Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2006, p. 3194-3196, Vol. 50, No. 9
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00246-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Dermatology,1 Institute for Infection Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany2
Received 27 February 2006/ Returned for modification 22 March 2006/ Accepted 7 July 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Another class of human antimicrobial proteins are represented by members of the RNase A superfamily, among them ECP (eosinophil cationic protein/RNase 3), EDN (eosinophil-derived neurotoxin/RNase 2), angiogenin (RNase 5), and RNase 7 (6, 7, 9, 14). Recently, a novel member of the RNase A superfamiliy, termed RNase 8, has been discovered by searching the human genome databases (15). Interestingly, RNase 8 and RNase 7 have an amino acid sequence similarity of 78% and a genomic distance of only 15,000 bp, suggesting that their genes may have evolved from a common ancestor gene by a duplication event (15). RNase 7 exhibits potent antimicrobial activity against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria (6, 14). Although one study reported no antimicrobial activity of a recombinant RNase 8 fusion protein against Escherichia coli (15), the high similarity of RNase 8 to the antimicrobially active RNase 7 suggests that RNase 8 might also act as an antimicrobial protein.
To investigate this hypothesis, we generated recombinant RNase 8 in E. coli. We used the program SignalP 3.0 (1) to determine the putative cleavage site in the RNase 8 amino acid sequence to generate the mature protein (Fig. 1A). The corresponding DNA encoding RNase 8 was amplified from genomic DNA (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) using the forward primer 5'-ACTGCATATGAAGCCCAAGGACATGACATCA-3' and reverse primer 5'-ATTTGCGGCCGCTTAGACAACTTTATCCAAGTGCA-3'. The resulting fragment was cloned into the expression vector pQE-2 (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) to generate a fusion protein containing an N-terminal His tag sequence allowing purification of the fusion protein by the use of a nickel affinity column (Fig. 1B). After expression of the fusion protein in E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS (Novagen, Madison, Wis.) the protein was purified using a nickel affinity column (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), followed by C8 reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) as described previously for the purification of human beta-defensin-3 (5). The N-terminal part of the purified fusion protein was cleaved off by dipeptidyl aminopeptidase I (QIAGEN), and the resulting mature RNase 8 protein was purified by C2/C18 reversed-phase HPLC as previously described (5). Mass analysis using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (QTOF-II hybrid mass spectrometer; Micromass, Manchester, United Kingdom) yielded a mass of 14,201.4 Da, which is 8 Da less than the theoretical mass calculated from the deduced amino acid sequence (14,209.3 kDa), suggesting that the eight cysteyl residues of RNase 8 are connected through four disulfide bridges.
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Recombinant generation of RNase 8 in E. coli. (A) Amino acid sequence of RNase 8 (single-letter code). Processing at the indicated putative cleavage site (arrow) leads to the mature RNase 8 sequence (boldface letters), which was recombinantly expressed in E. coli. The cysteyl residues presumably involved in disulfide bridges are underlined. (B) Strategy for expression of RNase 8 in E. coli. RNase 8 was expressed as a fusion protein containing an N-terminal His tag sequence. Cleavage of the expressed fusion protein with dipeptidyl aminopeptidase I results in the mature RNase 8 protein.
|
99.9% killing) or as the concentration necessary to kill 90% of the microorganisms (90% lethal dose [LD90]). RNase 8 exhibited a broad spectrum of potent antimicrobial activity against various bacterial strains tested. Many tested strains of gram-positive cocci, gram-negative fermentative rods, and gram-negative nonfermentative rods were shown to be highly susceptible (Table 1). In particular, many pathogenic bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae were killed by small amounts of RNase 8 (LD90 = 0.1 to 0.4 µM). Also the yeast Candida albicans was efficiently killed by RNase 8 (LD90 = 0.2 µM). To directly compare the antimicrobial activity of RNase 8 with the activity of RNase 7, we tested natural RNase 7 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 10145) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 12600). An LD90 value of 0.1 µM for both Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus indicates a slightly higher activity of RNase 7 compared to RNase 8.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Antimicrobial activity of RNase 8 against various clinically relevant microorganisms
|
The signal sequence of RNase 8 (Fig. 1A) displays a high similarity with the signal sequence of RNase 7 (85% identity). Since RNase 7 is secreted by epithelial cells (6; our unpublished data), one can speculate that RNase 8 may also be secreted. However, this remains to be proven.
Since several antimicrobial proteins have been reported to exhibit cytotoxic activity against eukaryotic cells, RNase 8 was also assayed for hemolytic activity against human erythrocytes as previously described (5). Little hemolytic activity was observed after incubation of erythrocytes with up to 28 µM RNase 8 (Fig. 2A). These data indicate that the killing activity of RNase 8 is specific for microorganisms and does not affect human cells.
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Hemolytic activity and salt sensitivity of RNase 8. (A) For analysis of hemolytic activity RNase 8 was incubated at 37°C for 3 h with 1 x 109 human erythrocytes/ml in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.34 M sucrose. Hemolysis was determined by measuring the A450 of the supernatants using 0.1% Triton X-100 for 100% hemolysis. (B) To test the salt sensitivity of RNase 8, E. coli (ATCC 35218) was treated with 3.5 µM RNase 8 in the presence of various concentrations of NaCl.
|
As mentioned above Zhang and colleagues recently reported that RNase 8 exhibits no antibacterial activity (15), an observation that is at variance with our results reported here. However, in contrast to our study Zhang et al. examined antibacterial activity against E. coli by measuring the growth of E. coli that expressed a recombinant RNase 8-FLAG fusion protein (15). These methodological differences may most likely account for the different results of these studies.
In summary, our data suggest that RNase 8 could contribute to innate immunity by acting as a potent antimicrobial protein. The broad-spectrum activity of RNase 8 also against multiresistant strains indicates that RNase 8 may be a useful agent for treating infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
We thank C. Butzeck-Mehrens, J. Quitzau, K. Schultz, and S. Voss for excellent technical assistance.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»