Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2007, p. 3734-3736, Vol. 51, No. 10
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00369-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
The Antifungal Polyketide Ambruticin Targets the HOG Pathway
Leandro Vetcher,1
Hugo G. Menzella,1
Toshiaki Kudo,2
Takayuki Motoyama,2 and
Leonard Katz1*
Kosan Biosciences, Inc., 3832 Bay Center Place, Hayward, California 94545,1
RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan2
Received 19 March 2007/
Returned for modification 13 June 2007/
Accepted 1 August 2007

ABSTRACT
The polyketide ambruticin is an attractive candidate for drug
development as an antifungal agent, but its mechanism of action
has not yet been elucidated. Here we present evidence that ambruticin
exerts its effect by targeting HOG, the osmotic stress control
pathway, through Hik1, a group III histidine kinase.

TEXT
Ambruticins are polyketides of unusual structure produced by
strains of
Sorangium (
Polyangium)
cellulosum (
4,
9,
17). The
S and VS congeners (Fig.
1) have potent antifungal activity
and might provide new drugs to treat certain fungal infections.
Ambruticin S and two derivatives of ambruticin VS3 have been
shown to cure mice of acute pulmonary coccidodiomycosis or histoplasmosis
with twice-a-day oral dosing (
6,
18). Similarly, oral administration
of an analog of ambruticin VS3 significantly reduced pulmonary
fungal burdens and promoted improved survival in a murine model
of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (
3).
A number of fungicides, including phenylpyrroles (e.g., pyrrolnitrin
and fludioxonil), dicarboximides (e.g., vinclozolin, iprodione,
and procymidone), and aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g., chloroneb
and quintozene), used commercially to protect crops from fungal
disease, exert their antifungal effects by inducing the high-osmolarity
glycerol (HOG) signaling pathway, resulting in the accumulation
of glycerol, with a concomitant accumulation of free fatty acids.
In the absence of high external osmolarity, intracellular accumulation
of glycerol causes leakage of cellular contents and ultimately
results in cell death (
11). Previous work has shown that ambruticin
may also mediate its effect through the HOG signaling pathway.
Fungal strains resistant to jerangolid, a compound similar in
structure to ambruticin, are cross-resistant to pyrrolnitrin
(
8), and accumulation of glycerol occurs when
Hansenula anomala is treated with ambruticin or pyrrolnitrin (
11). The HOG pathway
for osmoregulation has been characterized in considerable detail
in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (
10) and also in the filamentous
fungus
Neurospora crassa (
12). Osmotic stress is thought to
be sensed by one or more histidine kinases in the fungal membrane
or cytosol, and the expression of many genes is activated through
a signal transduction pathway homologous to the mitogen-activated
kinase (MAPK) pathway of animals (
15). In
S. cerevisiae, the
sensor is believed to be Sln1, a group VI histidine kinase (
2).
Sln1 transmits the stress response signal through a two-component
system (Sln1-Ypd1-Ssk1) and MAPK cascade (Ssk2/Ssk22-Pbs2-Hog1).
Under high-osmolarity conditions, Ssk1 is dephosphorylated;
dephospho-Ssk1 activates the downstream MAPK cascade. Phospho-Hog1
is necessary to turn on the genes for high-osmolarity adaptation,
resulting in a number of events, including glycerol accumulation.
Filamentous fungi have similar signal transduction pathways,
and group III histidine kinases (Os-1 orthologues) and group
VI histidine kinases are thought to sense osmotic stress. Mutations
that knock out the HOG pathway in
N. crassa cause both hypersensitivity
to osmotic stress and resistance to phenylpyrroles (
20). The
fungicide dicarboximide also seems to act via the HOG pathway,
and several reports have suggested that the target of both dicarboximides
and phenylpyrroles is Os-1 or an orthologue (
1,
5,
7,
16,
19).
In the rice BLAST fungus
Magnaporthe grisea, the Os-1 orthologue
is named Hik1 (
13).
Many yeasts, including S. cerevisiae, are naturally resistant to phenylpyrroles, while many filamentous fungi are susceptible. The basis of this difference is not fully understood but is believed to be related, in part, to the presence of the Os-1 sensor. In a recent report, expression of the HIK1 gene from M. grisea in S. cerevisiae made the strain susceptible to phenylpyrroles and other antifungal agents (14). These observations suggest that Hik1 is either a direct target of the fungicide or a mediator of its action, which is transmitted to the HOG pathway to produce intracellular glycerol accumulation in the absence of high external osmolarity.
In order to analyze whether the expression of the HIK1 gene confers ambruticin susceptibility to S. cerevisiae, the S. cerevisiae strains employed by Motoyama et al. (14) were tested for susceptibility to ambruticin and other antifungal agents. Table 1 shows that the pYES2-HIK1-containing strain is highly susceptible to ambruticin only when Hik1 is produced. Production of active Hik1 also confers susceptibility to the phenylpyrrole fludioxonil and the dicarboximide vinclozolin, as described previously (14). To investigate whether the regions required for histidine kinase function are required for the Hik1-dependent susceptibility to ambruticin, two plasmids for the expression of mutated versions of Hik1 were used. The vector pYES-HIK1-H736V encodes a Hik1p defective in autophosphorylation, making the histidine kinase domain nonfunctional, while the plasmid pYES-HIK1-D1153E encodes Hik1p with a mutation in the phosphoacceptor residue, thereby inactivating the response regulator domain (13). S. cerevisiae strains carrying either plasmid and induced to express the mutated HIK1 gene showed no susceptibility to any of the fungicides, suggesting that both the histidine kinase and the response regulator domains are required to confer susceptibility to the tested compounds. These findings indicate that functional Hik1 (and, most likely, phosphotransfer from Hik1) is required to confer ambruticin susceptibility to S. cerevisiae.
The level of phosphorylation of Hog1 in the presence of ambruticin
was also examined. It was recently described that fungicides
from the groups of phenylpyrroles, dicarboximides, and aromatic
hydrocarbons mediate their effects on the HOG pathway by promoting
double phosphorylation of the T174 and Y176 residues of Hog1
(
13). To determine whether exposure of the Hik1-expressing
S. cerevisiae strain to ambruticin resulted in phosphorylation
of Hog1, an antibody (anti-p38) that detects Hog1 in the doubly
phosphorylated state was employed. The total level of Hog1 was
determined using an anti-Hog1 antibody. As can be seen in Fig.
2A, an elevated level of phosphorylated Hog1 in the pYES2-HIK1-containing
strain was detected when HIK1 expression was induced and the
cells were either treated with ambruticin or exposed to 0.5
M NaCl. In cells carrying the empty pYES2 plasmid, phosphorylation
was detected only upon exposure to 0.5 M NaCl but not after
treatment with ambruticin. No signal was detected in any of
the Western blots for the isogenic
hog1 mutant strain used as
a control.
In summary, we have shown that the expression of Hik1 confers
ambruticin susceptibility to
S. cerevisiae and that Hog1 is
specifically phosphorylated when the Hik1-expressing cells are
exposed to ambruticin. The requirement for Hik1 suggests that
it is the likely molecular target of ambruticin and that binding
of the drug results in an inappropriate cellular response, including
intracellular accumulation of glycerol and, ultimately, cell
death. Binding of ambruticin could either stimulate the normal
phosphatase activity of Hik1 or induce the back transfer of
phosphate from Ypd1, the small phosphotranfer protein present
in fungi and yeast that carries the phosphate signal downstream
from Hik1 towards Hog1. Either mechanism for ambruticin action
would result in the emergence of dephosphorylated Ssk1 (active
form) and overstimulation of the HOG pathway and thus result
in cell death.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Ralph Reid and Chris Reeves for helpful discussions
and Jonathan Kennedy for help with the Western blots.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Leonard Katz Consulting, 6389 Longcroft Dr., Oakland, CA 94611. Phone and fax: (510) 336-7010. E-mail:
katzl{at}pacbell.net 
Published ahead of print on 13 August 2007. 

REFERENCES
1 - Avenot, H., P. Simoneau, B. Iacomi-Vasilescu, and N. Bataille-Simoneau. 2005. Characterization of mutations in the two-component histidine kinase gene AbNIK1 from Alternaria brassicicola that confer high dicarboximide and phenylpyrrole resistance. Curr. Genet. 47:234-243.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Catlett, N. L., O. C. Yoder, and B. G. Turgeon. 2003. Whole-genome analysis of two-component signal transduction genes in fungal pathogens. Eukaryot. Cell 2:1151-1161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Chiang, L. Y., D. E. Ejzykowicz, Z.-Q. Tian, L. Katz, and S. G. Filler. 2006. Efficacy of ambruticin analogs in a murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3464-3466.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Connor, D. T., R. C. Greenough, and M. von Strandtmann. 1977. W-7783, a unique antifungal antibiotic. J. Org. Chem. 42:3664-3669.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Cui, W., R. E. Beever, S. L. Parkes, P. L. Weeds, and M. D. Templeton. 2002. An osmosensing histidine kinase mediates dicarboximide fungicide resistance in Botryotinia fuckeliana (Botrytis cinerea). Fungal Genet. Biol. 36:187-198.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Deresinski, S. C., H. B. Levine, and D. A. Stevens. 1978. Coccidioides immitis endospores: phagocytosis by human cells. Mycopathologia 64:179-181.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Dry, I. B., K. H. Yuan, and D. G. Hutton. 2004. Dicarboximide resistance in field isolates of Alternaria alternata is mediated by a mutation in a two-component histidine kinase gene. Fungal Genet. Biol. 41:102-108.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - Gerth, K., P. Washausen, G. Hofle, H. Irschik, and H. Reichenbach. 1996. The jerangolids: a family of new antifungal compounds from Sorangium cellulosum (Myxobacteria). Production, physico-chemical and biological properties of jerangolid A. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 49:71-75.[Medline]
9 - Hoefle, G., H. Steinmetz, K. Gerth, and H. Reichenbach. 1991. Ambruticins VS: new members of the antifungal ambruticin family from Sorangium cellulosum. Leibigs Ann. Chem. 1991:941-945.[CrossRef]
10 - Hohmann, S. 2002. Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66:300-372.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Knauth, P., and H. Reichenbach. 2000. On the mechanism of action of the myxobacterial fungicide ambruticin. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 53:1182-1190.[Medline]
12 - Krantz, M., E. Becit, and S. Hohmann. 2006. Comparative analysis of HOG pathway proteins to generate hypotheses for functional analysis. Curr. Genet. 49:152-165.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 - Motoyama, T., K. Kadokura, T. Ohira, A. Ichiishi, M. Fujimura, I. Yamaguchi, and T. Kudo. 2005. A two-component histidine kinase of the rice blast fungus is involved in osmotic stress response and fungicide action. Fungal Genet. Biol. 42:200-212.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Motoyama, T., T. Ohira, K. Kadokura, A. Ichiishi, M. Fujimura, I. Yamaguchi, and T. Kudo. 2005. An Os-1 family histidine kinase from a filamentous fungus confers fungicide-sensitivity to yeast. Curr. Genet. 47:298-306.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Noguchi, R., S. Banno, R. Ichikawa, F. Fukumori, A. Ichiishi, M. Kimura, I. Yamaguchi, and M. Fujimura. 2007. Identification of OS-2 MAP kinase-dependent genes induced in response to osmotic stress, antifungal agent fludioxonil, and heat shock in Neurospora crassa. Fungal Genet. Biol. 44:208-218.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - Ochiai, N., M. Fujimura, T. Motoyama, A. Ichiishi, R. Usami, K. Horikoshi, and I. Yamaguchi. 2001. Characterization of mutations in the two-component histidine kinase gene that confer fludioxonil resistance and osmotic sensitivity in the os-1 mutants of Neurospora crassa. Pest Manag. Sci. 57:437-442.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 - Ringel, S. M., R. C. Greenough, S. Roemer, D. Connor, A. L. Gutt, B. Blair, G. Kanter, and M. von Strandtmann. 1977. Ambruticin (W7783), a new antifungal antibiotic. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 30:371-375.[Medline]
18 - Shubitz, L. F., J. N. Galgiani, Z.-Q. Tian, Z. Zhong, P. Timmermans, and L. Katz. 2006. Efficacy of ambruticin analogs in a murine model of coccidioidomycosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3467-3469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Yoshimi, A., M. Tsuda, and C. Tanaka. 2004. Cloning and characterization of the histidine kinase gene Dic1 from Cochliobolus heterostrophus that confers dicarboximide resistance and osmotic adaptation. Mol. Genet. Genomics 271:228-236.[CrossRef][Medline]
20 - Zhang, Y., R. Lamm, C. Pillonel, S. Lam, and J.-R. Xu. 2002. Osmoregulation and fungicide resistance: the Neurospora crassa os-2 gene encodes a HOG1 mitogen-activated protein kinase homologue. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:532-538.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2007, p. 3734-3736, Vol. 51, No. 10
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00369-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Dongo, A., Bataille-Simoneau, N., Campion, C., Guillemette, T., Hamon, B., Iacomi-Vasilescu, B., Katz, L., Simoneau, P.
(2009). The Group III Two-Component Histidine Kinase of Filamentous Fungi Is Involved in the Fungicidal Activity of the Bacterial Polyketide Ambruticin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
75: 127-134
[Abstract]
[Full Text]