Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2006, p. 1878-1880, Vol. 50, No. 5
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.50.5.1878-1880.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,1 Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,2 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,3 Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,4 Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania5
Received 6 October 2005/ Returned for modification 4 December 2005/ Accepted 13 February 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| TEXT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This was a prospective observational pilot study. The subjects were lung transplant patients,
18 years of age, who had received at least six oral doses of voriconazole prior to a scheduled bronchoscopy. The Institutional Review Board approved the study, and all patients provided written informed consent prior to participation.
Voriconazole treatment (6 mg/kg of body weight intravenously every 12 h for 2 doses followed by 200 mg orally twice daily) was initiated immediately after transplant and continued for approximately 4 months as standard clinical care. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks posttransplant in all patients during the voriconazole prophylaxis period. A blood sample and an aliquot of pooled BAL supernatant were acquired for study purposes during one of these procedures.
Total (free and protein-bound) voriconazole concentrations were measured in the plasma and BAL supernatant by a modified high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry technique (13, 18). Authentic voriconazole (UK-109,496) and an internal standard (UK-103,446) were provided by Pfizer Global Research and Development (Sandwich, United Kingdom). The standard curves were linear (r2 = 0.99) over a concentration range of 0.05 to 6.0 µg/ml for the plasma and 0.001 to 0.5 µg/ml for the BAL. Interday coefficients of variation were <12.6%.
The concentrations of urea in the serum and BAL supernatant were measured, separately, by a colorimetric method (serum, Vitros 950 [Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Rochester, NY]; BAL, Urea Nitrogen Reagent [Teco Diagnostics, Anaheim, CA], respectively). The volume of epithelial lining fluid (ELF) recovered in the BAL aspirate and the concentration of voriconazole in the ELF were calculated based on the urea dilution method as previously reported (1, 2, 12). A two-tailed Spearman's rank correlation test was applied to test for a relationship between plasma and ELF concentrations.
Twelve patients were enrolled in the study, with BAL and blood samples successfully collected from 11 patients (Table 1). All study patients were receiving multiple concomitant medications at the time of bronchoscopy, none of which has been documented to impact the plasma concentration of voriconazole (11).
|
The total voriconazole concentration in the ELF exceeded that in the plasma in all patients studied, with a mean ELF-to-plasma concentration ratio ± standard deviation of 11 ± 8 (Table 2). A strong association between plasma and ELF concentrations (r2 = 0.95; P < 0.0001) was observed. No differences in pulmonary penetration based on the type of lung transplantation or acute or chronic rejection status at the time of bronchoscopy were noted.
|
The highest voriconazole ELF concentrations were observed in patients sampled at 5 to 6 h postdose (Table 2). Since voriconazole reportedly peaks in the plasma at 2 to 3 h following oral dosing, this may indicate a lag time in the attainment of peak pulmonary concentrations (11). A wide degree of variability in ELF and plasma voriconazole concentrations between patients was observed (Table 2). This was expected, based on the nature of this type of study, the limited sample size, and the use of different BAL sampling time points in relation to drug administration. Furthermore, a large degree of interpatient pharmacokinetic variability is known to be associated with voriconazole due to its nonlinear pharmacokinetics and genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P-450 enzymes that metabolize voriconazole (11, 15).
The ELF concentration of an antibacterial agent is considered to be a "best estimate" of the concentration at the site of extrapulmonary bacterial infection (4, 8). However, the site of intrapulmonary infection of Aspergillus spp. is not well defined, and the clinical relevance of antifungal ELF concentrations is unknown. In vitro studies demonstrate a propensity for the conidiae and hyphae of Aspergillus fumigatus to invade and germinate in human pneumocytes (6, 17). Thus, the sites of pulmonary aspergillosis likely include not only the ELF but also alveolar macrophages, pulmonary epithelial cells, and the interstitial fluid of lung tissue.
The voriconazole ELF concentration achieved with the prophylactic regimen exceeded both the MIC50 (0.25 µg/ml) and the MIC90 (1.0 µg/ml) previously reported for Aspergillus spp. (10, 16) at the time of bronchoscopy in all but two patients. The ELF concentration in subject 9 fell below the MIC90 midway through the dosage interval. The clinical relevance of drug exposure in relation to the MIC of a fungal pathogen at the site of infection is unknown at this time. Further pharmacodynamic and clinical studies are required to identify clinically relevant antifungal concentrations at the site of infection.
The volume of ELF recovered in the BAL aspirate is calculated based on the premise that the urea concentration in the blood and ELF is in equilibrium. Although the ELF volume recovered in the current study (1.4 ± 0.7 ml) was consistent with that reported in healthy subjects (1.7 ± 0.2 ml), a larger proportion of BAL fluid was determined to be ELF (2% versus 1%, respectively) (12). It is unclear whether urea contamination of the BAL fluid from other sources contributed to an overestimation of ELF volume or whether our results depict differences in lung transplant patients compared to healthy subjects. Nonetheless, an overestimation of ELF volume would result in an underestimation of the ELF voriconazole concentration based on a dilutional effect (12). Finally, it must be noted that total voriconazole concentrations (free and protein bound) were measured in both the plasma and BAL supernatant. Free-drug concentrations in these compartments may be less than those reported here.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by the 2003 Thomas E. Starzl Young Investigator Award.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |