TB), consisting of 3% (wt/vol) thioglycolate containing 0.03% (wt/vol) polyanetholesulfonic acid, 1 M NaOH, and 0.5% Tween 80, for 72 h at 37°C. Antibiotic susceptibilities, as reported previously (9), were used to confirm the identities of bacteria cultured from biomaterial implants and tissue homogenates. A value of 5 CFU per 1-cm biomaterial implant was assigned to implants for which the sonicates did not yield growth on blood agar plates but were culture positive in broth. For representation on a logarithmic scale, a value of 1 CFU per biomaterial implant was assigned when no growth occurred at all.
(vi) Quantitative culture of homogenates. Tubes containing the tissue samples in saline were homogenized on ice with a tissue homogenizer (Tissue Tearor model 985-370; Biospec Products, Bartlesville, OK). Before each homogenization, the homogenizer was carefully cleaned, disinfected with 0.4% (wt/vol) sodium hypochlorite followed by 70% alcohol, and rinsed with sterile water and saline. Homogenates were 10-fold serially diluted and cultured as described for the sonicates from implants. In addition, 1/10 of each homogenate was cultured in 80 ml TB for 72 h at 37°C. The number of cultured S. epidermidis RP62a cells is expressed in CFU per biopsy. A value of 10 CFU was assigned when S. epidermidis was cultured in TB but not on blood agar plates. For representation on a logarithmic scale, a value of 1 CFU per biopsy was assigned when no growth occurred at all.
Statistical analysis. Numbers of bacteria cultured from biopsies or implants are expressed as median values. Two-sample comparisons were made using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney rank sum test. The significance of differences between the frequencies of categorical variables was determined using Fisher's exact test. For all tests, P values of <0.05 were considered significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The bactericidal activity of BP2 was also assessed in the presence of human plasma. Killing of S. epidermidis by BP2 at its MBC was inhibited by
50% plasma (Fig. 2). However, when incubated with BP2 at a concentration of 5 times the MBC, the entire S. epidermidis inoculum was killed within 30 min, irrespective of the concentration of plasma (up to 75%) (Fig. 2). At the MBC, the bactericidal activity of BP2 against S. aureus was inhibited by 25% plasma (Fig. 2), but at 5 times the MBC, S. aureus was completely killed within 1 h at all concentrations of plasma tested (Fig. 2). Thus, at 5 times the MBC, staphylococci were rapidly killed by BP2 despite the presence of up to 75% plasma.
|
For the saline control group, 11 (61%) of 18 biomaterial implants were culture positive for S. epidermidis (Fig. 3). Treatment with BP2 reduced the number of culture-positive implants to 2 (12%) of 17 (Fig. 3) (P = 0.0064). The implants from the BP2-treated mice yielded significantly smaller numbers of CFU than those from the control mice (P = 0.0348).
|
Thus, BP2 effectively reduced the number of culture-positive implants and the number of CFU of S. epidermidis RP62a cultured from peri-implant tissue in the treatment model of biomaterial-associated S. epidermidis infection.
Prophylaxis with BP2 against experimental biomaterial-associated S. epidermidis infection in mice. To assess the efficacy of BP2 in a prophylaxis regimen, BP2 was injected along subcutaneous implants 3 h prior to a challenge with 106 CFU of S. epidermidis RP62a. As in the treatment model, mice were sacrificed 24 h after injection, and bacterial survival was assessed.
For the saline control group, 10 (56%) of 18 implants were culture positive for S. epidermidis (Fig. 4), whereas 5 (28%) of 18 implants were culture positive for the group that received BP2 prophylaxis (not significant [P = 0.1756]). The implants from the BP2-treated mice yielded significantly smaller numbers of CFU than those from the control mice (Fig. 4) (P = 0.0046).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the in vitro assay, all gram-positive bacteria tested were highly susceptible to BP2, with MBCs of
4 µM, and most gram-negative bacteria were also susceptible, with MBCs of
8 µM. P. mirabilis and B. cepacia, which are known to be inherently resistant to AMPs (14, 41), were indeed also resistant to BP2 up to a concentration of at least 30 µM. Antibiotic-resistant clinical isolates of S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and E. faecium strains were as susceptible to BP2 as antibiotic-sensitive isolates, offering the prospect of BP2 as a novel antimicrobial agent. In addition, BP2 almost instantaneously killed E. coli, B. subtilis, S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and C. albicans. Moreover, the microbicidal activity of BP2 was not reduced at physiological salt concentrations in vitro, and its activity was only slightly affected by human plasma. Based on these promising characteristics, we assessed the potential for the application of BP2 in vivo, using a murine model of biomaterial-associated infection.
