Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2006, p. 1649-1655, Vol. 50, No. 5
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.50.5.1649-1655.2006
Division of Experimental Therapeutics, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910
Received 7 September 2005/ Returned for modification 29 November 2005/ Accepted 11 February 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pyrroloquinazolinediamine (PQD) and its derivatives are reported to possess anticancer, antimicrobial, and antimalarial activities (21). PQD and derivatives of it are very active antimalarial agents in vivo and in vitro (6, 12, 16, 21). Some derivatives were the most potent antimalarials discovered at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR), with 50% inhibitory concentrations <0.01 ng/ml and excellent activity against Plasmodium falciparum strains resistant to pyrimethamine (unpublished data). However, PQD also exhibited high host toxicity, with a 50% lethal dose in mice of less than 20 mg/kg of body weight when it was administered subcutaneously and causing deaths in Aotus monkeys at doses less than 2 mg/kg (unpublished data). This low therapeutic index of PQD severely limits its potential value as an antimalarial agent. Nevertheless, the high efficacy prompted us to synthesize new, safer derivatives.
To overcome the toxicity and solubility problems of PQD, several derivatives were prepared; and two of these derivatives, tetra-acetamide pyrroloquinazolinediamine (PQD-A4) and bis-ethylcarbamyl pyrroloquinazolinediamine (PQD-BE), were more potent and less toxic than the parent compound, PQD (Fig. 1). This compound not only displayed high in vitro activity against P. falciparum, with a 50% inhibitory concentration of 0.01 ng/ml, but also was highly active against P. berghei in a rodent model, with a 100% curative oral dose between 0.1 and 4 mg/kg. These two derivatives were also highly active in Aotus monkeys (oral curative dose, 1 mg/kg). Furthermore, PQD-A4 and PQD-BE showed no host toxicity at oral doses of 3 mg/kg/day for 3 days in Aotus monkeys and 10 mg/kg/day for 7 days in Rhesus monkeys (13).
|
The therapeutic index (the ratio of the effective dose/toxic dose) is a key criterion for candidate drug selection, and the Food and Drug Administration recommends that therapeutic-index assessments (efficacy and toxicity studies) be carried out with the same animal species, as cross-species scaling is often inaccurate (17). A rat model of malaria which resembles malaria in humans in terms of its symptoms, hyperparasitemia, and lethality (5, 9, 30) has successfully been developed in our laboratory for efficacy and toxicity studies (24, 31).
The rats used in this model were infected with the P. berghei ANKA strain. The result is different from that seen in mice, where untreated infection is always lethal. In this model, the rats sometimes develop a nonlethal infection with occasional self-clearance, as in humans. Parasitemia increased through days 3 to 11, with peak levels reaching 31% in most cases, followed (days 12 to 14) by self-clearance in 80% of the animals (approximately 17.9% mortality) to no parasitemia by day 21. Hyperparasitemia in the rat model (21 to 87%) is the same as that in the mouse (18 to 92%) (1, 28). However, the rat model displays a longer therapeutic time window of 5 to 7 days when effective therapy can be started (24, 31) rather than the 2 to 4 days in the P. berghei mouse model (8, 23). Although P. berghei has the limitation for human-specific complications such as cerebral malaria, rats infected with P. berghei ANKA show some symptoms similar to those in severe malaria in humans, for instance, hemolytic anemia, renal failure, hypoglycemia, hyperlactatemia, and metabolic acidosis, which develop after approximately 14 days of infection (15). One additional advantage to the rat model is that it is much easier to perform multiple studies, such as toxicity, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic studies, which require multiple blood samplings that cannot be performed with mice.
Aotus or Saimiri monkeys are World Health Organization-recommended primate species for studies of human malaria, and they can both be infected with P. falciparum (3). Healthy and splenectomized animals are susceptible to infection (19); the intact ones are able to keep parasitemia at lower levels for several days as a nonlethal pattern, but they develop complications such as severe anemia. Splenectomized monkeys develop higher levels of parasitemia and die (2, 27). The therapeutic time window for intact or splenectomized monkey models of P. falciparum (4, 29) infection is 0.4 to 3 days, with an average of about 2 days. However, the monkey model is not optimal for severe human malaria research because of the low level of parasitemia (<3%) in intact monkeys, and neither major complications nor immunoreactions are seen in the splenectomized monkeys (3). Although the splenectomized monkey model is often used in severe malaria research, the therapeutic time window is usually too short to treat the animals before they die from hyperparasitemia. Therefore, the rat model is more suitable for some aspects of severe malaria research than mouse or monkey models.
The present study assessed the therapeutic index and efficacy of the PQD derivatives PQD-A4 and PQD-BE in P. berghei ANKA-infected rats, an animal model that has close similarity to human severe malaria in terms of hyperparasitemia, anemia, renal failure, and mortality. The lead compound (PQD) and sodium artesunate (AS) were used as controls in the study.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Oral formulation and administration. Suspensions of PQD-A4, PQD-BE, and PQD were prepared fresh daily in 1% (wt/vol) carboxymethyl cellulose in distilled water by use of a Sonics Vibra Cell sonicator (Sonics & Materials, Inc., Danbury, CT), which was programmed to run with 5-s pulses and 5-s standbys for 8 min. To the suspension, 0.2% (vol/vol) of Tween 80 was added and the suspension was resonicated for another 2 min. The maximum concentration of the three test compounds was 50 mg/ml. The final suspension was checked for the size of the PQD-A4 particles by using a Horiba LA-930 light-scattering particle size and distribution analyzer connected to a personal computer.
Prior to each run for determination of the particle size, the sonicator was rinsed with pure water to remove any excess substances and an autoblank was performed. Occasionally, the accumulation of contaminants from past samples required comprehensive cleaning of the instrument. Particles of 6.4 to 17.8 µm of the three drugs were used in the dose-range, efficacy, and tolerant dose studies. Drugs were administered via gastric gavage. The vehicle (1% carboxymethyl cellulose suspension) was administered at the same volume, duration, and route as the test compounds.
Animals. The ANKA strain of P. berghei used in this study was adapted from a mouse strain for use in rates by three successive 4-week passages through 7-week-old rats. Parasitized blood from these animals was cryopreserved in a large batch and used to inoculate donor animals for the efficacy and toxicity experiments. Seven-week old P. berghei-infected and uninfected Sprague-Dawley rats (body weight, 186 to 213 g) were randomly assigned into study groups of 6 or 10 animals each. The animal protocol was approved by the IACUC, WRAIR. The research was conducted in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act and other federal statutes and regulations relating to animals and experiments involving animals and it adhered to principles stated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (26a).
All animals were quarantined (stabilized) for at least 7 days prior to infection. Rats were housed individually, with food and water supplied ad libitum. The rats were inoculated intraperitoneally with cryopreserved P. berghei-infected rat blood (2 x 107 parasitized erythrocytes/rat in 0.5 ml glucose-citrate solution) obtained from donor rats infected 1 week earlier with cryopreserved parasites. Two pretreatment smears were taken from all animals for parasitemia analysis. Animals with >4% parasitemia were selected for efficacy and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) studies. Eighteen posttreatment smears were obtained from each rat at 0, 3, 5, 8, and 12 h on day 6 and at 0, 3, and 6 h on days 7 and 8. From day 9 until day 28, blood smears were obtained from each animal once daily. Infected rats were used for efficacy, toxicity, and therapeutic-index studies.
Efficacy experiments. Rats with malaria (without delayed infection) randomized into groups of five to seven were given PQD-A4, PQD-BE, PQD, or AS (drug vehicle and various doses) intragastrically or intravenously (1.0 ml drug solution/kg) on days 6, 7, and 8 postinfection. For high oral doses (95 µmol/kg), 2.0 ml/kg of the appropriate drug dilution (at concentrations of 95 µmol drug base/ml) was administered orally. The composition and preparation of the drug vehicles used are described above. The general experimental design was similar to that of previously published efficacy studies with weanling rats (24). The general health status of the animals was monitored daily. Unless indicated otherwise, parasitemia was determined daily during days 6 through 12 postadministration and every other day or every third day thereafter. The experiments were terminated on day 28 (as by this time surviving rats would have cleared their infections).
MTD-defining experiments. Since the selection of dosage is one of the most critical issues to the success of the study, a preliminary dosage-defining test was performed for each new candidate drug prior to the definitive stage. This pilot test aimed to assess an appropriate minimum toxic dose and a maximum lethal dose of the selected compound(s) with oral or intravenous administrations in male rats, similar to the efficacy study. Three to five doses likely to encompass the MTD were tested with a small number of animals (four per group). Therefore, about 12 to 20 male rats per drug were included in the test. Death and other toxic signs identified by clinical observation and pathology were noted. The MTD was estimated and adjusted for definitive studies.
Data analysis and therapeutic-index determination. In the efficacy experiments, the parasite suppression, clearance, malaria cure, parasite clearance time (PCT), duration (days) of clearance, and time to recrudescence were calculated as described previously (24). Parasitemia suppression was deemed to have occurred if the level of parasitemia initially fell but was not cleared by drug treatment. The clearance effect of each drug was determined as the minimum dose that could clear parasites in 100% of animals without causing obvious clinical toxicity (minimum clearance dose [MCD]). Clearance was defined as two negative blood smears, taken 4 to 24 h apart, prior to day 12 postinfection. The detection limit for a negative thin smear was defined as the failure to observe a parasite after examination of 10,000 red blood cells (i.e., 0.01% parasitemia). The curative effect of each drug was determined as the minimum dose that could cure parasites in 100% of animals without causing obvious clinical toxicity (minimum curative dose [MCureD]). The negative thin smears were monitored until day 28 after inoculation.
MTD was defined as the dose that caused clinical toxicity in 100% of the animals but that did not cause death. To evaluate the overall therapeutic index (a numerical estimate of the relationship between the toxic dose of a drug and its therapeutic dose), the MTD was divided by MCD and MCureD. The data were generally found to fit a normal distribution. Means and standard deviations were calculated. Coefficients of variation were calculated as a percentage and were the standard deviation divided by mean value. Statistical analysis was conducted with Microsoft Excel software by using a Student t test for dependent samples to compare the means of paired and unpaired samples between treatment groups.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Efficacy and MTD of PQD-A4. The efficacy of PQD-A4 following 3-day oral administration was evaluated in P. berghei-infected rats (Table 1). A great suppressive effect of PQD-A4 was found in rats with malaria after administration of an oral dose of 0.625 mg/kg. The mean parasitemia of 87.2% was reduced after the first dosing of PQD-A4. When the dose was doubled to 1.25 mg/kg, a minimum clearance effect (MCD) was observed in all rats. During the treatments with 1.25, 2.5, and 5.0 mg/kg, the clearance times were 3.1, 5.5, and 9.8 days, respectively, suggesting that the clearance time is dose dependent. The minimum curative effect (MCureD) of PQD-A4 was found at the dose of 10 mg/kg and resulted in no recrudescence (Table 1). The MTD of PQD-A4 was evaluated over a dose range from 25 to 200 mg/kg; all rats survived up to the dose level of 100 mg/kg, while all rats died at the dose level of 200 mg/kg. As a result, the maximally tolerated dose of PQD-A4 was 100 mg/kg (190 µmol/kg).
|
Efficacy and MTD of PQD. The efficacy of PQD following 3-day oral administration was also evaluated (Table 1). A great suppressive effect (91.4%) of PQD was found in rats with malaria after administration of an oral dose of 0.43 mg/kg. When the dose was doubled to 0.86 mg/kg, an MCD was observed in all animals. At this MCD, the PCT of PQD was 49.2 h, but all animals exhibited a recrudescence of the parasitemia. The parasitemia-clearing effects of PQD remained following the administration of daily oral doses of 1.71 mg/kg, with a PCT of 68.4 h. An MCureD was found for PQD at a dose of 3.42 mg/kg. The MTD of PQD was evaluated following the administration of three daily intragastric doses. The dose range of PQD was from 3.42 to 34.2 mg/kg; all rats survived up to the dose level of 8.6 mg/kg, while half of the rats died after administration of the dose level of 17.1 mg/kg.
Efficacy and MTD of AS. The efficacy of AS following 3-day intravenous administration was evaluated in P. berghei-infected rats (Table 1). Infections were suppressed in all rats by AS at 9.2 mg/kg, with a mean suppression of 23.3%. Artesunate exhibited a great suppressive effect (80.7%) at a dose of 18.4 mg/kg. At the same dose level, AS cleared parasitemias in two of six rats. In order to achieve the MCD, the dose had to be increased to 60 mg/kg. At this and higher levels of 120 and 240 mg/kg, administered intravenously once daily for 3 consecutive days, AS cleared the parasitemia; however, the curative effect was not achieved at these high dose levels. The MTD of AS was evaluated following three daily intravenous injections. The dose range of AS was used was from 30 to 480 mg/kg; all rats survived up to the dose level of 240 mg/kg, while four of five rats died after administration of the dose level of 480 mg/kg (Table 1).
Primary therapeutic indices. Antimalarial potency was measured by determination of the minimum clearance effect, a commonly used efficacy measurement that is particularly appropriate when new agents are compared to AS, which does not cure malaria in rodent models. The MCDs of PQD-A4, PQD-BE, PQD, and AS were 1.25, 1.2, 0.86, and 60 mg/kg, respectively. It is noteworthy that the MCDs of the three PQDs are the same molar dosage level of 2.4 µmol/kg (Table 2). The MTDs of PQD-A4, PQD-BE, PQD, and AS were estimated to be 100, 38.4, 8.6, and 240 mg/kg, respectively. The therapeutic indices, which were obtained by using the MCDs as the effective parameters, were estimated to be 80 for PQD-A4, 32 for PQD-BE, 10 for PQD, and 4 for AS.
|
Comparison of PQD-A4 and AS. The efficacies of oral PQD-A4 and intravenous AS following 3-day intragastric or intravenous administration were compared by investigating the clearance of parasitemia in P. berghei-infected rats (Tables 1 and 2). The minimum clearance doses were 1.25 mg/kg for PQD-A4, which cleared the parasitemia within 3.1 days posttreatment, and 60 mg/kg for AS, which cleared the parasitemia within 4.2 days posttreatment. PQD-A4 and AS showed parallel responses in terms of their efficacy measurements following the administration of increased or decreased dose levels (Table 1). Therefore, the antimalarial potency of oral PQD-A4 was calculated to be 46.2 times higher than that of AS given by intravenous injection in P. berghei-infected animals when their antimalarial potencies were compared at the three dose levels by a parallel test for the number of days of parasitemia clearance (Fig. 2). PQD-A4 cures the rodents of malaria at a 10-mg/kg dose level, but AS does not. The advantage of the curative effect of oral PQD-A4 for the treatment of malaria is absolutely superior to that of AS intravenous injection.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We used two parameters to compare the efficacies of PQD-A4, PQD-BE, and PQD with that of the positive control, AS: (i) the dose of drug that resulted in minimum clearance of the parasite from all animals with no toxicity (MCD) and (ii) the dose of drug that resulted in a minimum curative treatment (MCureD). We also made note of recrudescence rates and times but did not consider these parameters to be critical for comparison of the efficacies of PQD-A4, PQD-BE, and PQD, given the stated clinical indications for their use.
The effects of PQD-A4, PQD-BE, and PQD on P. berghei malaria were not similar to those observed clinically with artemisinin derivatives such as AS; that is, the PQD class of agents could cure the rodents of malaria at 9.5 to 19.0 µmol/kg without recrudescence; but AS does not have such a curative effect even when it is used at a very high dose level of 625 µmol/kg, which is the maximum tolerated dose in the rat model. The 100% MCDs of PQD-A4, PQD-BE, and PQD were all 2.4 µmol/kg, suggesting that similar antimalarial potency was found for the three candidates with the MCD endpoint. The 100% MCureDs of PQD-A4, PQD-BE, and PQD were all within the range from 9.5 to 19.0 µmol/kg, indicating that the antimalarial potency of PQD is two times higher than those of PQD-A4 and PQD-BE at the MCureD measurement. However, the two derivatives showed a greater safety margin than the parent compound, PQD.
In conclusion, PQD-A4 and PQD-BE have the same efficacy as PQD, based on a comparison of the parasitemia clearance dose measurements, and have only half the antimalarial potency of PQD if the comparison is based on a curative dose level. However, PQD-A4 and PQD-BE can both be classified as non-narrow-window agents, with therapeutic indices of 80 and 32, respectively, and as much safer drug candidates (8-fold and 3.2-fold, respectively) than their parent compound, PQD. In addition, the three compounds PQD-A4, PQD-BE, and PQD are 20.0, 8.0, and 2.5 times safer, respectively, than AS based on a comparison of therapeutic indices.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the U.S. Department of Defense.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |