This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giannoni, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bugnon, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giannoni, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bugnon, D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2006, p. 2563-2568, Vol. 50, No. 7
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01149-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Prospective Determination of Plasma Imipenem Concentrations in Critically Ill Children

Eric Giannoni,1 Philippe Moreillon,2* Jacques Cotting,1 Adrien Moessinger,1 Jacques Bille,3 Laurent Décosterd,4 Giorgio Zanetti,5 Paul Majcherczyk,2 and Denis Bugnon6

Department of Pediatrics, CHUV, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland,1 Department of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Biophore Building, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland,2 Institute of Microbiology, CHUV, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland,3 Division of Clinical Pharmacology, CHUV, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland,4 Department of Hospital Hygiene, CHUV, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland,5 Laboratoire d'Antibiologie (UPRES EA-1156), Medicine School, F-44035 Nantes Cedex 01, France6

Received 2 September 2005/ Returned for modification 27 November 2005/ Accepted 12 April 2006


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Plasma imipenem concentrations were measured in 19 critically ill children (median age, 0.8 year; range, 0.02 to 12.9 years). Wide interindividual variations (2 to 4x at peak and >10x at trough concentrations) resulted in unpredictable plasma levels in several children. To avoid subtherapeutic drug levels, we recommend treatment with at least 100 mg/kg of body weight/day of imipenem-cilastatin for critically ill children requiring such therapy.


arrow
TEXT
 
Critically ill patients are particularly heterogeneous with regard to conditions that may alter drug levels in body fluids. Recently, we encountered problems in two critically ill children with Enterobacter cloacae septicemia who did not respond to treatment with imipenem-cilastatin, in spite of being infected with drug-susceptible pathogens (MIC of imipenem, 0.125 mg/liter). One patient developed hepatic microabscesses while under therapy. Concentrations of imipenem in the plasma were low (peak and trough levels, ≤20 mg/liter and undetectable, respectively), in spite of the use of doses within therapeutic recommendations (60 mg/kg of body weight/day) (4, 13). This prompted us to measure the concentrations of imipenem in the plasmas of children admitted to the intensive care unit and to determine whether individual variations could be predicted by bedside drug adjustment calculations, including age, size, weight, and renal function.

Methods and experimental design. Nineteen consecutive children requiring imipenem-cilastatin treatment were prospectively enrolled in an observational, noninterventional study between August 2000 and June 2001. Dosage and administration schedules were at the discretion of the physician in charge. The protocol was accepted by the local ethics committee, and written consent was obtained from the childrens' parents. Because of previous treatment failures with a total daily dose of 60 mg/kg, the physicians in charge prescribed 100 mg/kg/day of imipenem-cilastatin to all patients (Tienam; Merck Sharp and Dohme-Chibret AG, Switzerland). The drug was administered in either three (every 8 h [q8h]) or four (q6h) separate infusions (Fig. 1). Concentrations of imipenem were measured at the first dose and at steady state, i.e., between days 4 and 6 after treatment onset.


Figure 1
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Imipenem concentrations in the plasmas of 19 critically children. All children received the same nominal dose of 100 mg/kg/day, given in either three separate infusions (q8h, open triangles) or four separate infusions (q6h, closed circles). The drug (50-mg vials) was dissolved in 100 ml of 0.9% NaCl, according to the manufacturer's recommendations, and infused over a period of 30 min via an infusion pump (BD Pilote C; Becton Dickinson). Five blood samples were collected for each series of dosages. For q8h regimens, samples were collected just before and 30, 120, 270, and 480 min after the infusion onset. For q6h regimens, samples were collected just before and 30, 90, 210, and 360 min after the infusion onset. Panel A presents the concentration profiles for all the children included in the study. The open diamonds (right panel) indicate the imipenem plasma concentrations for a child who received a dose of 60 mg/kg/day (q8h) and failed to respond to therapy. Wide interindividual variations were observed. Panel B presents the concentration-time profiles for children who were <1 year old. Arrows in the right panel indicate children who were <1 month old. In spite of a decreased rate of imipenem elimination in very young children (1, 4, 21, 22), the concentration-time profiles were not markedly different from those for other children. Panel C depicts the concentration profiles of imipenem in a subset of children with impaired renal function, defined by creatinine clearance (ml/min x 1.73 m2) of <2 standard deviations for the age group (no cases requiring dialysis were included). Dotted lines represent approximations in a few cases where the last dosage was below the limit of quantification (i.e., 0.5 mg/liter). Note that since only a few points were taken during the first hour following administration, a precise distribution phase cannot be deduced from the figure.

Blood samples (0.4 ml) were drawn from a central line independent of the line used to infuse the drug, immediately chilled, centrifuged at 4°C, stabilized, and stored at –80°C as described previously (10). Imipenem concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (10). Plasma was deproteinized by ultrafiltration (16), thus yielding the free fraction of the drug. Standard curves, quality controls, and validation complied with previously described methodologies (5). The limit of quantification was 0.5 mg/liter, linearity was up to 200 mg/liter, and interrun and intrarun coefficients of variation were ≤13.4% (at 4, 40, and 120 mg/liter) and <6%, respectively (5).

Patient characteristics and imipenem concentrations in the plasma. Most children had high pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) scores (Table 1) (19). Three patients were newborn (<30 days old), seven were less than 1 year old, six were between 1 and 5 years old, and three were older (stratified following FDA recommendations [http://www.fda.gov/cber/gdlns/ichclinped.htm#iia]). All but two had harmonious weight-to-height ratios (20). Nine were mechanically ventilated, four were on continuous positive airway pressure, and all benefited from analgesia and sedation, including opiates and/or benzodiazepines. No cutaneous or neurological side effects were observed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Characteristics of patients

Sixteen (84%) patients had nosocomial infections, defined by onset ≥48 h after hospitalization. A presumed pathogen was cultured from 12/19 (63%) patients (Table 1). MICs of imipenem ranged from 0.125 to 4 mg/liter (susceptibility breakpoint, ≤4 mg/liter) (23), except that for a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolate (MIC of >32).

Concentration-time profiles were obtained for 10/19 patients for the first dose and 16/19 patients for the steady-state dose (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Imipenem concentrations varied by 2 to 4x at peak levels and up to >10x at trough levels (Fig. 1A). We sought whether pharmacokinetic (PK) values were associated with physiological variables (age, weight, body surface area, creatinine level, measured creatinine clearance, blood urea level, albumin level, blood lactate level, PRISM score, mean blood pressure, heart rate, and central venous pressure). Individual PK values were determined by standard noncompartmental analysis and computed using published methodologies (11). Calculated parameters included the terminal slope (Kß), area under the curve (AUC; 0 to 6 h and 0 to 8 h for q6h and q8h regimens, respectively), area under the first moment curve (AUMC), terminal half-life (T1/2ß = log 2/Kß), mean residence time (MRT = AUMC/AUC), systemic clearance (CLR = dose/AUC), and volumes of distribution (Vß = CLR/Kß and VSS = CLR x MRT).

All parameters were within the ranges of reported values for children (shown in part in Table 2). High and low values did not cluster with particular children, such as those less than 1 year old (Fig. 1B) or those with altered renal function (defined as creatinine clearance of <2 standard deviations for the age group) (Fig. 1C), although no cases requiring dialysis were included. Elimination parameters correlated with creatinine clearance (R > 0.8 by the Spearman correlation test). In addition, discrete positive and negative correlations were also found with several other factors, including blood pressure and acid/base equilibrium (Table 3). For instance, elimination was slower in the presence of high lactate and low bicarbonate levels. Lactic acidosis is a marker of poor perfusion. In patients with lactic acidosis, decreased blood flow to the kidneys could have resulted in decreased elimination of the imipenem. Moreover, although children who are <1 year old eliminate imipenem slower than older children (1, 4, 21, 22), the younger children did not demonstrate higher plasma levels of the drug (Fig. 1). This may reflect their larger volumes of distribution (3) (Fig. 2). While the correlations presented in Table 3 may have a direct or an indirect causal relation with renal elimination, the multiplicity of them could render drug adjustment notably difficult without the help of laboratory dosage and solid Bayesian-model predictions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Imipenem pharmacokinetics in children reported in various studies


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. R values for significant correlations between physiological and pharmacokinetic parametersa


Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. Correlation between age or height and the volume of distribution at steady state (VSS) in the study population. Each data point represents a single patient. Closed circles indicate patients who were <1 year old or had <70 cm in height. Open circles represent children with values above these respective cutoffs. There was a fracture between the two correlation curves at 1 year and/or 70 cm. Caution is warranted for data below these values, because both age and size are inversely correlated with V.

The PK parameters for all children at the first dose and steady state were not significantly different (a Wilcoxon matched-pair test was not significant)(Table 1). The PK parameters for the five children studied at both the first dose and steady state were not significantly different either, indicating individual stability (Table 1).

All children were clinically cured. The total duration of imipenem treatment was 9.6 + 3.4 days (mean + standard deviation). Most patients received additional antibiotics, including vancomycin for 13, amikacin for 2, and metronidazole for 3 patients. Pharmacodynamic recommendations for maximal bacterial killing by beta-lactams advocate a time above the MIC for the free fraction of the drug (fT>MIC) (18) of >40% for carbapenems, >50% for penicillins, and >60 to 70% for cephalosporins (7, 8, 12, 25). In the present study, the high-dose regimen (100 mg/kg/day) used by the physicians in charge ensured an fT>MIC of 70% to 100% for all recovered pathogens except the methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis isolate (fT>MIC = 13%) (Table 1). This is on the safe side of the recommended 40% fT>MIC mentioned above. In contrast, post hoc evaluation of the patient who failed treatment with the 60-mg/kg/day dosage gives an estimate of 10 to 20% fT>MIC for the pathogen, which is insufficient.

Although the high-dosage regimen appeared optimal, one should keep in mind that imipenem concentrations are lower in tissues than in the plasma and that this may also affect the therapeutic outcome (24). Three initially susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (MIC = 1 to 2 mg/liter) became resistant (MICs of 6 to 32 mg/liter), in spite of having a time above the MIC value of about 60%. This reminds us of the capacity of this organism to develop imipenem resistance (15) and that low drug concentrations in specific compartments may promote resistance (8).

Taken together, these data convey the following conclusions. First, the lower-range dose of 60 mg/kg/day of imipenem-cilastatin carries a nonnegligible risk of subtherapeutic drug levels in the plasma. Thus, it may be insufficient for critically ill children. Second, the higher-range dose of 100 mg/kg/day was uniformly appropriate over the whole pediatric population tested, irrespective of the q6h or q8h administration schedule (premature children were not included). This dose was also appropriate for the three neonates (<1 month of age), a category for which recommendations advocate 75 mg/kg/day in the United States and 60 mg/kg/day in Europe. Third, interindividual variations in imipenem plasma concentrations exist and are difficult to predict in critically ill children, as recently reported for critically ill adults (2). We propose that critically ill children requiring imipenem-cilastatin therapy should receive a dose of 100 mg/kg/day and that recourse to measurements of drug concentrations should be considered in complex and uncertain situations (17).


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by the Foundation for Advances in Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases and by an unrestricted grant from Merck Sharp and Dohme-Chibret.

We thank Saskia Bolay for outstanding technical assistance.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Biology Building, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. Phone: 41-21-692 5600. Fax: 41-21-692 5605. E-mail: Philippe.Moreillon{at}unil.ch. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Begue, P. C., S. Baron, P. Challier, J. L. Fontaine, and G. Lasfargues. 1987. Pharmacokinetic and clinical evaluation of imipenem/cilastatin in children and neonates. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 52(Suppl.):40-45.
    2. 2
  2. Belzberg, H., J. Zhu, E. E. Cornwell III, J. A. Murray, J. Sava, A. Salim, G. C. Velmahos, and M. A. Gill. 2004. Imipenem levels are not predictable in the critically ill patient. J. Trauma 56:111-117.[Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Besunder, J. B., M. D. Reed, and J. L. Blumer. 1988. Principles of drug biodisposition in the neonate. I. A critical evaluation of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic interface. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 14:189-216.[Medline]
    4. 4
  4. Blumer, J. L. 1996. Pharmacokinetic determinants of carbapenem therapy in neonates and children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 15:733-737.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Bugnon, D., E. Giannoni, P. Majcherczyk, M. P. Glauser, and P. Moreillon. 2002. Pitfalls in cefepime titration from human plasma: plasma- and temperature-related drug degradation in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3654-3656.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Claesson, G., M. Eriksson, and J. D. Rogers. 1992. Pharmacokinetics of imipenem/cilastatin sodium in children with peritonitis. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 71:103-106.[Medline]
    7. 7
  7. Craig, W. A. 1995. Interrelationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in determining dosage regimens for broad-spectrum cephalosporins. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 22:89-96.[CrossRef][Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Drusano, G. L. 2003. Prevention of resistance: a goal for dose selection for antimicrobial agents. Clin. Infect. Dis. 36:S42-S50.[CrossRef][Medline]
    9. 9
  9. Engelhard, D., I. Shalit, H. R. Stutman, R. Greenwood, J. Griffis, and M. I. Marks. 1986. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of imipenem-cilastatin in pediatric patients. Pediatr. Pharmacol. (New York) 5:273-279.
    10. 10
  10. Garcia-Capdevila, L., C. Lopez-Calull, C. Arroyo, M. A. Moral, M. A. Mangues, and J. Bonal. 1997. Determination of imipenem in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography for pharmacokinetic studies in patients. J. Chromatogr. B 692:127-132.[CrossRef][Medline]
    11. 11
  11. Gibaldi, M., and D. Perrier. 1982. Noncompartmental analysis based on statistical moment theory. Marcel Dekker, New York, N.Y.
    12. 12
  12. Gunderson, B. W., G. H. Ross, K. H. Ibrahim, and J. C. Rotschafer. 2001. What do we really know about antibiotic pharmacodynamics? Pharmacotherapy 21:302S-318S.[Medline]
    13. 13
  13. Henry, N. K., J. L. Hoecker, and K. H. Rhodes. 2000. Antimicrobial therapy for infants and children: guidelines for the inpatient and outpatient practice of pediatric infectious diseases. Mayo Clin. Proc. 75:86-97.[Abstract]
    14. 14
  14. Jacobs, R. F., G. L. Kearns, J. M. Trang, A. L. Brown, B. Marmer, J. C. McIntosh, F. L. Underwood, and R. B. Kluza. 1984. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of imipenem in children. J. Pediatr. 105:996-1001.[CrossRef][Medline]
    15. 15
  15. Livermore, D. M. 1995. Bacterial resistance to carbapenems. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 390:25-47.[Medline]
    16. 16
  16. Majcherczyk, P. A., P. Moreillon, L. A. Decosterd, D. Sanglard, J. Bille, M. P. Glauser, and O. Marchetti. 2002. Single-step extraction of fluconazole from plasma by ultra-filtration for the measurement of its free concentration by high performance liquid chromatography. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 28:645-651.[CrossRef][Medline]
    17. 17
  17. Mohr, J. F., A. Wanger, and J. H. Rex. 2004. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling can help guide targeted antimicrobial therapy for nosocomial gram-negative infections in critically ill patients. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 48:125-130.[CrossRef][Medline]
    18. 18
  18. Mouton, J. W., M. N. Dudley, O. Cars, H. Derendorf, and G. L. Drusano. 2005. Standardization of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) terminology for anti-infective drugs: an update. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 55:601-607.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    19. 19
  19. Pollack, M. M., K. M. Patel, and U. E. Ruttimann. 1996. PRISM III: an updated pediatric risk of mortality score. Crit. Care Med. 24:743-752.[CrossRef][Medline]
    20. 20
  20. Prader, A., R. H. Largo, L. Molinari, and C. Issler. 1989. Physical growth of Swiss children from birth to 20 years of age. First Zurich longitudinal study of growth and development. Helv. Paediatr. Acta 52(Suppl.):1-125.
    21. 21
  21. Reed, M. D., R. M. Kliegman, T. S. Yamashita, C. M. Myers, and J. L. Blumer. 1990. Clinical pharmacology of imipenem and cilastatin in premature infants during the first week of life. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:1172-1177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    22. 22
  22. Routledge, P. A. 1994. Pharmacokinetics in children. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 34(Suppl. A):19-24.
    23. 23
  23. Steward, C. D., J. M. Mohammed, J. M. Swenson, S. A. Stocker, P. P. Williams, R. P. Gaynes, J. E. McGowan, Jr., and F. C. Tenover. 2003. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of carbapenems: multicenter validity testing and accuracy levels of five antimicrobial test methods for detecting resistance in Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:351-358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    24. 24
  24. Tegeder, I., A. Schmidtko, L. Brautigam, A. Kirschbaum, G. Geisslinger, and J. Lotsch. 2002. Tissue distribution of imipenem in critically ill patients. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 71:325-333.[CrossRef][Medline]
    25. 25
  25. Vogelman, B., S. Gudmundsson, J. Leggett, J. Turnidge, S. Ebert, and W. A. Craig. 1988. Correlation of antimicrobial pharmacokinetic parameters with therapeutic efficacy in an animal model. J. Infect. Dis. 158:831-847.[Medline]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2006, p. 2563-2568, Vol. 50, No. 7
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01149-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lamoth, F., Buclin, T., Pascual, A., Calandra, T., Marchetti, O. (2009). Imipenem underdosing as a cause of persistent neutropenic fever?. J Antimicrob Chemother 64: 665-667 [Full Text]  
  • Jaruratanasirikul, S., Sudsai, T. (2009). Comparison of the pharmacodynamics of imipenem in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia following administration by 2 or 0.5 h infusion. J Antimicrob Chemother 63: 560-563 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lamoth, F., Buclin, T., Csajka, C., Pascual, A., Calandra, T., Marchetti, O. (2009). Reassessment of Recommended Imipenem Doses in Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Hematological Malignancies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 785-787 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giannoni, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bugnon, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giannoni, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bugnon, D.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»