| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2007, p. 4477-4479, Vol. 51, No. 12
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00529-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

School of Pharmacy, Curtin University of Technology, Bentley, Western Australia,1 School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia2
Received 21 April 2007/ Returned for modification 27 July 2007/ Accepted 2 September 2007
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| TEXT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Doxycycline (DOX) is widely used in malaria prophylaxis and is acceptable for long-term therapy, except in children and pregnant women (22). Furthermore, DOX combined with quinine is indicated for standby emergency treatment of falciparum malaria (22), and DOX has demonstrated efficacy in combination with artesunate, albeit with a 20% recrudescence rate that was attributed to an inadequate dosage of one or both drugs (13).
Despite the limited clinical role, in vitro and animal investigations have shown that DOX and other tetracyclines are effective antimalarial drugs against drug-resistant parasite strains (4, 10, 12). However, combination studies of DOX and artemisinin drugs have produced conflicting reports of additive (9, 23) and synergistic (7, 19) effects, thus highlighting the difficulty in predicting clinical outcomes from in vitro experiments and animal studies.
While differentiation between synergistic and additive effects may be problematic, interpretation of pharmacodynamic data should be more feasible with the recent elucidation of the mechanism of action of tetracyclines (8). Dahl et al. (8) showed that DOX caused a parasite organelle, the apicoplast, to become dysfunctional in progeny parasites. Late-stage parasites were most susceptible to DOX, and the drug effect was evident in mature parasites from the second generation, which did not rupture to release viable merozoites.
With a background of conflicting in vitro data, clinical observations of delayed effect, and the recently reported mechanism of action, we investigated the effect of DOX alone and in combination with dihydroartemisinin (DHA) in a murine malaria model. The method used in our study was adapted from the Rane test (15) in order to evaluate the drug effect on parasite elimination in an established infection and to obtain pharmacodynamic data from a treatment model.
DOX hyclate (molecular weight = 512.9) was obtained from Sigma Aldrich, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia. DHA was obtained from Dafra Pharma, Turnhout, Belgium. All general laboratory chemicals were of analytical grade (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, WI; BDH Laboratory Supplies, Poole, England; Merck Pty Limited, Kilsyth, Victoria, Australia).
This study was approved by the Curtin University Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee. Male Swiss (5- to 6-week-old) and BALB/c (7- to 8-week-old) mice were obtained from the Animal Resource Centre (Murdoch, Western Australia) and housed at 22°C in a 12-h light/dark cycle, with free access to sterilized commercial food pellets (Glen Forrest Stockfeeders, Perth, Western Australia) and acidified water (pH 2.5).
Plasmodium berghei ANKA parasites were obtained from the Australian Army Malaria Research Institute (Enoggera, QLD, Australia) and maintained by weekly blood passage in BALB/c mice. An inoculum of 107 parasitized erythrocytes per 100 µl was prepared by dilution of blood harvested from BALB/c mice in citrate-phosphate-dextrose solution (sodium citrate [30 g/liter], sodium dihydrogen phosphate [0.15 g/liter], dextrose [2 g/liter]) and used to infect the experimental (Swiss) mice.
Peripheral blood smears were prepared two or three times per day from tail vein bleeds until the time of euthanasia (>40% parasitemia, >10% reduction in mouse body weight in less than 24 h, or termination of the experimental protocol). The thin films were fixed in methanol (3 min) and then stained with May Grunwald Giemsa, using a Hema-Tek staining machine (AMES, Elkhart, IL). Parasitemia was determined by counting 30 or 100 fields of view for >0.5% or <0.5% infected erythrocytes, respectively, under 100x oil immersion light microscopy (Leica DMLS microscope; Leica Microsystems, Gladsville, NSW, Australia). This procedure ensured a limit of detection of approximately 0.002% parasitemia.
DOX hyclate was dissolved in water (11.25 mg/ml; injection volume, 200 µl) and administered by intraperitoneal injection at a dose of 90 mg/kg of body weight (equivalent to 78 mg/kg DOX; molecular weight = 444.4). DHA was dissolved in a 60:40 mixture of dimethyl sulfoxide-polysorbate 80 (7.5 mg/ml; injection volume, 100 µl) for a dose of 30 mg/kg. Drug administration commenced with DHA 64 h after inoculation (anticipated parasitemia, 2 to 5%), and three doses of DOX were given at 1, 12, and 24 h to avoid adverse effects associated with concurrent drug administration. The control, DHA, DOX, and DOX-DHA groups comprised 7, 5, 10, and 10 mice, respectively.
Statistical analysis and representation was performed using SigmaStat 2004 and SigmaPlot 2004 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Data are given as means and standard deviations unless otherwise indicated.
Consistent with our previous work (11), DHA administration resulted in a prompt decline in parasitemia to a nadir approximately 24 h after dosing (Fig. 1). Preliminary single-dose DOX studies were based on previous reports of DOX in murine malaria (2, 3) but demonstrated weak effect up to 180 mg/kg of DOX (data not shown) and signs of discomfort in the mice at the highest dose. A three-dose regimen of DOX at 90 mg/kg per dose subsequently demonstrated a potent, delayed antimalarial effect with no observed adverse effects. A DOX-DHA combination was found to provide an apparent additive antimalarial effect (Fig. 1).
|
This study complements the recent elucidation of the mechanism of action of tetracyclines (8), showing that the response to DOX is delayed by at least 24 to 48 h (one to two erythrocytic cycles for P. berghei), consistent with an effect on progeny parasites. Furthermore, we have demonstrated a strategy for pharmacodynamic evaluation of antimalarial combinations and shown that the murine malaria treatment model could be valuable when the effect of individual components cannot be investigated in clinical trials or where a potent drug obscures the response of apparently weaker partner drugs (16).
The DOX doses used in our study were consistent with previous reports for a P. berghei model (2, 3). For example, six doses of 32 mg/kg DOX over 3 days were ineffective but six doses of 128 mg/kg (over 3 days) showed good antimalarial efficacy (2). By comparison, human doses of DOX for the treatment of falciparum malaria are in the order of 3 to 4 mg/kg/day for 7 days, in combination with other antimalarial drugs (14, 22). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships are not well established for tetracyclines (1), and this is particularly evident in the case of DOX and malaria. In human studies, the mean half-life of DOX has been reported to range from 14 to 20 h (1). However, Newton et al. (14) reported that the half-life was 10.5 to 11.6 h in malaria infection, with doses given every 24 h (the erythrocytic cycle for P. falciparum is 48 h). In the present murine malaria study, we adopted the same strategy as Andersen et al. (2) and administered DOX every 12 h (the erythrocytic cycle for P. berghei is 24 h). Hence, 12-hourly dosing of DOX in the murine model is comparable to 24-hourly dosing in humans, in relation to the erythrocytic cycle of the parasite. By contrast, the pharmacokinetic relationship is less clear as pharmacokinetic properties for DOX in murine malaria have not been reported, although the half-life in healthy mice is approximately 2.8 h (5, 6) and evidence of allometry in DOX pharmacokinetics has been reported (18). Further studies of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships and interspecies scaling for DOX in malaria will be required to link murine data to human dosage regimens.
The murine malaria treatment model provides an understanding of drug efficacy in the context of an established infection and can be used for single (11) or multiple-dose investigations, as shown in the present study. By comparison, the Peters 4-day test evaluates drug efficacy according to suppression of malaria infection, with drug administration commencing at the time of parasite inoculation (15). Previously, Chawira et al. (7) used the Peters test and reported that a combination of artemisinin and tetracycline was synergistic in suppressing malaria infection with chloroquine-sensitive and chloroquine-resistant P. berghei. However, in our model, DOX lowered the rate of parasite growth and the maximum observed effect was 6 to 7 days after commencing drug treatment. Addition of DHA as a potent, rapid-acting partner drug resulted in a prompt decline in parasite density that was sustained by the concurrent administration of DOX. These data indicate that in a murine malaria treatment model, DOX and DHA have an additive antimalarial effect.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 17 September 2007. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |