AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, G.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, G.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2006, p. 3142-3145, Vol. 50, No. 9
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00342-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Generation of a Reporter Cell Line for Detection of Infectious Varicella-Zoster Virus and Its Application to Antiviral Studies

Guan-Qing Wang,1,{dagger} Tatsuo Suzutani,2 Yumiko Yamamoto,1 Yoshiko Fukui,1 Naoki Nozawa,1 D. Scott Schmid,3 Ichiro Kurane,1 and Naoki Inoue1*

Department of Virology I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan,1 Department of Microbiology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan,2 National Varicella-Zoster Virus Laboratory, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia3

Received 22 March 2006/ Returned for modification 27 April 2006/ Accepted 5 July 2006


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Text
 References
 
To simplify the titration of infectious varicella-zoster virus (VZV), we generated a reporter cell line that produced luciferase in a dose-dependent manner upon infection with cell-free VZV. A few VZV-infected cells were detectable by coculturing with the cell line. We demonstrated the usefulness of the cell line for antiviral studies.


   TEXT
Top
 Abstract
 Text
References
 
Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) causes varicella on primary infection and zoster upon reactivation. Both conditions may be associated with severe complications (1). For the treatment of VZV-associated diseases, acyclovir (ACV), valaciclovir, and famciclovir have been used widely (1, 25). The number of approved drugs for treating VZV diseases is limited, and all of them have the same mode of action. The development of resistant strains and the ineffectiveness of available antivirals at preventing complications have necessitated a search for alternative compounds (7, 8, 25, 33). Several new compounds have been under investigation (13, 20, 21, 31, 32). Plaque reduction assays have been routinely used to screen and evaluate candidate compounds, but this method is made laborious and time consuming due to the slow growth of VZV in tissue culture. Some methods aimed at reducing the inconvenience have been developed (26, 27, 34), as has a biochemical assay for characterization of ACV-resistant strains (29). However, the unavailability of a rapid, high-throughput assay for titrating VZV has hampered efforts both to screen new compounds and to detect drug-resistant strains in a timely fashion.

Previously, we established a reporter cell line for human herpesvirus 8 and demonstrated its practical uses (10, 11, 14). We report here the generation of a similar cell line for VZV by use of the following approach: (i) selection of the most suitable promoter from various promoters, (ii) identification of the minimum sequence length for efficient activation of the selected promoter to avoid nonspecific activation, (iii) establishment of a cell line that contains the reporter gene under the control of the minimum promoter, and (iv) characterization of the clone that performed best.

Characterization of individual VZV promoters and global VZV gene expression have been reported previously (4, 5, 12). On the basis of those studies, various DNA fragments containing known or putative VZV promoters (Table 1) were amplified from the nucleocapsid DNA of VZV pOka strain by PCR, cloned into a luciferase vector pGL3-Basic, and then analyzed for their responses to VZV infection in transient transfection experiments using BSC40 cells (3) and MeWo cells (9). Among the promoters examined, the ORF9 promoter was most strongly activated in both cell lines (Fig. 1). Activation of each promoter was also analyzed by cotransfection with a plasmid expressing VZV IE62. The correlation between infection- and IE62-mediated activation (Fig. 1C) was good, indicating that infection-mediated activation was VZV specific.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Comparison of VZV promoter activities

 

Figure 1
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Comparison of VZV promoter activities. MeWo (7 x 104 cells/well) (A) and BSC40 (2.4 x 104 cells/well) cells (B) in 96-well plates were transfected with 125 ng of a reporter plasmid containing the promoter for the indicated open reading frame (ORF) along with 4 ng of a Renilla luciferase-expressing plasmid (pRL-CMV; Promega) as an internal control, by using FuGENE 6 (Roche). pGL3-Basic, a vector plasmid used to clone the promoters, was used as a negative control (–). At 24 h after transfection, the cells were infected with VZV at an multiplicity of infection of ~0.02, and 1 day later, both firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were determined by a chemiluminescent assay reaction (Dual-Glo luciferase assay system; Promega) followed by measurement of relative light units (RLU) with a luminometer (JNR AB2300; ATTO, Japan). Means and standard deviations (SDs) of RLU from triplicate wells are shown. (C) Correlation of IE62- and infection-dependent promoter activation. MeWo cells were transfected with each reporter plasmid along with an IE62-expressing plasmid, and 2 days later their luciferase activities were measured and compared with those represented in panel A. Each circle represents one promoter-reporter construct. An arrow indicates ORF9.

 
The minimal essential region for the ORF9 promoter was mapped to a 93-bp-long sequence by progressively truncating the promoter (Fig. 2). The patterns of relative promoter activity among the constructs were similar in infected and IE62-transfected cells. A 2-bp substitution introduced into the upstream stimulating factor (USF) motif reduced the promoter activity, supporting the importance of the USF-binding site reported for some VZV promoters (16, 17, 19). Since the presence of intact USF sites did not always correlate with promoter activity, further study will be needed to identify the sequence or context that makes the ORF9 promoter more responsive than the others.


Figure 2
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. Minimum ORF9 promoter region for responses to VZV infection and to IE62. (A) Reporter plasmids containing truncated ORF9 promoter sequences, 9C, 9D, 9F, 9G, and 9I were constructed. A duplicated form of the minimum essential 93-bp sequence (9G) was cloned into BamHI site of pGL3-Basic, resulting in pGL-T9G. (B) The sequence of the minimum essential region of the ORF9 promoter (9G) and the USF binding motif in the region are shown. A 2-bp alteration (CACGTG to CAtaTG) of the USF binding motif (9U) was introduced into the sequence. (C and D) Activities of the modified promoters represented in panels A and B were analyzed in transient transfection experiments. Means and SDs of luciferase activities from triplicate wells are shown. pGL3-Basic (vector) used for cloning of the promoters was used as a negative control.

 
Duplication of the minimal promoter region between 34 and 127 bp upstream of ORF9 (T9G) increased the promoter activity twofold. As such, our VZV reporter cell line was generated by transfecting MeWo cells with pGL-T9G, together with a plasmid encoding the G418-resistant gene. The cell clone MV9G was selected from 86 G418-resistant clones based on two criteria: high luciferase activities on VZV infection and low background activity in the absence of the infection.

The luciferase activity in MV9G increased gradually after infection, and the activity increased in a dose-dependent manner with a detection limit of 50 PFU (Fig. 3). Coculturing of VZV-infected cells with MV9G cells induced luciferase activities with a detection limit of fewer than 10 infected cells (Fig. 3C). No luciferase activity was detected in MV9G cells cocultured with cells infected with human cytomegalovirus (Towne), human herpesvirus 6 (Z29) (15), or human herpesvirus 7 (SB) (2) or in MV9G cells directly infected with cell-free human cytomegalovirus. In contrast, MV9G cells infected with herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) resulted in luciferase activities similar to those seen with VZV-infected cells at 24 h after infection. However, at 48 h after infection, the infected cells showed strong cytopathic effect and their luciferase activities decreased, making it practical to distinguish HSV-1 infection from VZV infection.


Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. Characterization of VZV reporter cell line MV9G. (A) Time-dependent activation of the reporter cell line after VZV infection. MV9G cells in 96-well plates were infected with 60 and 600 PFU of VZV and incubated for 2 h. After removal of the inoculums, cells were cultured for the indicated period (in hours), rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline, and stored at –80°C until luciferase activity was measured. Means and SDs of luciferase activities from triplicate wells are shown. (B) MV9G cells were infected with the indicated PFU of VZV and incubated for 2 h. After removal of the inoculums, the cells were cultured for an additional 46 h. Means and SDs of luciferase activities from triplicate wells are shown. (C) MV9G cells were infected with cell-associated virus, and their luciferase activities were measured 2 days later. MeWo cells were infected with the same cell-associated virus, and the numbers of the infected cells used for the inoculation were obtained by immunostaining using anti-VZV IE62 monoclonal antibody (MAb8616; Chemicon International). The luciferase activities were compared with the numbers of the infected cells.

 
For proof of concept, we evaluated the usefulness of MV9G cells for antiviral studies. MeWo cells were infected with cell-associated VZV or with cell-free VZV, cultured in the presence of ACV, and then cocultured with MV9G cells (Fig. 4A). The 50% effective concentration (EC50) of ACV against infection with cell-free virus was <5 µg/ml, which is consistent with the reported EC50 (~2 µg/ml) (13, 18, 28). The EC50 against infection with cell-associated virus was 10 to 20 µg/ml. Note that the EC50 of ACV is known to be higher when infections are induced using cell-associated virus (24). ACV treatment decreased luciferase activity only slightly in MV9G cells infected directly with cell-free virus; this was not unexpected, since the reporter gene expression in MV9G depends on a promoter that is active during the early phase of infection.


Figure 4
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4. Applications of the reporter cell assay. (A) MeWo cells (7 x 104 cells/well) in 96-well plates were inoculated with cell-associated VZV (~1 x 103 MeWo cells infected with VZV; cytopathic effect > 70%) ({circ}, "cell-associated") or with 250 PFU of cell-free VZV (•, "cell-free") and cultured in the presence or absence of the indicated concentrations of ACV. Two days later, MV9G cells (7 x 104 cells/well) were added to each well and cocultured in the presence of ACV for 1 day. The cells were harvested, and their luciferase activities were measured. Means and SDs of luciferase activities from triplicate wells are shown. (B) MeWo cells (7 x 104 cells/well) in 96-well plates were inoculated with approximately 200 of MeWo cells infected with TK-positive (pOka [•] and CaQu [{blacklozenge}]) or -negative (rOkaYSR [{circ}] and Kanno [{Delta}]) strains (22, 23, 28), and cultured in the presence of ACV for 2 days. Then, MV9G cells were overlaid and cocultured for 1 day. The luciferase activities in the ACV-treated cultures were expressed as percent RLU, with the activities obtained in the culture without inhibitor treatment used as a standard. Means and SDs of luciferase activities from triplicate wells are shown. (C) MeWo cells (7 x 104 cells/well) were infected with cell-associated VZV, cultured for 2 days, and then cocultured with MV9G for 1 day (•, "coculture"). MV9G cells (7 x 104 cells/well) were directly infected with 400 PFU of cell-free VZV, and cultured for 2 days ({circ}, "direct infection"). Roscovitine was added at the indicated concentrations throughout the processes. Means and SDs of luciferase activities from triplicate wells are shown.

 
We also examined the ability to detect ACV-resistant strains by coculturing MV9G cells with a small number of the cells that were infected and treated with ACV (Fig. 4B). The average EC50 of ACV for thymidine kinase (TK)-deficient strains was ~40 µg/ml, which was much higher than that observed for TK-positive strains. The use of a reporter cell assay thus eliminates the need for laborious preparation of cell-free VZV stocks for the detection of ACV-resistant strains, providing a strong practical advantage.

Roscovitine, a kinase inhibitor, decreased luciferase activities, both in directly infected MV9G cells and in MV9G cells cocultured with MeWo cells that were infected in the presence of roscovitine (Fig. 4C). This suggests that at least part of its inhibitory effect occurs in the early phase of infection, which is consistent with previous reports (30). Cellular factors required for virus infection are attractive targets for the development of novel antiviral drugs. High-throughput screening of compounds in a cell-based assay is essential for that purpose, and MV9G appears to be ideally suited for that role.

In conclusion, the VZV reporter cell assays developed here are expected to foster the efficient evaluation of new antiviral compounds for the treatment of VZV-associated diseases.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Jennifer Lynch for pGL-ORF47 and -ORF66 plasmids, Bill Ruyechan for pGL-ORF67 plasmid, and Koich Yamanishi for pOka.

This work was supported by a Grant-on-Aid for Science from the Ministry of Education, Science, Technology and Sports, Japan (N.I.), and by the Research on Health Sciences focusing on Drug Innovation program of Japanese Human Science Foundation (T.S., D.S.S., N.I.). G.-Q.W. was a fellow supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of Herpesviruses, Department of Virology I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, 1-23-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8640. Phone: 81-3-5285-1111, ext. 2528. Fax: 81-3-5285-1180. E-mail: ninoue{at}nih.go.jp. Back

{dagger} Present address: Department of Dermatology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, and Department of Dermatology, Medical College of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 

  1. Arvin, A. M. 2002. Antiviral therapy for varicella and herpes zoster. Semin. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 13:12-21.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Black, J. B., N. Inoue, K. Kite-Powell, S. Zaki, and P. E. Pellett. 1993. Frequent isolation of human herpesvirus 7 from saliva. Virus Res. 29:91-98.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Brockman, W. W., and D. Nathans. 1974. The isolation of simian virus 40 variants with specifically altered genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71:942-946.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cohen, J. I., and S. E. Straus. 2001. Varicella-zoster virus and its replication, p. 2707-2730. In D. M. Knipe and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 4th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa.
  5. Cohrs, R. J., M. P. Hurley, and D. H. Gilden. 2003. Array analysis of viral gene transcription during lytic infection of cells in tissue culture with varicella-zoster virus. J. Virol. 77:11718-11732.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Davison, A. J., and J. E. Scott. 1986. The complete DNA sequence of varicella-zoster virus. J. Gen. Virol. 67:1759-1816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Field, A. K., and K. K. Biron. 1994. "The end of innocence" revisited: resistance of herpesviruses to antiviral drugs. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 7:1-13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Gilbert, C., J. Bestman-Smith, and G. Boivin. 2002. Resistance of herpesviruses to antiviral drugs: clinical impacts and molecular mechanisms. Drug Resist. Updates 5:88-114.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Grose, C., and P. A. Brunel. 1978. Varicella-zoster virus: isolation and propagation in human melanoma cells at 36 and 32 degrees C. Infect. Immun. 19:199-203.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Inoue, N., T. Spira, L. Lam, J. L. Corchero, and W. Luo. 2004. Comparison of serologic responses between Kaposi's sarcoma-positive and -negative men who were seropositive for both human herpesvirus 8 and human immunodeficiency virus. J. Med. Virol. 74:202-206.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Inoue, N., J. Winter, R. B. Lal, M. K. Offermann, and S. Koyano. 2003. Characterization of entry mechanisms of human herpesvirus 8 by using an Rta-dependent reporter cell line. J. Virol. 77:8147-8152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Kennedy, P. G., E. Grinfeld, M. Craigon, K. Vierlinger, D. Roy, T. Forster, and P. Ghazal. 2005. Transcriptomal analysis of varicella-zoster virus infection using long oligonucleotide-based microarrays. J. Gen. Virol. 86:2673-2684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kern, E. R., N. L. Kushner, C. B. Hartline, S. L. Williams-Aziz, E. A. Harden, S. Zhou, J. Zemlicka, and M. N. Prichard. 2005. In vitro activity and mechanism of action of methylenecyclopropane analogs of nucleosides against herpesvirus replication. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:1039-1045.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Krug, L. T., V. P. Pozharskaya, Y. Yu, N. Inoue, and M. K. Offermann. 2004. Inhibition of infection and replication of human herpesvirus 8 in microvascular endothelial cells by alpha interferon and phosphonoformic acid. J. Virol. 78:8359-8371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lopez, C., P. Pellett, J. Stewart, C. Goldsmith, K. Sanderlin, J. Black, D. Warfield, and P. Feorino. 1988. Characteristics of human herpesvirus-6. J. Infect. Dis. 157:1271-1273.[Medline]
  16. Meier, J. L., X. Luo, M. Sawadogo, and S. E. Straus. 1994. The cellular transcription factor USF cooperates with varicella-zoster virus immediate-early protein 62 to symmetrically activate a bidirectional viral promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:6896-6906.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Michael, E. J., K. M. Kuck, and P. R. Kinchington. 1998. Anatomy of the varicella-zoster virus open-reading frame 4 promoter. J. Infect. Dis. 178(Suppl. 1):S27-S33.
  18. Morfin, F., D. Thouvenot, M. Turenne-Tessier, B. Lina, M. Aymard, and T. Ooka. 1999. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of thymidine kinase from clinical strains of varicella-zoster virus resistant to acyclovir. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2412-2416.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Rahaus, M., N. Desloges, M. Yang, W. T. Ruyechan, and M. H. Wolff. 2003. Transcription factor USF, expressed during the entire phase of varicella-zoster virus infection, interacts physically with the major viral transactivator IE62 and plays a significant role in virus replication. J. Gen. Virol. 84:2957-2967.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Schang, L. M. 2005. Advances on cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) as novel targets for antiviral drugs. Curr. Drug Targets Infect. Disord. 5:29-37.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Schnute, M. E., M. M. Cudahy, R. J. Brideau, F. L. Homa, T. A. Hopkins, M. L. Knechtel, N. L. Oien, T. W. Pitts, R. A. Poorman, M. W. Wathen, and J. L. Wieber. 2005. 4-Oxo-4,7-dihydrothieno[2,3-b]pyridines as non-nucleoside inhibitors of human cytomegalovirus and related herpesvirus polymerases. J. Med. Chem. 48:5794-5804.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Shigeta, S., S. Mori, T. Yokota, K. Konno, and E. De Clercq. 1986. Characterization of a varicella-zoster virus variant with altered thymidine kinase activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 29:1053-1058.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Shigeta, S., T. Yokota, T. Iwabuchi, M. Baba, K. Konno, M. Ogata, and E. De Clercq. 1983. Comparative efficacy of antiherpes drugs against various strains of varicella-zoster virus. J. Infect. Dis. 147:576-584.[Medline]
  24. Shiraki, K., H. Ochiai, J. Namazue, T. Okuno, S. Ogino, K. Hayashi, K. Yamanishi, and M. Takahashi. 1992. Comparison of antiviral assay methods using cell-free and cell-associated varicella-zoster virus. Antiviral Res. 18:209-214.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Snoeck, R., G. Andrei, and E. De Clercq. 1999. Current pharmacological approaches to the therapy of varicella zoster virus infections: a guide to treatment. Drugs 57:187-206.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Snoeck, R., D. Schols, C. Sadzot-Delvaux, J. M. Cloes, G. Andrei, E. De Clercq, J. Piette, and B. Rentier. 1992. Flow cytometric method for the detection of gpI antigens of varicella zoster virus and evaluation of anti-VZV agents. J. Virol. Methods 38:243-254.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Standring-Cox, R., T. H. Bacon, and B. A. Howard. 1996. Comparison of a DNA probe assay with the plaque reduction assay for measuring the sensitivity of herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus to penciclovir and acyclovir. J. Virol. Methods 56:3-11.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Suzutani, T., M. Ogasawara, T. Shibaki, and M. Azuma. 2000. Susceptibility of protein kinase (ORF47)-deficient varicella-zoster virus strains to anti-herpesvirus nucleosides. Antiviral Res. 45:79-82.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Suzutani, T., M. Saijo, M. Nagamine, M. Ogasawara, and M. Azuma. 2000. Rapid phenotypic characterization method for herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus thymidine kinases to screen for acyclovir-resistant viral infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1839-1844.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Taylor, S. L., P. R. Kinchington, A. Brooks, and J. F. Moffat. 2004. Roscovitine, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, prevents replication of varicella-zoster virus. J. Virol. 78:2853-2862.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Villarreal, E. C. 2003. Current and potential therapies for the treatment of herpes-virus infections. Prog. Drug Res. 60:263-307.[Medline]
  32. Visalli, R. J., and M. van Zeijl. 2003. DNA encapsidation as a target for anti-herpesvirus drug therapy. Antiviral Res. 59:73-87.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Visse, B., B. Dumont, J. M. Huraux, and A. M. Fillet. 1998. Single amino acid change in DNA polymerase is associated with foscarnet resistance in a varicella-zoster virus strain recovered from a patient with AIDS. J. Infect. Dis. 178(Suppl. 1):S55-S57.
  34. Weinberg, A., J. C. Clark, S. A. Schneider, B. Forghani, and M. J. Levin. 1996. Improved detection of varicella zoster infection with a spin amplification shell vial technique and blind passage. Clin. Diagn. Virol. 5:61-65.[CrossRef][Medline]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2006, p. 3142-3145, Vol. 50, No. 9
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00342-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, G.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, G.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, N.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS