AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AAC.01589-06v1
51/11/4214    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Odabasi, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Odabasi, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.

 Previous Article

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2007, p. 4214-4216, Vol. 51, No. 11
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01589-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Effects of Serum on In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Echinocandins{triangledown}

Zekaver Odabasi,1* Victor Paetznick,2 John H. Rex,2,{dagger} and Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner2

Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas

Received 20 December 2006/ Returned for modification 3 April 2007/ Accepted 26 August 2007


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
The effects of protein binding on the activities of caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin were evaluated against Candida and Aspergillus species. Adding human serum sharply increased the MICs of micafungin and anidulafungin and modestly affected the MIC of caspofungin. The increase in MICs does not appear consistent with the rate of protein binding for the three compounds.


   TEXT
Top
 ABSTRACT
 TEXT
REFERENCES
 
The echinocandins are a new class of lipopeptide antifungal agents that act by inhibiting the synthesis of (1,3)-ß-D-glucan. Compounds of this class are relatively highly protein bound, with rates of 96% reported for caspofungin (5), 99.8% for micafungin (15), and ~99% for anidulafungin (Eraxis package insert; Pfizer). Protein binding may change the in vitro and in vivo activities of antimicrobial agents (17). The available data on the effects of protein binding on the antifungal activities of echinocandins are limited to reports of increased MICs for anidulafungin when tested against Candida albicans (Eraxis package insert; Pfizer), of increased MICs for micafungin when tested against Candida spp. and Aspergillus fumigatus (4, 16), of no effect on caspofungin MICs for one isolate of C. albicans (2), and of a potentiation of the effect of caspofungin versus A. fumigatus (3). As none of these reports have provided comparative data and the total number of isolates evaluated has been small, we now report the effect of 50% human serum on the activities of the echinocandins against a collection of Candida and Aspergillus isolates.

A total of 16 Candida isolates and 8 Aspergillus isolates were tested. The isolates included were C. albicans (two isolates), C. parapsilosis (five isolates), C. krusei (three isolates), C. glabrata (two isolates), C. tropicalis (two isolates), C. lusitaniae (two isolates), A. fumigatus (four isolates), A. flavus (two isolates), A. terreus (one isolate), and A. niger (one isolate). The two quality control isolates specified in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27-A2 procedure (10), ATCC 6258 (C. krusei) and ATCC 22019 (C. parapsilosis), were included in each set of the test and the results compared with published control limits (1).

Caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin were supplied by their respective manufacturers. Stock solutions were prepared by dissolving the compounds in dimethyl sulfoxide (anidulafungin) or water (caspofungin and micafungin). Following the principles of CLSI M27-A2, serial dilutions at twice the desired final concentration were prepared in double-strength test medium (RPMI 1640 medium buffered with 0.165 M morpholinepropanesulfonic acid [MOPS] to pH 7.0). Test trays were prepared in advance by dispensing 100 µl of serially diluted drug into 96-well microdilution plates and freezing the plates at –70°C. All three compounds were tested over a 20-fold dilution range from 64 to 0.00012 µg/ml.

The MICs of test drugs with Candida species and Aspergillus species were determined using the broth microdilution variants of CLSI M27-A2 and CLSI M38-A (9), respectively. Testing was performed both in standard medium (RPMI 1640, 0.165 M MOPS, pH 7.0) and in standard medium containing 50% pooled human serum (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). To achieve this, inocula were standardized spectrophotometrically and diluted either with sterile water or with 100% pooled human serum to final concentrations of 1 x 103 to 5 x 103 yeast or 0.4 x 104 to 5 x 104 conidia. Then, 100-µl volumes of these double-strength inocula were added to the 100-µl volumes of serially diluted drug in the microdilution trays. MICs of Candida and Aspergillus species were read after 24 and 48 h at 35°C as MIC-0, i.e., complete growth inhibition, and MIC-2, i.e., at least 50% growth inhibition. For Aspergillus, a minimum effective concentration was also determined microscopically (7) and found to be equivalent to the macroscopically determined MIC-2 reading. The MIC-2 readings are thus used for both fungal genera.

A line listing of the results seen after 24 h is shown in Table 1. The qualitative effects of serum on echinocandin susceptibility were similar for Candida species at 24 and 48 h and using endpoints of MIC-0 and MIC-2 (not shown); thus, the 24-h MIC-2 results are shown as being characteristic of the entire data set. For Aspergillus species, all MIC-0 readings were off-scale, and thus only the MIC-2 readings provide useful information; qualitative effects of serum on echinocandin susceptibility were similar at 24 and 48 h, as seen for Candida spp. A summary of the ratios of the MIC-2 values by time, genus, and drug is shown in Table 2. The addition of 50% serum consistently elevated the observed MICs for anidulafungin and micafungin. For caspofungin, on the other hand, an increased MIC was observed for some (but not all) isolates, and this effect was never as frequent as or of the magnitude of that seen for the other two agents. An analysis of the effect of serum for Candida and Aspergillus species (Table 3) showed that the effect of serum was similar for each drug across the range of tested species.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Comparison of MIC-2 values observed for RPMI and 50% serum

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Ratios of MIC-2 values with and without serum

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 3. Relationship of MIC-2 values with/without serum to Candida and Aspergillus species

 
In this study, we have extended prior work by testing a broad range of Candida and Aspergillus spp. and by directly comparing the effects of serum on all three echinocandins (2, 3, 4, 16; Eraxis package insert [Pfizer]). The effect of serum was greatest for anidulafungin and micafungin, and this is entirely consistent with the results of prior studies on these two drugs (4, 16; Eraxis package insert [Pfizer]). Prior work with caspofungin against single isolates of C. albicans (2) and A. fumigatus (3) found that serum had no effect against the Candida isolate and enhanced activity against the Aspergillus isolate. These results are consistent with the absence of effect of serum seen for some isolates in our survey, and we did not see any enhancing activity with the addition of serum.

In summary, we have observed that serum strongly affects the observed MICs of anidulafungin and micafungin and modestly affects the MIC of caspofungin. This rank order of effects does not appear consistent with the rank order of protein binding for the three compounds and is thus a further demonstration of the relatively unpredictable nature of the effect of serum on antifungal effect. As related examples, terbinafine (>99% protein bound [13]) has a reduced in vitro potency in the presence of serum that has been correlated with reduced in vivo potency (8, 11, 14). On the other hand, although the potency of itraconazole (99.8% protein bound [6]) does appear affected in vitro or in vivo by the presence of serum, protein binding does not impede the drug's activity (12, 13, 18). For the echinocandin antifungal agents, the impact of these in vitro effects on in vivo activity is not yet understood and is likely not of clinical significance. However, we think that the different serum effects with these three echinocandins may explain the different dosage regimens of these drugs in clinical practice.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Marmara University Hospital, Tophanelioglu caddesi, No:13, 34662 Altunizade, Istanbul, Turkey. Phone and fax: 90 212 327 4142. E-mail: zekaver{at}marmara.edu.tr Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 4 September 2007. Back

{dagger} Present address: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Alderley House, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, United Kingdom SK10 4TF. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 ABSTRACT
 TEXT
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Barry, A. L., M. A. Pfaller, S. D. Brown, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. A. Ghannoum, C. Knapp, R. P. Rennie, J. H. Rex, and M. G. Rinaldi. 2000. Quality control limits for broth microdilution susceptibility tests of ten antifungal agents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3457-3459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bartizal, K., C. J. Gill, G. K. Abruzzo, A. M. Flattery, L. Kong, P. M. Scott, J. G. Smith, C. E. Leighton, A. Bouffard, J. F. Dropinski, and J. Balkovec. 1997. In vitro preclinical evaluation studies with the echinocandin antifungal MK-0991 (L-743,872). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2326-2332.[Abstract]
  3. Chiller, T., K. Farrokhshad, E. Brummer, and D. A. Stevens. 2000. Influence of human sera on the in vitro activity of the echinocandin caspofungin (MK-0991) against Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:3302-3305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Ernst, E. J., E. E. Roling, C. R. Petzold, D. J. Keele, and M. E. Klepser. 2002. In vitro activity of micafungin (FK-463) against Candida spp.: microdilution, time-kill, and postantifungal-effect studies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3846-3853.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hajdu, R., R. Thompson, J. G. Sundelof, B. A. Pelak, F. A. Bouffard, J. F. Dropinski, and H. Kropp. 1997. Preliminary animal pharmacokinetics of the parenteral antifungal agent MK-0991 (L-743,872). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2339-2344.[Abstract]
  6. Heykants, J., M. Michiels, W. Meuldermans, J. Monbaliu, K. Lavrijsen, A. Van Peer, J. C. Levron, R. Woestenborghs, and G. Cauwenbergh. 1987. The pharmacokinetics of itraconazole in animals and man: an overview, p. 1-29. In R. A. Fromtling (ed.), Recent trends in the discovery, development and evaluation of antifungal agents. J. R. Prous Science Publishers, Barcelona, Spain.
  7. Kurtz, M. B., I. B. Heath, J. Marrinan, S. Dreikorn, J. Onishi, and C. Douglas. 1994. Morphological effects of lipopeptides against Aspergillus fumigatus correlate with activities against (1,3)-ß-D-glucan synthase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:1480-1489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Machard, B., P. Misslin, and M. Lemaire. 1989. Influence of plasma protein binding on the brain uptake of an antifungal agent, terbinafine, in rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 41:700-704.[Medline]
  9. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; approved standard NCCLS document M38-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.
  10. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard NCCLS document M27-A2. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.
  11. Ryder, N. S., and I. Frank. 1992. Interaction of terbinafine with human serum and serum proteins. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 30:451-460.[Medline]
  12. Schafer-Korting, M., H. C. Korting, F. Amann, R. Peuser, and A. Lukacs. 1991. Influence of albumin on itraconazole and ketoconazole antifungal activity: results of a dynamic in vitro study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:2053-2056.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Schafer-Korting, M., H. C. Korting, W. Rittler, and W. Obermuller. 1995. Influence of serum protein binding on the in vitro activity of anti-fungal agents. Infection 23:292-297.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Schmitt, H. J., J. Andrade, F. Edwards, Y. Niki, E. Bernard, and D. Armstrong. 1990. Inactivity of terbinafine in a rat model of pulmonary aspergillosis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 9:832-835.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Suzuki, S., M. Terakawa, F. Yokobayashi, F. Fujiwara, and T. Hata. 1998. Pharmacokinetics of FK463, a novel water-soluble echinocandin-like lipopeptide, in animals, abstr. F-144, p. 269. Abstr. 38th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., San Diego, CA.
  16. Tawara, S., F. Ikeda, K. Maki, Y. Morishita, K. Otomo, N. Teratani, T. Goto, M. Tomishima, H. Ohki, A. Yamada, K. Kawabata, H. Takasugi, K. Sakane, H. Tanaka, F. Matsumo, and S. Kuwahara. 2000. In vitro activities of a new lipopeptide antifungal agent, FK463, against a variety of clinically important fungi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:57-62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wise, R. 1985. The relevance of pharmacokinetics to in-vitro models: protein binding—does it matter? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 15(Suppl. A):77-83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Wright, K. A., J. R. Perfect, and W. Ritter. 1990. The pharmacokinetics of BAY R3783 and its efficacy in the treatment of experimental cryptococcal meningitis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 26:387-397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2007, p. 4214-4216, Vol. 51, No. 11
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01589-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AAC.01589-06v1
51/11/4214    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Odabasi, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Odabasi, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS