Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2006, p. 3150-3153, Vol. 50, No. 9
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00141-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Greater Los Angeles Veterans Administration Healthcare Systems,1 Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California2
Received 2 February 2006/ Returned for modification 13 April 2006/ Accepted 12 June 1006
|
|
|---|
bmeB1
bmeB3
bmeB12
bmeB15) were selected with antimicrobials. Ampicillin, doripenem, imipenem, levofloxacin, and metronidazole selected for mutants from both strains; cefoxitin selected for mutants from strain ADB77 only; and sodium dodecyl sulfate selected mutants from ADB77
bmeB1
bmeB3
bmeB12
bmeB15 only. The mutants overexpressed one or more efflux pumps. |
|
|---|
The parent strains used in this study were B. fragilis ADB77 (Wadsworth Anaerobe Laboratory [WAL] strain 108), an isogen of B. fragilis 638R optimized for gene deletion, and its derivative, a quadruple bmeB deletion mutant, ADB77
bmeB1
bmeB3
bmeB12
bmeB15 (WAL 219) (7). Antimicrobial MICs for each strain were determined with the spiral gradient endpoint method (14). Mutants were selected from the strains described above by the spiral plater technique (9) in a single step on a gradient of increasing antimicrobial concentrations on brucella blood agar plates. Twenty-one antimicrobials (antibiotics, detergents, and dyes) were tested: ampicillin (AMP), cefoperazone, cefotaxime, ceftizoxime, cephalexin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, doripenem (DPM), faropenem (FPM), gatifloxacin, imipenem (IPM), levofloxacin (LVX), meropenem, metronidazole (MDZ), moxifloxacin, norfloxacin, tetracycline, ethidium bromide (ETBR), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and triclosan. The antimicrobials were deposited in a radially decreasing concentration gradient from the center to the outside of the plate by using a spiral plater (Autoplate 4000; Advanced Instruments, Norwood, MA). The strains were resuspended in brucella broth to an optical density equivalent to the 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard (108 CFU/ml) and were inoculated along the antimicrobial concentration gradient. The assay plates were incubated for 12 to 24 h at 37°C under anaerobic conditions. The bacteria grew from the edge of the plate toward the center. The end radius (ER) where growth stopped was the MIC. Susceptibility studies were performed on at least three independent occasions. A fourfold or greater difference in susceptibility was considered significant. The effects of efflux pump inhibitors (EPIs) were determined by measuring the decrease in antimicrobial MICs after incorporation of 25 µg/ml carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) or reserpine (RPN).
Incubation of the MIC assay plates for 48 to 60 h resulted in isolated mutant colonies growing as a tail beyond the MIC up the concentration gradient to the tail end radius (TER) (Fig. 1). Five of 21 antimicrobials, ampicillin, doripenem, imipenem, meteronidazole, and levofloxacin, selected mutants from both strains (strains 108-AMP, 108-DPM, 108-IPM, 108-MDZ, 108-LVX 219-AMP, 219-DPM, 219-IPM, 219-MDZ, and 219-LVX); cefoxitin (FOX) selected a mutant from the wild type only (strain 108-FOX), and SDS selected a mutant from the deletion mutant only (strain 219-SDS). All mutants were resistant to at least three antimicrobial classes and were therefore multidrug resistant (Table 1). The MDR antibiograms varied between the mutants and were stable even after repeated subculture on antibiotic-free medium (MIC data were reproducible between three independent experiments). The selection of MDR mutants by SDS was particularly intriguing, especially since SDS is a fairly ubiquitous component of normal household and cosmetic cleansers. A correlation between the use of antiseptics/disinfectants and antibiotic resistance (11) has been reported, and triclosan has been shown to select for MDR mutants in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (10). However, to our knowledge this is the first study demonstrating the selection of MDR mutants by a detergent. Due to the sheer number of antimicrobials used and the mutants selected, only antibiotics that selected mutants were used as representatives to determine the effects of EPIs on MICs. Studies usually show two- to fourfold effects of EPIs on MICs (6). In the current study, both EPIs reduced the MICs of the antimicrobials tested (ampicillin, cefoxitin, doripenem, imipenem, levofloxacin, metronidazole, norfloxacin, and SDS; P < 0.05) by up to fourfold, suggesting that energy-dependent efflux was a major mechanism of resistance in the MDR mutants selected (Table 1).
![]() View larger version (90K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Mutant selection with metronidazole by the spiral plater technique. (A) Locations 1 and 2, the wild-type strain (strain ADB77) that gave rise to mutants; locations 3 and 4, strain ADB77 bmeB1 bmeB3 bmeB12 bmeB15 that gave rise to mutants; location 5, metronidazole-resistant control strain; (B) enlargement of location 2. Colonies arose within the region (indicated by the white arrow, which also shows the increasing antibiotic concentration) between the endpoint radius (MIC) to the tail end radius (indicated by the two white lines).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of selected mutants
|

CT) method (7, 12). Data from five experiments were analyzed by Student's t test, and a P value of
0.05 was considered significant. A twofold or greater difference in expression was considered different. All mutants except for 219-DPM overexpressed one or more of the bmeB genes by greater than twofold (Table 2). Changes were detected in 11 of 16 bmeB genes (bmeB1, bmeB2, bmeB3, bmeB4, bmeB5, bmeB6, bmeB7, bmeB11, bmeB12, bmeB15, bmeB16). The order of the greatest fold overexpression was bmeB4 (14.9-fold), bmeB7 (14.0-fold), bmeB15 (9.1-fold), bmeB11 (7.9-fold), bmeB5 (6.3-fold), bmeB6 (6.2-fold), bmeB16 (4.3-fold), bmeB1 (4.2-fold), bmeB3 (3.7-fold), bmeB2 (3.2-fold), and bmeB12 (2.4-fold). The order of frequency of overexpression (the number of isolates in which the pump was overexpressed) was bmeB4 (six isolates); bmeB1 (five isolates); bmeB2, bmeB5, bmeB7, and bmeB11 (four isolates each); bmeB3, bmeB6, and bmeB12 (two isolates each); and bmeB15 and bmeB16 (one isolate each). A large number of publications on gene expression coupled with physiological data have shown that changes in gene expression as low as twofold can have a significant physiological impact, and real-time RT-PCR is a highly sensitive method which has been extensively used to study the differential expression of efflux pumps (2, 12). Therefore, the changes observed in this study were significant.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Efflux pump overexpression in mutants selected from strain 108 (ADB77) and its derivative bmeB quadruple deletion mutant 219 (ADB77 bmeB1 bmeB3 bmeB12 bmeB15)
|
In summary, antimicrobials can select for MDR mutants that overexpress bmeB genes; overexpression of particular bmeB genes is associated with certain MDR antibiograms. When several bmeB genes are missing (i.e., in strain 219), the mutant selection potential of antimicrobials is unchanged, reduced, or increased. Mutant 219-DPM did not overexpress any bmeB pumps and yet had an MDR profile which was affected by EPIs. In addition, mutants 219-LVX and 219-SDS overexpressed bmeB4 only but had high-level MDR profiles which differed slightly. These data suggest that a non-RND efflux gene(s) is also overexpressed, especially when several RND pumps are missing.
In conclusion, the mutant selection window (MSW) hypothesis postulates that bacterial mutant subpopulations resistant to antimicrobials are selected predominantly when drug concentrations are above the MIC but below the mutant prevention concentration (MPC; i.e., the lowest concentration where further mutant selection is prevented) (1, 15). In this study, the ER represented the MIC and the TER represented the MPC, and mutants were selected as a tail in the window between these concentrations. Therefore, these data support the MSW hypothesis. A recent animal model study of infection demonstrated that levofloxacin-resistant mutants of Staphylococcus aureus were most readily selected when antimicrobial concentrations at the site of infection fluctuated within the MSW defined in vitro (J. Cui, Y. Liu, W. Tong, K. Drlica, and X. Zhao, Abstr. 45th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. 431, 2005). Since several of the agents tested in our study are used in therapy for infections involving B. fragilis and our own studies have also demonstrated overexpression of bmeB efflux pump genes in clinical isolates of B. fragilis (7a), the data presented here could reflect a mechanism by which multidrug resistant isolates could arise during therapy.
B. fragilis ADB77 (WAL 108) and pADB242, a plasmid used to construct WAL 219, were kind gifts from Michael Malamy, Tufts University Medical School, Boston, MA.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»