We used an established murine model of biomaterial-associated infection in which the injection of 106 CFU of S. epidermidis along SEpvp segments implanted subcutaneously in C57BL/6 mice causes the persistence of >3,000 CFU of S. epidermidis in peri-implant tissue and small numbers of S. epidermidis cells adhering to biomaterial implants for at least 2 days, with the persistence of small numbers of bacteria in the tissue for up to 60 days (9). Recent studies at our laboratory with different strains of S. epidermidis, different biomaterials, and different strains of mice have shown that the peri-implant tissue is the predominant site of S. epidermidis infection in all cases (C. A. N. Broekhuizen, personal communication). This indicates that survival of bacteria in peri-implant tissue may also be an important determinant in the pathogenesis of BAI.
Administration of BP2 1 h after challenge with S. epidermidis resulted in an almost 100-fold reduction in the median number of CFU in peri-implant tissues compared to those for the control group, demonstrating the potent bactericidal activity of BP2 in vivo. In addition, nearly all biomaterial implants (88%) were completely culture negative 24 h after BP2 treatment, whereas for the control group the majority (61%) were still culture positive.
Since little is known about the pharmacokinetics of BP2, we wondered whether BP2 would also be effective when administered prior to bacterial challenge. When BP2 was injected 3 h prior to challenge with S. epidermidis, most biomaterial implants (72%) were completely culture negative 24 h later, whereas 56% of the control implants still contained viable adherent bacteria. In addition, an approximately 10-fold reduction in the median number of CFU in peri-implant tissues was achieved. Although it was slightly less effective than in the treatment protocol, BP2 clearly had potent bactericidal activity when administered prophylactically several hours prior to bacterial challenge, indicating good peptide stability in vivo. We chose to administer BP2 at the site of infection as a strategy for the prevention or treatment of BAI, since these infections usually are caused by bacteria contaminating the implant during insertion or implantation. Since the tissue distribution of BP2 is as yet unknown, the potential of BP2 for other than local application remains to be determined.
AMPs are increasingly being tested for their clinical potential in various animal models and also in clinical trials (20, 21, 31, 53). In only a limited number of studies has the application of AMPs for prevention or treatment of BAI been assessed. Omiganan (MBI-226), a synthetic analogue of bovine neutrophil indolicidin (27), has advanced to clinical trials for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections. Exit-site application of a 1% gel formulation of this antimicrobial peptide significantly reduced catheter colonization and catheter-related local infections in a phase IIIa study (21). A confirmatory phase IIIb study to assess whether omiganan can reduce the frequency of catheter-related bloodstream infections has been initiated (28). Prophylactic efficacies of the antimicrobial peptide temporin A (12) and of a derivative of dermaseptin (3) in a subcutaneous rat model have been reported. When Dacron grafts were presoaked in a solution containing 50 mg/liter of the dermaseptin derivative prior to infection with S. epidermidis or S. aureus, there was no evidence of bacterial colonization of grafts at 7 days postinfection, in contrast to >106 CFU/cm2 for untreated controls (3). In a similar experiment, presoaking with 10 mg/liter temporin A resulted in a >3-log reduction in bacterial colonization (12). Clearly, antimicrobial peptides have potential for therapeutic application in biomaterial-associated infections.
The present study demonstrated that the local injection of BP2 strongly reduced the survival of S. epidermidis in peri-implant tissue and the colonization of biomaterial implants. In addition, other applications of BP2 for prevention of BAI, such as coating of biomaterials or use in exit-site dressings, could be developed.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Leonie de Boer, Laura Boszhard, Corine Broekhuizen, and Bert van Urk for assistance with animal experimentation.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 25 September 2006. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |