Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2007, p. 1818-1821, Vol. 51, No. 5
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.01217-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
In Vitro Activities of Isavuconazole and Other Antifungal Agents against Candida Bloodstream Isolates
H. Seifert,1*
U. Aurbach,1
D. Stefanik,1 and
O. Cornely2
Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene,1
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany2
Received 27 September 2006/
Returned for modification 22 December 2006/
Accepted 11 February 2007

ABSTRACT
Isavuconazole is the active component of the new azole antifungal
agent BAL8557, which is entering phase III clinical development.
This study was conducted to compare the in vitro activities
of isavuconazole and five other antifungal agents against 296
Candida isolates that were recovered consecutively from blood
cultures between 1995 and 2004 at a tertiary care university
hospital. Microdilution testing was done in accordance with
CLSI (formerly NCCLS) guideline M27-A2 in RPMI-1640 MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic
acid) broth. The antifungal agents tested were amphotericin
B, flucytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and
isavuconazole.
C. albicans was the most common species, representing
57.1% of all isolates. There was no trend found in favor of
non-
Candida albicans species over time. In terms of MIC
50s,
isavuconazole was more active (0.004 mg/liter) than amphotericin
B (0.5 mg/liter), itraconazole (0.008 mg/liter), voriconazole
(0.03 mg/liter), flucytosine (0.125 mg/liter), and fluconazole
(8 mg/liter). For isavuconazole, MIC
50s/MIC
90s ranged from 000.2/0.004
mg/liter for
C. albicans to 0.25/0.5 mg/liter for
C. glabrata.
Two percent of isolates (
C. glabrata and
C. krusei) were resistant
to fluconazole;
C. albicans strains resistant to fluconazole
were not detected. There were only two isolates with MICs for
isavuconazole that were >0.5 mg/liter: both were
C. glabrata isolates, and the MICs were 2 and 4 mg/liter, respectively.
In conclusion, isavuconazole is highly active against
Candida bloodstream isolates, including fluconazole-resistant strains.
It was more active than itraconazole and voriconazole against
C. albicans and
C. glabrata and appears to be a promising agent
against systemic
Candida infections.

INTRODUCTION
Over the past two decades, the incidence of
Candida bloodstream
infections has increased dramatically (
3,
15), primarily due
to the increase in the number of at-risk patients. Mortality
rates associated with systemic
Candida infections remain high
(
1,
4). Several
Candida spp., such as
C. glabrata and
C. krusei,
exert reduced susceptibility to fluconazole, the first available
triazole antifungal agent (
8). Recently, a new generation of
triazoles, including posaconazole, voriconazole, ravuconazole,
and isavuconazole, has been developed. As a prodrug, BAL8557
is the water-soluble triazole precursor suitable for oral and
intravenous administration (
11). In vitro, the active moiety
isavuconazole shows broad-spectrum activity against all major
opportunistic fungi (e.g.,
Candida,
Cryptococcus,
Aspergillus,
Absidia,
Rhizopus, and
Rhizomucor species) and the dimorphic
fungi (
13,
16). In rat models, the active drug is highly effective
against systemic candidiasis and disseminated
Aspergillus flavus infection (
14).
In this study, we compared the in vitro activity of isavuconazole with those of fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, and flucytosine against 296 clinical isolates of Candida spp. from bloodstream infections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Organisms.
A total of 296 bloodstream isolates of
Candida spp. obtained
consecutively at a single university center over a 10-year period
between 1995 and 2004 were selected for testing. The collection
included
C. albicans (166 isolates),
C. glabrata (46 isolates),
C. krusei (11 isolates),
C. parapsilosis (23 isolates),
C. tropicalis (25 isolates), and other
Candida spp. (25 isolates, including
6 isolates of
C. lusitaniae; 4 of
C. guilliermondii; 4 of
C. kefyr; 3 of
C. dubliniensis; 2 each of
C. famata and
C. pulcherrima;
and 1 each of
C. catenulata,
C. inconspicua,
C. lipolytica,
and
C. rugosa) (Table
1). All isolates were identified to the
species level by CHROMagar Candida (Mast Diagnostica GmbH, Reinfeld,
Germany) and with the VITEK 2 automated identification system
(bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) using VITEK 2 YST
cards in accordance with the guidelines of the manufacturers.
Identification of rare species was confirmed by API Candida
(bioMérieux). Prior to testing, each isolate was subcultured
at least twice on Sabouraud dextrose agar plates to ensure purity
and optimal growth.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. MIC distributions of isavuconazole and other antifungals determined by broth microdilution for 296 Candida isolates
|
Antifungal susceptibility testing.
Broth microdilution was performed by the reference method described
by the CLSI (formerly National Committee for Clinical Laboratory
Standards) in accordance with guideline M27-A2 (
5), with a final
inoculum concentration of 0.5
x 10
3 to 2.5
x 10
3 cells per ml
and RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany) buffered to
pH 7.0 with 0.165 M MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid) buffer
(Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Microtiter plates containing dehydrated
antifungal agents were provided by Merlin Diagnostica (Bornheim-Hersel,
Germany). The antifungal agents and concentration ranges tested
in twofold steps were as follows: amphotericin B, 0.03 to 32
mg/liter; flucytosine, 0.03 to 64 mg/liter; fluconazole, 0.06
to 128 mg/liter; itraconazole, 0.004 to 8 mg/liter; voriconazole,
0.004 to 8 mg/liter; and isavuconazole, 0.00025 to 8 mg/liter.
Plates were incubated in air at 35°C for 24 to 48 h. Plates
were observed for the presence or absence of growth at 24 h
and reexamined at 48 h if sufficient growth was not obtained
at 24 h. The MIC was determined visually as the lowest concentration
of drug showing no growth for amphotericin B and a prominent
reduction of growth (

50%) for flucytosine and the azoles compared
to the drug-free growth control.
C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019
and
C. krusei ATCC 6258 were used as quality control strains.
Interpretative criteria for susceptibility to amphotericin B (MIC,
1 mg/liter), flucytosine (MIC,
4 mg/liter), fluconazole (MIC,
8 mg/liter), and itraconazole (MIC,
0.125 mg/liter) were those published by Rex et al. (9) and CLSI (5).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The number of
Candida bloodstream infections at our hospital
remained stable from 1995 to 2002, ranging from 20 to 29 episodes
per year; it increased, however, to 49 and 47 episodes in 2003
and 2004, respectively. The species distribution is illustrated
in Fig.
1.
C. albicans was the most common species, with 56.1%
of all isolates; followed by
C. glabrata, accounting for 15.5%
of isolates;
C. tropicalis (8.4%); and
C. parapsilosis (7.8%).
These data are in agreement with previously reported findings
(
6,
7).
Table
1 summarizes the MIC distributions and in vitro susceptibilities
of 296 bloodstream isolates of
Candida spp. to isavuconazole
in comparison to other azole antifungal agents, amphotericin
B, and flucytosine. Isavuconazole showed good activity against
all
Candida spp., including those species that are inherently
less susceptible to fluconazole (e.g.,
C. glabrata and
C. krusei).
Overall, on the basis of MIC
90s, isavuconazole was as active
as amphotericin B, itraconazole, and voriconazole (each at 0.5
mg/liter) and more active than flucytosine (2 mg/liter) and
fluconazole (8 mg/liter). In terms of MIC
50s, isavuconazole
was more active (0.004 mg/liter) than amphotericin B (0.5 mg/liter),
itraconazole (0.008 mg/liter), voriconazole (0.03 mg/liter),
flucytosine (0.125 mg/liter), and fluconazole (8 mg/liter).
For isavuconazole, MIC
50s/MIC
90s ranged from 0.002/0.004 mg/liter
for
C. albicans to 0.25/0.5 mg/liter for
C. glabrata. Using
tentative breakpoints, all isolates were susceptible to amphotericin
B, whereas 92.6% of isolates were susceptible to flucytosine.
Nonsusceptibility to flucytosine was noted for 0.6% of
C. albicans,
2.2% of
C. glabrata, 100% of
C. krusei, and 36% of
C. tropicalis isolates.
Candida isolates with MICs of >32 mg/liter, >0.5 mg/liter, and >2 mg/liter for fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole, respectively, are considered resistant (5, 9). Of the 296 isolates studied, 6 (3 of C. krusei, 2 of C. glabrata, and 1 of C. lusitaniae) were resistant to fluconazole (2%), 5 (all C. glabrata) were resistant to itraconazole, and 2 (both C. glabrata) were resistant to voriconazole. Consistent with previous reports (10), isolates with elevated MICs for one azole were generally less susceptible to all azoles (Table 2). There were only two isolates with MICs for isavuconazole that were >0.5 mg/liter: both were C. glabrata isolates, and the MICs were 2 and 4 mg/liter, respectively. MICs of other azoles for these two isolates were as follows: fluconazole, 32 and 128 mg/liter; itraconazole, 1 and 2 mg/liter; and voriconazole, 2 and 8 mg/liter, respectively.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2. In vitro activities of antifungal agents against Candida bloodstream isolates with elevated MICs of fluconazole, itraconazole, or voriconazole
|
Twenty-one isolates (11 of
C. glabrata, 8 of
C. krusei, and
1 each of
C. famata and
C. inconspicua) were inhibited by 16
to 32 mg/liter fluconazole (dose dependently susceptible). Of
note, none of the
C. albicans isolates was resistant to fluconazole,
and the highest MIC recorded was 4 mg/liter. The number of isolates
resistant or dose dependently susceptible to fluconazole was
far less than in other recent studies (
2,
6,
7). Isavuconazole
efficacy in mice, similarly to those of other azoles, is driven
by the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) (
12), often
expressed as ratio of daily AUC over the MIC. Assuming that
pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in humans follow similar rules,
at steady state the ratio of the daily AUC over the MIC
90 will
be 80 or 160 for maintenance doses of 100 or 200 mg, respectively
(
11). Correction of the daily AUC by the free fraction in plasma
of 0.02 will result in ratios greater than 1 for the vast majority
of bloodstream isolates. Limitations of our study include the
fact that the number of isolates was small and represents only
a single medical center. Larger studies are needed to confirm
the potent activity of the drug against fluconazole-resistant
strains.
In conclusion, isavuconazole exhibited good activity against 296 Candida bloodstream isolates obtained over a period of 10 years. Isavuconazole was more potent than fluconazole against all organisms tested and often more potent than itraconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, and flucytosine, confirming its potential as a useful agent for patients with serious systemic Candida infections.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by Basilea Pharmaceutica, Basel, Switzerland.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Goldenfelsstrasse 19-21, 50935 Cologne, Germany. Phone: 49-221-478-32008. Fax: 49-221-478-32035. E-mail:
harald.seifert{at}uni-koeln.de 
Published ahead of print on 16 February 2007. 

REFERENCES
1 - Kullberg, B. J., J. D. Sobel, M. Ruhnke, P. G. Pappas, C. Viscoli, J. H. Rex, J. D. Cleary, E. Rubinstein, L. W. Church, J. M. Brown, H. T. Schlamm, I. T. Oborska, F. Hilton, and M. R. Hodges. 2005. Voriconazole versus a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 366:1435-1442.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Laverdiere, M., D. Hoban, C. Restieri, and F. Habel. 2002. In vitro activity of three new triazoles and one echinocandin against Candida bloodstream isolates from cancer patients. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 50:119-123.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Martin, G. S., D. M. Mannino, S. Eaton, and M. Moss. 2003. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N. Engl. J. Med. 348:1546-1554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Mora-Duarte J., R. Betts, C. Rotstein, A. L. Colombo, L. Thompson-Moya, J. Smietana, R. Lupinacci, S. Sable, N. Kartsonis, J. Perfect, et al. 2002. Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 347:2020-2029.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard, 2nd ed. NCCLS document M27-A2. NCCLS, Wayne, PA.
6 - Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., J. H. Rex, P. G. Pappas, R. J. Hamill, R. A. Larsen, H. W. Horowitz, W. G. Powderly, N. Hyslop, C. A. Kauffman, J. Cleary, J. E. Mangino, and J. Lee. 2003. Antifungal susceptibility survey of 2,000 bloodstream Candida isolates in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3149-3154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Pfaller M. A., D. J. Diekema, R. N. Jones, S. A. Messer, R. J. Hollis, and the SENTRY Participants Group. 2002. Trends in antifungal susceptibility of Candida spp. isolated from pediatric and adult patients with bloodstream infections: SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997 to 2000. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:852-856.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, R. J. Hollis, R. N. Jones, G. V. Doern, M. E. Brandt, and R. A. Hajjeh. 1998. In vitro susceptibilities of Candida bloodstream isolates to the new triazole antifungal agents BMS-207147, Sch 56592, and voriconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:3242-3244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Rex, J. H., M. A. Pfaller, J. N. Galgiani, M. S. Bartlett, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. A. Ghannoum, M. Lancaster, F. C. Odds, M. G. Rinaldi, T. J. Walsh, A. L. Barry, et al. 1997. Development of interpretive breakpoints for antifungal susceptibility testing: conceptual framework and analysis of in vitro-in vivo correlation data for fluconazole, itraconazole, and candida infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:235-247.[Medline]
10 - Sabatelli, F., R. Patel, P. A. Mann, C. A. Mendrick, C. C. Norris, R. Hare, D. Loebenberg, T. A. Black, and P. M. McNicholas. 2006. In vitro activities of posaconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B against a large collection of clinically important molds and yeasts. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:2009-2015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Schmitt-Hoffmann, A., B. Roos, M. Heep, M. Schleimer, E. Weidekamm, T. Brown, M. Roehrle, and C. Beglinger. 2006. Single-ascending-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of the novel broad-spectrum antifungal triazole BAL4815 after intravenous infusions (50, 100, and 200 milligrams) and oral administrations (100, 200, and 400 milligrams) of its prodrug, BAL8557, in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:279-285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Te Dorsthorst, D., P. E. Verweij, J. F. Meis, and J. W. Mouton. 2004. Pharmacodynamics of BAL4815, a new azole antifungal in a mouse model of systemic infection. Abstr. 44th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. A-1874.
13 - Warn, P. A., A. Sharp, and D. W. Denning. 2006. In vitro activity of a new triazole BAL4815, the active component of BAL8557 (the water-soluble prodrug), against Aspergillus spp. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57:135-138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Warn, P. A., A. Sharp, J. Mosquera, J. Spickermann, A. Schmitt-Hoffmann, M. Heep, and D. W. Denning. 2006. Comparative in vivo activity of BAL4815, the active component of the prodrug BAL8557 in a neutropenic murine model of disseminated Aspergillus flavus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 58:1198-1207.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Wisplinghoff, H., T. Bischoff, S. M. Tallent, H. Seifert, R. P. Wenzel, and M. B. Edmond. 2004. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39:309-317.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - Yamazaki, T., T. Tsukaguchi, Y. Ono, Y. Satoh, T. Fujii, Y. Inagaki, S. Ichihara, J. Ohwada, I. Umeda, K. Kobayashi, N. Shimma, and M. Arisawa. 2002. RO0098557, a novel water soluble azole prodrug for parenteral and oral administration (II). Prodrug principle and broad spectrum antifungal. Abstr. 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-821.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2007, p. 1818-1821, Vol. 51, No. 5
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.01217-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Warn, P. A., Sharp, A., Parmar, A., Majithiya, J., Denning, D. W., Hope, W. W.
(2009). Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of a Novel Triazole, Isavuconazole: Mathematical Modeling, Importance of Tissue Concentrations, and Impact of Immune Status on Antifungal Effect. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 3453-3461
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Thompson, G. R. III, Wiederhold, N. P., Fothergill, A. W., Vallor, A. C., Wickes, B. L., Patterson, T. F.
(2009). Antifungal Susceptibilities among Different Serotypes of Cryptococcus gattii and Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 309-311
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Thompson, G. R. III, Fothergill, A. W., Wiederhold, N. P., Vallor, A. C., Wickes, B. L., Patterson, T. F.
(2008). Evaluation of Etest Method for Determining Isavuconazole MICs against Cryptococcus gattii and Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 2959-2961
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Guinea, J., Pelaez, T., Recio, S., Torres-Narbona, M., Bouza, E.
(2008). In Vitro Antifungal Activities of Isavuconazole (BAL4815), Voriconazole, and Fluconazole against 1,007 Isolates of Zygomycete, Candida, Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Scedosporium Species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 1396-1400
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Illnait-Zaragozi, M.-T., Martinez, G. F., Curfs-Breuker, I., Fernandez, C. M., Boekhout, T., Meis, J. F.
(2008). In Vitro Activity of the New Azole Isavuconazole (BAL4815) Compared with Six Other Antifungal Agents against 162 Cryptococcus neoformans Isolates from Cuba. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 1580-1582
[Abstract]
[Full Text]