This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ASM journals
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, Y.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Hsueh, P.-R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huang, Y.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Hsueh, P.-R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2007, p. 1570-1572, Vol. 51, No. 4
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01352-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Daptomycin Susceptibility of Unusual Gram-Positive Bacteria: Comparison of Results Obtained by the Etest and the Broth Microdilution Method{triangledown}

Yu-Tsung Huang,1,3 Chun-Hsing Liao,1,3 Lee-Jeng Teng,2,4 and Po-Ren Hsueh2,3*

Department of Internal Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei County,1 Departments of Laboratory Medicine,2 Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital,3 School of Medical Technology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan4

Received 29 October 2006/ Returned for modification 11 December 2006/ Accepted 27 December 2006


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
MICs of daptomycin, linezolid, and vancomycin against 212 isolates, including Listeria monocytogenes and Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, Rhodococcus, and Nocardia spp., were determined by the broth microdilution method; daptomycin MICs were also determined by the Etest. Except with those for Leuconostoc spp., daptomycin Etest MICs showed >90% agreement with MICs obtained by the broth microdilution method.


arrow
TEXT
 
Daptomycin is a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic, produced by Streptomyces roseosporus, with rapid bactericidal activity against a wide spectrum of gram-positive organisms, including multidrug-resistant strains such as vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and penicillin-resistant streptococci (2, 8). Daptomycin also has in vitro activity against several anaerobic gram-positive pathogens, including Clostridium perfringens, C. difficile, Finegoldia magna, Propionibacterium acnes, Peptoniphilus asaccharolyticus, and Anaerococcus prevotii (12, 19). However, data about its in vitro activity against unusual yet clinically relevant gram-positive microbes with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, including Listeria monocytogenes and Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, Rhodococcus, and Nocardia spp., remain scarce (3, 11, 13, 14, 18). All of these pathogens can cause invasive diseases, including bacteremia, pulmonary infections, and soft tissue infections, which usually occur in immunocompromised but occasionally in immunocompetent hosts (1, 3, 9, 13, 17).

In this study, we investigated the in vitro activities of daptomycin, vancomycin, and linezolid against five unusual gram-positive pathogens by determining the MICs by the broth microdilution method and comparing the daptomycin MIC results with those obtained by a daptomycin Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden).

(This paper was presented in part as a poster at the 46th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy [15a].)

A total of 212 nonduplicate unusual gram-positive bacterial isolates were tested. These bacteria included Listeria monocytogenes (n = 31), Pediococcus spp. (n = 13), Leuconostoc spp. (n = 68), Rhodococcus spp. (n = 21), Nocardia asteroides (n = 19), Nocardia brasiliensis (n = 34), and other Nocardia species (n = 26). These isolates were collected from various clinical specimens (blood, sterile tissues, airway secretions, nonsterile tissues, and wound cultures) of patients who were treated at the National Taiwan University Hospital, a 2,000-bed hospital located in northern Taiwan, from January 1995 to June 2006. The in vitro activities of drugs were determined using the broth microdilution method recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (5). The test medium for all drugs was Mueller-Hinton broth; for testing daptomycin, the broth contained physiological levels of calcium (50 µg/ml) as recommended previously (7). Standard powders of the three antimicrobial agents, daptomycin, vancomycin, and linezolid, were obtained from various manufacturers for broth microdilution testing. The Etest containing a gradient of daptomycin plus calcium was used according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the results were compared with MICs obtained by the broth microdilution method. S. aureus ATCC 29213 and Enterococcus faecalis 29212 were used as control strains.

Acceptable Etest accuracy for an antimicrobial agent was defined as >90% agreement (within 1 twofold dilution) with MICs determined by the broth microdilution method (6). The mean difference in log2 units between MICs obtained by the two methods was calculated using a one-sample t test.

The broth dilution MICs of the three drugs for the different bacteria are shown in Table 1. Elevated linezolid MICs were found for isolates of Leuconostoc spp. and some Nocardia spp. MICs were higher for N. brasiliensis isolates than for N. asteroides and other Nocardia species. The results of the daptomycin Etest correlated well with those obtained by the broth microdilution method, except for Leuconostoc spp. (agreement, 82.3%) (Table 2). For four isolates, MICs were 2 dilutions higher by the Etest than by the broth microdilution method; these included one L. monocytogenes, one Leuconostoc sp., one Pediococcus sp., and one Nocardia sp. isolate. The daptomycin MICs for Leuconostoc spp. by the Etest tended to be lower than those by the broth microdilution method and ≥2-fold lower for 16.2% of the isolates. Among all isolates tested, MICs determined by the Etest were more than 2 dilutions lower than MICs determined by the broth microdilution method for 12 isolates (17.6%) and more than 3 dilutions lower for 4 isolates (5.8%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of 212 unusual gram-positive bacteria to daptomycin, linezolid, and vancomycin determined by the broth microdilution method and the Etesta


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Comparison of daptomycin MIC results obtained by the Etest and the broth microdilution method against 212 unusual gram-positive bacterial isolates

Our data further support the potential clinical application of daptomycin against infections caused by Leuconostoc and Pediococcus spp., though only limited clinical data have been reported (11). Infections caused by L. monocytogenes are rare in Taiwan and usually present as bloodstream infections in patients with underlying malignancies and as meningitis in healthy persons (16). The MICs of daptomycin against L. monocytogenes were higher in this study than in recent reports (19). Rhodococcus spp. typically cause bacteremia and pulmonary infection in immunocompromised hosts; occasionally, they may cause pulmonary infection or localized infection in immunocompetent patients (17). Effective treatment often requires a combination of several agents and prolonged usage. In Taiwan, multidrug-resistant strains causing invasive diseases have been reported, limiting treatment options (15). The in vitro activity of daptomycin against Rhodococcus spp. was poor, a finding that has not been reported previously. The MIC data for vancomycin against Rhodococcus spp. differed in this study, indicating that any treatment with this agent should be based on individualized MIC data.

Sulfonamides combined with a carbapenem or an expanded-spectrum cephalosporin are regarded as the drugs of choice for severely ill patients (3). All of the 79 Nocardia isolates tested in this study were also inhibited by linezolid at a concentration of ≤8 µg/ml, but the MICs at which 50 and 90% of isolates were inhibited (MIC50 and MIC90, respectively) were higher than those previously reported (4, 10, 20). Linezolid MICs were higher for N. brasiliensis isolates than for N. asteroides and other Nocardia species in this study. The mechanisms responsible for high linezolid MICs against Nocardia species in Taiwan require further clarification.

Daptomycin Etest MIC results correlated well with results obtained by the broth microdilution method for L. monocytogenes and for Pediococcus, Rhodococcus, and Nocardia spp. in this study, suggesting the clinical usefulness of the Etest method. For L. monocytogenes, there is a trend toward overestimation of MICs determined by the Etest (Table 2). For Leuconostoc, a very major error occurred between these two methods, indicating that the Etest should not be used clinically to detect the daptomycin MICs for this organism.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan. Phone: 886-2-3123456, ext. 5355. Fax: 886-2-23224263. E-mail: hsporen{at}ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 12 January 2007. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Arya, B., S. Hussian, and S. Hariharan. 2004. Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in a renal transplant patient: a case report and review of literature. Clin. Transplant. 18:748-752.[CrossRef][Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Barry, A. L., P. C. Fuchs, and S. D. Brown. 2001. In vitro activities of daptomycin against 2,789 clinical isolates from 11 North American medical centers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1919-1922.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Brown-Elliott, B. A., J. M. Brown, P. S. Conville, and R. J. Wallace, Jr. 2006. Clinical and laboratory features of the Nocardia spp. based on current molecular taxonomy. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19:259-282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Brown-Elliott, B. A., S. C. Ward, C. J. Crist, L. B. Mann, R. W. Wilson, and R. J. Wallace, Jr. 2001. In vitro activities of linezolid against multiple Nocardia species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1295-1297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    5. 5
  5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2006. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; 16th informational supplement. CLSI/NCCLS document M100-S16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
    6. 6
  6. Ferraro, M. J., and J. H. Jorgensen. 2003. Susceptibility testing instrumentation and computerized expert systems for data analysis and interpretation, p. 208-217. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. A. Pfaller, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
    7. 7
  7. Fuchs, P. C., A. L. Barry, and S. D. Brown. 2000. Daptomycin susceptibility tests: interpretive criteria, quality control, and effect of calcium on in vitro tests. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 38:51-58.[CrossRef][Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Fuchs, P. C., A. L. Barry, and S. D. Brown. 2002. In vitro bactericidal activity of daptomycin against staphylococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 49:467-470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Gerner-Smidt, P., S. Ethelberg, P. Schiellerup, J. J. Christensen, J. Engberg, V. Fussing, A. Jensen, C. Jensen, A. M. Petersen, and B. G. Bruun. 2005. Invasive listeriosis in Denmark 1994-2003: a review of 299 cases with special emphasis on risk factors for mortality. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 11:618-624.[CrossRef][Medline]
    10. 10
  10. Glupczynski, Y., C. Berhin, M. Janssens, and G. Wauters. 2006. Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Nocardia spp. from clinical specimens by Etest. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 12:905-912.[CrossRef][Medline]
    11. 11
  11. Golan, Y., D. D. Poutsiaka, S. Tozzi, S. Hadley, and D. R. Snydman. 2001. Daptomycin for line-related Leuconostoc bacteraemia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 47:364-365.[Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Goldstein, E. J., D. M. Citron, Y. A. Warren, K. L. Tyrrell, C. V. Merriam, and H. T. Fernandez. 2006. In vitro activities of dalbavancin and 12 other agents against 329 aerobic and anaerobic gram-positive isolates recovered from diabetic foot infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:2875-2879.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Green, M., K. Barbadora, and M. Michaels. 1991. Recovery of vancomycin-resistant gram-positive cocci from pediatric liver transplant recipients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:2503-2506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 14
  14. Hansen, J. M., P. Gerner-Smidt, and B. Bruun. 2005. Antibiotic susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes in Denmark 1958-2001. APMIS 113:31-36.[CrossRef][Medline]
    15. 15
  15. Hsueh, P. R., C. C. Hung, L. J. Teng, M. C. Yu, Y. C. Chen, H. K. Wang, and K. T. Luh. 1998. Report of invasive Rhodococcus equi infections in Taiwan, with an emphasis on the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains. Clin. Infect. Dis. 27:370-375.[Medline]
    16. 15
  16. Huang, Y. T., and P. R. Hsueh. 2006. Abstr. 46th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. E-724, p. 268.
    17. 16
  17. Hung, C. C., S. C. Chang, Y. C. Chen, W. C. Hsieh, and K. T. Luh. 1995. Antibiotic therapy for Listeria monocytogenes bacteremia. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 94:19-22.[Medline]
    18. 17
  18. Kedlaya, I., M. B. Ing, and S. S. Wong. 2001. Rhodococcus equi infections in immunocompetent hosts: case report and review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32:E39-E46.[CrossRef][Medline]
    19. 18
  19. Streit, J. M., R. N. Jones, and H. S. Sader. 2004. Daptomycin activity and spectrum: a worldwide sample of 6737 clinical Gram-positive organisms. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53:669-674.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    20. 19
  20. Tyrrell, K. L., D. M. Citron, Y. A. Warren, H. T. Fernandez, C. V. Merriam, and E. J. Goldstein. 2006. In vitro activities of daptomycin, vancomycin, and penicillin against Clostridium difficile, C. perfringens, Finegoldia magna, and Propionibacterium acnes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:2728-2731.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    21. 20
  21. Vera-Cabrera, L., A. Gomez-Flores, W. G. Escalante-Fuentes, and O. Welsh. 2001. In vitro activity of PNU-100766 (linezolid), a new oxazolidinone antimicrobial, against Nocardia brasiliensis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:3629-3630.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2007, p. 1570-1572, Vol. 51, No. 4
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01352-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Presterl, E., Hajdu, S., Lassnigg, A. M., Hirschl, A. M., Holinka, J., Graninger, W. (2009). Effects of Azithromycin in Combination with Vancomycin, Daptomycin, Fosfomycin, Tigecycline, and Ceftriaxone on Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 3205-3210 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lai, C.-C., Tan, C.-K., Lin, S. H., Liao, C.-H., Chou, C.-H., Hsu, H.-L., Huang, Y.-T., Hsueh, P.-R. (2009). Comparative in vitro activities of nemonoxacin, doripenem, tigecycline and 16 other antimicrobials against Nocardia brasiliensis, Nocardia asteroides and unusual Nocardia species. J Antimicrob Chemother 64: 73-78 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Spanjaard, L., Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C. M. J. E. (2008). Activity of Daptomycin against Listeria monocytogenes Isolates from Cerebrospinal Fluid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 1850-1851 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ASM journals
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, Y.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Hsueh, P.-R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huang, Y.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Hsueh, P.-R.

Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»