Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2007, p. 2195-2197, Vol. 51, No. 6
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.01587-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Division of Microbial Diseases, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, 256 Gray's Inn Road, University College London, London WC1X 8LD, United Kingdom,1 GlaxoSmithKline Oral Healthcare, Weybridge, United Kingdom2
Received 20 December 2006/ Returned for modification 26 January 2007/ Accepted 13 March 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The methods for sampling, culture, and detection of tet(W)-containing strains have been described previously (12). Plasmid DNA was isolated using QIAprep miniprep and midiprep kits by following the supplier's protocol (QIAGEN, Crawley, United Kingdom). When required, cultures were supplemented with tetracycline (5 µg/ml). Genomic DNA was prepared from Rothia sp. strain T40.1 using a Puregene kit (Gentra, Flowgen, Nottingham, United Kingdom). Genomic DNA was partially digested with MboI (NEB, Hitchin, United Kingdom), and fragments between 4 and 15 kb were cut from an agarose gel and purified using a QIAquick gel extraction kit (QIAGEN). These fragments were ligated into BamHI-digested and dephosphorylated pUC18. Transformants containing tet(W) were selected on Luria-Bertani (9) agar plates containing ampicillin (50 µg/ml) and tetracycline (5 µg/ml). Plasmid DNA was isolated and digested with HindIII and EcoRI to liberate the inserts. One plasmid carrying the cloned tetracycline resistance gene and designated pPPMW was selected for further study. Approximately 7 kb of the 12.6-kb insert of pPPMW was sequenced by Lark Technology Inc. (Takeley, United Kingdom); the remaining sequence was obtained in-house using Big Dye terminator ready reaction mix version 3.1 and an ABI 310 genetic analyzer. Primers were designed using Primer3 software (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer3/primer3_www.cgi). Sequencing was performed on both strands and was analyzed using BLAST software (1). Bacterial identification was carried out as described previously (6, 12). The pPPMW insert (accession number EF177463) contained nine potential open reading frames (ORFs) (Fig. 1 and Table 1).
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the deduced genetic organization of the 13-kb insert contained in pPPMW and the deletion derivative (pPPMW-1) after the spontaneous loss of tet(W). The predicted direction of the transcription of the genes is shown by the direction of the arrowed boxes. The vertical double-headed arrows represent disruption points of the ORFs. The ORFs (orf2 and orf3) coding for the ATPase are disrupted by the insertion of 34 extra nucleotides, and there is a point mutation in IS256 (orf6 and orf7) leading to the introduction of a stop codon. The single-headed horizontal arrows represent the identical sequences present in the deletion derivative and in the right end of the 13-kb insert (the sequences are 100% identical at the nucleotide level), and these sequences are repeated in the left end of the 13-kb insert (they are 99% identical at the nucleotide level). A series of primers were designed to amplify the regions between tet(W) and IS256 (Set1), IS256 (Set2), IS256 and downstream orf8 (Set3), mef (Set4), and ATPases and IS30 (Set5). The regions corresponding to the resulting amplicons are indicated by the horizontal double-headed arrows.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Closest relatives to orf genes flanking tet(W) of a Rothia sp.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Primers used in this study
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Study of the genetic support of tet(W) isolated from oral bacteria by PCR
|
The tet(W) gene cloned in Escherichia coli was unstable, being lost after overnight culture in the absence of tetracycline. Plasmids were prepared from five tetracycline-sensitive colonies and digested with HindIII and EcoRI, revealing that an 11-kb sequence had been deleted (results not shown). One of the deletion derivatives, pPPMW-1, was selected for further study. When the Rothia sp. strain (T40.1) was grown in the absence of tetracycline, no loss of tet(W) was observed after 21 passages, showing that the gene is stable in its original host.
In pPPMW, there is a directly repeated sequence of 2,129 bp (orf1 and orf9, which are nearly identical mef genes) that flanks the region containing the tet(W) gene (Fig. 1). DNA sequencing of the deleted derivative (pPPMW-1) shows that the first repeat is deleted along with all the DNA between the two direct repeats [i.e., orf1 to orf8 and tet(W)], leaving behind one copy of the repeat containing the second mef gene, orf9 (Fig. 1).
Rothia sp. strain T40.1 was mated with Enterococcus faecalis JH2-2 to determine if tet(W) is transferable. No transconjugants were obtained, indicating a transfer frequency of less than 109 per donor. However, further work is required to prove unequivocally that tet(W) cannot be transferred from this strain.
In conclusion, we have shown that the tet(W) gene is contained within a number of different genetic supports in oral bacteria. Furthermore, in Rothia sp. strain T40.1, the gene is linked to insertion sequences and flanked by directly repeated mef genes. Recombination between these direct repeats presumably contributes to the observed instability of the tet(W) gene in E. coli.
Published ahead of print on 19 March 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»