AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Capitano, B.
Right arrow Articles by Venkataramanan, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Capitano, B.
Right arrow Articles by Venkataramanan, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2006, p. 1878-1880, Vol. 50, No. 5
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.50.5.1878-1880.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Intrapulmonary Penetration of Voriconazole in Patients Receiving an Oral Prophylactic Regimen

Blair Capitano,1,2* Brian A. Potoski,1,2 Shahid Husain,2 Shimin Zhang,1 David L. Paterson,2 Sean M. Studer,3 Kenneth R. McCurry,4 and Raman Venkataramanan1,5

School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,1 Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,2 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,3 Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,4 Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania5

Received 6 October 2005/ Returned for modification 4 December 2005/ Accepted 13 February 2006


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 
Voriconazole penetrated well into the pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (ELF) in lung transplant patients receiving oral prophylaxis. The ELF concentrations exceeded those of the plasma, with an average ELF-to-plasma ratio of 11 (±8). A strong association between plasma and ELF concentrations (r2 = 0.95) was noted.


    TEXT
 Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 
Adequate drug penetration to the infection site is crucial for antimicrobial therapeutic optimization. The lungs are the most common site of primary infection in cases of invasive aspergillosis (9, 14). Voriconazole has become a preferred agent for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis (3). Despite its widespread use in the management of pulmonary aspergillosis, the intrapulmonary penetration of voriconazole has not been reported in humans. Voriconazole is used routinely as antifungal prophylaxis in some lung transplant centers; this offers an opportunity to study the intrapulmonary penetration of the drug, since lung transplant recipients routinely undergo surveillance bronchoscopy (5, 7).

This was a prospective observational pilot study. The subjects were lung transplant patients, ≥18 years of age, who had received at least six oral doses of voriconazole prior to a scheduled bronchoscopy. The Institutional Review Board approved the study, and all patients provided written informed consent prior to participation.

Voriconazole treatment (6 mg/kg of body weight intravenously every 12 h for 2 doses followed by 200 mg orally twice daily) was initiated immediately after transplant and continued for approximately 4 months as standard clinical care. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks posttransplant in all patients during the voriconazole prophylaxis period. A blood sample and an aliquot of pooled BAL supernatant were acquired for study purposes during one of these procedures.

Total (free and protein-bound) voriconazole concentrations were measured in the plasma and BAL supernatant by a modified high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry technique (13, 18). Authentic voriconazole (UK-109,496) and an internal standard (UK-103,446) were provided by Pfizer Global Research and Development (Sandwich, United Kingdom). The standard curves were linear (r2 = 0.99) over a concentration range of 0.05 to 6.0 µg/ml for the plasma and 0.001 to 0.5 µg/ml for the BAL. Interday coefficients of variation were <12.6%.

The concentrations of urea in the serum and BAL supernatant were measured, separately, by a colorimetric method (serum, Vitros 950 [Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Rochester, NY]; BAL, Urea Nitrogen Reagent [Teco Diagnostics, Anaheim, CA], respectively). The volume of epithelial lining fluid (ELF) recovered in the BAL aspirate and the concentration of voriconazole in the ELF were calculated based on the urea dilution method as previously reported (1, 2, 12). A two-tailed Spearman's rank correlation test was applied to test for a relationship between plasma and ELF concentrations.

Twelve patients were enrolled in the study, with BAL and blood samples successfully collected from 11 patients (Table 1). All study patients were receiving multiple concomitant medications at the time of bronchoscopy, none of which has been documented to impact the plasma concentration of voriconazole (11).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Patient characteristics

 
The average volumes instilled and recovered during the BAL procedure were 116 ± 11 ml and 64 ± 14 ml, respectively. The average calculated ELF volume recovered was 1.4 ± 0.7 ml, or 2% of the total lavage fluid recovered. At the time of bronchoscopy, 2/12 patients had minimal acute rejection, and 1/12 patients had severe acute rejection.

The total voriconazole concentration in the ELF exceeded that in the plasma in all patients studied, with a mean ELF-to-plasma concentration ratio ± standard deviation of 11 ± 8 (Table 2). A strong association between plasma and ELF concentrations (r2 = 0.95; P < 0.0001) was observed. No differences in pulmonary penetration based on the type of lung transplantation or acute or chronic rejection status at the time of bronchoscopy were noted.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Plasma and ELF concentrations for each patienta

 
To our knowledge, this is the first report of the intrapulmonary penetration of voriconazole in humans. Although based on a limited sample size, our data reveal that voriconazole achieves substantial lung penetration. The physiological basis for the higher concentration of voriconazole in the ELF than that in the plasma is unknown and warrants further evaluation.

The highest voriconazole ELF concentrations were observed in patients sampled at 5 to 6 h postdose (Table 2). Since voriconazole reportedly peaks in the plasma at 2 to 3 h following oral dosing, this may indicate a lag time in the attainment of peak pulmonary concentrations (11). A wide degree of variability in ELF and plasma voriconazole concentrations between patients was observed (Table 2). This was expected, based on the nature of this type of study, the limited sample size, and the use of different BAL sampling time points in relation to drug administration. Furthermore, a large degree of interpatient pharmacokinetic variability is known to be associated with voriconazole due to its nonlinear pharmacokinetics and genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P-450 enzymes that metabolize voriconazole (11, 15).

The ELF concentration of an antibacterial agent is considered to be a "best estimate" of the concentration at the site of extrapulmonary bacterial infection (4, 8). However, the site of intrapulmonary infection of Aspergillus spp. is not well defined, and the clinical relevance of antifungal ELF concentrations is unknown. In vitro studies demonstrate a propensity for the conidiae and hyphae of Aspergillus fumigatus to invade and germinate in human pneumocytes (6, 17). Thus, the sites of pulmonary aspergillosis likely include not only the ELF but also alveolar macrophages, pulmonary epithelial cells, and the interstitial fluid of lung tissue.

The voriconazole ELF concentration achieved with the prophylactic regimen exceeded both the MIC50 (0.25 µg/ml) and the MIC90 (1.0 µg/ml) previously reported for Aspergillus spp. (10, 16) at the time of bronchoscopy in all but two patients. The ELF concentration in subject 9 fell below the MIC90 midway through the dosage interval. The clinical relevance of drug exposure in relation to the MIC of a fungal pathogen at the site of infection is unknown at this time. Further pharmacodynamic and clinical studies are required to identify clinically relevant antifungal concentrations at the site of infection.

The volume of ELF recovered in the BAL aspirate is calculated based on the premise that the urea concentration in the blood and ELF is in equilibrium. Although the ELF volume recovered in the current study (1.4 ± 0.7 ml) was consistent with that reported in healthy subjects (1.7 ± 0.2 ml), a larger proportion of BAL fluid was determined to be ELF (2% versus 1%, respectively) (12). It is unclear whether urea contamination of the BAL fluid from other sources contributed to an overestimation of ELF volume or whether our results depict differences in lung transplant patients compared to healthy subjects. Nonetheless, an overestimation of ELF volume would result in an underestimation of the ELF voriconazole concentration based on a dilutional effect (12). Finally, it must be noted that total voriconazole concentrations (free and protein bound) were measured in both the plasma and BAL supernatant. Free-drug concentrations in these compartments may be less than those reported here.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Paul M. Schorr and Judy L. Vensak for their invaluable help in the execution of this study. We also thank Teresa P. McKaveney for her assistance.

This work was supported by the 2003 Thomas E. Starzl Young Investigator Award.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, 720 Salk Hall, 3501 Terrace St., Pittsburgh, PA 15261. Phone: (412) 648-9629. Fax: (412) 624-8175. E-mail: capitanob{at}upmc.edu. Back


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 

  1. Capitano, B., H. M. Mattoes, E. Shore, A. O'Brien, S. Braman, C. Sutherland, and D. P. Nicolau. 2004. Steady-state intrapulmonary concentrations of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin and azithromycin in older adults. Chest 125:965-973.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Conte, J. E., J. Golden, S. Duncan, E. McKenna, E. Lin, and E. Zurlinden. 1996. Single-dose intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of azithromycin, clarithromycin, ciprofloxacin, and cefuroxime in volunteer subjects. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1617-1622.[Abstract]
  3. Herbrecht, R., D. W. Denning, T. F. Patterson, J. E. Bennett, R. E. Greene, J. W. Oestmann, W. V. Kern, K. A. Marr, P. Ribaud, O. Lortholary, R. Sylvester, R. H. Rubin, J. R. Wingard, P. Stark, C. Durand, D. Caillot, E. Thiel, P. H. Chandrasekar, M. R. Hodges, H. T. Schlamm, P. F. Troke, and B. de Pauw. 2002. Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 347:408-415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Honeybourne, D. 1997. Antibiotic penetration in the respiratory tract and implications for the selection of antimicrobial therapy. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 3:170-174.[Medline]
  5. Husain, S., D. B. Zaldonis, E. J. Kwak, and K. R. McCurry. 2004. Role of voriconazole prophylaxis for the prevention of invasive aspergillosis (IA) at six months in lung transplant recipients. J. Heart Lung Transpl. 23(Suppl. 1):S110.
  6. Ibrahim-Granet, O., B. Philippe, H. Boleti, E. Boisvieux-Ulrich, D. Grenet, M. Stern, and J. P. Latgé. 2003. Phagocytosis and intracellular fate of Aspergillus fumigatus conidia in alveolar macrophages. Infect. Immun. 71:891-903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Lehneman, J. B., G. A. Smallwood, L. A. Lesniak, and E. C. Lawrence. 2005. Review of patient outcomes of Aspergillus prophylaxis with voriconazole after transplantation. J. Heart Lung Transpl. 24(Suppl. 1):S169.
  8. Nix, D. E. 1998. Intrapulmonary concentrations of antimicrobial agents. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 12:631-647.[Medline]
  9. Patterson, T. F., W. R. Kirkpatrick, M. White, J. W. Hiemenz, J. R. Wingard, B. Dupont, M. G. Rinaldi, D. A. Stevens, J. R. Graybill, et al. 2000. Invasive aspergillosis. Disease spectrum, treatment practices and outcomes. Medicine 79:250-260.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, R. J. Hollis, R. N. Jones, and the Sentry Participants Group. 2002. Antifungal activities of posaconazole, ravuconazole, and voriconazole compared to those of itraconazole and amphotericin B against 239 clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. and other filamentous fungi: report from SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program, 2000. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1032-1037.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals. 2002. Voriconazole (Vfend®) package information. Pfizer Inc., New York, N.Y.
  12. Rennard, S. I., G. Basset, D. Lecossier, K. M. O'Donnell, P. Pinkston, P. G. Martin, and R. G. Crystal. 1986. Estimation of volume of epithelial lining fluid recovered by lavage using urea as a marker of dilution. J. Appl. Physiol. 60:532-538.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Roffey, S. J., S. Cole, P. Comby, D. Gibson, S. G. Jezequel, A. N. R. Nedderman, D. A. Smith, D. K. Walker, and N. Wood. 2003. The disposition of voriconazole in mouse, rat, rabbit, guinea pig, dog and human. Drug Metab. Dispos. 31:731-741.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Singh, N., and D. L. Paterson. 2005. Aspergillus in transplant patients. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18:44-69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Trifilio, S., R. Oritz, G. Pennick, A. Verma, J. Pi, V. Stosor, T. Zembower, and J. Mehta. 2005. Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 35:509-513.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Warn, P. A., A. Sharp, and D. W. Denning. 2006. In-vitro activity of a new triazole BAL4815, the active component of BAL8557 (the water soluble prodrug), against Aspergillus spp. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57:135-138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wasylnka, J. A., A. H. T. Hissen, A. N. C. Wan, and M. M. Moore. 2005. Intracellular and extracellular growth of Aspergillus fumigatus. 43(Suppl. 1):S27-S30.
  18. Zhou, L., R. D. Glickman, N. Chen, W. E. Sponsel, J. R. Graybill, and K. W. Lam. 2002. Determination of voriconazole in aqueous humor by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B 776:213-220.[CrossRef]


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2006, p. 1878-1880, Vol. 50, No. 5
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.50.5.1878-1880.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Capitano, B.
Right arrow Articles by Venkataramanan, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Capitano, B.
Right arrow Articles by Venkataramanan, R.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS