Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Maisetta, G. Articles by Campa, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Maisetta, G. Articles by Campa, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2006, p. 806-809, Vol. 50, No. 2
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.50.2.806-809.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Bactericidal Activity of Human ß-Defensin 3 against Multidrug-Resistant Nosocomial Strains

Giuseppantonio Maisetta, Giovanna Batoni,^* Semih Esin, Walter Florio, Daria Bottai, Flavia Favilli, and Mario Campa

Dipartimento di Patologia Sperimentale, Biotecnologie Mediche, Infettivologia ed Epidemiologia, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Received 4 August 2005/ Returned for modification 13 September 2005/ Accepted 14 November 2005

Top Abstract Text References

 
The antimicrobial activity of human ß-defensin 3 (hBD-3) against multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Acinetobacter baumannii was evaluated. A fast bactericidal effect (within 20 min) against all bacterial strains tested was observed. The presence of 20% human serum abolished the bactericidal activity of hBD-3 against gram-negative strains and reduced the activity of the peptide against gram-positive strains.

Top Abstract Text References

 
The evolution and rapid spread of clinical bacterial strains resistant to the available antimicrobial agents are significant nosocomial problems and are of increasing importance in community-acquired infections (11). Besides being a growing cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, the spread of multiresistant strains is associated with an increased rate of hospitalization, increased lengths of hospital stay, and consequently, increased health care costs (11). The progressive reduction of the therapeutic efficacies of the available antibiotics due to the spread of antimicrobial resistance underlines the urgency for the development of new classes of drugs for the treatment of infectious diseases (11). In light of this situation, antimicrobial peptides, alone or combined with conventional antibiotics, are attractive candidates as therapeutic agents for bacterial infections because of their selectivity, speed of action, relative difficulty in selection of resistant mutants in vitro, and inherent immunological compatibility (2, 3). In humans, an important family of antimicrobial peptides is represented by defensins; they are small cationic and Cys-rich peptides with molecular masses ranging from 3 to 5 kDa (1). On the basis of sequence homology and the localization of six conserved cysteyl residues, human defensins are classified into the and the ß families (6). In particular, the ß-defensin 3 (hBD-3), which is widely expressed in skin, respiratory epithelium, and oral tissues, has generated interest because it shows strong, broad-spectrum, and salt-insensitive antimicrobial activity at concentrations noncytotoxic for human cells (4, 7, 9). A previous report demonstrated that hBD-3 is bactericidal against a panel of reference strains of clinically relevant bacterial species (12). No data on the effects of hBD-3 against multidrug-resistant strains isolated from hospitalized patients are yet available.

The aims of this study, therefore, were (i) to evaluate the bactericidal activity of hBD-3 against multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of common nosocomial pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and clinical isolates of emergent pathogens, such as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Acinetobacter baumannii; (ii) to investigate the kinetics of the bactericidal activity of hBD-3 against selected strains; and (iii) to evaluate the bactericidal activity of hBD-3 in the presence of human serum.

The bactericidal activity of hBD-3 against all clinical isolates was evaluated by a liquid microdilution assay in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (SPB; pH 7.4) (7). The bactericidal activity of the peptide was also tested against a representative gram-positive strain and a representative gram-negative strain in 50 and 150 mM SPB. Identification and susceptibility testing of clinical isolates, collected from distinct patients at the Microbiology Unit of the University Hospital of Pisa, were performed by using VITEK 2 automatic instruments (Bio-Merieux, Lyon, France). The drug susceptibilities of S. maltophilia and A. baumannii and the vancomycin susceptibility of E. faecium were confirmed by using Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). Clinical isolates were considered multidrug resistant if they were resistant to at least three agents from distinct classes of antibiotics. According to this definition only A. baumannii strains 4, 5, and 6 were not multidrug resistant (Table 1). The bacterial strains were grown in tryptone soy broth (TSB; Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom). Synthetic hBD-3 (Sigma-Genosys) was diluted in 0.1% acetic acid to obtain a stock solution of 10 mg/ml. Exponentially growing bacteria were resuspended in SPB to reach a density of 1 x 10⁷ CFU/ml. Ten microliters of each bacterial suspension was exposed at 37°C for various times (from 1 min to 3 h) to different concentrations of hBD-3 in 100 µl of SPB alone or in the presence of 20% heat-inactivated (56°C for 30 min) pooled human sera obtained from five healthy donors. Following incubation, the samples were diluted 10-fold in TSB, and 0.2 ml of each dilution was plated onto tryptone soy agar. The number of CFU was determined after 24 h of incubation at 37°C. Bactericidal activity was defined as a reduction in the numbers of viable bacteria of 3 log₁₀ CFU/ml at any of the incubation times tested.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Bactericidal activity of hBD-3 against nosocomial strains with defined resistance phenotypes

hBD-3 demonstrated bactericidal activity against all clinical isolates tested (six strains of every species). The concentrations of peptide sufficient to obtain a bactericidal effect after 1.5 h of incubation in SPB were 4 µg/ml for A. baumannii; 8 µg/ml for E. faecium; and from 4 to 8 µg/ml for S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and S. maltophilia (Table 1).

The killing kinetics of hBD-3 were evaluated with a representative isolate of each bacterial species arbitrarily chosen from among those that turned out to be less susceptible to the peptide (Table 1). In these experiments the peptide was tested at concentrations equal to or twofold greater than those that resulted in bactericidal activity after 1.5 h of incubation. hBD-3 showed fast bactericidal activity against every bacterial strain tested (Fig. 1). In particular, hBD-3 used at a concentration of 4 µg/ml was bactericidal against A. baumannii (strain 3) after 3 min of incubation (Fig. 1e). At a concentration of 8 µg/ml, the peptide caused a bactericidal effect within 20 min of incubation against S. aureus (strain 3), E. faecium (strain 3), and P. aeruginosa (strain 3) and within 1 min against S. maltophilia (strain 4) and A. baumannii (Fig. 1a to e). At a concentration of 16 µg/ml, the peptide produced a bactericidal effect against S. aureus, E. faecium, P. aeruginosa, and S. maltophilia within 10, 20, 5, and 1 min, respectively (Fig. 1a to d, respectively). In order to evaluate the impact of high ionic strength on the activity of hBD-3, the killing kinetics of hBD-3 against A. baumannii (strain 3) and S. aureus (strain 3) were also determined in the presence of 50 and 150 mM SPB. The peptide showed a bactericidal effect in 50 mM SPB against A. baumannii at 8 µg/ml after 3 min of incubation and against S. aureus at 16 µg/ml after 1.5 h of incubation. In the presence of 150 mM SPB, hBD-3 was bactericidal against A. baumannii at 64 µg/ml after 1.5 h of incubation, while it was shown to be inactive against S. aureus (data not shown).

View larger version (29K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Time-kill curves of S. aureus (strain 3) (a), E. faecium (strain 3) (b), P. aeruginosa (strain 3) (c), S. maltophilia (strain 4) (d), and A. baumannii (strain 3) (e) in SPB. The concentrations of hBD-3 are in µg/ml. The control consisted of bacteria incubated in the absence of hBD-3 but in the presence of the appropriate amount of the solvent (0.1% acetic acid). Data are means ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. •, control; , 4 µg/ml; , 8 µg/ml; , 16 µg/ml.

In order to evaluate whether hBD-3 retains activity against selected drug-resistant strains in the presence of biological fluids, bactericidal assays were performed in the presence of human serum. Heat-inactivated human serum diluted at 20% abolished the bactericidal activity of hBD-3 (assayed to 256 µg/ml) against P. aeruginosa (strain 3), S. maltophilia (strain 4), and A. baumannii (strain 3) within 3 h of incubation, while the peptide maintained its bactericidal activity against S. aureus (strain 3) and E. faecium (strain 3) at concentrations of 128 and 64 µg/ml, respectively (Table 2).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Effect of human serum on bactericidal activity of hBD-3

This study demonstrates that hBD-3 at relatively low concentrations is bactericidal against multidrug-resistant nosocomial strains, independently of their resistance phenotypes. It is noteworthy that a significant variability of the bactericidal concentrations of hBD-3 was not observed among clinical isolates belonging to the same species, while a strain selectivity of hBD-3, when it was tested against periodontal pathogens, has recently been reported (5). Those authors argue that such a strain selectivity of the peptide can be due to the variable compositions of lipopolysaccharide, which represents an important microbial target of the peptide (5). Moreover, hBD-3 exhibited rapid bactericidal activity against every bacterial strain tested, suggesting that the drug resistance does not interfere with the mode of action of hBD-3. Although hBD-3 is insensitive to physiologic concentrations of NaCl (150 mM) (4), the strong inhibition of bactericidal activity of hBD-3 in the presence of 150 mM SPB was observed. This finding suggests that hBD-3 is not insensitive to all types of salts, although the concentrations of phosphate salts tested were much higher than those detectable in normal serum (13). In accordance with our previous findings, the bactericidal activity of hBD-3 was inhibited in the presence of human serum (8). In particular, while the bactericidal activity of hBD-3 against gram-negative strains was completely abolished in the presence of serum, the peptide remained active against gram-positive isolates when it was used at high concentrations. Altogether these results suggest that, in addition to the presence of proteases or molecules that reduce peptide bioavailability (14), other serum-mediated inhibitory mechanisms, such as high ionic strength or salt properties, might be important in hBD-3 inhibition. Moreover, the differential susceptibilities to hBD-3 of gram-positive and gram-negative isolates observed in serum suggests that human serum may contain components that could mask the binding sites for the peptide as a result of their interaction with the surfaces of gram-negative bacterial microorganisms (10). Further studies aimed at elucidating the mechanisms involved in the inhibitory effect of serum on hBD-3 and the identification of derivatives of the peptide less sensitive to the inhibitory action of serum are required. Nevertheless, the high susceptibility to hBD-3 of bacterial strains resistant to most currently available antibiotics makes such a peptide an interesting antimicrobial agent for potential use for the therapy of nosocomial infections.

 
This work was supported by grants from "PRIN" protocols 2002067349-001 and 2004067822-001, Rome, Italy.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dipartimento di Patologia Sperimentale, Biotecnologie Mediche, Infettivologia ed Epidemiologia, Via San Zeno 35-39, 56127, Pisa, Italy. Phone: 39-050-2213694. Fax: 39-050-2213771. E-mail: batoni{at}biomed.unipi.it.

Top Abstract Text References

 

1
1. Ganz, T. 2003. Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity. Nat. Rev. 3:710-720.
2
2. Hancock, R. E. W. 2005. Mechanism of action of newer antibiotics for gram-positive pathogens. Lancet Infect. Dis. 5:209-218.[CrossRef][Medline]
3
3. Hancock, R. E. W. 2001. Cationic peptides: effectors in innate immunity and novel antimicrobials. Lancet Infect. Dis. 1:156-164.[CrossRef][Medline]
4
4. Harder, J., J. Bartels, E. Christophers, and J. M. Schroder. 2001. Isolation and characterization of human ß-defensin 3, a novel human inducible peptide antibiotic. J. Biol. Chem. 276:5707-5713.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Joly, S., C. Maze, P. B. McCray, Jr., and J. M. Guthmiller. 2004. Human ß-defensin 2 and 3 demonstrate strain-selectivity against oral microorganisms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:1024-1029.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Lehrer, R. I. 2004. Primate defensins. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2:727-738.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
7. Maisetta, G., G. Batoni, S. Esin, F. Luperini, M. Pardini, D. Bottai, W. Florio, M. R. Giuca, M. Gabriele, and M. Campa. 2003. Activity of human ß-defensin 3 alone or combined with other antimicrobial agents against oral bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3349-3351.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8
8. Maisetta, G., G. Batoni, S. Esin, G. Raco, D. Bottai, F. Favilli, W. Florio, and M. Campa. 2005. Susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans to bactericidal activity of human ß-defensin 3 in biological fluids. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:1245-1248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Nishimura, M., Y. Abiko, Y. Kurashige, M. Takeshima, M. Yamazaki, K. Kusano, M. Saitoh, K. Nakashima, T. Inoue, and T. Kaku. 2004. Effect of defensin peptides on eukaryotic cells: primary epithelial cells, fibroblast and squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. J. Dermatol. Sci. 36:87-95.[Medline]
10
10. Nyberg, P., M. Rasmussen, and L. Bjorck. 2004. ₂-macroglobulin-proteinase complex protect Streptococcus pyogenes from killing by the antimicrobial peptide LL-37. J. Biol. Chem. 51:52820-52823.
11
11. Rice, L. B. 2003. Do we really need new anti-infective drugs? Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 5:459-463.
12
12. Sahly, H., S. Shubert, J. Harder, P. Rautenberg, U. Ulmann, J. Schroder, and R. Podschun. 2003. Burkholderia is highly resistant to human beta-defensin 3. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 5:1739-1741.
13
13. Shiber, J. R., and A. Mattu. 2002. Serum phosphate abnormalities in the emergency department. J. Emerg. Med. 23:395-400.[CrossRef][Medline]
14
14. Wang, Y., B. Agerberth, A. Lothgren, A. Almstedt, and J. Johansson. 1998. Apolipoprotein A-I binds and inhibits the human antibacterial/cytotoxic peptide LL-37. J. Biol. Chem. 273:33115-33118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

---

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2006, p. 806-809, Vol. 50, No. 2
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.50.2.806-809.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hinrichsen, K., Podschun, R., Schubert, S., Schroder, J. M., Harder, J., Proksch, E. (2008). Mouse Beta-Defensin-14, an Antimicrobial Ortholog of Human Beta-Defensin-3. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 1876-1879 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mangoni, M. L., Maisetta, G., Di Luca, M., Gaddi, L. M. H., Esin, S., Florio, W., Brancatisano, F. L., Barra, D., Campa, M., Batoni, G. (2008). Comparative Analysis of the Bactericidal Activities of Amphibian Peptide Analogues against Multidrug-Resistant Nosocomial Bacterial Strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 85-91 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Harder, J., Glaser, R., Schroder, J.-M. (2007). Review: Human antimicrobial proteins effectors of innate immunity. Innate Immunity 13: 317-338 [Abstract]  
• Kwakman, P. H. S., te Velde, A. A., Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C. M. J. E., van Deventer, S. J. H., Zaat, S. A. J. (2006). Treatment and Prevention of Staphylococcus epidermidis Experimental Biomaterial-Associated Infection by Bactericidal Peptide 2. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 3977-3983 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Maisetta, G. Articles by Campa, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Maisetta, G. Articles by Campa, M.