Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 2007, p. 1089-1091, Vol. 51, No. 3
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00671-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Evaluation of Accessory Gene Regulator (agr) Group and Function in the Proclivity towards Vancomycin Intermediate Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
Brian T. Tsuji,1,2,5
Michael J. Rybak,1,2,3*
Kerry L. Lau,1 and
George Sakoulas4
Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences,1
School of Medicine, Wayne State University,3
Detroit Receiving Hospital and University Health Center, Detroit, Michigan 48201,2
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, New York Medical College, Munger Pavilion 245, Valhalla, New York, 10595,4
University at Buffalo, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Buffalo, New York 142605
Received 1 June 2006/
Returned for modification 15 August 2006/
Accepted 4 December 2006

ABSTRACT
Simulated therapeutic vancomycin exposures were evaluated against
agr wild-type and knockout
Staphylococcus aureus groups I, II,
III, and IV using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. All
agr groups developed intermediate resistance to vancomycin after
subtherapeutic exposure. The free unbound fraction of the area
under the concentration-time curve (
fAUC/MIC) required to suppress
resistance was fourfold higher (
P < 0.001) in
agr dysfunctional
strains (112 to 169) than that in parent wild-type strains (28).

TEXT
The accessory gene regulator is a quorum-sensing operon which
coordinates the expression of secreted and cell-associated virulence
factors and controls several metabolic pathways in
Staphylococcus aureus in a growth phase-related fashion (
4,
5,
7,
8).
S. aureus strains which exhibit a dysfunction accessory gene regulator
(
agr) locus may possess an intrinsic survival advantage under
vancomycin-selective pressure (
11-
14). However, the correlation
between vancomycin exposure using the area under the concentration-time
curve (AUC/MIC) necessary to suppress the development of vancomycin-intermediate
resistance and
agr function or group has not been investigated.
We examined the relationship between vancomycin exposure and
the development of intermediate-level resistance in
agr groups
I, II, III, and IV
S. aureus using an in vitro pharmacodynamic
model.
RN6390, RN6607, RN3984, and RN4850 represent agr-positive S. aureus prototype strains carrying agr groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively, and were obtained from the Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (NARSA), supported under NIAID/NIH contract N01-AI-95359, and Richard P. Novick. RN6911, RN9120, and RN9121 are the agr-null derivates of groups I, II, and IV (NARSA), respectively. RN3984-M is the null derivate of RN3984, which demonstrated a loss of agr function by a lack of production of delta-hemolysin.
Vancomycin analytical-grade powder was commercially purchased (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Stock solutions were freshly prepared at the beginning of each week and kept frozen daily at 4°C. Mueller-Hinton broth (Difco, Detroit, MI) supplemented with 25 µg/ml calcium and 12.5 µg/ml magnesium (SMHB) was used for in vitro pharmacodynamic models and susceptibility testing involving vancomycin. Colony counts were determined using tryptic soy agar (TSA; Difco, Detroit, MI) plates. MICs were determined by broth microdilution in SMHB according to CLSI guidelines (2). The function of the agr operon was qualitatively assessed in all isolates using S. aureus RN4420 (NARSA) for delta-hemolysin expression, as previously described (13).
An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was utilized as previously described for the collection of bacterial and antimicrobial dosing and sampling (1). All model simulations were conducted over 72 h and were performed in triplicate to ensure reproducibility. Vancomycin regimens of 62.5, 125, 250, 500, 750, and 1,000 mg every 12 h (free unbound fraction of the AUC [fAUC/MIC/24] exposures of 14 to 225 µg/ml/h; half-life 6 h) were simulated according to the manufacturer's recommendations for a patient with normal renal function. A protein binding level of 55% was utilized for all model simulations (9). Antibiotic concentrations were determined from each model at 0 to 72 h for pharmacokinetic analysis. The AUC from 0 to 24 h was calculated using the linear trapezoid method. Vancomycin concentrations were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (TDx; Abbott Diagnostics) as previously described (16). Differences between regimens in log10 CFU/ml at 72 h were determined using analysis of variance with Tukey's test for multiple comparisons. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software (Release 12.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois).
The development of resistance was evaluated at multiple time points throughout the simulation at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h for all model simulations. Resistance was determined by the detection of growth on TSA plates containing 3 and 6 µg/ml and by changes in MIC via Etest of all model samples.
All of the characterized S. aureus strains evaluated were susceptible to vancomycin MICs of 1.0 µg/ml. Observed pharmacokinetic parameters for all tested therapeutic regimens are shown in Table 1. Quantitative changes in log10 CFU/ml over 72 h are graphically displayed in Fig. 1. Changes in MIC secondary to 72 h vancomycin exposure are displayed in Table 2. Against all agr-null strains (agr group I, II, III, and IV), the exposure of an
AUC/MIC of 14 resulted in a subsequent increase in MIC at 72 h. In agr-null group II, S. aureus increases to a MIC of 8 µg/ml were noted secondary to exposure as high as an
AUC/MIC of 112. Parent wild-type strains (agr groups I, II, III, and IV [RN6390, RN6607, RN3984, and RN8450, respectively]) also resulted in the development of intermediate resistance after exposure to an
AUC/MIC of 14, although the magnitude of MIC increases were lower compared with that in agr-null isolates: MIC increases of 3 to 4 µg/ml were noted in agr-positive isolates relative to increases of 6 to 8 µg/ml in agr-null isolates. The vancomycin exposure necessary to suppress the development of resistance in S. aureus agr knockout isolates was fourfold greater with fAUC/MICs of 112 to 169 versus an
AUC/MIC of 28 for wild-type, agr-positive isolates (P < 0.001).
Recently, prolonged administration of vancomycin has been linked
with vancomycin tolerance and down-regulation of the
agr locus.
In addition,
S. aureus exposure to trough vancomycin concentrations
of <10 µg/ml has been associated with an increase in
the MIC and development of glycopeptide-intermediate
S. aureus-like
characteristics (
15a,
17). In the present investigation, we
sought to determine whether a relationship exists between the
development of heterogeneous resistance among all wild-type
and knockout
agr isolates using an in vitro pharmacodynamic
model simulating vancomcyin therapeutic dosing.
S. aureus isolates
that were dysfunctional in
agr required vancomycin doses and
fAUC/MICs more than fourfold higher than that necessary for
wild-type isolates to prevent the development of resistance.
Interestingly, although we observed MIC increases of up to 3
to 4 µg/ml (which may be currently classified as reduced
susceptibility) in wild-type,
agr-positive isolates, the alterations
in MIC in
agr dysfunctional isolates were typically at least
onefold higher at 6 to 8 µg/ml at the same vancomycin
exposure. Therefore, in all
agr dysfunctional isolates, the
development of intermediate resistance was evident after subtherapeutic
vancomycin exposure using both the previous (

4 µg/ml)
and newer breakpoints of susceptibility (

2 µg/ml) (
2).
Additionally, although we found the development of resistance
in all
agr dysfunctional groups, the magnitude of increase in
vancomycin MIC was greatest in the
agr-null group II isolate.
This is in agreement with previous reports that this genotype
may possess an intrinsic survival advantage (
6,
15), as this
isolate demonstrated the largest increase in MIC (8 µg/ml),
and the greatest exposure of vancomycin was necessary to suppress
the development of resistance.
We conclude that the development of vancomycin-intermediate resistance may be driven by suboptimal vancomycin exposure in the setting of dysfunction in the agr locus in S. aureus. These findings suggest the use of more aggressive vancomycin-dosing strategies to maintain optimal exposures. These findings highlight the potential problems associated with suboptimal vancomycin exposures, which ultimately impact the susceptibility of this antibiotic with possible consequences to other classes of antimicrobials (3, 10, 11, 17). More attention to optimal dosing of vancomycin may be important in managing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Pharmacy Practice - 4148, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, 259 Mack Ave., Detroit, MI 48201. Phone: (313) 993-4673. Fax: (313) 577-8915. E-mail:
m.rybak{at}wayne.edu.

Published ahead of print on 11 December 2006. 

REFERENCES
1 - Allen, G. P., R. Cha, and M. J. Rybak. 2002. In vitro activities of quinupristin-dalfopristin and cefepime, alone and in combination with various antimicrobials, against multidrug-resistant staphylococci and enterococci in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2606-2612.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2005. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 15th informational supplement. CLSI M100-S15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
3 - Cui, L., E. Tominaga, H. M. Neoh, and K. Hiramatsu. 2006. Correlation between reduced daptomycin susceptibility and vancomycin resistance in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1079-1082.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Ji, G., R. Beavis, and R. P. Novick. 1997. Bacterial interference caused by autoinducing peptide variants. Science 276:2027-2030.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Lyon, G. J., J. S. Wright, T. W. Muir, and R. P. Novick. 2002. Key determinants of receptor activation in the agr autoinducing peptides of Staphylococcus aureus. Biochemistry 41:10095-10104.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Moise-Broder, P. A., G. Sakoulas, G. M. Eliopoulos, J. J. Schentag, A. Forrest, and R. C. Moellering, Jr. 2004. Accessory gene regulator group II polymorphism in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is predictive of failure of vancomycin therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:1700-1705.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Novick, R. P. 2003. Autoinduction and signal transduction in the regulation of staphylococcal virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 48:1429-1449.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - Novick, R. P. 2000. Pathogenicity factors and their regulation, p. 392-407. In V. A. Fischetti, R. P. Novick, J. J. Ferretti, and D. A. Portnoy (ed.), Gram-positive pathogens. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
9 - Rybak, M. J. 2006. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of vancomycin. Clin. Infect. Dis. 42(Suppl. 1):S35-S39.
10 - Sakoulas, G., J. Alder, C. Thauvin-Eliopoulos, R. C. Moellering, Jr., and G. M. Eliopoulos. 2006. Induction of daptomycin heterogeneous susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus by exposure to vancomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1581-1585.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Sakoulas, G., G. M. Eliopoulos, V. G. Fowler, Jr., R. C. Moellering, Jr., R. P. Novick, N. Lucindo, M. R. Yeaman, and A. S. Bayer. 2005. Reduced susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to vancomycin and platelet microbicidal protein correlates with defective autolysis and loss of accessory gene regulator (agr) function. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:2687-2692.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Sakoulas, G., G. M. Eliopoulos, R. C. Moellering, Jr., R. P. Novick, L. Venkataraman, C. Wennersten, P. C. DeGirolami, M. J. Schwaber, and H. S. Gold. 2003. Staphylococcus aureus accessory gene regulator (agr) group II: is there a relationship to the development of intermediate-level glycopeptide resistance? J. Infect. Dis. 187:929-938.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 - Sakoulas, G., G. M. Eliopoulos, R. C. Moellering, Jr., C. Wennersten, L. Venkataraman, R. P. Novick, and H. S. Gold. 2002. Accessory gene regulator (agr) locus in geographically diverse Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1492-1502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Sakoulas, G., R. C. Moellering, Jr., and G. M. Eliopoulos. 2006. Adaptation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the face of vancomycin therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 42(Suppl. 1):S40-S50.
15 - Sakoulas, G., P. A. Moise-Broder, J. Schentag, A. Forrest, R. C. Moellering, Jr., and G. M. Eliopoulos. 2004. Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:2398-2402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Sakoulas, G., H. S. Gold, R. A. Cohen, L. Venkataraman, R. C. Moellering, and G. M. Eliopoulos. 2006. Effects of prolonged vancomycin administration on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a patient with recurrent bacteraemia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57:699-704.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Tsuji, B. T., and M. J. Rybak. 2005. Short-course gentamicin in combination with daptomycin or vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:2735-2745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Woods, C. W., A. C. Cheng, V. G. Fowler, Jr., M. Moorefield, J. Frederick, G. Sakoulas, V. G. Meka, F. C. Tenover, P. Zwadyk, and K. H. Wilson. 2004. Endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:1188-1191.[CrossRef][Medline]
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 2007, p. 1089-1091, Vol. 51, No. 3
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00671-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sun, W., Chen, H., Liu, Y., Zhao, C., Nichols, W. W., Chen, M., Zhang, J., Ma, Y., Wang, H.
(2009). Prevalence and Characterization of Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from 14 Cities in China. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 3642-3649
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Harigaya, Y., Bulitta, J. B., Forrest, A., Sakoulas, G., Lesse, A. J., Mylotte, J. M., Tsuji, B. T.
(2009). Pharmacodynamics of Vancomycin at Simulated Epithelial Lining Fluid Concentrations against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): Implications for Dosing in MRSA Pneumonia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 3894-3901
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rybak, M., Lomaestro, B., Rotschafer, J. C., Moellering, R. Jr., Craig, W., Billeter, M., Dalovisio, J. R., Levine, D. P.
(2009). Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: A consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm
66: 82-98
[Full Text]
-
Lodise, T. P., Lomaestro, B., Graves, J., Drusano, G. L.
(2008). Larger Vancomycin Doses (at Least Four Grams per Day) Are Associated with an Increased Incidence of Nephrotoxicity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 1330-1336
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tsuji, B. T., von Eiff, C., Kelchlin, P. A., Forrest, A., Smith, P. F.
(2008). Attenuated Vancomycin Bactericidal Activity against Staphylococcus aureus hemB Mutants Expressing the Small-Colony-Variant Phenotype. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 1533-1537
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rose, W. E., Rybak, M. J., Tsuji, B. T., Kaatz, G. W., Sakoulas, G.
(2007). Correlation of vancomycin and daptomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus in reference to accessory gene regulator (agr) polymorphism and function. J Antimicrob Chemother
59: 1190-1193
[Abstract]
[Full Text]